Wednesday, August 13, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

8 Ways to Fight for Privacy Today

Mass surveillance

How you can make an impact.

Published 19 December 2024
– By Naomi Brockwell
We do not yield to the mass surveillance machine.
5 minute read

Last week, we published the Priv/Acc Manifesto, and I was deeply moved by the outpouring of responses from people eager to take action. So many of you reached out, asking, “How can I help?”

The threat to privacy is obvious—relentless surveillance from governments, corporations, and bad actors alike. Countless bills trying to ban end-to-end encryption and mandate back doors. A sea of complacency from people who have been tricked into thinking privacy is about hiding, instead of about consent.

But the path to meaningful action isn’t always clear.

The good news is that everyone, regardless of background, has a role to play in safeguarding privacy. Whether you’re a coder building better tools, an educator raising awareness, an advocate pushing for change, or simply someone who values personal freedom, there are practical steps you can take to make a difference.

In this newsletter, I want to share some of the ways you can contribute to this critical fight.

#1 Lead by example

The easiest way to contribute is by making deliberate choices about the products and services you use. Switching to privacy-respecting tools not only protects your data, but also sends a powerful market signal that privacy matters. When you choose privacy-focused companies, you help them thrive, fostering the development of even better tools. On the flip side, continuing to use platforms that harvest our data undermines privacy-focused alternatives, pushing them out of the market.

Here are a handful of my favorite tools, but our channel features hundreds of videos showcasing great alternatives you can explore:

  • Messaging: Signal
  • Web Browsing: Brave Browser
  • VPNs: Mullvad VPN
  • Email: ProtonMail and Tutanota
  • Productivity: CryptPad and LibreOffice

#2 Push Back Against Cultural Norms

The phrase “I have nothing to hide” has become a lazy justification for dismissing privacy. It’s time to reframe the conversation. Privacy isn’t about secrecy – it’s about consent. It’s about having the right to choose who gets access to our data and rejecting the idea that valuing privacy is something to be ashamed of.

Privacy protects whistleblowers, activists, and everyday individuals from surveillance and coercion. When someone parrots “nothing to hide,” remind them that privacy safeguards freedom, creativity, and autonomy. Changing this mindset is essential to making privacy a societal priority.

#3 User Manuals and Educational Awareness

You don’t need to be technical to make a huge impact. Writing clear, accessible guides for privacy tools is one of the most valuable ways to help. Blogs with beginner-friendly tutorials or personal experiences using privacy tools contribute to a growing reservoir of educational material for the community. Translating tutorials into other languages can expand their reach even further.

Even super simple tutorials—like explaining that Gmail can read your emails—can be eye-opening for many people. Education is a powerful way to build awareness, and your efforts might help someone take their first step toward reclaiming their privacy.

#4 Contribute to Open-Source Projects

For those with technical expertise, contributing to open-source privacy projects is one of the most effective ways to support the cause. Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) tools like TorGrapheneOS, and VeraCrypt are essential for people worldwide, but these projects are often critically underfunded and under-resourced.

Developers can help by building features or fixing bugs, while researchers can perform security audits to identify vulnerabilities. Remember the Heartbleed vulnerability? It was a major flaw in SSL, a cornerstone of internet security, that went undetected for years—illustrating the need for more eyes on open-source projects. Even small contributions, like reviewing code, can make a huge difference.

#5 Test Privacy Tools and Provide Feedback

For privacy tools to succeed, they need to be user-friendly and accessible to everyone—not just tech enthusiasts. By testing privacy platforms and sharing constructive feedback, you can help developers improve default settings and refine the overall user experience (UX). These small adjustments can make tools more intuitive, significantly boosting adoption among non-technical users.

Even if you’re not a coder, your contributions—like testing tools, reporting bugs, or improving documentation—are invaluable to open-source projects. Developers rely on user input to ensure their tools work for everyone, making your efforts critical to advancing privacy.

#6 Financial Support

Financial support is vital for building a robust ecosystem of privacy tools. Many open-source projects rely on donations to survive, and businesses building privacy tools need customers to remain sustainable. FOSS ensures that privacy tools are accessible to everyone, but if you can afford to donate or pay for premium versions, your support keeps these tools available for those who need them most.

#7 Drive Change From Within

If you work for a tech company, advocate for privacy-by-design principles—embedding privacy into products from the ground up. Push for policies like data minimization and transparency, or encourage your organization to invest in privacy research. Cutting-edge technologies like zero-knowledge proofs and homomorphic encryption are redefining what’s possible in privacy-preserving data analysis. Supporting innovation in these areas can have a profound impact on the future of privacy.

#8 Engage in Policy Advocacy

Governments frequently pass laws regulating technology without fully understanding their implications. Your voice can make a difference by shaping these policies to prevent harmful consequences. Push back against attempts to ban privacy tools or mandate backdoors, ensuring that the most vulnerable in society always have a way to protect themselves.

Supporting organizations like the EFF or other advocacy groups is another great way to get involved. These groups lobby for digital rights, educate the public, and fight back against policies that fuel the surveillance state. Together, we can help ensure that privacy remains a fundamental right.

The Power of Community

Privacy advocacy is about more than safeguarding our own information—it’s about defending the fundamental rights that underpin a free and just society. It ensures that those on the front lines—whistleblowers, activists, journalists, and others fighting for change—are equipped with the protection they need to carry out their vital work.

Every time you choose a privacy-respecting tool, educate someone about the importance of privacy, or contribute to an open-source project, you’re strengthening the movement.

Privacy isn’t about having something to hide—it’s about having the freedom to live, think, and act without fear or surveillance. It’s the foundation of creativity, dissent, and progress. Together, we can protect this essential right and ensure a future where privacy empowers us all.

Thanks for being part of this movement, everyone. This week I’m truly thankful and grateful to every one of you.

 

Yours in privacy,
Naomi

Naomi Brockwell is a privacy advocacy and professional speaker, MC, interviewer, producer, podcaster, specialising in blockchain, cryptocurrency and economics. She runs the NBTV channel on Rumble.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Facebook’s insidious surveillance: VPN app spied on users

Mass surveillance

Published 9 August 2025
– By Editorial Staff
2 minute read

In 2013, Facebook acquired the Israeli company Onavo for approximately 120 million dollars. Onavo was marketed as a VPN app that would protect users’ data, reduce mobile usage, and secure online activities. Over 33 million people downloaded the app believing it would strengthen their privacy.

In reality, Onavo gave Facebook complete insight into users’ phones – including which apps were used, how long they were open, and which websites were visited.

According to court documents and regulatory authorities, Facebook used this data to identify trends and map potential competitors. By analyzing user patterns in apps like Houseparty, YouTube, Amazon, and Snapchat, the company could determine which platforms posed a threat to its market dominance.

When Snapchat’s popularity began to explode in 2016, Facebook encountered a problem: encrypted traffic prevented insight into users’ behavior, reports Business Today. To circumvent this, Facebook launched an internal operation called “Project Ghostbusters”.

Facebook engineers developed specially adapted code based on Onavo’s infrastructure. The app installed a so-called root certificate on users’ phones – consent was hidden in legal documentation – which enabled Facebook to create fake certificates that mimicked Snapchat’s servers.

This made it possible to decrypt and analyze Snapchat’s traffic internally. The purpose was to use the information as a basis for strategic decisions, product development, or potential acquisitions.

Snapchat said no – Facebook copied instead

Based on data from Onavo, Facebook offered to buy Snapchat for 3 billion dollars. When Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel declined, Facebook responded by launching Instagram Stories – a direct copy of Snapchat’s most popular feature. This became a decisive move in the competition between the two platforms.

In 2018, Apple removed Onavo from the App Store, citing that the app violated the company’s data protection rules. Facebook responded by launching a new app: Facebook Research, internally called Project Atlas, which offered similar surveillance functions. This time, the company paid users – some as young as 13 – up to 20 dollars per month to install the app.

When Apple discovered this, the company acted forcefully and revoked Facebook’s enterprise development certificates. This meant that all internal iOS apps were temporarily stopped – one of Apple’s most far-reaching measures ever.

In 2020, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) sued Facebook, now called Meta, for misleading users with false promises about privacy. In 2023, Meta’s subsidiaries were fined a total of 20 million Australian dollars (approximately €11 million) for misleading behavior.

Why it still matters

Business Insider emphasizes that the Onavo story is not just about a misleading app. It also illustrates how one of the world’s most powerful tech companies built a surveillance system disguised as a privacy tool.

The fact that Facebook used the data to map competitors, copy features, and maintain control over the social media market – and also targeted underage users for data collection – raises additional ethical questions.

“Even a decade later, Onavo remains a case study in how ‘data is power’ and how far companies are willing to go to get it”, the publication concludes.

Amazon acquires AI company that records everything you say

Mass surveillance

Published 27 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
3 minute read

Tech giant Amazon has acquired the Swedish AI company Bee, which develops wearable devices that continuously record users’ conversations. The deal signals Amazon’s ambitions to expand within AI-driven hardware beyond its voice-controlled home assistants.

The acquisition was confirmed by Bee founder Maria de Lourdes Zollo in a LinkedIn post, while Amazon told tech site TechCrunch that the deal has not yet been completed. Bee employees have been offered positions within Amazon.

AI wristband that listens constantly

Bee, which raised €6.4 million in venture capital last year, manufactures both a standalone wristband similar to Fitbit and an Apple Watch app. The product costs €46 (approximately $50) plus a monthly subscription of €17 ($18).

The device records everything it hears – unless the user manually turns it off – with the goal of listening to conversations to create reminders and to-do lists. According to the company’s website, they want “everyone to have access to a personal, ambient intelligence that feels less like a tool and more like a trusted companion.”

Bee has previously expressed plans to create a “cloud phone” that mirrors the user’s phone and gives the device access to accounts and notifications, which would enable reminders about events or sending messages.

Competitors struggle in the market

Other companies like Rabbit and Humane AI have tried to create similar AI-driven wearable devices but so far without major success. However, Bee’s device is significantly more affordable than competitors’ – the Humane AI Pin cost €458 – making it more accessible to curious consumers who don’t want to make a large financial investment.

The acquisition marks Amazon’s interest in wearable AI devices, a different direction from the company’s voice-controlled home assistants like Echo speakers. Meanwhile, ChatGPT creator OpenAI is working on its own AI hardware, while Meta is integrating its AI into smart glasses and Apple is rumored to be working on the same thing.

Privacy concerns remain

Products that continuously record the environment carry significant security and privacy risks. Different companies have varying policies for how voice recordings are processed, stored, and used for AI training.

In its current privacy policy, Bee says users can delete their data at any time and that audio recordings are not saved, stored, or used for AI training. However, the app does store data that the AI learns about the user, which is necessary for the assistant function.

Bee has previously indicated plans to only record voices from people who have verbally given consent. The company is also working on a feature that lets users define boundaries – both based on topic and location – that automatically pause the device’s learning. They also plan to build AI processing directly into the device, which generally involves fewer privacy risks than cloud-based data processing.

However, it’s unclear whether these policies will change when Bee is integrated into Amazon. Amazon has previously had mixed results when it comes to handling user data from customers’ devices.

The company has shared video clips with law enforcement from people’s Ring security cameras without the owner’s consent or court order. Ring also reached a settlement in 2023 with the Federal Trade Commission after allegations that employees and contractors had broad and unrestricted access to customers’ video recordings.

Now you’re forced to pay for Facebook or be tracked by Meta

Mass surveillance

Published 22 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
2 minute read

Social media giant Meta is now implementing its criticized “pay or be tracked” model for Swedish users. Starting Thursday, Facebook users in Sweden and some other EU-countries are forced to choose between paying €7 per month for an ad-free experience or accepting extensive data collection. Meanwhile, the company faces daily fines from the EU if the model isn’t changed.

Swedish Facebook users have been greeted since Thursday morning with a new choice when logging into the platform. A message informs them that “you must make a choice to use Facebook” and explains that users “have a legal right to choose whether you want to consent to us processing your personal data to show you ads.”

Screenshot from Facebook.

The choice is between two alternatives: either pay €7 monthly for an ad-free Facebook account where personal data isn’t processed for advertising, or consent to Meta collecting and using personal data for targeted ads.

As a third alternative, “less personalized ads” is offered, which means Meta uses somewhat less personal data for advertising purposes.

Screenshot from Facebook.

Background in EU legislation

The introduction of the payment model comes after the European Commission in March launched investigations of Meta along with Apple and Google for suspected violations of the DMA (Digital Markets Act). For Meta’s part, the investigation specifically concerns the new payment model.

In April, Meta was fined under DMA legislation and ordered to pay €200 million in fines because the payment model was not considered to meet legal requirements. Meta has appealed the decision.

According to reports from Reuters at the end of June, the social media giant now risks daily penalties if the company doesn’t make necessary changes to its payment model to comply with EU regulations.

The new model represents Meta’s attempt to adapt to stricter European data legislation while the company tries to maintain its advertising revenue through the alternative payment route.

RFK Jr wants health trackers on every American within four years

Mass surveillance

Published 26 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
"We think that wearables are a key to the MAHA agenda", Kennedy claims.
3 minute read

US Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has presented a plan for all Americans to wear body-monitoring technology that tracks their health in real time.

The measure is described as a crucial part of the national initiative MAHA – Make America Healthy Again – which aims to reverse America’s widespread public health crisis using modern technology.

During a hearing before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Tuesday, Kennedy revealed that the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will launch one of its most extensive campaigns ever – to get Americans to wear so-called wearables, body-worn technology that collects health data around the clock.

– We’re about to launch the biggest advertising campaign in HHS history to encourage Americans to use wearables, Kennedy said.

Products mentioned in the initiative include FitBit, Oura Ring, and Apple Watch – popular devices that can measure heart rate, movement, sleep, and in some cases even blood glucose.

– It’s a way people can take control over their own health. They can take responsibility. They can see, as you know, what food is doing to their glucose levels, their heart rates, and a number of other metrics, as they eat it, he explained in a statement also published on the X platform.

“Key to the MAHA agenda”

Kennedy emphasized that he sees the technology as a crucial part of his vision:

– We think that wearables are a key to the MAHA agenda of making America healthy again and my vision is that every American is wearing a wearable in four years.

The Secretary, who belongs to the influential Kennedy family, often emphasizes individual responsibility for health but also links the issue to national security. During his Senate hearing, he described America’s obesity epidemic which now affects about 40 percent of the population as a threat to military readiness.

“Reduce global metabolic suffering”

One of the leading advocates for this type of technology is also President Trump’s nominee for Surgeon General, Dr. Casey Means. She is co-founder of Levels, a company that develops and sells Continuous Glucose Monitors (CGM) sensors attached directly to the skin that send blood glucose values to an app in real time.

Means claims in a blog post that “these small plastic discs” can “reduce global metabolic suffering” and provide much-needed help to the “93.2 percent of people” suffering from metabolic issues.

The food industry is also affected by MAHA. Kennedy recently revealed that Starbucks will make changes to its menu in line with the agenda – even though the company already avoids several common additives such as artificial colors, flavors, and high-fructose corn syrup.

Earlier this year, Kennedy implemented a ban on artificial colors in U.S. food production one of his first major interventions as Secretary. Critics have questioned both methods and priorities in the MAHA policy, but Kennedy sees it as a first step toward a healthier and more responsible nation.

Concerns about mass surveillance

The use of wearable health technology has raised questions about users’ right to privacy. Most health trackers collect large amounts of sensitive information including heart rate, sleep patterns, movement, and blood glucose levels stored in apps connected to companies.

Critics argue that there is a lack of clear transparency in how this data is used, shared, or sold, and that state-encouraged collection of health data risks blurring the line between voluntary health monitoring and systematic surveillance.

While Kennedy emphasizes voluntariness, some analysts warn that large-scale campaigns and technology adaptations by major companies may create indirect pressure to participate.

As more institutions such as employers, schools, or businesses adapt to health tracking, there is a risk that those who opt out may be seen as deviant, receive worse conditions, or be excluded from parts of society.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.