Monday, October 6, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Big Brother watching: British police map citizens with AI technology

Totalitarianism

Published 15 January 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Civil rights groups are sounding the alarm that facial recognition technology can and will be abused.
2 minute read

British police have secretly conducted hundreds of facial recognition searches using the UK’s database of more than 46 million passport holders.

Civil liberties group Big Brother Watch calls the development “deeply worrying” and points out that “there is no clear legal basis for this intrusive technology”.

Last year, policing minister Chris Philip raised the possibility of police accessing the database of British passport holders to use facial recognition technology to identify suspects of crimes including burglary, theft and shoplifting, according to The Telegraph.

In reality, however, the AI technology has been secretly used for this purpose since 2019 or earlier, and the passport database was searched at least 300 times in the first nine months of 2023 alone.

The revelation has led to harsh criticism from several civil liberties groups and MPs, who are concerned about the implications of such searches for data protection and citizens’ privacy. Former cabinet minister David Davis also argues that there is “no explicit legal basis” for the use of facial recognition technology in the UK.

– The data on both the UK passport database and the immigration database was not provided for these purposes,” he said. “For the police to act like this undermines the data relationship between the citizen and the state. At the very least, the House of Commons should be informed precisely who authorised this and who carried it out, Davis comments.

“Risk losing the trust of the public”

Tony Porter, the former CCTV Commissioner, says it is “problematic” that passport holders’ data was sought by the police without their knowledge or consent to be used for such a purpose.

– The other thing that is problematic is that the Government has extolled the importance of transparency. They should be putting this out there about how and why it’s legitimate otherwise they risk losing the trust and confidence of the public, Porter says.

With facial recognition technology, police can use images from sources such as surveillance cameras or cell phones – even those that are blurred or partially obscured – and search for matches in a database of potential suspects.

Use of the technology has increased sharply in recent years, and police forces already conduct thousands of searches each year against the Police National Database, which contains some 16 million images of people who have been arrested, including hundreds of thousands who have never been charged or acquitted of crimes.

Government refuses to back down

In December, it emerged that police would also soon be able to search a database of Britain’s 50 million driving license holders under a new law making its way through Parliament.

Madeleine Stone, of civil liberties group Big Brother Watch, calls the expansion of AI surveillance “deeply worrying” and says there is “no clear legal basis for this invasive technology”.

But the UK government is standing firm, saying “the Government is committed to making sure the police have the tools and technology they need to solve and prevent crimes, bring offenders to justice, and keep people safe”.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Telegram founder reveals blackmail attempt by French intelligence service

Totalitarianism

Published 29 September 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Pavel Durov resisted when France demanded censorship of Moldovan opposition channels on Telegram.
2 minute read

Telegram co-founder Pavel Durov claims that French intelligence services tried to get him to censor opposition channels ahead of Moldova’s presidential election – in exchange for help with his French legal case.

In a social media post, Pavel Durov reveals a blackmail attempt by French intelligence services that allegedly took place about a year ago, when he was detained in Paris, France, accused of inadequate control over criminal content on the Telegram platform.

“About a year ago, while I was stuck in Paris, the French intelligence services reached out to me through an intermediary, asking me to help the Moldovan government censor certain Telegram channels ahead of the presidential elections in Moldova”, he writes.

After reviewing the channels flagged by French and Moldovan authorities, the Telegram team identified some that clearly violated the platform’s rules, and these were removed. But then came an unexpected offer.

“The intermediary then informed me that, in exchange for this cooperation, French intelligence would ‘say good things’ about me to the judge who had ordered my arrest in August last year”, Durov reveals.

“Unacceptable on multiple levels”

Durov describes the offer as “unacceptable on multiple levels” and points to serious problems regardless of whether the claim was true or false.

“If the agency did in fact approach the judge – it constituted an attempt to interfere in the judicial process. If it did not, and merely claimed to have done so, then it was exploiting my legal situation in France to influence political developments in Eastern Europe – a pattern we have also observed in Romania”, he states.

Shortly thereafter, the Telegram team received a second list of so-called “problematic” Moldovan channels. But this time the situation was different.

“Unlike the first, nearly all of these channels were legitimate and fully compliant with our rules. Their only commonality was that they voiced political positions disliked by the French and Moldovan governments”, Durov explains.

Refused to remove political content

The Telegram chief claims they refused to comply with the French intelligence service’s demands this time.

“We refused to act on this request. Telegram is committed to freedom of speech and will not remove content for political reasons”, Durov declares.

He concludes with a promise to Telegram users about transparency regarding future pressure attempts.

“I will continue to expose every attempt to pressure Telegram into censoring our platform. Stay tuned”.

The allegations come amid Moldova’s crucial parliamentary elections, where President Maia Sandu’s strongly pro-EU party faces the opposition bloc BEP, which advocates for the country’s neutrality and accuses the government of silencing opposition voices.

Von der Leyen’s media plans spark anger: “Pure George Orwell’s 1984”

Totalitarianism

Published 12 September 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Swedish EU parliamentarian Dick Erixon from the Sweden Democrats is not impressed by von der Leyen's speech about the EU needing to "protect" establishment media.
3 minute read

Ursula von der Leyen presented plans in the European Parliament for a new media support program and increased EU funding for traditional establishment media.

Sweden Democrats’ EU parliamentarian Dick Erixon calls the EU Commission President’s speech “pure George Orwell’s 1984” and accuses von der Leyen of wanting to stifle freedom of expression.

In her speech to the European Parliament, the heavily criticized EU Commission President complained about how traditional establishment media are struggling for survival and spoke about rural areas where the local newspaper has become “a nostalgic memory” while warning that this has created “news deserts where disinformation thrives”.

As a solution, von der Leyen presented a “Media Resilience Programme” that will actively support what she and other EU power holders consider to be independent journalism and media literacy.

She also announced that the EU Commission proposes to “significantly boost funding for media” in the next EU budget, but only certain media will be able to access EU citizens’ tax money.

“Wants to protect legacy media”

Dick Erixon, the Sweden Democrats’ representative in the European Parliament, is among several who are directing very harsh criticism at the proposals.

“Deplorable speech by Ursula von der Leyen: Wants state authorities to protect legacy media from source criticism. It was a particularly divisive speech we heard in the European Parliament today. Ursula spoke about freedom but wants to stifle freedom of expression”, he states.

He is particularly critical of von der Leyen’s statement that the EU should “protect” traditional media.

“The EU will protect (yes, ‘protect’) legacy media in a new media program. Since paper newspapers are just a memory, ‘news deserts where disinformation thrives’ are created. Therefore, citizens need journalism they can ‘trust'”, Erixon writes sarcastically.

Warned about autocrats

In her speech, von der Leyen also claimed that independent media are under attack from “autocrats” who want to take control of them.

“The first step in an autocrat’s playbook is always to capture independent media. Because this enables backsliding and corruption to happen in the dark”, she proclaimed dramatically.

“A free press is the backbone of any democracy”, she then claimed and promised that the EU will “support Europe’s press to remain free”.

Dick Erixon points out, however, that von der Leyen and her allies hardly have any interest in a truly independent media landscape and that her rhetoric is rather about citizens blindly trusting what establishment media say and write – while forums that EU leaders don’t control should be made suspicious and censored.

“For Ursula, critical source examination of power holders and the establishment is of no value. ‘Trust traditional media’ was her message, while she believes that social media serves the purposes of darkness and corruption. It’s pure George Orwell’s 1984”, he says.

Wants to limit social media for children

Von der Leyen also wants to introduce restrictions on children’s use of social media. She accused the platforms of using “algorithms that prey on children’s vulnerabilities with the explicit purpose of creating addictions” and announced that an expert panel will develop proposals for EU restrictions before the end of the year.

“Our friends in Australia are pioneering a social media restriction. I am watching the implementation of their policy closely to see what next steps we can take here in Europe”, von der Leyen said.

Von der Leyen gave no further details in her speech about how the media support program will work, what criteria will be used to distribute support, or how large a budget is planned for the program. She also did not specify who will define what counts as “disinformation” or “independent media”.

The EU Commission has also proposed using private capital to support certain media, without further explaining how this will work.

Swedish government seeks expanded powers during emergencies

Totalitarianism

Published 11 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Gunnar Strömmer (M) promises that "in practice, Parliament always has the last word".
3 minute read

The Swedish government wants to have more power to act quickly in serious crises during peacetime – without having to wait for approval from parliament.

The proposal has been met with strong criticism from several sides, with people warning that it paves the way for abuse of power and risks undermining democratic principles.

A new bill proposes constitutional amendments that would allow decisions on temporary measures in situations such as cyberattacks, natural disasters, or terrorist attacks.

The proposed changes to the constitution are said to be aimed at enabling the government to act more quickly in crises, even in peacetime.

By delegating special powers from the Riksdag, the government will be able to issue temporary regulations that are valid for up to three months. However, these may not change or repeal the constitution.

The government needs the right tools to govern the country, Minister of Justice Gunnar Strömmer (M) states.

Spread of infection and cyber attacks

In particularly urgent cases, the government will be able to take a so-called activation decision – a form of state of emergency – to take immediate action without the prior approval of the Riksdag. This is said to be relevant in events such as:

• Nuclear accidents

• Natural disasters

• Extensive spread of infectious diseases

• Terrorist attacks

• Major financial crises

• Extensive IT disruptions or cyberattacks

The government itself claims that the reform is necessary to protect society and safeguard democratic governance in emergency situations where crucial decisions must be made very quickly.

“Ensures separation of powers”

However, several organizations, including LO, the Swedish Union of Journalists, and the Stockholm District Court, have sharply criticized the proposal. The Swedish Union of Journalists warns that a future authoritarian government could use these powers to implement changes without the support of the Riksdag, which in practice risks undermining democracy.

To limit the risks, the government claims that it will only be able to use these powers if it is clear that the Riksdag’s decision cannot be delayed.

An activation decision must also be approved retrospectively by a three-quarters majority in the Riksdag. If regulations are not submitted to parliament within a week or approved within a month, they cease to apply immediately, it is stated.

– This ensures the separation of powers and reduces the scope for a government with more despotic ambitions to take liberties, argues Gunnar Strömmer.

In practice, the Riksdag always has the final say, he assures us.

Concerns about abuse

The bill also contains proposals to allow the Riksdag to meet in locations other than Stockholm in the event of serious crises. In addition, digital meetings will be made possible to ensure that the Riksdag can function even under extreme conditions.

The legislative changes, which are proposed to come into force on January 1, 2027, are based on a report supported by seven of the eight parties in parliament.

Despite broad political support, the proposal has raised concerns among critics. On social media, many warn that the changes could reduce the influence of the people even more than today and lead to abuse of power, as well as being misused to introduce various totalitarian and repressive measures.

EU leaders want to punish Hungary for Pride ban

Totalitarianism

Published 27 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Viktor Orbán's divergence from the official EU line on several issues has long caused anger and frustration.
2 minute read

A majority of EU member state leaders, including France and Germany, are calling on the European Commission to take action against Hungary over Prime Minister Viktor Orbán’s plans to ban future Pride parades in Budapest.

A total of 16 countries are behind the call, which was coordinated by the Netherlands and demands that the Commission “expeditiously make full use of the rule of law toolbox” to get Hungary to back down from the proposed ban, Politico reports.

Signatories include Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Ireland, and the three Baltic states, as well as major EU players such as Germany and France.

We are highly alarmed by these developments”, the statement said, pointing to Hungarian laws that risk fines for organizers and participants in various LGBTQ events.

According to those in power, the Hungarian laws “run contrary to the fundamental values to human dignity, freedom, equality and respect for human rights as laid down in Article 2 of the Treaty on European Union”.

Blocked Ukraine aid causes anger

Exactly what measures the Commission should take is not yet clear, but several EU diplomats mention so-called interim measures as an alternative – legal injunctions that would in practice override Hungarian law and force Budapest to allow Pride celebrations.

The EU is already withholding €18 billion in funds to Hungary due to disputes over the rule of law, but Brussels has so far chosen not to proceed with more extensive coercive measures.

According to Politico, Equality Commissioner Hadja Lahbib opposed further measures during a meeting last week, citing a lack of support from the heavily criticized Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.

At the same time, pressure on von der Leyen to take tougher action against Orbán’s government is said to be growing – not only because of the Pride ban, but also because of Hungary’s continued blocking of EU aid to Ukraine. Several diplomats say that EU leaders’ patience is now running out.

Frustration toward Hungary has been building massively. If there’s an existential threat at our borders, how long are you going to put up with that?” commented one official.

Sweden wants to take “the next step”

Ahead of the EU General Affairs Council, Sweden’s EU Minister Jessica Rosencrantz also made it clear that she wants to force Hungary to change its policy:

– After seven years and seven hearings, we are at a crossroads. Unless we see a completely new Hungarian approach at tomorrow’s meeting, I see no point in continuing these hearings. It’s high time we get serious about next steps.

One of the most far-reaching options currently being discussed is to activate Article 7 of the EU Treaty – the so-called “nuclear option” – which could ultimately result in Hungary being stripped of its voting rights in the European Council. At least 19 member states are said to support this, three fewer than the qualified majority required to move forward with the process.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.