Thursday, May 29, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Cinema mourns the loss of Gene Hackman

Published 28 February 2025
– By Editorial Staff
A selection from the diverse roles of the multifaceted Gene Hackman.

Character actor and movie legend Gene Hackman has died at the age of 95. With a career spanning five decades, Hackman leaves behind a cinematic masterpiece from broken anti-heroes to charismatic villains.

Among other things, Hackman’s presence on the silver screen helped change the way we as moviegoers view complex male roles.

Legendary actor Gene Hackman and his wife Betsy Arakawa (a fact that makes the cause of death somewhat unclear at this point), were found deceased yesterday Wednesday at their home in Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Back in the 1960s, Gene Hackman established himself as a powerful counterpoint to Hollywood’s glamorous stars. His breakthrough performance as the nervous criminal Buck Barrow in Arthur Penn’s gangster classic Bonnie and Clyde (1967) showed a new kind of realism – a man who not only played fear, but breathed it.

When he won an Oscar in 1972 for his role as the obsessed narcotics officer Jimmy “Popeye” Doyle in William Friedkin’s crime drama French Connection, he cemented his place as one of the most versatile actors of the generation.

– He shattered expectations. Every scene became a masterpiece of presence, Friedkin said in a 2005 interview.

In the Clint Eastwood-directed The Unforgiven (1992), Hackman played a sadistic sheriff, a role that earned him his second Oscar. Hackman has often praised Clint Eastwood for giving him the role.

Lex Luthor

Gene Hackman’s interpretation of Lex Luthor, in Richard Donner’s groundbreaking Superman The Movie (1978), and its sequel Superman II (1981), is one of the most memorable villainous roles in movie history. With a perfect balance of charm, eccentricity and manipulative evil, Hackman created a Luthor who was as entertaining as he was menacing.

His version of the iconic arch-enemy of Superman was that of a shamelessly egotistical criminal mastermind, driven by power and greed rather than physical violence, who saw himself as the true genius of the world.

Despite refusing to shave his head for the role (and instead wearing a wig in several scenes), Gene Hackman’s Lex Luthor became an unforgettable part of the Superman mythology, a charismatic antagonist who proved that brains often trump brawn.

The Marines gave Hackman discipline

Before becoming an actor, Hackman served in the Marines for three years, an experience that gave him a discipline he later applied to his acting career

Early on, Hackman demonstrated remarkable versatility in his ability to portray everything from hard-boiled cops to comic roles and villains. His powerful screen presence made him one of Hollywood’s most respected actors.

In 2004, Hackman retired from acting after a role in Welcome to Mooseport and then devoted himself to writing novels.

Gene Hackman’s passing marks the end of an era in American cinema, but his legacy lives on through his impressive filmography and the countless other actors he inspired.

Some selected films and roles with Gene Hackman

  • Bonnie and Clyde (1967) – Buck Barrow
  • The French Connection (1971) – Jimmy "Popeye" Doyle (O)
  • The Poseidon Adventure (1972) – Reverend Scott
  • The Conversation (1974) – Harry Caul
  • Superman The Movie (1978) – Lex Luthor
  • Reds (1981) – Pete Van Wherry
  • Superman II (1981) – Lex Luthor
  • Hoosiers (1986) – Coach Norman Dale
  • Mississippi Burning (1988) – Agent Anderson
  • Unforgiven (1992) – Little Bill Daggett (O)
  • The Firm (1993) – Avery Tolar
  • Crimson Tide (1995) – Captain Ramsey
  • An Enemy of the State (1998) – Brill
  • The Royal Tenenbaums (2001) – Royal Tenenbaum

(O) = Oscar-winning role

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Israel’s Eurovision public vote record sparks suspicion of coordinated campaign

Published 20 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Israeli representative Yuval Raphael performing at this year's Eurovision.

Israel’s contribution to the Eurovision Song Contest 2025 has become a hot topic – not only for its performance, but also for the record-high number of votes from the audience. Now, suspicions are growing that organized campaigns may have influenced the result.

According to the Schibsted newspaper SvD, both experts and Eurovision fans have reacted to Israel receiving so many votes from TV viewers. Israel’s representative Yuval Raphael won the public vote by a large margin, but Austria took home the final victory thanks to higher scores from the jury groups.

As in Malmö last year, Israel’s entry was controversial even before the final, mainly because of the ongoing war in Gaza.

It is worth noting that Yuval Raphael survived the Hamas attack at the Nova music festival on October 7, 2023, and she says that the experience has shaped her and her entry, “New Day Will Rise”, which she believes carries a strong message of hope and reconstruction.

EBU will investigate

According to SvD, there are suspicions of coordinated efforts on platforms such as Telegram, Facebook, and X, where users have shared instructions on how to vote from different countries and use VPN services to circumvent geographical restrictions.

Similar patterns have been seen in previous years, but this year’s mobilization is described as unusually extensive. There have also been reports of automated bots and paid advertisements targeting the Eurovision audience.

The European Broadcasting Union (EBU), which organizes the contest, has confirmed that it is following up on the information and analyzing voting patterns. In a statement, the EBU says it has advanced systems to detect and stop cheating, but that it always reviews its procedures after the contest.

Journalist asked critical questions about Israel – banned from Eurovision

The situation in Gaza

Published 15 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Journalist Szymon Stellmaszyk, banned from Eurovision 2025.

Polish journalist Szymon Stellmaszyk has been denied accreditation for this year’s Eurovision Song Contest in Basel. He believes this is due to a critical question he asked Israeli artist Eden Golan last year – something the EBU denies.

Szymon Stellmaszyk has covered the Eurovision Song Contest for 20 years and runs both the Facebook page “Let’s talk about ESC” and the industry website “Radio Newsletter”. This year, for the first time, he has been denied accreditation to cover the contest in Basel.

The background, according to Stellmaszyk himself, is a critical question he asked Israel’s contestant, Eden Golan, during Eurovision in Malmö last year. He asked whether Golan, given the political situation and the war in Gaza, thought her presence could pose a security risk to other participants and the audience.

The question attracted attention and was criticized by some, but Stellmaszyk emphasizes that it was not intended to be offensive or “anti-Semitic”. In an email to Stellmaszyk, which the Swedish state broadcaster SVT has seen, the EBU justifies its decision by saying that the platforms Stellmaszyk uses do not have sufficient reach.

“Restriction”

Szymon Stellmaszyk himself is convinced that the EBU is making excuses and that it is in fact about the question he asked last year.

– This is some kind of revenge and, in practice, a restriction of freedom of expression, he says.

It should also be noted that this year’s EBU media handbook contains a new rule stating that published content must be “respectful” towards Eurovision and the EBU. Eurovision boss Martin Green says the wording is unfortunate and promises that it will be reworded for next year.

At the same time, he does not want to comment on individual cases, but points out that there are a limited number of places for journalists.

The Eurovision Song Contest 2025 will be held in Basel, Switzerland.

Bizarre children’s series described as “digital drug”

Cultural revolution in the West

Published 10 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The characters of the children's series Cocomelon with its abnormal proportions.

The children’s series Cocomelon attracts young children around the world with its colorful animations and catchy songs. Despite its enormous popularity, criticism of the series is growing, with some warnings that its extreme editing could have a very negative effect on children’s brains.

More and more parents and experts are questioning the extremely fast pace of Cocomelon and whether the mass-produced style is really good for young minds, or whether it risks overstimulating children and making them restless.

One of the major objections to Cocomelon is its rapid editing technique, where camera angles change every two to three seconds. This is a hectic and exaggerated pace that is unfortunately all too common in modern children’s entertainment, but here it is taken to a new level.

According to a study by PubMed Central (PMC), the executive functions of 4-year-olds, such as self-control and working memory, are at risk of being severely impaired after being exposed to fast-paced clips for too long.

Many parents also report that their children become agitated after watching children’s series such as Cocomelon, and there is plenty of criticism on social media platforms such as X.

Mass-produced aesthetics

Other research also indicates that rapid camera and clip changes can negatively affect young children’s concentration. The fast pace is no accident either. Cocomelon is designed to capture children’s attention, but some argue that it now goes too far.

According to Findmykids.org, the constant impressions can trigger dopamine release, causing children to seek the same quick rewards even outside the screen – something that can make it harder for them to focus on calmer activities such as reading or playing.

In addition to the pace, the series’ aesthetics have also been criticized. Like most animated productions today, the characters have disproportionately large heads and overly cheerful expressions, which some find unpleasant.

For many parents and viewers, it feels like the series is made on an assembly line where quantity takes precedence over quality, resulting in an aesthetic that is more frightening than charming.

Opinions are divided

Unlike traditional cartoons such as Scooby-Doo, Cocomelon is animated in a way that prioritizes quantity over quality, which is evident in the disproportionate characters and the assembly line feel.

Opinions about Cocomelon are divided. Some experts, such as Rebecca Cowan at Walden University, argue that there is insufficient evidence to single out Cocomelon as the problem – instead, it is total screen time that may be harmful.

– Without empirical research on the show Cocomelon, there is no data to substantiate claims that this show is overstimulating due to the pace of the scenes, she says.

But others warn that the series’ pace and overstimulating elements can have a very negative impact on children’s development, especially in terms of concentration and calmness.

Cocomelon may seem like an easy solution for entertaining young children, but it is worth considering what the fast pace and mass-produced style do to young viewers.

Trump wants 100% tariff on foreign films

Donald Trump's USA

Published 9 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff

Donald Trump has announced that he has initiated a process to impose a 100% tariff on all films produced outside the US that are then imported into the country. Critics warn of the consequences and argue that tariffs will worsen the situation for the American film industry.

The decision, which was announced on May 4, is intended, according to Trump, to protect the American film industry, which he believes is on the verge of “a very fast death”, reports industry publication Variety.

– This is a concerted effort by other nations and, therefore, a national security threat. It is, in addition to everything else, messaging and propaganda, Trump wrote on his platform Truth Social.

Trump said he has instructed the Department of Commerce and the US Trade Representative to quickly begin the process of imposing the tariffs.

Exact details on how the tariffs will be implemented, such as whether they will also cover streaming services or how the size of the tariffs will be calculated, have not yet been announced.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has confirmed that the authorities are working on the issue.

“Incredibly stupid”

Many American productions are currently filmed in several countries that offer financial incentives for film production, including Canada, the UK, and Australia, and industry representatives are now concerned about how the tariffs would affect ongoing projects and collaborations.

The chair of the Swedish Film and TV Producers Association, Eva Hamilton, called the proposal “incredibly stupid” and warned that it could isolate the US culturally and economically.

It just sounds incredibly stupid, and I find it hard to see how it could be implemented. He’s right that Hollywood hasn’t kept up, but stopping all foreign expertise sounds like shooting yourself in the foot, Eva Hamilton said in an interview with Schibsted owned TV4.

Trump has previously singled out Hollywood as a “very problematic place” and, in early 2025, appointed actors Jon Voight, Mel Gibson, and Sylvester Stallone as ambassadors to promote American film production.

The American film industry has already been affected by Trump’s trade war, and China, among others, has reduced its quota for American films allowed to be shown in response to the new American tariffs on the country.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.