In a hidden recording, Fox News producer Sean Langille says that the channel’s popular anchor Tucker Carlson was indeed fired from the network as part of a legal settlement with the vote counting company Dominion.
He also says that Fox’s owner family Murdoch was unhappy that Tucker Carlson highlighted information that the FBI was involved in the storming of the Capitol – as well as the fact that the channel is financed by the pharmaceutical giants and the big tech companies.
News anchor and commentator Tucker Carlson suddenly left Fox News less than a week after the network reached a $787.5 million settlement with Dominion Voting Systems, which had sued Fox in a $1.6 billion defamation case related to its coverage of the 2020 presidential election.
An O’Keefe Media Group journalist has now managed to record Fox News producer Sean Langille admitting that Carlson was fired as part of the settlement.
– They gave them [Dominion] money. They say it wasn’t part of it. But we’re learning that, Tucker getting fired was part of that.
– Yeah, he was ousted. Well, he brought up things that cost the company a lot of money…That, that was part of it. He was going to go after this whole thing about January 6 was… It was an inside job. He went after this guy Ray Epps, he said he was an FBI agent on the inside…. And basically encouraged it. He was going to go on the air and refute what that guy said on 60 Minutes.
OMG EXCLUSIVE FOX INSIDER TELL ALL; Says Tucker Termination was Part of Dominion Settlement
Discusses "shady" work of "friend," former Biden operative Mike LaRosa now working for Dominion
“When it’s corporate media you’re beholden to advertisers… we take money from Pfizer" pic.twitter.com/6Gpj2Qqj97
However, he doesn’t think the network will lose money in the long term from Carlson’s firing – because wealthy advertisers will be more willing to pay for advertising once Tucker Carlson is gone.
– It’s Big Pharma. Which is crazy because we would do all the stuff about COVID vaccines—and we’re getting money from Pfizer… Big Pharma, Big Tech.
Langille berättar vidare att hans vän – presidenthustrun Jill Bidens tidigare talesman Michael LaRosa, lämnade Biden-administrationen för att börja arbeta åt en PR-firma vars främsta klient var just Dominion Voting Systems – och pekar på att Dominion i och med detta faktiskt har en tät koppling till Vita huset.
– He left the White House to literally go take down the news outlet that was being unfavorable to his boss.
– He’s the one who’s crafting Dominion’s message to the public… But no one’s picking up on the fact that here’s someone who… worked in the administration… working with a voting company to take down Fox News…
The O'Keefe Media Group was established on March 15, 2023 by James O'Keefe, founder and former head of the investigative journalism group Project Veritas.
James O'Keefe left Project Veritas in February of this year after a dispute with the board of directors in which he was accused, among other things, of "financial malfeasance" and of using donations and funds raised for private consumption and the purchase of luxury products.
TNT is truly independent!
We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.
Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…
The US is phasing out its military security support programs for European countries on the border with Russia. The decision is part of President Donald Trump’s stated strategy to make Europe take greater responsibility for its own defense.
Pentagon representatives informed European diplomats last week that the Americans will no longer finance programs that train and equip soldiers in several Eastern European countries.
The current program, known as “section 333”, has a global budget of over one billion dollars and the cuts are expected to eliminate military support worth hundreds of millions of dollars to countries on Russia’s border.
Between 2018 and 2022, 1.6 billion dollars from the program went to Europe. The main recipients have been the Baltic states of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Already approved funds remain until September 2026, but the Trump administration has not requested new appropriations.
“Europe must take more responsibility”
A White House official tells the Financial Times that the decision aligns with Trump’s ambitions to “reassess and redistribute” foreign aid.
— This action has been co-ordinated with European countries in line with the executive order and the president’s long-standing emphasis on ensuring Europe takes more responsibility for its own defense.
Under pressure from the Trump administration, Europe’s NATO countries also agreed in June to aim to increase their defense spending to 5 percent of GDP.
Several European governments were surprised by the announcement and are now trying to get more information from Washington, according to diplomats with insight into the discussions.
— If they are being brutal then it will have big implications, says one diplomat, adding that the military alliance will definitely be affected since parts of the funding are channeled through the alliance.
— It’s causing a lot of concern and uncertainty, states another diplomat.
Increased presence in Poland?
Senator Jeanne Shaheen, leading Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, is very upset about the announcement and describes the cuts as a “misguided move that sends exactly the wrong signal as we try to force Putin to the negotiating table and deter Russian aggression”.
The future of the Baltic Security Initiative, created in 2020 to strengthen NATO countries in the Baltic region, is also uncertain. The White House has not requested continued funding for the program in next year’s budget.
— The loss of US security assistance would be very tough for the Baltic states. The whole idea here is making them capable of defending themselves, argues retired Admiral Mark Montgomery at the think tank Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.
While the administration reviews US troop deployments worldwide, Trump assured Polish President Karol Nawrocki on Wednesday that American troops will remain in Poland going forward.
— I am very pleased with the arrangement. We’ll put more there if they want, Trump said about the approximately 10,000 American soldiers stationed in Poland.
The US state of Florida is planning to remove vaccine requirements for attending school. Florida’s Surgeon General, Joseph Ladapo, argues that it is “slavery” to force parents to have their children injected.
In the United States, vaccines are required for children attending school, with requirements varying from state to state, but often including vaccines against diseases such as measles and polio. Ladapo said during a press conference on Wednesday that the state now plans to work toward removing all vaccine requirements for schoolchildren in Florida.
— Every last one of them is wrong and drips with disdain and slavery, he says according to NBC News.
The Surgeon General points out that parents should have the right to decide for themselves and that forcing vaccination is “immoral”.
— Who am I to tell you what your child should put in their body? I don’t have that right.
“Absolutely frightening”
Other doctors and health experts, however, criticize Ladapo’s statement and argue that there will be a greater risk for children to become ill.
— The idea that children would be allowed to go to school unvaccinated is absolutely frightening, says Dr. Richard Besser, former acting director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
It is unclear when the vaccine requirements are planned to be abolished, but Ladapo says that Florida’s Department of Health will collaborate with the governor to implement the plan.
For the first time in 66 years, the leaders of China, Russia and North Korea gathered in Beijing.
The extensive military parade marked the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with over 100 new domestically produced weapons systems – including nuclear missiles, hypersonic weapons and unmanned vehicles.
China conducted its second-ever military parade on Wednesday to mark Victory Day – 80 years after the end of World War II. The massive display at Tiananmen Square in Beijing became a demonstration of power where Chinese President Xi Jinping received 26 world leaders, including Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un.
The parade, witnessed by 50,000 spectators and 10,000 participating soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army, Navy and Air Force, marked the first time in 66 years that the leaders of China, Russia and North Korea gathered in Beijing. The last time this occurred was in 1959, during perhaps the most tense period of the Cold War.
Dressed in a gray Mao suit, Xi Jinping spoke from the Gate of Heavenly Peace. He focused on China’s victory over “Japanese aggression” in what he called the “global anti-fascist war”, but chose not to mention the United States by name despite the country’s decisive role in the war’s final stages.
— Humanity is again faced with a choice of peace or war, dialogue or confrontation, and win-win outcomes or zero-sum games, Xi declared and continued:
— The Chinese people will stand firmly on the right side of history and on the side of human progress, adhere to the path of peaceful development, and join hands with the rest of the world to build a community with a shared future for humanity.
Photo: Kremlin/CC BY 4.0
Nuclear arsenal in focus
Al Jazeera correspondent Katrina Yu emphasized the historical significance of the speech from Beijing:
— It really is difficult to understate how much of this is a part of the national psyche, the psyche of the Communist Party that, in the previous 100 years, China was repressed, invaded and humiliated by foreign forces.
Over 100 types of domestically produced weapons rolled along Chang’an Avenue. Particular attention was given to the new nuclear-capable missiles. For the first time, submarine-based JL-3 missiles were also displayed, whose extended range theoretically allows the entire US mainland to be reached from the South China Sea without submarines needing to advance into the Pacific Ocean.
The new intercontinental ballistic missile DF-61 also made its debut. It is estimated to be over 20 meters long with a range exceeding 12,000 kilometers. Additionally, the DF-5C was presented, which may have a range over 20,000 kilometers, carry ten nuclear warheads and reach speeds over Mach 10.
The hypersonic missile YJ-21, called the “carrier killer”, was also presented. The weapon is said to be able to strike aircraft carriers at Mach 10 – ten times the speed of sound – at a distance of 2,000 kilometers.
Trump’s sarcastic reaction
US President Donald Trump reacted to the parade with a sarcastic post on Truth Social:
“The big question to be answered is whether or not President Xi of China will mention the massive amount of support and ‘blood’ that The United States of America gave to China in order to help it to secure its FREEDOM from a very unfriendly foreign invader”, he wrote and continued:
“Many Americans died in China’s quest for Victory and Glory… May President Xi and the wonderful people of China have a great and lasting day of celebration. Please give my warmest regards to Vladimir Putin, and Kim Jong Un, as you conspire against The United States of America”.
Photo: screenshot/Trump/Truth Social
The Kremlin later commented on Trump’s statement and briefly explained that “no one even had this in their thoughts”.
New warfare technology presented
During the parade, China showcased its investment in modern warfare technology. Unmanned surface vessels (USV), underwater drones and unmanned aerial vehicles were presented alongside the new LY-1 laser system for shooting down drones and missiles. According to China, the new HQ-29 air defense system can defend against hypersonic missiles – a claim that has yet to be verified.
“For Xi, the point is to reinforce the impression that the People’s Republic of China has arrived as a great power under his leadership. Another is the array of leaders at the parade, which suggests that the PRC cannot be isolated, and is unafraid of pressure and bullying, particularly from the United States”, comments Ian Chong, political scientist at the National University of Singapore.
Above the parade, the air force conducted flyovers with helicopters carrying banners with messages such as “Justice will prevail”, “Peace will prevail” and “The people will win”.
US deploys missile systems
China declared that all of the more than 100 weapon types displayed were domestically produced. Despite the Chinese economy slowing down, the country’s defense spending has increased by more than 7 percent for four consecutive years and now amounts to approximately 4.2 times Japan’s defense budget. The military balance in the region has thus shifted markedly and China is gaining increasingly greater military influence.
Unmanned watercraft on display. Photo: Xinhua
Parallel to this development, the US and Japan are conducting extensive military exercises together. The US Army will for the first time deploy its medium-range missile system Typhon in Japan during the Resolute Dragon 25 exercise taking place September 11-25. Typhon can launch both Tomahawk and SM-6 missiles from land.
In July, the US placed two new weapons systems at its base in Okinawa: the MADIS air defense system and the NMESIS robot system that can combat ships. Both systems will also be used on Ishigaki Island during the Japanese-American exercise and military activities in the region are expected to intensify in coming years.
Modi abstained
Military parades on Victory Day are a relatively new phenomenon under Xi Jinping’s era – the first was held in 2015 to mark the 70th anniversary, and this year’s parade was thus only the second of its kind.
Despite friendly meetings with Xi Jinping and Putin during the SCO summit, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi chose to leave China before the military parade.
According to analysts, this was partly to avoid offending Japan, but also to signal that New Delhi certainly has strategic alternatives to the US but simultaneously remains concerned about maintaining its Western partnerships and cooperation.
Documents from the Epstein investigation have been requested from the US Department of Justice by the House Oversight Committee. In total, over 33,000 additional documents have been made public.
Since the Jeffrey Epstein scandal was exposed, there has been strong interest in gaining greater insight into the investigation, particularly since a number of well-known names have been linked to the convicted sex offender. Last year, federal judge Loretta A. Preska released classified lawsuit documents, where among others Prince Andrew is accused of having sexual relations with minors at orgies on several occasions.
During Donald Trump’s election campaign, he declared that more documents would be released if he became president, including Epstein’s “black book” with names of clients who he flew with his private jet, called “Lolita Express”, to his private island in the Caribbean. After being elected president, however, he chose to put a lid on it, something that upset Trump’s voter base. Both Democrats and Republicans in Congress have also demanded that the documents be released.
Democrats argued that Trump had broken his promise and he was accused of trying to cover up the investigation. To force the release of the documents, they therefore implemented “the rule of five”, which in short is a law that makes it possible to force federal agencies to release documents if five members of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs request it.
Full transparency
Now 33,000 documents from the investigation have been requested from the Department of Justice by the U.S. House Oversight Committee, reports CNN.
— We’re in the process of uploading those documents for full transparency so everyone in America can see those documents, says the committee chairman, Republican James Comer.
The primary reason is that they want transparency in the case. However, they note that 97 percent of the documents received from the Department of Justice were already public.
“There is no mention of any client list or anything that improves transparency or justice for victims”, says Democrat Robert Garcia, who sits on the committee.
It is unclear, however, whether the documents contain any new information.
