Tuesday, November 4, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Exposing the lies that keep you trapped in surveillance culture

Debunking the biggest myths about data collection

Published April 19, 2025 – By Naomi Brockwell

Let’s be honest: data is useful. But we’re constantly told that in order to benefit from modern tech—and the insights that come with it—we have to give up our privacy. That useful data only comes from total access. That once your info is out there, you’ve lost control. That there’s no point in trying to protect it anymore.

These are myths. And they’re holding us back.

The truth is, you can benefit from data-driven tools without giving away everything. You can choose which companies to trust. You can protect one piece of information while sharing another. You can demand smarter systems that deliver insights without exploiting your identity.

Privacy isn’t about opting out of technology—it’s about choosing how you engage with it.

In this issue, we’re busting four of the most common myths about data collection. Because once you understand what’s possible, you’ll see how much power you still have.

Myth #1: "I gave data to one company, so my privacy is already gone".

This one is everywhere. Once people sign up for a social media account or share info with a fitness app, they often throw up their hands and say, "Well, I guess my privacy’s already gone".

But that’s not how privacy works.

Privacy is about choice. It’s about context. It’s about setting boundaries that make sense for you.

Just because you’ve shared data with one company doesn’t mean you’re giving blanket permission to every app, government agency, or ad network to track you forever.

You’re allowed to:

  • Share one piece of information and protect another.
  • Say yes to one service and no to others.
  • Change your mind, rotate your identifiers, and reduce future exposure.

Privacy isn’t all or nothing. And it's never too late to take some power back.

Myth #2: "If I give a company data, they can do whatever they want with it".

Not if you pick the right company.

Many businesses are committed to ethical data practices. Some explicitly state in their terms that they’ll never share your data, sell it, or use it outside the scope of the service you signed up for.

Look for platforms that don’t retain unnecessary data. There are more of them out there than you think.

Myth #3: "To get insights, a company needs to see my data".

This one’s finally starting to crumble—thanks to game-changing tech like homomorphic encryption.

Yes, really: companies can now do compute on encrypted data without ever decrypting it.

It’s already in use in financial services, research, and increasingly, consumer apps. It proves that privacy and data analysis can go hand in hand.

Imagine this: a health app computes your sleep averages, detects issues, and offers recommendations—without ever seeing your raw data. It stays encrypted the whole time.

We need to champion this kind of innovation. More research. More tools. More adoption. And more support for companies already doing it—because our business sends a signal that this investment was worth it for them, and encourages other companies to jump on board.

Myth #4: “To prove who you are, you have to hand over sensitive data.”

You’ve heard this from banks, employers, and government forms: "We need your full ID to verify who you are".

But here’s the problem: every time we hand over sensitive data, we increase our exposure to breaches and identity theft. It’s a bad system.

There’s a better way.
With zero-knowledge proofs, we can prove things like being over 18, or matching a record—without revealing our address, birthdate, or ID number.

The tech already exists. But companies and institutions are slow to adopt it or even recognize it as legitimate. This won’t change until we demand better.

Let’s push for a world where:

  • Our identity isn’t a honeypot for hackers.
  • We can verify ourselves without becoming vulnerable.
  • Privacy-first systems are the norm—not the exception.

Takeaways

The idea that we have to trade privacy for progress is a myth. You can have both. The tools exist. The choice is ours.

Privacy isn’t about hiding—it’s about control. You can choose to share specific data without giving up your rights or exposing everything.

Keep these in mind:

  • Pick tools that respect you. Look for platforms with strong privacy practices and transparent terms.
  • Use privacy-preserving tech. Homomorphic encryption and zero-knowledge proofs are real—and growing.
  • Don’t give up just because you shared once. Privacy is a spectrum. You can always take back control.
  • Talk about it. The more people realize they have options, the faster we change the norm.

Being informed doesn’t have to mean being exploited.
Let’s demand better.

 

Yours in privacy,
Naomi

Naomi Brockwell is a privacy advocacy and professional speaker, MC, interviewer, producer, podcaster, specialising in blockchain, cryptocurrency and economics. She runs the NBTV channel on Rumble.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

IT expert warns: ID requirements online bring us closer to totalitarian surveillance

Mass surveillance

Published yesterday 4:31 pm – By Editorial staff
Swedish Liberal Party politician Nina Larsson wants to introduce age verification – but IT experts warn of serious consequences

IT security specialist Karl Emil Nikka advises Sweden against following the UK's example of mandatory age verification on pornographic websites. The risk of data breaches and increased surveillance is too great, he argues.

Swedish Gender Equality Minister Nina Larsson wants Sweden to introduce technical barriers requiring age verification on pornographic websites to protect children from explicit sexual content.

The proposal is based on the British model where websites must verify users' age or identity, for example through authentication with ID cards or credit cards.

But Karl Emil Nikka, an IT security specialist, is strongly critical of the proposal. He points to serious flaws in the British solution, not least the risk of data breaches.

As an example, he mentions the leak from the messaging platform Discord, where photos of 70,000 users ended up in the wrong hands after a cyberattack in connection with the law change. Additionally, the barriers are easy to circumvent using VPN services, which caused the use of such services to skyrocket when the British law came into effect.

Risks surveillance

Nikka also warns that requirements for online identification bring Sweden closer to a type of surveillance that otherwise only exists in totalitarian states.

— It's a small problem as long as we live in a democracy, but it's damn dangerous to believe we always will, he says.

Instead, parents should be encouraged to use the controls already built into phones and other devices, where one can easily choose which sites to block.

— From a security perspective, it's the only reasonable solution, Nikka states.

Foreign sites attract

An additional risk with technical barriers is that young users turn to lesser-known foreign sites that don't care about legal requirements, Nikka argues. Jannike Tillå, head of communications and social benefit at the Swedish Internet Foundation, confirms this picture.

— According to experts in various countries, it seems that people have turned to other lesser-known websites abroad, she says.

However, Tillå believes that technical solutions can have a place, provided they are more anonymous than the British ones and combined with other measures.

— It can help raise thresholds and reduce exposure.

Conversations crucial

At the same time, she emphasizes the importance of complementing any technical solutions with investments in digital literacy and, above all, conversations between parents and children.

— That's where real protection begins. We know that many parents find it difficult to have the porn conversation, but you should do it early, says Jannike Tillå.

She stresses that the question of privacy and freedom online must not be set against child protection.

— We must find that balance and manage both things, she concludes.

Musk plans data centers in space using Starlink satellites

The future of AI

Published November 2, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Photo: Space X

Elon Musk's space company SpaceX announces plans to build data centers in space based on Starlink satellites. Interest in space-based data storage is surging among tech giants as artificial intelligence demands increasingly more computing power.

Artificial intelligence is driving a growing need for data storage and processing power, prompting several tech companies to turn their attention to space. After former Google CEO Eric Schmidt acquired space company Relativity Space in May, and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos predicted gigawatt-scale data centers in space within 10 to 20 years, Elon Musk is now entering the race.

In a post on social media platform X, Musk explained that SpaceX satellites could be used for this purpose. "Simply scaling up Starlink V3 satellites, which have high speed laser links would work. SpaceX will be doing this", he wrote in response to an article about the potential for space-based data centers.

Musk's announcement dramatically raises the profile of this emerging industry. SpaceX's Starlink constellation is already the world's dominant space-based infrastructure, and the company has demonstrated it can profitably deliver high-speed broadband to millions of customers worldwide.

Free energy and no environmental costs

Advocates for space-based data centers highlight clear advantages: unlimited and free energy from the sun, as well as the absence of environmental costs associated with building these facilities on Earth, where opposition to energy-intensive data centers has begun to grow.

Critics argue, however, that it is economically impractical to build such facilities in space and that proponents underestimate the technology required to make it work.

Caleb Henry, research director at analytics firm Quilty Space, believes the development is worth watching closely.

— The amount of momentum from heavyweights in the tech industry is very much worth paying attention to. If they start putting money behind it, we could see another transformation of what's done in space, he says in an interview.

Tenfold capacity

SpaceX's current Starlink V2 mini satellites have a maximum download capacity of approximately 100 Gbps. The upcoming V3 satellite is expected to increase this capacity tenfold, to 1 Tbps. This is not an unprecedented capacity for individual satellites – telecom company Viasat has built a geostationary satellite with the same capacity that will soon be launched – but it is unprecedented at the scale SpaceX is planning.

The company intends to launch around 60 Starlink V3 satellites with each Starship rocket launch. These launches could occur as early as the first half of 2026, as SpaceX has already tested a satellite dispenser on Starship.

— Nothing else in the rest of the satellite industry that comes close to that amount of capacity, Henry notes.

Exactly what a "scaling up" of Starlink V3 satellites would look like is not clear, but the development speaks for itself. The first operational Starlink satellites were launched just over five years ago with a mass of approximately 300 kg and a capacity of 15 Gbps. Starlink V3 satellites will likely weigh 1,500 kg.

Spotify founder’s company may sell attack drones to Germany

The new cold war

Published October 30, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Daniel Ek with the HX-2 drone. German contract could generate billions in euros for Helsing.

The German government plans to award three companies contracts worth €1 billion for the delivery of kamikaze drones – one of them is Daniel Ek's military technology company Helsing.

The three companies expected to share the contract are the Ek-backed startup Helsing, German competitor Stark – which counts Silicon Valley billionaire Peter Thiel among its investors – and military-industrial giant Rheinmetall. Each company is expected to be awarded contracts of around €300 million each, according to sources speaking to the Financial Times.

No formal agreements have yet been signed, but if the contracts are approved by the German Bundestag's budget committee, they will likely be the largest deals for both young startups to date.

Under the agreement, the three companies are to deliver up to 12,000 kamikaze drones, though only a portion of that number will be delivered initially. The drones are expected to be deployed with a new German brigade stationed in Lithuania, with the official mission of defending NATO's eastern border against potential Russian attacks and airspace violations.

According to sources who spoke with FT, German authorities hope that splitting the contract among three players will stimulate innovation and competition.

— They're doing it to keep the competition alive and make sure they get the best system, said one of the sources.

European drone armament buildup

The deal comes at a time when European countries are significantly building up their drone warfare capabilities, both in terms of defensive technology to protect against potential drone attacks and offensive drones to conduct attacks against targets in other countries.

Investment in Europe's military technology startups has soared since the war in Ukraine escalated in 2022, with various venture capital firms now investing large sums in military operations.

Helsing has been described as Europe's most valuable military startup with a valuation of €12 billion, and over the past year the company has announced plans to deliver 6,000 drones to Ukraine, acquired German aircraft manufacturer Grob, and presented plans to manufacture underwater surveillance systems in the United Kingdom.

Stark was founded just 15 months ago and is backed by investors including American tech billionaire Peter Thiel and venture capital firm Sequoia Capital. The company has a team in Ukraine working on testing and development, and in July announced plans to open a factory in the English town of Swindon.

Rheinmetall surprised observers

That part of the contract would go to artillery and tank manufacturer Rheinmetall, which has already won tens of billions of euros in government contracts, came as a surprise to some players in the military-industrial sector.

Although the company has partnerships with American drone manufacturer Anduril and Israeli company UVision, it had until recently not had its own armed drone in its product portfolio.

Rheinmetall, headquartered in Düsseldorf, Germany, offered to deliver the armed drone FV-014 to the German army, which the company publicly presented in September. The drone, also known as Raider, can carry a 5-kilogram payload and has a range of 100 kilometers.

Stark will deliver its armed drone Virtus and Helsing its HX-2.

Elon Musk launches Grokipedia

Published October 28, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Grokipedia already contains 800,000 AI-generated articles.

Grokipedia was released last night – Musk's AI-based encyclopedia designed to compete with Wikipedia. The founder himself claims that Grokipedia is already significantly better than its competitor, even in its first version.

The service is built on the tech billionaire's AI chatbot Grok, which was developed as an alternative to ChatGPT. While Wikipedia relies on users to both create and review content, Grokipedia is designed to autonomously perform calculations, verify facts, and write articles.

Grokipedia version 0.1 was launched overnight. The platform already contains over 800,000 articles generated by Grok and has been integrated with real-time data from X (formerly Twitter).

Musk has long criticized Wikipedia for being heavily politically correct in its articles, and has urged people to stop donating to the platform. He is not alone in his criticism – an increasing number of people often accuse the site of having transformed into a political weapon with a strong left-liberal bias.

"Version 1.0 will be 10X better, but even at 0.1 it’s better than Wikipedia imo", he writes on X.

"The goal is truth"

The launch was not without problems, however, as it briefly crashed overnight due to overload – though this was quickly stabilized.

Grokipedia uses some content from Wikipedia under Creative Commons license, but aims to "cleanse" perceived bias through an evidence- and physics-based rewriting process.

"The goal of Grok and Grokipedia.com is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. We will never be perfect, but we shall nonetheless strive towards that goal", Musk writes on X.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.