Saturday, July 26, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Iranian Brigadier General: “Foreign intelligence behind riots”

Published 22 June 2023
– By Editorial Staff
Mohammad Kazemi believes that US, Israeli and UK intelligence agencies, among others, have fueled the riots.
3 minute read

Brigadier General Mohammad Kazemi, the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard’s intelligence service, now claims that up to 20 foreign intelligence agencies were involved in the riots and disturbances that plagued Iran last year.

Kazemi says the riots broke out shortly after US authorities realized the failure of their foreign policy towards Iran after Joe Biden was elected president, and felt compelled to increase pressure on the Iranian government.

After the Biden administration came to power, the Americans reached this strategic conclusion that they had faced failure in many foreign cases, and the reason for that was the actions of Iran and the management of its Leader; these failures had caused America’s international position to be overshadowed; so, Iran must pay the price, Kazemi said in an interview.

According to Kazemi, U.S. intelligence was actively working to ensure that the protests following the death of a 22-year-old woman in unclear circumstances during a police raid would continue at all costs, including turning these protests into strikes and riots and armed resistance against the Iranian government by engaging militant groups.

The Brigadier General also claims to have found evidence that nearly 20 foreign intelligence agencies were involved in the riots – including the US, UK, Israel, UAE, Saudi Arabia, France, Germany, Canada and Bahrain.

Coordinated operation

According to Kazemi, French diplomats in Iran tried to gather information about the riots, Iran’s security and the status of its police force, among other things, and then forwarded this information to the embassy of another European country.

The Israeli regime allegedly raised money to support the rioters, receiving funding from the US and others for this purpose, and worked closely with the United Arab Emirates to support the riots in various ways.

28 European countries also considered closing their embassies during the riots to increase pressure on Iran. Foreign nationals from countries such as Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq were allegedly used to gather information about Iran and the riots.

In addition, the American CIA allegedly created and provided internet platforms to facilitate the global dissemination of news about the riots, and provided other technical equipment and mobile communication devices to help opponents of the regime.

“CIA, Mossad and MI6 in close cooperation”

The CIA is also said to have put together a team with the Israeli Mossad and the British MI6 to resume, towards the end of the riots, the project of assassinating Iranian scientists – especially in the fields of nuclear, space and military technology, which Israel had been engaged in for many years.

The Brigadier General further claims that the foreign forces devoted considerable resources to fomenting distrust among the Iranian people from different social strata and political orientations – including by accusing the regime of discrimination and violations of women’s rights or by claiming that the Islamic Republic was about to collapse.

The riots injured a large number of civilians as well as many police officers and guards and caused millions of dollars of damage to public buildings. In February, Iran’s leaders declared an amnesty for all those involved in the riots – but not for murderers or terrorists.

In Sweden and the West, the mass media image of the protests has been that they were popular and that the Iranian regime used excessive force against civilians in connection with them.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Israeli minister: “All of Gaza will be Jewish”

The genocide in Gaza

Published yesterday 19:32
– By Editorial Staff
"Thank God, we are erasing this evil. All of Gaza will be Jewish," said Jewish Power representative Amichai Eliyahu recently on an Israeli radio program regarding the starving population in Gaza and the ongoing genocide. Right: The starving children in Gaza where the situation is becoming increasingly desperate.
2 minute read

Israeli Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu has drawn strong criticism after statements about Israel not needing to worry about starvation in Gaza. The statement is one in a series from officials within Israel’s far-right government in line with the genocidal ambitions expressed already at the beginning of the Gaza war.

The far-right politician Amichai Eliyahu from the Jewish Power party (Otzma Yehudit) dismissed renewed UN warnings about artificial famine in the besieged enclave on Thursday. In an interview with Radio Kol Barama, he claimed that the Israeli government is “rushing to erase Gaza”.

Thank God, we are erasing this evil. All of Gaza will be Jewish, Eliyahu said according to Israeli news site Ynet.

— We shouldn’t be dealing with hunger in Gaza – let the world take care of them. No nation feeds its enemies. Have we completely lost our minds? Should we care about their evening meal?, he added.

Strong criticism from government leadership

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly distanced himself from the statements and pointed out that Eliyahu is not a member of the security cabinet, which decides on warfare.

“This government’s policy is clear and unified. His statements do not represent it”, Netanyahu said.

Israel’s ambassador to the US, Yechiel Leiter, also condemned Eliyahu’s comments and called them “wrong, foolish and completely unrepresentative of Israel’s government and people”. In a post on X, he emphasized that Israel is committed to creating a mechanism to deliver humanitarian aid to civilians in Gaza “but not through Hamas”.

UN warns of mass starvation

According to local health authorities, more than 59,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since October 2023, including at least 113 who died of starvation. World Health Organization chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on Wednesday that Israel’s “blockade” has brought Gaza to the brink of “mass starvation”.

Philippe Lazzarini, head of the UN Palestinian refugee agency UNRWA, has urged Israel to allow access for the 6,000 aid transports currently stalled in Egypt and Jordan.

Israeli officials have in turn accused Hamas and other armed groups of hoarding supplies and attacking civilians at distribution sites.

WEF founder manipulated reports to protect political relationships

The globalist agenda

Published yesterday 12:00
– By Editorial Staff
"We must protect our relationships with India before Davos 2019", Schwab is alleged to have said, manipulating the organization's prestigious "Global Competitiveness Report" for political reasons.
3 minute read

Klaus Schwab allegedly altered countries’ rankings in important economic reports to avoid affecting relationships with India, and to prevent Brexit supporters from being able to use positive figures for the United Kingdom. Meanwhile, extensive expenses of 900,000 Swiss francs that his wife charged through WEF are being scrutinized.

World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab is accused of manipulating the organization’s prestigious “Global Competitiveness Report” for political reasons. According to an ongoing investigation, he changed countries’ rankings to protect diplomatic relationships and thereby prevent the results from being used politically, reports the Swiss newspaper Tages-Anzeiger.

Changed to protect India relations

The serious incident occurred in 2017-2018 when a methodology change caused India to fall over 20 places in the ranking while the United Kingdom climbed from seventh to fourth place. Schwab then intervened directly and emailed those responsible with the justification: “We must protect our relationships with India before Davos 2019”.

He did not want to risk Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi canceling his visit. At the same time, he wrote that the United Kingdom “must not see any improvement” because this would be “exploited by the Brexit camp”.

Despite Schwab saying he supported the new methodology, he concluded: “This year we simply cannot implement this”. Otherwise, the good relationships with India, which he had “invested so much in during the year”, would be destroyed.

The report was eventually published, but with altered figures: India ended up in 40th place and the United Kingdom in eighth place – both only one place worse than in 2016.

Shared secret reports with governments

Even more serious is that Schwab in 2022 allegedly shared a secret draft of the report with a government representative from an Arab country whose ranking had deteriorated significantly. After receiving “critical feedback”, Schwab recommended to management that the report not be published at all.

The 2021-2022 report was never published, and no new versions have appeared since then.

Wife’s expenses without official role

In parallel, Schwab’s wife Hilde is now being scrutinized, who without an official function at WEF has had her travels charged through the organization. Lawyers from the firm Homburger have discovered questionable expenses totaling 900,000 Swiss francs (€970,000) over the past ten years.

Hilde Schwab runs her own foundation for social entrepreneurship but has no formal role within WEF. Despite this, her travels, which cannot always be explained by her activities, have been paid for by WEF.

Denies the allegations

Schwab has tried to defend himself against the manipulation allegations:

To construct this as a manipulation is an insult to my academic standing, he has said.

He claims that he only forwarded corrections from governments to use updated data or correct errors in the analysis.

Investigation ongoing

The Nordic Times already reported in April that Klaus Schwab was forced to resign from WEF and that a comprehensive investigation is ongoing. The federal foundation authority is also reviewing the use of WEF’s funds.

An important board meeting has been postponed, but time is running out. By the end of August at the latest, invitations to WEF 2026 must be sent out.

Schwab’s spokesman, Jörg Denzler, refuses to comment on the investigation:

— The June agreement is of central significance for Mr. Schwab. In contrast to some other parties, Mr. Schwab fully complies with the terms and does not comment publicly when approached by the media.

Russia rules out talks between Putin and Zelensky without final agreement

The war in Ukraine

Published yesterday 10:10
– By Editorial Staff
Moscow says no to a meeting between Putin and Zelenskyj before a finished agreement is on the table.
2 minute read

Russia currently rules out a meeting between President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, unless the parties first agree on the draft of a finished memorandum. This was stated by Vladimir Medinsky, the Kremlin’s lead negotiator in talks with Ukraine, in connection with the latest peace talks in Turkey.

Medinsky, one of the most prominent representatives of the Kremlin in the ongoing peace negotiations, emphasized that a personal meeting between the two leaders is only meaningful if they have already agreed on the terms of a peace agreement and are ready to sign it.

There’s no point in meeting only to begin negotiations from square one, he said, referring to previous summits that in practice prolonged the conflict rather than resolved it.

He also brought up historical cases where heads of state only met to sign already negotiated agreements, not to initiate new processes.

As an example, Medinsky mentioned the Chinese civil war in the 1940s:

Chiang Kai-shek constantly insisted on meeting in person to discuss everything. I believe they met five times, smiled, and posed for photographs, but it did not bring an end to the civil war. The core issues remained unresolved, and the war went on.

The Kremlin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, confirmed Medinsky’s line and stated that Russia considers such a meeting relevant only when a final agreement is in place.

The statements come at a time when the question of a meeting between Putin and Zelensky is once again being discussed internationally as a possible path to peace in Ukraine.

Parties far apart from each other

Many diplomats and international actors, not least in the West, have for a long time advocated direct talks between the two leaders to break the diplomatic deadlock in the conflict.

Volodymyr Zelenskyj has previously expressed a willingness to meet Putin to discuss peace, but has also set demands including the withdrawal of Russian forces and confirmation of Ukraine’s sovereignty as prerequisites.

Russia, for its part, has consistently demanded that the talks should be based on Russian security interests, including control over certain territories – something that the Ukrainian government rejects.

Medinsky’s and Peskov’s statements underscore that Russia does not see any immediate room for a summit as long as the fundamental prerequisites for peace are not already established, which makes the conditions for direct dialogue continue to be difficult.

Gabbard accuses Obama of years-long coup against Trump

Donald Trump's USA

Published 24 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
There is indisputable evidence that shows in detail how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence assessment that they knew was false, according to Gabbard.
3 minute read

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released a previously classified report that she claims reveals how former President Barack Obama and his administration deliberately created false information about Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Gabbard describes it as “the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history”.

At a White House press conference on July 23, Gabbard presented the declassified report from the House Intelligence Committee, which was originally produced in September 2020.

The report questions the foundations for the assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin would have wanted to help Donald Trump win the election.

The stunning revelations that we are releasing today should be of concern to every American. This is not about Democrats or Republicans. This has to do with the integrity of our Democratic Republic, Gabbard said at the press conference.

Obama “knew the report was false”

Gabbard accuses the Obama administration of deliberately creating an intelligence assessment that they “knew was false”. She claims they created a fabricated narrative that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Trump win.

There is irrefutable evidence that detail how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false, Gabbard explained.

According to the report, Obama allegedly issued “unusual directives” to expedite the publication of the intelligence assessment before Trump’s inauguration, bypassing normal coordination procedures within the intelligence services.

CIA accused of inadequate sources

The report criticizes the CIA for failing to follow its own standards and for basing its conclusions on what is described as “scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment of a sentence from one of the substandard reports”.

Gabbard claims that then-CIA Director John Brennan and the intelligence community deliberately suppressed information showing that Putin “held back from leaking compromising material on Hillary Clinton prior to the election”.

Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a quote clear preference for Trump, she said.

Claims about Clinton’s health condition

The report describes extensive material that Russia allegedly had about Hillary Clinton, including documents that according to Gabbard showed “psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression” and claims that Clinton was “on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers”.

Gabbard also claims that the intelligence community excluded important information that would have contradicted their main conclusions, including reports that “some Russian intelligence officials were planning for candidate Hillary Clinton’s victory”.

Demands for judicial review

She has demanded a criminal investigation of officials from the Obama era and accuses them of manufacturing a false narrative to discredit a sitting president. Trump has supported her conclusions and demanded prosecution of Obama and senior officials in his administration.

They conspired to subvert the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump in that election in November of 2016 they worked with their partners in the media to promote this lie ultimately to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump and launching what would be a years-long coup against him and his administration, Gabbard said.

The report also claims that internal US intelligence assessments consistently concluded that Russia lacked both the capability and intent to intervene in the 2016 election, but that these findings were deliberately suppressed.

Russia has denied all involvement in American elections, and President Putin has repeatedly said that Moscow does not favor any particular American political candidate.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.