Tuesday, May 6, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Privacy is about choice

Mass surveillance

Not about living like a hermit.

Published 23 October 2024
– By Naomi Brockwell

In today’s digital world, the concepts of privacy and anonymity are often used interchangeably, but they’re not the same thing. Privacy is about having control over your personal information – choosing what you share and with whom. Anonymity, on the other hand, is about completely concealing your identity. While both have their place, many people shy away from even basic privacy practices because they believe they can’t achieve full anonymity. But that’s a common misconception.

Not everyone needs to be anonymous, nor does everyone’s threat model demand it. The reality is, reclaiming your privacy isn’t about disappearing from the world or living in isolation. It’s about having the right to decide who has access to your data and how much you want to protect. But in the modern age, we’ve lost much of that control. We’re often coerced into signing away our data rights through lengthy terms of service agreements that give companies and governments permission to do what they want with our information.

The good news is that we do have a choice. Today, there are platforms that won’t demand you sign 60-pages of legalese, or even collect your data in the first place. A decade ago, privacy-focused companies barely existed, and those that did offered subpar solutions. But today, we have amazing alternatives that truly protect your privacy. It’s just a matter of learning about them and reminding ourselves that we still hold the power to choose.

Why privacy matters even if you’re not anonymous

For many people, the idea of online privacy seems overwhelming because it feels like an all-or-nothing game. If you can’t be 100% anonymous, why even try? But privacy isn’t about disappearing – it’s about minimizing risk and gaining more control over your personal information. Sometimes, we might choose to give certain companies our data because their services genuinely help us, and they need access to certain information to do that. That’s a perfectly valid choice. Privacy is not about never sharing information; it’s about thinking carefully about what data we want to share, with whom, and being allowed to make that decision.

The current norm is to throw our hands up in the air, feeling powerless in this data free-for-all we’ve found ourselves in. We’ve become desensitized to pervasive data collection in almost everything we do. Privacy is about shifting back to a norm where we realize we don’t have to give everyone our data. We can opt into some services, opt out of others, and choose companies that respect their usersrather than those that monetize our most sensitive information and hide it behind vague privacy policies.

You don’t have to go to extreme lengths to make a difference. Whether you’re reducing data collection on social media, switching to more secure messaging apps, or avoiding unnecessary location tracking, every step you take toward privacy empowers you and helps you reassert control over your digital life. Each action is another way to regain control over the information you share and the freedom to decide how your data is used.

A good analogy is locking your doors at night. It won’t stop the most determined intruders, but it deters most threats and gives you peace of mind. Similarly, small actions like using encrypted email or blocking trackers can shield you from everyday digital threats, even if complete anonymity isn’t your goal.

The privacy spectrum where do you fall?

Not everyone’s privacy needs are the same. Some people may want to go fully anonymous, avoiding any traceable digital footprint, while others may just want to make sure they aren’t oversharing personal details on social media. And that’s perfectly fine! The goal is not to push everyone toward total anonymity but to help you find the level of privacy that fits your life.

At NBTV, we recognize that privacy is personal, and there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. We give people the tools to protect themselves, whether they’re looking for something as simple as secure email or more advanced solutions like de-Googling their phone. If you’re extreme and want anonymity, we explain that it can be possible. If you’re just starting to care about privacy, we guide you through easy, impactful steps.

 

Yours in privacy,
Naomi Brockwell

Naomi Brockwell is a privacy advocacy and professional speaker, MC, interviewer, producer, podcaster, specialising in blockchain, cryptocurrency and economics. She runs the NBTV channel on Youtube.

Key takeaways

  • Privacy vs. Anonymity: Privacy is about control, while anonymity is about concealment. You can increase your privacy, and hence the control you have over your digital life, without becoming anonymous.
  • Every Step Counts: You don’t need to achieve full anonymity to make meaningful improvements to your privacy. Even small changes can make a difference.
  • You Have a Choice: In today’s world, we’ve been conditioned to sign away our data, but there are platforms that respect your privacy and don't require you to sacrifice control. These platforms exist, and they're better than ever.
  • Privacy Spectrum: Whether you’re seeking complete anonymity or just looking to protect basic personal information, there’s a level of privacy that fits your needs.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Dutch opinion leader targeted by spy attack: “Someone is trying to intimidate me”

Mass surveillance

Published 1 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
According to both Eva Vlaardingerbroek and Apple, it is likely that the opinion leader was attacked because of her views.

Dutch opinion maker and conservative activist Eva Vlaardingerbroek recently revealed that she had received an official warning from Apple that her iPhone had been subjected to a sophisticated attack – of the kind usually associated with advanced surveillance actors or intelligence services.

In a social media post, Vlaardingerbroek shared a screenshot of Apple’s warning and drew parallels to the Israeli spyware program Pegasus, which has been used to monitor diplomats, dissidents, and journalists, among others.

– Yesterday I got a verified threat notification from Apple stating they detected a mercenary spyware attack against my iPhone. We’re talking spyware like Pegasus.

– In the message they say that this targetted mercenary attack is probably happening because of ‘who I am and what I do’, she continues.

The term mercenary spyware is used by Apple to describe advanced surveillance technology, such as the notorious Pegasus software developed by the Israeli company NSO Group. This software can bypass mobile security systems, access calls, messages, emails, and even activate cameras or microphones without the user’s knowledge.

Prominent EU critic

Although Apple does not publicly comment on individual cases, the company has previously confirmed that such warnings are only sent when there is a “high probability” that the user has been specifically targeted. Since 2021, the notifications have mainly been sent to journalists, human rights activists, political dissidents, and officials at risk of surveillance by powerful interests.

Vlaardingerbroek has long been a prominent voice critical of the EU and has become known for her sharp criticism of EU institutions and its open-border immigration policy. She insists that the attack is likely politically motivated:

– I definitely dont know who did it. It could be anyone. This could be name a government that doesn’t like me. Name a organization that doesnt like me. Secret services, you name it.

– All I know for sure right now is that someone is trying to intimidate me. I have a message for them: It won’t work.

“There must be full transparency”

The use of Pegasus-like programs has been heavily criticized by both governments and privacy advocates. The tools, originally marketed for counterterrorism, have since been reported to be used against journalists and opposition leaders in dozens of countries.

In response, Apple sued NSO Group in 2021 and launched a system to warn users. However, the company claims that the threats are “rare” and not related to common malware.

The Vlaardingerbroek case is now raising questions about whether such technology is also being used in European domestic political conflicts, and the organization Access Now is calling on authorities in the Netherlands and at the EU level to investigate the attack.

– There must be full transparency. No one in a democratic society – regardless of political views – should be subjected to clandestine spying for expressing opinions or participating in public discourse, said a spokesperson.

Neither Apple nor the Dutch authorities have commented publicly on the case. Vlaardingerbroek says she has not yet seen any signs that data has actually been leaked, but has taken extra security measures.

Swedish government proposes wiretapping children without criminal suspicion

Mass surveillance

Published 1 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The government's own investigator proposed that only the Swedish Security Service (Säpo) should be allowed to eavesdrop on children without criminal suspicion - but this is not enough, according to the government.

Gang crime continues to plague Sweden, with recurring bombings, shootings and contract killings spreading fear in society, without those in power managing to get a grip on crime.

Criminal gangs often use minors to carry out serious crimes. For this reason, the Tidö parties (the center-right coalition government) want to give police the authority to wiretap children under the age of 15 – even in cases where there is no specific suspicion of a crime.

During a press conference the government stated that the social trend is bleak, that “serious crime is penetrating lower and lower down the age scale” and that children are increasingly “playing central roles in the commission of serious crimes“.

Currently, police are not allowed to use “secret coercive measures” against children under the age of 15 – which allegedly hinders police work when investigating murders and bombings.

At a press conference on Wednesday, representatives of the Tidö parties confirmed that they want to change the legislation so that children can also be wiretapped – partly when they are being investigated for crimes – but also for “preventive purposes” – i.e. without any actual suspicion of crime.

These are far-reaching proposals. But it is justified by the development of society, said Minister for Justice Gunnar Strömmer (M), and continued:

– It is about preventing crime, but also about reaching those who are behind and controlling via children’s cell phones.

Dismisses own investigator’s limitations

The government’s own legal investigator had recommended that only the Swedish Security Service (Säpo) be allowed to use wiretapping without suspicion of a crime. However, the government disagrees, arguing that it is “absolutely necessary” for regular police to also be allowed to wiretap children if they can be linked to serious organized crime.

The government maintains that fighting gang crime is more important than protecting the integrity of minors. Strömmer stated that “there are very significant risks in allowing the current reality to continue as it is”.

The change in the law is proposed to come into force this fall for at least five years, after which it will be evaluated.

Although most people seem to agree that organized crime needs to be fought, many are also opposed to the fact that the moderate-led government repeatedly chooses to focus so much on increased wiretapping and surveillance. Critics also point out that there is a real risk that the surveillance apparatus will be abused in the future or used very arbitrarily and without legal certainty.

Amazon updates privacy settings – all voice data to be stored in the cloud

Mass surveillance

Published 26 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Amazon itself states that it saves users' calls in order to improve the service.

As of March 28, some Echo devices will no longer be able to process voice data locally – all voice information will be sent to Amazon’s cloud service, regardless of the user’s will.

Echo is a series of smart devices, including speakers, developed by Amazon. The device records what you say and sends it to Amazon’s servers to be stored and analyzed, allegedly to improve the service. Privacy settings have previously allowed some devices to process voice data locally without sending it to Amazon.

In an email to Echo users, shared on Reddit, Amazon announced that the ability to process voice commands locally is being removed. Instead, all recordings will be sent to the cloud for processing, as Sweclockers has reported.

If the user doesn’t actively change their settings before March 28, they will automatically be set to “do not save data”. This means that Amazon will still collect and process your voice information, but that this will be deleted after Alexa handles the request. However, it is unclear how long the information will be stored before it is actually deleted.

Amazon states that voice data is needed to train the company’s AI model, Alexa Plus. At the same time, the company promises that all previously saved voice data will be deleted if the user has the “do not save data” feature enabled.

The tech mogul on the future of AI: Constant mass surveillance

Mass surveillance

Published 24 January 2025
– By Editorial Staff
With the help of AI, Ellison believes that in the future, those in power will be able to follow citizens' every move.

Tech giant Oracle’s CEO Larry Ellison believes in a future where artificial intelligence becomes an integral part of a borderless mass surveillance society where privacy no longer exists and where everything citizens do is mapped and recorded.

Oracle and Larry Ellison will play a key role in Trump’s AI venture “Stargate” expected to cost upwards of $500 billion and described by the President himself as “by far the largest AI infrastructure project in history”.

There is no doubt that Ellison is one of the world’s most successful tech moguls just last fall he overtook Amazon founder Jeff Bezos to become the world’s second richest man after Elon Musk. But how does he see the future of artificial intelligence and how it will affect our lives?

During a meeting with financial analysts last fall, he predicted a future that critics say is reminiscent of dark dystopian novels like George Orwell’s 1984, where humans are subject to constant mass surveillance and AI is used to map citizens’ every move.

According to Ellison, it is highly likely that in the future, AI models will be used to analyze in real time all the material not only from surveillance cameras, police body cameras, but also from car cameras and doorbells.

Citizens will be on their best behavior because we are constantly recording and reporting everything that’s going on.

Every police officer is going to be supervised at all times, and if there’s a problem, AI will report the problem and report it to the appropriate person, he continued.

“Big brother is watching you”

The multi-billionaire also believes that AI-controlled drones will replace real police officers during car chases and other types of crime and disorder.

– If something happens in a shopping center, a drone goes out there and reaches the scene way faster than a police car.

Technology website Ars Technica’s writer Benji Edwards is one of many who reacted strongly to Ellison’s vision of AI surveillance, saying his comments raise questions about the future of citizens’ privacy and right to privacy.

Ellison’s vision bears more than a passing resemblance to the cautionary world portrayed in George Orwell’s prescient novel 1984. In Orwell’s fiction, the totalitarian government of Oceania uses ubiquitous ‘telescreens’ to monitor citizens constantly, creating a society where privacy no longer exists and independent thought becomes nearly impossible“, Edwards notes.

But Orwell’s famous phrase ‘Big Brother is watching you’ would take on new meaning in Ellison’s tech-driven scenario, where AI systems, rather than human watchers, would serve as the ever-vigilant eyes of authority. Once considered a sci-fi trope, automated systems are already becoming a reality: Similar automated CCTV surveillance systems have already been trialed in London Underground and at the 2024 Olympics“, he continues.

“A slave obeys”

He points out that automated surveillance systems have already been implemented in Chinese cities, among others, and that AI software is already available that can sort and organize the data collected on residents using a network of deployed surveillance cameras.

According to many observers, similar and even more advanced solutions may soon become part of everyday life in the United States and other countries, and there are warnings that a “digital dictatorship” is emerging where the surveillance state is so all-encompassing that it is impossible for anyone to escape.

“‘Good Behavior’ as defined by the billionaires who own and control everything. Otherwise known as blind obedience and willful subservience to their every whim and want. Because a slave obeys, expresses one of many worried voices.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.