Saturday, August 16, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Buying someone’s real-time location is shockingly cheap

You need to stop handing out your cell number. Seriously.

Published 5 July 2025
– By Naomi Brockwell
11 minute read

Most people have no idea how exposed they are.

Your location is one of the most sensitive pieces of personal information, and yet it’s astonishingly easy to access. For just a few dollars, someone can track your real-time location without ever needing to hack your phone.

This isn’t science fiction or a rare edge case. It’s a thriving industry.

Telecom providers themselves have a long and disturbing history of selling customer location data to data brokers, who then resell it with little oversight.

In 2018, The New York Times exposed how major U.S. carriers, including AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, and Sprint, were selling access to phone location data. This data was ultimately accessed by bounty hunters and law enforcement, without user consent or a warrant.

A 2019 investigation by Vice showed that you could buy the real-time location of nearly any phone in the U.S. for about $300.

Other vendors advertise this service for as little as $5 on underground forums and encrypted messaging channels. No need to compromise someone’s device, just give them a phone number.

The big takeaway from this article is that if someone has your number, they can get your location. We’re going to go over how to shut this tracking method down.

Whether you’re an activist, journalist, or just someone who values your right to privacy, this newsletter series is designed to give you the tools to disappear from unwanted tracking, one layer at a time.

How cell numbers leak location

Your cell number is a real-time tracking beacon. Every time your phone is powered on, it talks to nearby cell towers. This happens even if you’re not making a call.

Your phone’s location is continuously updated in a database called the Home Location Register (HLR), which lets your carrier know which tower to route calls and texts through. If someone has access to your number, they can locate you, sometimes within meters, in real time. Here are some ways they can do it:

1. Access to telecom infrastructure

Selling data / corrupting employees:

Telecom providers are notorious for selling customers’ location data directly from their HLR. Alternatively, unauthorized individuals or entities can illegally access this data by bribing or corrupting telecom employees who have direct access to the HLR.

The data retrieved from the HLR database reveals only which specific cell tower your phone is currently registered to, and typically identifies your approximate location within tens or hundreds of meters, depending on tower density in the area.

To pinpoint your exact location with greater precision, down to just a few meters, requires additional specialized methods, such as carrier-based triangulation. Triangulation involves actively measuring your phone’s signal strength or timing from multiple cell towers simultaneously. Such detailed, real-time triangulation is typically restricted to telecom companies and authorized law enforcement agencies. However, these advanced methods can also be misused if telecom personnel or authorized entities are compromised through bribery or corruption.

Exploiting the SS7 protocol (telecom network vulnerabilities):

Attackers can also exploit vulnerabilities such as those in SS7, a global telecom signaling protocol, to illicitly request your current cell tower location from the HLR database. SS7 itself doesn’t store any location data — it provides the means to query your carrier’s HLR and retrieve your current tower association.

2. IMSI catchers (“Stingrays”): Your phone directly reveals its location

IMSI catchers (often called “Stingrays”) are specialized surveillance devices acting as fake cell towers. Your phone constantly searches for the strongest available cell signal, automatically connecting to these fake towers if their signals appear stronger than legitimate ones.

In this method, instead of querying telecom databases, your phone directly reveals its own location to whoever is operating the fake cell tower, as soon as the phone connects. Operators of IMSI catchers measure signal strength between your phone and their device, enabling precise location tracking, often accurate within a few meters.

While IMSI catchers were initially developed and primarily used by law enforcement and intelligence agencies, the legality of their use (even by authorities) is subject to ongoing debate. Unauthorized versions of IMSI catchers have also become increasingly available on black and gray markets.

The solution? Move to VoIP

Cell numbers use your phone’s baseband processor to communicate directly with cell towers over the cellular network, continuously updating your physical location in telecom databases.

VoIP numbers (Voice over Internet Protocol), on the other hand, transmit calls and texts through the internet using data connections. They don’t keep HLR records, and so they’re immune to tower-based location tracking.

Instead, the call or message is routed through internet infrastructure and only connects to the cellular network at carrier-level switching stations, removing the direct tower-based tracking of your physical location.

So the takeaway is that you want to stop using cell numbers, and start using VoIP number instead, so that anyone who knows your number isn’t able to use it to track your location.

But there’s a catch: VoIP is heavily regulated. In most countries, quality VoIP options are scarce, and short code SMS support is unreliable. In the US, though, there are good tools.

Action items:

1. Get a VoIP provider

Two good apps that you can download where you can generate VoIP numbers in the U.S. are:

  • MySudo: Great for compartmentalizing identity. Up to 9 identities/numbers per account.
  • Cloaked.com: Great for burner/throwaway numbers.

We are not sponsored by or affiliated with any of the companies mentioned here, they’re just tools I use and like. If you have services that you like and recommend, please let others know in the comments!

Setting up MySudo

Step 1: Install the app

  • You will need a phone with the Google Play Store or the Apple App Store.
  • Search for MySudo, download and install it, or visit the store directly via their webpage.

Step 2: Purchase a plan

  • $15/month gets you up to 9 Sudo profiles, each with its own number. Or you can start with just 1 number for $2/month. You will purchase this plan inside the app store on your phone.

Step 3: Set up your first Sudo profile

When prompted, create your first Sudo profile. Think of this as a separate, compartmentalized identity within MySudo, distinct from your main user account.

Each Sudo profile can include:

  • A dedicated phone number
  • Optional extras like an email alias, username handle, virtual credit card, etc.

For now, we’re focusing only on phone numbers:

  • Choose a purpose for this profile (such as Shopping, Medical, Work). This purpose will appear as a heading in your list of Sudos.
  • Create a name for your Sudo profile (I usually match this to the chosen purpose).

Step 4: Add a phone number to your Sudo

  • Tap the Sudo icon in the top-left corner.
  • Select the Sudo profile you just created.
  • Tap “Add a Phone Number.”
  • Select your preferred country, then enter a city name or area code.
  • Pick a number from the available options, then tap “Choose Number.”

You’re now set up and ready to use your VoIP number!

Step 4: Compartmentalize

You don’t need to assign all 9 numbers right away. But here are helpful categories you might consider:

  • Friends and family
  • Work
  • Government
  • Medical
  • Banking
  • Purchases
  • Anonymous purchases
  • High-risk anonymous use
  • Catch-all / disposable

Incoming calls go through the MySudo app, not your default dialer. Same with SMS. The person on the other end doesn’t know it’s VoIP.

Short codes don’t always work

Short codes (such as verification codes sent by banks or apps) use a special messaging protocol that’s different from regular SMS texts. Many VoIP providers don’t consistently support short codes, because this capability depends entirely on the underlying upstream provider (the entity that originally provisioned these numbers) not on the VoIP reseller you purchased from.

If you encounter problems receiving short codes, here are ways around the issue:

  • Use the “Call Me” option:
    Many services offer an alternative verification method: a phone call delivering the verification code verbally. VoIP numbers handle these incoming verification calls without any issue.
  • Try another VoIP provider (temporary):
    If a service blocks your primary VoIP number and insists on a real cellular number, you can borrow a non‑VoIP SIM verification service like SMSPool.net. They provide actual cell‑based phone numbers via the internet, but note: these are intended for temporary or burner use only. Don’t rely on rented numbers from these services for important or long-term accounts, always use stable, long-term numbers for critical purposes.
  • Register using a real cell number and port it to VoIP:
    For critical accounts, another option is to use a prepaid SIM card temporarily to register your account, then immediately port that number to a VoIP provider (such as MySudo or Google Voice). Many services only check whether a number is cellular or VoIP during initial account registration, and don’t recheck later.
  • Maintain a separate SIM just for critical 2FA:
    If you find that after porting, you still can’t reliably receive certain verification codes (particularly short codes), you might need to maintain a separate, dedicated SIM and cellular number exclusively for receiving critical two-factor authentication (2FA) codes. Do not share this dedicated SIM number with everyone, and do not use it for regular communications.

Important caveat for high-risk users:

Any SIM cards placed into the same phone are linked together by the telecom carrie, which is important information for high-risk threat models. When you insert a SIM card into your device, the SIM itself will independently send special messages called “proactive SIM messages” to your carrier. These proactive messages:

  • Completely bypass your phone’s operating system (OS), making them invisible and undetectable from user-level software.
  • Contain device-specific identifiers such as the IMEI or IMEISV of your phone and also usually include the IMEI of previous devices in which the SIM was inserted.

If your threat model is particularly high-risk and requires total compartmentalization between identities or numbers, always use separate physical devices for each compartmentalized identity. Most people don’t need to take such extreme precautions, as this generally falls outside their threat model.

Cloaked.com for burner numbers

  • Offers unlimited, disposable phone numbers.
  • Great for one-off verifications, restaurants, or merchants.
  • Doesn’t require installing an app, you can just use it in the browser and never link any forwarding number.
  • Be aware that if any of the VoIP numbers you generated inside Cloaked hasn’t received any calls or messages for 60 days, it enters a watch period. After an additional 60 days without receiving calls or messages (120 days total of inactivity), you lose the number, and it returns to the available pool for someone else to use. Only use Cloaked for numbers you expect to actively receive calls or messages on, or for temporary use where losing the number isn’t an issue.

What to do with your current cell number

Your cell number is already everywhere: breached databases, government forms, medical records, and countless other places. You can’t “un-breach” it, and you don’t want to lose that number because it’s probably an important number that people know they can contact you on. But you can stop it from being used to track you.

Solution: Port your existing cell number to a VoIP Provider

Best choice: Google Voice (recommended due to strong security protections)

  • You can choose to just pay a one-time $20 fee, which turns the number into a receiving-only number. You’ll get to receive calls and texts forever on this number with no ongoing fees.
  • Or you can choose to pay an ongoing monthly fee, which will allow you to continue to make outgoing calls and send outgoing messages from the number.

The one-time fee option will be sufficient for most people, because the aim is to gradually make this existing number obsolete and move people over to your new VoIP numbers.

Google Voice is considered a strong option because the threat of SIM swapping (where an attacker fraudulently takes control of your phone number) is very real and dangerous. Unlike basically every other telecom provider, Google lets you secure your account with a hardware security key, making it significantly harder for attackers to port your number away from your control.

Google obviously is not a privacy-respecting company, but remember, your existing cell number isn’t at all private anyway. The idea is to eventually stop using this number completely, while still retaining control of it.

How to port your existing cell number to Google Voice

  1. Check porting eligibility
    Visit the Google Voice porting tool and enter your number to verify it’s eligible.
  2. Start the port-in process
    • Navigate to Settings → Phones tab → Change / Port.
    • Select “I want to use my mobile number” and follow the on-screen prompts
  3. Pay the one-time fee
    A $20 fee is required to port your number into Google Voice
  4. Complete the porting process
    • Enter your carrier account details and submit the request. Porting generally completes within 24–48 hours, though it can take longer in some cases.
  5. Post-port setup
    • Porting your number to Google Voice cancels your old cellular service. You’ll need a new SIM or plan for regular mobile connectivity, but you’ll ideally only use this new SIM for data, and use your VoIP numbers for communication not the associated cell number.
    • Configure call forwarding, voicemail transcription, and text forwarding to email from the Google Voice Settings page.

Now, even if someone tries to look you up via your old number, they can’t get your real-time location. It’s no longer tied to a SIM that is logging your location in HLRs.

Summary: Take it one step at a time

Switching to VoIP numbers is a big change, so take it step by step:

  1. Download your VoIP apps of choice (like MySudo) and set up your new numbers.
  2. Gradually migrate your contacts to your new VoIP numbers.
  3. Use burner numbers (via Cloaked or similar services) for reservations, merchants, or anyone who doesn’t genuinely need your permanent number.

Keep your existing SIM active for now, until you’re comfortable and confident using the new VoIP system.

When ready, finalize your migration:

  1. Port your original cell number to Google Voice.
  2. Get a new SIM card with a fresh number, but don’t use this new number for calls, texts, or identification.
  3. Use the new SIM solely for data connectivity.

This completes your migration, significantly enhancing your privacy and reducing your exposure to location tracking.

GrapheneOS users

You can’t currently purchase your MySudo subscription directly on a GrapheneOS device. Instead, you’ll first need to buy your MySudo plan through the Google Play Store or Apple App Store using another device.

Once you’ve purchased your plan, you can migrate your account to your GrapheneOS phone:

  1. On your GrapheneOS device, download and install MySudo from your preferred app store (I personally like the Aurora store as a front-end for the Google Play Store).
  2. Open MySudo on your GrapheneOS device and navigate to:
    Settings → Backup & Import/Export → Import from Another Device
  3. Follow the on-screen prompts to securely migrate your entire account over to your GrapheneOS phone.

You can retain your original device as a secure backup for messages and account data.

To ensure reliable, real-time notifications for calls and messages, make sure sandboxed Google Play is enabled on the GrapheneOS profile where you’re using MySudo.

What you’ve achieved

You now have:

  • Up to 9 persistent, compartmentalized VoIP numbers via MySudo.
  • Disposable, on-demand burner numbers via Cloaked.
  • Your original cell number safely ported to Google Voice and secured with a hardware security key.
  • A clear plan for transitioning away from your original cell number.

You’ve replaced a vulnerable, easily trackable cell identifier. Your real-time location is no longer constantly broadcast through cell towers via a number that is identified as belonging to you, your digital identities are better compartmentalized, and you’re significantly harder to track or exploit.

This marks the beginning of a safer digital future. What’s next? More layers, better privacy tools, and greater freedom. Remember, privacy isn’t a destination, it’s a lifestyle. You’re now firmly on that path.

 

Yours in Privacy,
Naomi

Naomi Brockwell is a privacy advocacy and professional speaker, MC, interviewer, producer, podcaster, specialising in blockchain, cryptocurrency and economics. She runs the NBTV channel on Rumble.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

What I learnt at DEFCON

Why hacker culture is essential if we want to win the privacy war.

Published today 8:16
– By Naomi Brockwell
6 minute read

DEFCON is the world’s largest hacker conference. Every year, tens of thousands of people gather in Las Vegas to share research, run workshops, compete in capture-the-flag tournaments, and break things for sport. It’s a subculture. A testing ground. A place where some of the best minds in security and privacy come together not just to learn, but to uncover what’s being hidden from the rest of us. It’s where curiosity runs wild.

But to really get DEFCON, you have to understand the people.

What is a hacker?

I love hacker conferences because of the people. Hackers are notoriously seen as dangerous. The stereotype is that they wear black hoodies and Guy Fawkes masks.

But that’s not why they’re dangerous: They’re dangerous because they ask questions and have relentless curiosity.

Hackers have a deep-seated drive to learn how things work, not just at the surface, but down to their core.

They aren’t content with simply using tech. They want to open it up, examine it, and see the hidden gears turning underneath.

A hacker sees a device and doesn’t just ask, “What does it do?”
They ask, “What else could it do?”
“What isn’t it telling me?”
“What’s under the hood, and why does no one want me to look?”

They’re curious enough to pull back curtains others want to remain closed.

They reject blind compliance and test boundaries.
When society says “Do this,” hackers ask “Why?”

They don’t need a rulebook or external approval.
They trust their own instincts and intelligence.
They’re guided by internal principles, not external prescriptions.
They’re not satisfied with the official version. They challenge it.

Because of this, hackers are often at the fringes of society. They’re comfortable with being misunderstood or even vilified. Hackers are unafraid to reveal truths that powerful entities want buried.

But that position outside the mainstream gives them perspective: They see what others miss.

Today, the word “hack” is everywhere:
Hack your productivity.
Hack your workout.
Hack your life.

What it really means is:
Don’t accept the defaults.
Look under the surface.
Find a better way.

That’s what makes hacker culture powerful.
It produces people who will open the box even when they’re told not to.
People who don’t wait for permission to investigate how the tools we use every day are compromising us.

That insistence on curiosity, noncompliance, and pushing past the surface to see what’s buried underneath is exactly what we need in a world built on hidden systems of control.

We should all aspire to be hackers, especially when it comes to confronting power and surveillance.

Everything is computer

Basically every part of our lives runs on computers now.
Your phone. Your car. Your thermostat. Your TV. Your kid’s toys.
And much of this tech has been quietly and invisibly hijacked for surveillance.

Companies and governments both want your data. And neither want you asking how these data collection systems work.

We’re inside a deeply connected world, built on an opaque infrastructure that is extracting behavioral data at scale.

You have a right to know what’s happening inside the tech you use every day.
Peeking behind the curtain is not a crime. It’s a public service.

In today’s world, the hacker mindset is not just useful. It’s necessary.

Hacker culture in a surveillance world

People who ask questions are a nightmare for those who want to keep you in the dark.
They know how to dig.
They don’t take surveillance claims at face value.
They know how to verify what data is actually being collected.
They don’t trust boilerplate privacy policies or vague legalese.
They reverse-engineer SDKs.
They monitor network traffic.
They intercept outgoing requests and inspect payloads.

And they don’t ask for permission.

That’s what makes hacker culture so important. If we want any hope of reclaiming privacy, we need people with the skills and the willingness to pull apart the systems we’re told not to question.

On top of that, governments and corporations both routinely use outdated and overbroad legislation like the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) to prosecute public-interest researchers who investigate tech. Not because those researchers cause harm, but because they reveal things that others want kept hidden.

Laws like this pressure people towards compliance, and make them afraid to ask questions. The result is that curiosity feels like a liability, and it becomes harder for the average person to understand how the digital systems around us actually work.

That’s why the hacker mindset matters so much: Because no matter how hard the system pushes back, they keep asking questions.

The researchers I met at DEFCON

This year at DEFCON, I met researchers who are doing exactly that.

People uncovering surveillance code embedded in children’s toys.
People doing analysis on facial recognition SDKs.
People testing whether your photo is really deleted after “verification”.
People capturing packets who discovered that the “local only” systems you’re using aren’t local at all, and are sending your data to third parties.
People analyzing “ephemeral” IDs, and finding that your data was being stored and linked back to real identities.

You’ll be hearing from some of them on our channel in the coming months.
Their work is extraordinary, and helping all of us move towards a world of informed consent instead of blind compliance. Without this kind of research, the average person has no way to know what’s happening behind the scenes. We can’t make good decisions about the tech we use if we don’t know what it’s doing.

Make privacy cool again

Making privacy appealing is not just about education.
It’s about making it cool.

Hacker culture has always been at the forefront of turning fringe ideas into mainstream trends. Films like Hackers and The Matrix made hackers a status symbol. Movements like The Crypto Wars (when the government fought Phil Zimmermann over PGP), and the Clipper Chip fights (when they tried to standardize surveillance backdoors across hardware) made cypherpunks and privacy activists aspirational.

Hackers take the things mainstream culture mocks or fears, and make them edgy and cool.

That’s what we need here. We need a cultural transformation and to push back against the shameful language that demands we justify our desire for privacy.

You shouldn’t have to explain why you don’t want to be watched.
You shouldn’t have to defend your decision to protect your communications.

Make privacy a badge of honor.
Make privacy tools a status symbol.
Make the act of encrypting, self-hosting, and masking your identity a signal that says you’re independent, intelligent, and not easily manipulated.

Show that the people who care about privacy are the same people who invent the future.

Most people don’t like being trailblazers, because it’s scary. But if you’re reading this, you’re one of the early adopters, which means you’re already one of the fearless ones.

When you take a stand visibly, you create a quorum and make it safer for others to join in. That’s how movements grow, and we go from being weirdos in the corner to becoming the majority.

If privacy is stigmatized, reclaiming it will take bold, fearless, visible action.
The hacker community is perfectly positioned to lead that charge, and to make it safe for the rest of the world to follow.

When you show up and say, “I care about this,” you give others permission to care too.

Privacy may be on the fringe right now, but that’s where all great movements begin.

Final Thoughts

What I learnt at DEFCON is that curiosity is powerful.
Refusal to comply is powerful.
The simple act of asking questions can be revolutionary.

There are systems all around us extracting data and consolidating control, and most people don’t know how to fight that, and are too scared to try.

Hacker culture is the secret sauce.

Let’s apply this drive to the systems of surveillance.
Let’s investigate the tools we’ve been told to trust.
Let’s explain what’s actually happening.
Let’s give people the knowledge they need to make better choices.

Let’s build a world where curiosity isn’t criminalized but celebrated.

DEFCON reminded me that we don’t need to wait for permission to start doing that.

We can just do things.

So let’s start now.

 

Yours in privacy,
Naomi

Naomi Brockwell is a privacy advocacy and professional speaker, MC, interviewer, producer, podcaster, specialising in blockchain, cryptocurrency and economics. She runs the NBTV channel on Rumble.

Facebook’s insidious surveillance: VPN app spied on users

Mass surveillance

Published 9 August 2025
– By Editorial Staff
2 minute read

In 2013, Facebook acquired the Israeli company Onavo for approximately 120 million dollars. Onavo was marketed as a VPN app that would protect users’ data, reduce mobile usage, and secure online activities. Over 33 million people downloaded the app believing it would strengthen their privacy.

In reality, Onavo gave Facebook complete insight into users’ phones – including which apps were used, how long they were open, and which websites were visited.

According to court documents and regulatory authorities, Facebook used this data to identify trends and map potential competitors. By analyzing user patterns in apps like Houseparty, YouTube, Amazon, and Snapchat, the company could determine which platforms posed a threat to its market dominance.

When Snapchat’s popularity began to explode in 2016, Facebook encountered a problem: encrypted traffic prevented insight into users’ behavior, reports Business Today. To circumvent this, Facebook launched an internal operation called “Project Ghostbusters”.

Facebook engineers developed specially adapted code based on Onavo’s infrastructure. The app installed a so-called root certificate on users’ phones – consent was hidden in legal documentation – which enabled Facebook to create fake certificates that mimicked Snapchat’s servers.

This made it possible to decrypt and analyze Snapchat’s traffic internally. The purpose was to use the information as a basis for strategic decisions, product development, or potential acquisitions.

Snapchat said no – Facebook copied instead

Based on data from Onavo, Facebook offered to buy Snapchat for 3 billion dollars. When Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel declined, Facebook responded by launching Instagram Stories – a direct copy of Snapchat’s most popular feature. This became a decisive move in the competition between the two platforms.

In 2018, Apple removed Onavo from the App Store, citing that the app violated the company’s data protection rules. Facebook responded by launching a new app: Facebook Research, internally called Project Atlas, which offered similar surveillance functions. This time, the company paid users – some as young as 13 – up to 20 dollars per month to install the app.

When Apple discovered this, the company acted forcefully and revoked Facebook’s enterprise development certificates. This meant that all internal iOS apps were temporarily stopped – one of Apple’s most far-reaching measures ever.

In 2020, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) sued Facebook, now called Meta, for misleading users with false promises about privacy. In 2023, Meta’s subsidiaries were fined a total of 20 million Australian dollars (approximately €11 million) for misleading behavior.

Why it still matters

Business Insider emphasizes that the Onavo story is not just about a misleading app. It also illustrates how one of the world’s most powerful tech companies built a surveillance system disguised as a privacy tool.

The fact that Facebook used the data to map competitors, copy features, and maintain control over the social media market – and also targeted underage users for data collection – raises additional ethical questions.

“Even a decade later, Onavo remains a case study in how ‘data is power’ and how far companies are willing to go to get it”, the publication concludes.

Show your papers: The internet is about to change forever

A crackdown sweeping the globe is replacing the free internet with government surveillance.

Published 9 August 2025
– By Naomi Brockwell
8 minute read

A dangerous shift is happening online. All around the world, governments are quietly rewriting the rules of internet access. Soon, privacy and anonymity online may become relics of the past.

The UK’s newly enacted Online Safety Act marks a fundamental shift. You now need to verify your identity simply to watch a video, visit a website, or share your thoughts. The Act mandates strict age verification and identity checks for websites and platforms considered to host “harmful” or “adult content”.

But the definition of “harmful or adult content” is deliberately broad, encompassing every social media platform and website hosting user-generated content. This maneuver places all interactive sites under strict regulatory oversight, forcing them to implement identity verification systems. Users must now provide government ID or undergo facial recognition checks, ending the ability to browse, communicate, or consume content anonymously.

Platforms that don’t comply face massive fines. The result is that a vast portion of the internet has been seized under the guise of “safety”, threatening to erase the free and open internet we once knew.

The consequences are cascading. As this becomes increasingly normalized, nearly all platforms face pressure to demand user identification or age verification. This shift represents a major step toward eliminating online privacy. This isn’t about protecting children; it’s about ending anonymity altogether.

Global surveillance surge

If we look at the surveillance initiatives of governments around the world these past few weeks, it’s chilling. In what feels like a sudden, synchronized wave, the entire globe is moving in lockstep towards eliminating freedom on the internet. As well as the UK’s initiative:

  • Canada: A surveillance bill has just been introduced that will significantly expand online tracking. Bill C-2 mandates backdoors in apps and platforms, giving authorities real-time access to your private data and undermining encryption. It also drastically expands surveillance by allowing police warrantless access to personal details like user identities, login history, and online activities.
  • Australia: Has banned YouTube and social media platforms for users under 16, mandated face scans and government ID verification to access major internet services, and is planning to expand these invasive controls to basic online searches, embedding identity checks into everyday internet use.
  • European Union: The proposed Chat Control law will go to a final vote in October 2025. If passed, it will mandate that platforms automatically scan private messages, emails, and stored files for illegal content, including encrypted communications, effectively abolishing end-to-end encryption protections across Europe. Additionally, the Digital Services Act (DSA) requires platforms hosting user-generated content to implement age verification measures, giving platforms a 12-month grace period to roll out strict ID verification systems.
  • Switzerland: Have a surveillance law in the works that will force VPNs, messaging apps, and online platforms to log users’ identities, IP addresses, and metadata for government access, effectively ending online anonymity. Privacy-focused companies like Proton have announced plans to relocate if the law passes.
  • United States: Numerous states are rapidly introducing and passing bills mandating strict age verification and identity checks for social media platforms and other online services, pushing the country toward the same surveillance and identity-control measures seen globally.

This explains the recent wave of platforms suddenly mandating stricter ID checks, like Spotify requiring you to upload your government ID before listening to music, or YouTube using AI to infer your age and enforce restrictions. Even in countries that don’t legally require these measures, companies often roll them out globally because it’s simpler and cheaper to have a single policy everywhere. This forces every country into the same authoritarian policies, whether they wanted them or not.

But these recent requirements didn’t appear overnight. Platforms have been slowly adding more identity verification methods for years. Did all these companies independently decide to create more friction for their users? Of course not. User friction is rarely the goal.

Instead, much of this seemingly voluntary cooperation was a response to implicit government pressure. This tactic is known as “jawboning”.

Jawboning: Silent coercion

Jawboning is informal, behind-the-scenes pressure from lawmakers and regulators. No new legislation is needed. Instead, governments make quiet but clear suggestions.
Officials might tell a tech company, “we’re concerned about misinformation spreading on your platform”, or quietly warn “this app poses a national security risk, you might want to address that before we’re forced to intervene”.
The threat is implicit.

As a result, platforms have been steadily increasing their identity checks, whether through phone number verification that ties accounts to real identities, or directly asking users to submit ID documents.

Governments don’t always need legal authority. Sometimes they simply suggest something strongly enough that compliance is inevitable.

In recent years we’ve seen this tactic intensify, with governments increasingly engaging directly with social media companies to shape moderation decisions. Without formal subpoenas or official orders, platforms receive subtle yet persistent suggestions about the type of content to flag or remove, effectively steering public narratives. This informal pressure quietly influences what users can see and say online.

Some people suggest that this sudden global crackdown on privacy must have been a coordinated and deliberate strike. But there’s a simpler explanation. None of what’s happened this past week appeared out of nowhere. We’ve been setting the stage for years.

After years of incremental normalization, surveillance culture reached a critical mass. Each small change seemed minor and tolerable. Governments nudged. Companies complied. Users accepted. Bit by bit, surveillance became normalized, until we reached a tipping point. When enough incremental intrusions pile up, they set the stage for something much bigger. By the time major restrictions arrived this week, we’d already grown numb to privacy incursions. The world was primed, and now a wave of regulation has swept in almost unopposed.

The cultural shift we must fight

The internet was conceived as a tool for freedom and connection. But almost overnight, it has become a surveillance landscape where every click, view, and conversation is gated by ID checkpoints. Our greatest tool for free expression is now our greatest instrument of control.

We can’t accept this shift passively. The normalization of mandatory identity verification is deeply harmful. Privacy isn’t suspicious or criminal; it’s normal, and we must vigorously push back against these cultural changes.

This is a landslide of lost freedoms, and it’s happened in mere weeks.

Decentralized infrastructure: Our last hope

Decentralization is critical in the fight for online freedom. Centralized systems, such as those mandated by regulations like the UK’s Online Safety Act, provide easy targets for governments to enforce identity checks, age limits, and surveillance. These centralized checkpoints enable extensive monitoring and control. Decentralized infrastructure, on the other hand, distributes control across many independent participants, making it inherently resistant to intrusive mandates and significantly harder for governments to impose surveillance and censorship.

Here are just a handful of powerful decentralized tools already available, each combining decentralization with robust privacy protections:

Bitchat
Bitchat is a Bluetooth Low Energy mesh messaging network launched by Jack Dorsey’s team in July 2025. It enables peer-to-peer communication among nearby devices without requiring internet access, user accounts, or phone numbers. Users can communicate via public channels or password-protected private groups. Bitchat also supports direct private messages secured by end-to-end encryption with forward secrecy, ensuring only the intended recipients can decrypt messages. Additional privacy features include timing obfuscation and dummy traffic to protect metadata, as well as a panic mode that instantly erases all locally stored data. The mesh network becomes stronger, more secure, and more resilient as additional users run the app in proximity.

Meshtastic
Meshtastic uses small radio devices to create local mesh networks independent from the internet, helping resist centralized censorship. Users send either public or private messages. Public messages are visible to everyone, while private channels use a shared encryption key (shared securely outside the app). Meshtastic also supports direct messages encrypted end-to-end via public-key cryptography.

SimpleX chat
A serverless, peer-to-peer messaging app with no identifiers or phone numbers required. All messages are end-to-end encrypted using a double-ratchet protocol. Metadata, contact lists, and message logs remain solely on the user’s device. Private message routing further obscures IP address or network information from relay servers. More participation, by either running relay nodes yourself or using independent relay servers, makes the system stronger and more censorship-resistant.

IPFS (InterPlanetary File System)
Distributed file storage with encryption. Instead of relying on centralized servers, files are split and stored across independent nodes. Once content is pinned to multiple nodes, there’s no single point of failure. IPFS resists censorship because no central authority can easily remove or block files. More participants equals greater redundancy and resilience.

Filecoin
Filecoin provides a decentralized marketplace for data storage. Unlike centralized cloud storage, Filecoin allows users to securely contract with independent storage providers directly through its blockchain, without third-party intermediaries. Files aren’t automatically distributed; instead, they’re stored with specific providers that users contract with directly, and the Filecoin blockchain ensures data integrity through built-in cryptographic proofs verifying providers actually store your data as promised.

Zero-Knowledge proofs (ZK proofs)
Zero-knowledge proofs are a type of privacy-preserving cryptographic validation. Initially pioneered by the cryptocurrency Zcash, ZK proofs have since become essential tools in a wide range of applications beyond cryptocurrency, including decentralized identity systems, secure age verification, and anonymous credentialing. They allow you to prove sensitive attributes, such as being over a certain age, without revealing any personal details, offering robust privacy protections in many digital interactions.

Several decentralized social media platforms have emerged as promising alternatives to centralized giants like Twitter and Facebook. Platforms such as Mastodon, Nostr, Bluesky, and Matrix offer decentralized architectures in theory, spreading control across independently operated servers or nodes. In practice, however, most users currently congregate around just a few widely used nodes, creating potential points of vulnerability. Still, these platforms represent meaningful progress, and I’m genuinely optimistic about the future of decentralized social media. As more people learn to run their own independent servers and nodes, these platforms will grow increasingly robust, resilient, and truly censorship resistant.

Why these tools matter

Together, decentralization and encryption directly undermine the systems that the UK Online Safety Act and similar laws rely on, such as central checkpoints, mandated identity verification, and mass data collection. These authoritarian measures become much harder to enforce when control is distributed, data remains with individual users, and identity can be verified anonymously.

Decentralized technology is still young, and many tools currently lack the polished interfaces and extensive user bases of centralized platforms. You won’t yet find the same network effect as mainstream social networks. But decentralized technology holds immense promise. As governments increasingly mandate backdoors, identity checks, and documentation simply to communicate online, these decentralized alternatives represent the future of digital freedom. Their strength and resilience depend directly on collective adoption: running nodes, hosting relay services, and contributing to open-source development.

The moment to act is now

Privacy isn’t about hiding; it’s about autonomy. Decentralized technologies aren’t mere ideals. They’re practical tools for reclaiming power online. The more widely adopted these tools become, the more robust and resistant they are to centralized control. Let’s actively build, support, and embrace decentralized, encrypted alternatives, and reclaim the internet while we still have the chance.

 

Yours in privacy,
Naomi

Naomi Brockwell is a privacy advocacy and professional speaker, MC, interviewer, producer, podcaster, specialising in blockchain, cryptocurrency and economics. She runs the NBTV channel on Rumble.

OpenAI launches GPT-5 – Here are the new features in the latest ChatGPT model

The future of AI

Published 8 August 2025
– By Editorial Staff
"GPT-5 is the first time that it really feels like talking to an expert in any topic, like a PhD-level expert", claims CEO Sam Altman during the company's presentation of the new model.
2 minute read

OpenAI released its new flagship model GPT-5 on Thursday, which is now available free of charge to all users of the ChatGPT chatbot service. The American AI giant claims that the new model is “the best in the world” and takes a significant step toward developing artificial intelligence that can perform better than humans in most economically valuable work tasks.

GPT-5 differs from previous versions by combining fast responses with advanced problem-solving capabilities. While previous AI chatbots could primarily provide smart answers to questions, GPT-5 can perform complex tasks for users – such as creating software applications, navigating calendars, or compiling research reports, writes TechCrunch.

— Having something like GPT-5 would be pretty much unimaginable at any previous time in history, said OpenAI CEO Sam Altman during a press conference.

Better than competitors

According to OpenAI, GPT-5 performs somewhat better than competing AI models from companies like Anthropic, Google DeepMind, and Elon Musk’s xAI on several important tests. In programming, the model achieves 74.9 percent on real coding tasks, which marginally beats Anthropic’s latest model Claude Opus 4.1, which reached 74.5 percent.

A particularly important improvement is that GPT-5 “hallucinates” – that is, makes up incorrect information – significantly less than previous models. When tested on health-related questions, the model gives incorrect answers only 1.6 percent of the time, compared to over 12 percent for OpenAI’s previous models.

This is particularly relevant since millions of people use AI chatbots to get health advice, despite them not replacing professional doctors.

New features and pricing models

The company has also simplified the user experience. Instead of users having to choose the right settings, GPT-5 has an automatic router that determines how it should best respond – either quickly or by “thinking through” the answer more thoroughly.

ChatGPT also gets four new personalities that users can choose between: Cynic, Robot, Listener, and Nerd. These customize how the model responds without users needing to specify it in each request.

For developers, GPT-5 is launched in three sizes via OpenAI’s programming interface, with the base model priced at €1.15 per million input words and €9.20 per million generated words.

The launch comes after an intense week for OpenAI, which also released an open AI model that developers can download for free. ChatGPT has grown to become one of the world’s most popular consumer products with over 700 million users every week – nearly 10 percent of the world’s population.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.