Thursday, June 12, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

X adds labeling to parody accounts

Published 13 January 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Example of what a labeling of accounts might look like.
1 minute read

Parody accounts on X will be labeled to distinguish them from other accounts. The label will be visible both on the account itself and on its posts.

The reason for labeling parody and satire profiles is said to be that users, including news presenters, have often mistaken posts from these accounts for authentic statements.

We’re rolling out profile labels for parody accounts to clearly distinguish these types of accounts and their content on our platform. We designed these labels to increase transparency and to ensure that users are not deceived into thinking such accounts belong to the entity being parodied”, one wrote in a post.

Currently, it is the responsibility of the account holders themselves to obtain the labels, but it will become mandatory in the future.

According to the company’s authenticity policy, impersonation of accounts is not allowed. However, the platform allows parody, comments and fan accounts, as long as they follow the platform’s rules.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Organic Maps – the map app that doesn’t map you

Advertising partnership with Teuton Systems

Tired of Google Maps tracking you? Here's the free alternative that lets you navigate completely offline!

Published today 11:57
Organic Maps allow you to navigate completely offline when you have poor coverage or are hiking in the wilderness, for example.
4 minute read

In our series on open, surveillance-free apps, we take a closer look at Organic Maps – a map app that stands out as a privacy-friendly alternative to Google Maps. For many smartphone users, Google Maps has become the standard for navigation, but that convenience comes at a price: extensive collection of location data and dependence on a constant internet connection. Organic Maps is a free, open-source app (FOSS) that takes a completely different approach. Here, you can navigate without being tracked and without being tied to an internet connection.

Unlike Google Maps, which is neither open source nor particularly privacy-friendly, Organic Maps is built on open source and created by a community. The source code is openly available, which means that independent developers can review and improve the app. Most importantly, Organic Maps does not contain any tracker features – it does not collect your personal information or location data at all.

The app also has no ads or hidden data collection services running in the background. You don’t need to log in or give away any information – privacy is a core principle. Thanks to the open code, users can trust that there are no ulterior motives; it’s all about providing maps and navigation, nothing else.

Works completely offline – everywhere

One of the biggest advantages of Organic Maps is that the app works completely offline. All map data is based on the community project OpenStreetMap, which covers the entire world. You choose which maps (countries or regions) you want to download to your phone, and then you can navigate freely without the internet. Unlike Google and Apple Maps – whose offline features are very limited and lack full search or navigation functionality outside of the network – Organic Maps offers 100% of its features without a connection.

Searching for addresses and places, viewing points of interest, and turn-by-turn voice guidance work just as well offline as online. This means you can use the app in airplane mode, abroad without roaming, or far out in the wilderness.

Sample screenshots from Organic Maps: An offline map of some nature reserves, navigation in night mode, menu for downloading maps, and menu for map layers.

Since Organic Maps is based on OpenStreetMap, you also get very detailed maps. The community updates the maps continuously with everything from new bike paths to small forest trails. For example, a technology writer noted that he has yet to encounter a hiking trail that is missing from Organic Maps’ maps – often there is information that large map services miss. This makes the app particularly popular among outdoor enthusiasts, but everyone benefits: even regular roads, addresses, and points of interest are extensively covered thanks to OpenStreetMap. In short, the offline map gives you the peace of mind that the map is always available, no matter where you are.

Battery-efficient navigation

Offline navigation not only gives you freedom from the mobile network – it also saves battery power. Organic Maps is remarkably energy efficient and uses minimal power compared to many other navigation services. Without constant data traffic, background tracking, or heavy advertising, the app can focus on what it’s supposed to do and nothing more. One reviewer says he used the app during several days of hiking without having to charge his phone.

The developers themselves claim that you can go on a week-long trip on a single charge with Organic Maps as your guide. For those who travel frequently or are simply tired of GPS draining their battery, this is a game-changer. Its energy efficiency also makes Organic Maps well suited for older or simpler smartphones that may have weaker batteries – the app is lightweight and resource-efficient.

Available for Android and iPhone

Despite its different philosophy, Organic Maps is as easy to get and use as any popular app. The app is available to download for free for both Android and iOS – you can find it in the Google Play Store and Apple’s App Store. For those who use completely Google-free phones (such as GrapheneOS on Matrix mobile), it is also available through alternative open app stores such as F-Droid.

The interface is intuitive and similar to other map apps, so the barrier to switching is low. You can search for addresses or businesses, bookmark your favorite places, and get turn-by-turn voice directions. All these features are available offline after you download the maps for the area you need. In short, you get a full-featured map service on your phone – but without the surveillance.

Pre-installed on the Matrix phone

Organic Maps has become a staple in privacy-focused circles. Teuton Systems pre-installs the app on its Matrix phone – a security-focused Android smartphone based on GrapheneOS – as part of a Google-free ecosystem. This gives users a map service that respects their privacy right from the start. But even if you don’t own a Matrix mobile phone, you can still easily enjoy the benefits. Replacing Google Maps with Organic Maps on your current phone is a step towards a more privacy-secure everyday life, without losing any functionality. The app is completely free and open for everyone to try.

Organic Maps exemplifies how free and open software can give us, the average user, more control. You don’t have to worry about being tracked when you look up an address or navigate to a destination, and you can trust that the app only does what it says it does. The combination of open source code, offline capability, and top-notch privacy has earned the app excellent recommendations in tech media.

For those who value their privacy – or just want a reliable map app that works everywhere – Organic Maps is an inspiring alternative that shows it’s possible to navigate freely without giving up your privacy!

 

Features of Organic Maps

The ultimate app for travelers, tourists, hikers and cyclists:

  • Detailed offline maps with locations not found on other maps, thanks to OpenStreetMap
  • Bike paths, hiking trails and walking routes
  • Contour lines, elevation profiles, peaks and slopes
  • Turn-by-turn navigation for walking, cycling and car navigation with voice guidance, Android Auto
  • Quick offline map search
  • Export and import bookmarks in KML/KMZ format, import GPX
  • Dark mode to protect your eyes
  • Countries and regions do not take up much space
  • Free and open source

Macron seeks to ban children from social media

Internet censorship

Published today 10:50
– By Editorial Staff
While most people agree that children need to be protected online, many worry about arbitrary censorship and lack of legal certainty.
3 minute read

French President Emmanuel Macron wants to ban social media for children under the age of 15. At the same time, the European Commission has stated that such decisions are a national matter.

Macron advocates an EU-wide age verification system, but the Commission believes that responsibility lies with individual member states.

The president’s statement came late on Tuesday in response to a tragic knife attack in a Paris suburb where a teacher’s assistant was stabbed to death by a 14-year-old student.

Macron, who has previously advocated a ban on social media for younger users, now raised the tone further and called on the EU and its member states to act quickly.

– I’m giving us a few months to achieve European mobilization. Otherwise, I will negotiate with the Europeans so that we can do it ourselves in France, said the president.

However, the EU Commission’s response was clear: it is up to the French authorities to decide on the issue.

– Let’s be clear… wide social media ban is not what the European Commission is doing. It’s not where we are heading to. Why? Because this is the prerogative of our member states, Commission spokesman Thomas Regnier told reporters yesterday.

Big problem in Denmark

According to the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), member states have the right to set their own minimum age for when social media platforms can process personal data, as long as it is above 13 years.

The GDPR is an EU law that regulates the handling of personal data and allows for national adaptations for example, data may be processed for younger users if their parents give their consent.

– Of course, member states can go for that option, Regnier continued.

But introducing such a ban is easier said than done. Technical challenges make it difficult to verify users’ ages. In Denmark, for example, almost half of all children under the age of ten already have social media accounts. By the age of 13, almost everyone is registered, according to the country’s Minister for Digitalization, Caroline Stage Olsen.

Digital Services Act

In addition to the GDPR, the DSA (Digital Services Act) also plays an important role. The DSA is an EU law that regulates digital services and platforms and gives the Commission responsibility and powers to supervise large social media platforms. The law also requires that minors be protected online.

– We want to make the digital space safe but also need to tackle risks coming from it. This is where the DSA comes into place, Regnier claimed.

The Commission is currently working on EU-wide guidelines on how platforms should comply with the DSA on issues relating to the protection of minors. These guidelines are expected to be finalised before the summer break. At the same time, an age verification app is being developed and will be tested in five countries, including France.

Risk of censorship

Despite ongoing initiatives, France and several other EU countries have expressed frustration with the Commission’s pace of work. Denmark, which takes over the presidency of the EU Council of Ministers from July to December, plans to push for better protection for minors online in the coming months.

Although the Digital Services Act is praised by its proponents, the law has also been criticized for threatening the rule of law and freedom of expression. Critics warn that the DSA, which requires the rapid removal of illegal content, risks leading to arbitrary censorship and overblocking, where platforms delete even legal material for fear of sanctions.

There are also concerns that the rules could be abused to silence opposition and political dissent and that protecting children is not really the issue at stake. Since legal review often takes place after the fact, the protection of fundamental rights is also being called into question.

Why does France want to ban social media for children?

French officials raised several reasons for a ban for children under 15:

  • Mental health: Concerns about increasing mental health problems among young people, linked to the impact of social media on self-esteem, sleep and concentration.
  • Bullying and harassment: Social media is often used as a platform for cyberbullying, which hits children particularly hard.
  • Exposure to harmful content: Children are at risk of being exposed to violent, sexual or extreme content without being able to handle it.
  • Data protection and privacy: Children's personal data is handled by commercial platforms without sufficient control or understanding.
  • School-related violence: The recent knife attack at a school was used as an example of how digital environments can contribute to radicalization or aggressive behaviour.
  • Parental responsibility and control: Macron says the current system makes it difficult for parents to know what their children are doing online.

.

Opt-in childhood

What we signed them up for before they could object.

Published 7 June 2025
– By Naomi Brockwell
6 minute read

A few weeks ago, we published an article about oversharing on social media, and how posting photos, milestones, and personal details can quietly build a digital footprint for your child that follows them for life.

But social media isn’t the only culprit.

Today, I want to talk about the devices we give our kids: the toys that talk, the tablets that teach, the monitors that watch while they sleep.

These aren’t just tools of convenience or connection. Often, they’re Trojan horses, collecting and transmitting data in ways most parents never realize.

We think we’re protecting our kids.
But in many cases, we’re signing them up for surveillance systems they can’t understand, and wouldn’t consent to if they could.

How much do you know about the toys your child is playing with?

What data are they collecting?
With whom are they sharing it?
How safely are they storing it to protect against hackers?

Take VTech, for example — a hugely popular toy company, marketed as safe, educational, and kid-friendly.

In 2015, VTech was hacked. The breach wasn’t small:

  • 6.3 million children’s profiles were exposed, along with nearly 5 million parent accounts
  • The stolen data included birthdays, home addresses, chat logs, voice recordings… even photos children had taken on their tablets

Terms no child can understand—but every parent accepts

It’s not just hackers we should be mindful of — often, these companies are allowed to do almost anything they want with the data they collect, including selling it to third parties.

When you hand your child a toy that connects to Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, you might be agreeing to terms that say:

  • Their speech can be used for targeted advertising
  • Their conversations may be retained indefinitely
  • The company can change the terms at any time, without notice

And most parents will never know.

“Safe” Devices With Open Doors

What about things like baby monitors and nanny cams?

Years ago, we did a deep dive into home cameras, and almost all popular models were built without end-to-end encryption. That means the companies that make them can access your video feed.
How much do you know about that company?
How well do you trust every employee who might be able to access that feed?

But it’s not just insiders you should worry about.
Many of these kiddy cams are notoriously easy to hack. The internet is full of real-world examples of strangers breaking into monitors, watching, and even speaking to infants.

There are even publicly available tools that scan the internet and map thousands of unsecured camera feeds, sortable by country, type, and brand.
If your monitor isn’t properly secured, it’s not just vulnerable — it’s visible.

Mozilla, through its Privacy Not Included campaign, audited dozens of smart home devices and baby monitors. They assessed whether products had basic security features like encryption, secure logins, and clear data-use policies. The verdict? Even many top-selling monitors had zero safeguards in place.

These are the products we’re told are protecting our kids.

Apps that glitch, and let you track other people’s kids

A T-Mobile child-tracking app recently glitched.
A mother refreshed the screen—expecting to see her kids’ location.
Instead, she saw a stranger’s child. Then another. Then another.

Each refresh revealed a new kid in real time.

The app was broken, but the consequences weren’t abstract.
That’s dozens of children’s locations broadcast to the wrong person.
The feature that was supposed to provide control did the opposite.

Schools are part of the problem, too

Your child’s school likely collects and stores sensitive data—without strong protections or meaningful consent.

  • In Virginia, thousands of student records were accidentally made public
  • In Seattle, a mental health survey led to deeply personal data being stored in unsecured systems

And it’s not just accidents.

A 2015 study investigated “K–12 data broker” marketplaces that trade in everything from ethnicity and affluence to personality traits and reproductive health status.
Some companies offer data on children as young as two.
Others admit they’ve sold lists of 14- and 15-year-old girls for “family planning services.”

Surveillance disguised as protection

Let’s be clear: the internet is a minefield, filled with ways children can be tracked, profiled, or preyed upon. Protecting them is more important than ever.

One category of tools that’s exploded in popularity is the parental control app—software that lets you see everything happening on your child’s device:
The messages they send. The photos they take. The websites they visit.

The intention might be good. But the execution is often disastrous.

Most of these apps are not end-to-end encrypted, meaning:

  • Faceless companies gain full access to your child’s messages, photos, and GPS
  • They operate in stealth mode, functionally indistinguishable from spyware
  • And they rarely protect that data with strong security

Again, how much do you know about these companies?
And even if you trust them, how well are they protecting this data from everyone else?

The “KidSecurity” app left 300 million records exposed, including real-time child locations and fragments of parent credit cards.
The “mSpy” app leaked private messages and movement histories in multiple breaches.

When you install one of these apps, you’re not just gaining access to your child’s world.
So is the company that built it… and everyone they fail to protect it from.

What these breaches really teach us

Here’s the takeaway from all these hacks and security failures:

Tech fails.

We don’t expect it to be perfect.
But when the stakes are this high — when we’re talking about the private lives of our children — we should be mindful of a few things:

1) Maybe companies shouldn’t be collecting so much information if they can’t properly protect it.
2) Maybe we shouldn’t be so quick to hand that information over in the first place.

When the data involves our kids, the margin for error disappears.

Your old phone might still be spying

Finally, let’s talk about hand-me-downs.

When kids get their first phone, it’s often filled with tracking, sharing, and background data collection from years of use. What you’re really passing on may be a lifetime of surveillance baked into the settings.

  • App permissions often remain intact
  • Advertising IDs stay tied to previous behavior
  • Pre-installed tracking software may still be active

The moment it connects to Wi-Fi, that “starter phone” might begin broadcasting location data and device identifiers — linked to both your past and your child’s present.

Don’t opt them in by default: 8 ways to push back

So how do we protect children in the digital age?

You don’t need to abandon technology. But you do need to understand what it’s doing, and make conscious choices about how much of your child’s life you expose.

Here are 8 tips:

1: Stop oversharing
Data brokers don’t wait for your kid to grow up. They’re already building the file.
Reconsider publicly posting their photos, location, and milestones. You’re building a permanent, searchable, biometric record of your child—without their consent.
If you want to share with friends or family, do it privately through tools like Signal stories or Ente photo sharing.

2: Avoid spyware
Sometimes the best way to protect your child is to foster a relationship of trust, and educate them about the dangers.
If monitoring is essential, use self-hosted tools. Don’t give third parties backend access to your child’s life.

3: Teach consent
Make digital consent a part of your parenting. Help your child understand their identity—and that it belongs to them.

4: Use aliases and VoIP numbers
Don’t link their real identity across platforms. Compartmentalization is protection.

5: Audit tech
Reset hand-me-down devices. Remove unnecessary apps. Disable default permissions.

6: Limit permissions
If an app asks for mic or camera access and doesn’t need it—deny it. Always audit.

7: Set boundaries with family
Ask relatives not to post about your child. You’re not overreacting—you’re defending someone who can’t yet opt in or out.

8: Ask hard questions
Ask your school how data is collected, stored, and shared. Push back on invasive platforms. Speak up when things don’t feel right.

Let Them Write Their Own Story

We’re not saying throw out your devices.
We’re saying understand what they really do.

This isn’t about fear. It’s about safety. It’s about giving your child the freedom to grow up and explore ideas without every version of themselves being permanently archived, and without being boxed in by a digital record they never chose to create.

Our job is to protect that freedom.
To give them the chance to write their own story.

Privacy is protection.
It’s autonomy.
It’s dignity.

And in a world where data compounds, links, and lives forever, every choice you make today shapes the freedom your child has tomorrow.

 

Yours in privacy,
Naomi

Naomi Brockwell is a privacy advocacy and professional speaker, MC, interviewer, producer, podcaster, specialising in blockchain, cryptocurrency and economics. She runs the NBTV channel on Youtube.

AI surveillance in Swedish workplaces sparks outrage

Mass surveillance

Published 4 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
In practice, it is possible to analyze not only employees' productivity - but also their facial expressions, voices and emotions.
2 minute read

The rapid development of artificial intelligence has not only brought advantages – it has also created new opportunities for mass surveillance, both in society at large and in the workplace.

Even today, unscrupulous employers use AI to monitor and map every second of their employees’ working day in real time – a development that former Social Democratic politician Kari Parman warns against and calls for decisive action to combat.

In an opinion piece in the Stampen-owned newspaper GP, he argues that AI-based surveillance of employees poses a threat to staff privacy and calls on the trade union movement to take action against this development.

Parman paints a bleak picture of how AI is used to monitor employees in Swedish workplaces, where technology analyzes everything from voices and facial expressions to productivity and movement patterns – often without the employees’ knowledge or consent.

It’s a totalitarian control system – in capitalist packaging”, he writes, continuing:

There is something deeply disturbing about the idea that algorithms will analyze our voices, our facial expressions, our productivity – second by second – while we work”.

“It’s about power and control”

According to Parman, there is a significant risk that people in digital capitalism will be reduced to mere data points, giving employers disproportionate power over their employees.

He sees AI surveillance as more than just a technical issue and warns that this development undermines the Swedish model, which is based on balance and respect between employers and employees.

It’s about power. About control. About squeezing every last ounce of ‘efficiency’ out of people as if we were batteries”.

If trade unions fail to act, Parman believes, they risk becoming irrelevant in a working life where algorithms are taking over more and more of the decision-making.

To stop this trend, he lists several concrete demands. He wants to see a ban on AI-based individual surveillance in the workplace and urges unions to introduce conditions in collective agreements to review and approve new technology.

Kari Parman previously represented the Social Democrats in Gnosjö. Photo: Kari Parman/FB

“Reduced to an algorithm’s margin of error”

He also calls for training for safety representatives and members, as well as political regulations from the state.

No algorithm should have the right to analyze our performance, movements, or feelings”, he declares.

Parman emphasizes that AI surveillance not only threatens privacy but also creates a “psychological iron cage” where employees constantly feel watched, blurring the line between work and private life.

At the end of the article, the Social Democrat calls on the trade union movement to take responsibility and lead the resistance against the misuse of AI in the workplace.

He sees it as a crucial issue for the future of working life and human dignity at work.

If we don’t stand up now, we will be alone when it is our turn to be reduced to an algorithm’s margin of error”, he concludes.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.