Thursday, April 17, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Russian court fines Google 20 quintillion dollars

Published 1 November 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Google's parent company reported a profit of about $170 billion last year.

A Russian court has ordered Google to pay the equivalent of $20 quintillion in fines after the internet giant blocked 17 Russian news channels from its YouTube platform.

In numbers, it’s $20,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 – and the fine is doubling every week.

In 2020, Google was initially sentenced to pay 100,000 rubles a day until it stopped censoring Russian news channels, but then after more media were censored, it was also decided that the fine would be doubled every week, without any upper limit – which is why the fine is so high today, Russian RBC reports.

According to the court, Google will have to pay a fine of 40 quintillion dollars in a week, and by the end of the year it will be more than five sextillion dollars (5,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000).

Although Google is one of the world’s richest companies, its parent company Alphabet “only” made around USD 170 billion in profits last year and paying the fine is therefore considered a practical impossibility, should Google agree to comply with the court’s decision.

World GDP – a drop in the ocean

By comparison, the World Bank estimates that the world’s total GDP is around $100 trillion – which is nowhere near enough money to pay Google’s fine.

Google’s parent company Alphabet has previously said it does not “believe these ongoing legal matters will have a material adverse effect” on the company’s business.

However, in August, Google filed lawsuits in US and UK courts against Russian RT, Tsargrad and Spas seeking to prohibit them from initiating legal proceedings in foreign jurisdictions based on the Moscow court’s decision, RT reports.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

UK Supreme Court: Womanhood is something one is born into

The LGBT lobby

Published today 9:03
– By Editorial Staff
Many British women consider the court's decision a great victory.

The UK Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that the term “woman” in the country’s equality legislation refers to biological sex and nothing else.

The ruling rejects the Scottish Government’s interpretation, which included trans women in the definition and quotas for biological men who have “changed sex” as women in the workplace.

A panel of five judges, led by Justice Patrick Hodge, ruled that the words “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act refer to a biological woman and biological sex.

The ruling means, among other things, that transgender people should not be counted as women for the purposes of the Equality Act’s quotas although the court was careful to emphasize that they should continue to be protected from discrimination on the basis of their gender identity.

The case stems from a 2018 Scottish law requiring public authorities in Scotland to have at least 50% women on their boards. According to the Scottish Government’s interpretation, trans women were included in this quota. However, the women’s rights group For Women Scotland (FWS) disputed this, arguing that the definition of woman cannot be extended beyond biological sex.

“Refers to reality –  not to paperwork”

An early court ruling in 2022 was appealed to the Supreme Court, which has now agreed with FWS.

Maya Forstater of the group Sex Matters considers the ruling a “great victory”:

– The court has given us the right answer: the protected characteristic of sex – male and female – refers to reality, not to paperwork, she says.

FWS director Trina Budge previously warned that a broader interpretation of gender risks filling quotas with “50% men, and 50% men with certificates”, which would undermine the purpose of the law.

Supported by J.K. Rowling

The group also highlighted that transgender access to women’s toilets, women’s prisons and women’s wards in hospitals can have very negative consequences and create insecurity.

FWS lawyer Aidan O’Neill argued during the trial that gender must be understood in law as a “expression of one’s bodily reality. It is an immutable biological state”.

For Women Scotland has received support from well-known author J.K. Rowling, who has reportedly donated hundreds of thousands of pounds to the group. Rowling has long argued in the past that it is unreasonable for trans women’s rights to be at the expense of biological women.

However, not everyone is applauding the ruling on the contrary, the human rights organization Amnesty International is highly critical and claims that transgender people now risk having their human rights violated.

US tightens visa controls – social media to be scrutinized

Published yesterday 10:38
– By Editorial Staff
Anyone who has expressed support for any of Israel's enemies is expected to be denied entry to the United States.

The U.S. will begin denying visas based on the content of applicants’ social media – including posts, shares, and messages that express support for what are considered anti-Semitic messages, for example.

The country’s immigration agency, USCIS, will begin reviewing social media for all immigrants applying for lawful permanent residence, work authorization, visas, as well as foreign students and people affiliated with educational institutions.

What will be looked for are, for example, posts or messages supporting groups labeled terrorist in the United States, such as Hamas, Hezbollah in Lebanon or the Houthi movement in Yemen. Anti-Semitic messages are also included and will constitute “negative factors” when deciding on a visa or residence permit.

– There is no room in the United States for the rest of the world’s terrorist sympathizers, and we are under no obligation to admit them or let them stay here, said Tricia McLaughlin, Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at DHS, in a press release.

The proposal has raised concerns among immigration and free speech advocates because it could also affect people already in the country legally not just those applying for entry. Critics also point out that it is unclear how “anti-Semitism”, for example, should be defined, and there is concern that virtually all criticism of Israel will be rejected.

According to AP News, social media monitoring by immigration authorities has been going on for over a decade, starting under the Obama administration and expanding during Donald Trump’s first term.

Trump: Deport American criminals to El Salvador

Donald Trump's USA

Published 15 April 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Trump wants to get rid of America's worst criminals - but there are doubts about its constitutionality.

Donald Trump wants to review the possibility of deporting the country’s worst violent criminals to El Salvador – even if they are US citizens.

We also have homegrown criminals that are absolute monsters”, the President said during a press conference, stressing that the law must be reviewed.

It was during a White House meeting with El Salvador’s outspoken president, Nayib Bukele, that Trump declared that he wanted to deport not only foreign criminals to the country but also American criminals.

– We always have to obey the laws, but we also have homegrown criminals that push people into subways, that hit elderly ladies on the back of the head with a baseball bat when they’re not looking, that are absolute monsters, he explained.

– I’d like to include them in the group of people to get them out of the country, but you’ll have to be looking at the laws on that, the President continued.

During his election campaign, Donald Trump promised to use unorthodox methods and get tough on the widespread violent crime in the country but the move has nevertheless led to strong reactions and a lot of criticism.

“No provision under US law”

Many critics point out that, as a rule, US citizens cannot be deported and that there are only a few exceptions to this rule. These include people born in other countries who have been granted citizenship but lied during their application process or committed terrorist crimes or treason.

– There is no provision under US law that would allow the government to kick citizens out of the country, Erin Corcoran, an immigration law expert at the University of Notre Dame, told the AP news agency.

The civil rights organization ACLU is also highly critical and believes that deportation of American citizens would be a direct attack on the US Constitution.

Sent to mega prison

However, Trump has emphasized that his proposal will only be implemented if it is deemed compatible with the country’s laws. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt later explained that the move should be seen as a proposal that has been “raised but not yet decided. According to analysts, the Constitution must first be revised if deportations of US citizens are to become a reality.

The background to the president’s statement is that Nayib Bukele during a previous meeting opened up to receive American prisoners an idea that Trump praised and said he “loved”.

Already today, the United States is sending hundreds of migrants with suspected criminal links to El Salvador’s controversial mega prison, the Terrorism Confinement Center, under a contract in which the US pays the country $6 million for their detention.

Israeli Defense Minister: “Will carry out Trump’s vision for Gaza”

Published 15 April 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Israel's defense minister, Israel Katz, says it is pursuing Trump's vision of clearing Gaza of Palestinians.

Israel’s Defense Minister, Israel Katz, has announced that Israel is further intensifying its military operations in Gaza with the aim of realizing Donald Trump’s controversial plan for the territory, which calls for the US to take over Gaza and relocate its population.

After the IDF took over the Morag corridor between Rafah and Khan Younis in southern Gaza, Defense Minister Israel Katz is now calling on Palestinians to remove Hamas and release all hostages, before the military operation is expanded in the Gaza Strip, The Jerusalem Post reports.

– This is the final moment to remove Hamas and release the hostages and bring about an end to the war, Katz said in a statement.

Katz also stated that Israel will implement Trump’s Gaza plan, which was launched in February. The plan calls for the US to take over Gaza and relocate its population to other countries.

– Those interested will also be able to voluntarily move to various countries around the world, in accordance with the vision of the US president, which we are working to carry out, says Katz.

Donald Trump has previously suggested that Gaza should be emptied of Palestinians and turned into a coastal city under US supervision. The plan has been strongly criticized internationally as a project of ethnic cleansing in violation of international law.

Beyond the Morag corridor in southern Gaza, the IDF claims that the town of Rafah is now surrounded by the Israeli military. Israel currently claims to control around 50% of the Gaza Strip.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.