Thursday, June 12, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Congressman: “Every Republican has a personal Israel lobbyist”

Published 15 June 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Ted Cruz is one of the most explicitly pro-Israel members of the Republican Party. But he is not alone.
3 minute read

Libertarian congressman Thomas Massie reveals in an interview with Tucker Carlson that every Republican in congress has a personal Israel lobbyist from AIPAC with whom they are in close contact and who tells them how to vote on various issues.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is one of the most influential lobbying groups in the United States and the world, working to promote what it calls “pro-Israel policies” in the United States in various ways.

This often involves “buying” individual politicians at the federal or state level by simply donating very large sums of money to their election campaigns – in exchange for their pledge of loyalty to Israel and the Jewish diaspora in the United States.

Large sums are also spent on ad campaigns and other lobbying to smear and oppose politicians who are perceived in various ways as “enemies” of Israel – for example, for opposing Israel’s invasion of Gaza.

Thomas Massie, a Republican member of the House of Representatives, tells Tucker Carlson in an interview that AIPAC’s influence is greater than many could have imagined, and that all his party colleagues in congress have a personal Israel lobbyist with whom they are in very close contact, ask for advice, and who invites them on trips to Israel.

Fear of reprisals

Massie himself is deeply unpopular with the Israel lobby for questioning unlimited US military and economic support for Israel, and he says his party colleagues often complain that they are afraid to vote the way he does for fear of reprisals and problems.

– And I have Republicans who come to me and say, ‘That’s wrong, what a PAC is doing to you. Let me talk to my AIPAC person.’ By the way, everybody but me has an AIPAC person.

– It’s like your babysitter. Your AIPAC babysitter who is always talking to you for AIPAC. They’re probably a constituent in your district, but they are, you know, firmly embedded in AIPAC.

He goes on to say that he doesn’t know if Democratic members of congress also have a personal Israel lobbyist with whom they are in close contact, but notes that at least that is the case for Republicans.

– And when they come to D.C., you go have lunch with them. And they’ve got your cell number and you have conversations with them.

Thomas Massie has long been opposed by the Israel Lobby. Photo: Gage Skidmore/CC BY-SA 2.0

Nothing to gain by telling

When Tucker Carlson says it sounds “absolutely insane” and asks why the public doesn’t know about it, Massie explains that neither party benefits when the frequent contacts become public knowledge.

– It doesn’t benefit anybody. Why would they want to tell their constituents that they’ve basically got a buddy system with somebody who’s representing a foreign country? It doesn’t benefit the congressman for people to know that. So they’re not going to tell you that.

– They pay for trips for congressmen and their spouses to go to Israel. I’m not the only Republican who hasn’t taken the AIPAC trip to Israel, but I’m probably one of a dozen that hasn’t taken that trip and the other ones just haven’t got around to it.

Massie is one of the few Republicans who has long been at odds with AIPAC, and the lobbying group spent billions trying to smear him ahead of a Kentucky primary in early May, for example, effectively painting him as a supporter of the terror-listed Palestinian group Hamas. The witch hunt failed to produce the desired results, however, and the Libertarian managed to win with 76% of the vote.

Ahead of the November presidential election, the Israel lobby has announced plans to spend nearly $100 million to combat political candidates it perceives as harmful or hostile to Israel.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

World saw record number of armed conflicts last year

Published today 7:19
– By Editorial Staff
Israeli soldiers during the invasion of Gaza.
3 minute read

The number of armed conflicts reached a historic high in 2024, according to new statistics from the Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP) at Uppsala University.

Despite a marginal decrease in the total number of deaths, targeted violence against civilians also increased significantly.

UCDP recorded 61 armed conflicts involving at least one state in 2024 an increase from 59 the previous year and the highest number since measurements began in 1946. Of these, 11 were classified as wars, which according to the UCDP definition means at least 1,000 combat-related deaths in a year – the highest figure since 2016.

In total, around 160,000 people were killed in organized violence during the year, a slight decrease compared to the extremely deadly year of 2022.

– This is not about the world becoming more peaceful. We are seeing more wars and more conflicts than before, but with slightly fewer deaths than in the exceptionally bloody year of 2022. 2024 is the fourth most violent year since the genocide in Rwanda in 1994, said Shawn Davies, senior analyst at UCDP.

The conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza

The war in Ukraine remained the world’s deadliest conflict in 2024, with around 76,000 combat-related deaths. In the Middle East, Israel’s war in Gaza and against Hezbollah in Lebanon contributed to high death tolls, especially among civilians. The UCDP recorded a total of around 26,000 deaths in these two conflicts, 94 percent of whom were civilians or persons of unknown identity.

– It has become increasingly difficult to distinguish between civilians and members of armed groups, despite improvements in information in many areas over the past 15 years. This is particularly challenging in situations where the line between civilians and combatants is blurred, or where indiscriminate violence, such as aerial bombardments, is used in densely populated areas, says Therese Pettersson, senior analyst at UCDP.

In Gaza, only 2% of deaths could be linked to members of a combatant group, while 48% were classified as civilians. The rest were recorded as persons of unknown identity.

Reliable information about who is killed is important for investigating suspected war crimes, for the international community to be able to act appropriately, and for knowing what needs society has after a conflict ends, Pettersson continues.

Decade of increasing conflict

Targeted attacks against civilians increased sharply in 2024. The UCDP recorded 13,900 civilian deaths in such attacks – an increase of 31 percent compared to the previous year. For the tenth year in a row, the Islamist terrorist group IS was the deadliest actor, with around 3,800 civilian casualties, mainly in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Since 2010, the number of armed conflicts involving state actors has almost doubled, and the number of deaths has increased fivefold – despite some temporary declines.

– Over the past decade, we have seen an increase in the number of inter-state conflicts, with 2024 recording the highest number since 1987. Conflicts in which states actively support armed groups in other countries have also become more common during this period. This is a worrying development that risks contributing to higher death tolls, explains Davies, adding:

– We are living in a new era with more and more intense and complex conflicts, which places higher demands on international conflict resolution and better protection of civilians. It is also important to continue documenting what is happening in the world’s conflicts.

Organized violence

UCDP defines organized violence as armed confrontations between two organized actors in which at least 25 people are killed in direct combat in a calendar year. It includes three categories: state violence (between state and actor), non-state violence (between two non-state groups) and unilateral violence directed against civilians.

All deaths must be combat-related, i.e. directly caused by armed violence not indirect consequences such as starvation or disease.

Tulsi Gabbard: The warmongers are driving the world to nuclear holocaust

The new cold war

Published yesterday 16:03
– By Editorial Staff
Tulsi Gabbard has previously accused NATO leaders of being "insane" and of trying to drag humanity into a third world war.
3 minute read

US National Intelligence Officer Tulsi Gabbard warns in a grim video message of the risk of a full-scale nuclear war.

She sharply criticizes “the political elite warmongers” and accuses them of pushing the world “closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before”.

In the three-minute video clip, Gabbard talks about her recent visit to Hiroshima, Japan, where she studied the aftermath of the US nuclear attack on the city in 1945. The video mixes images from the trip with archive footage of the victims of the bombing and shows Gabbard speaking directly to the camera about the consequences of a modern nuclear attack.

Gabbard points out that today’s nuclear weapons are significantly more powerful than those used in World War II.

– A single nuclear weapon today could kill millions in just minutes, she explains, continuing:

– This is the reality of what’s at stake, what we are facing now. Because as we stand here today, closer to the brink of nuclear annihilation than ever before, political elite warmongers are carelessly fomenting fear and tensions between nuclear powers.

“Up to us – the people”

Gabbard further suggests that powerful people are convinced that they would have access to “nuclear shelters” and therefore believe themselves to be protected from the consequences of a nuclear war.

– It’s up to us, the people, to speak up and demand an end to this madness. We must reject this path to nuclear war and work toward a world where no one has to live in fear of a nuclear holocaust, she concludes.

It is unclear exactly when the video was recorded, but Gabbard visited Japan last week, including an American military base together with the US ambassador to the country. However, according to her staff, she did not visit Hiroshima during her first visit to Japan as director of intelligence in March.

When asked to clarify her statements, Gabbard’s deputy chief of staff, Alexa Henning, responded that President Donald Trump also shares her concern about a future nuclear war.

President Trump has repeatedly stated in the past that he recognizes the immeasurable suffering, and annihilation can be caused by nuclear war, which is why he has been unequivocal that we all need to do everything possible to work towards peace”, Henning said in a written statement, adding that Gabbard supports Trump’s goal of lasting peace and stability.

“Trying to drag us into World War III”

This is not the first time the former Democratic congresswoman and presidential candidate has warned that a nuclear war could be imminent – and she has also strongly criticized politicians and military leaders for their warmongering.

During her 2019 presidential campaign, she said the world was “on the brink of nuclear war”, and in Congress she was a strong advocate for nuclear disarmament and renewed international agreements.

As recently as 2023, she also accused leading representatives of the US, NATO, and Ukraine of having ambitions to start a third world war and risk the survival of all humanity.

The warmongers are trying to drag us into World War III, which can only end one way: nuclear annihilation and the suffering and death of all our loved ones. Zelensky, Biden, NATO, congressional and media neocons are insane. And we are insane if we passively allow them to lead us into this holocaust like sheep to the slaughter”, she warned on X.

Musk walks back Trump attacks: “Went too far”

Donald Trump's USA

Published yesterday 13:57
– By Editorial Staff
The relationship between Musk and Trump is now said to be dead.
2 minute read

Elon Musk has now expressed regret over several of his posts about former US President Donald Trump, following a high-profile war of words on social media.

Among other things, the billionaire claimed that Trump’s name appears in classified documents linked to notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and that the US president should be impeached.

I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far”, Musk wrote on his platform X on Wednesday.

The conflict between the two escalated after the Tesla owner called Trump’s new tax bill a “disgusting abomination”. Musk also urged Americans to contact their political representatives in Washington to stop the bill, which he said would “cause a recession in the second half of the year”.

Trump responded with harsh criticism, claiming that his former advisor had “lost his mind”. He also threatened to withdraw government contracts worth an estimated $38 billion from Musk’s companies.

– I think it’s a very bad thing, because he’s very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the president, Trump said in an interview with NBC on Sunday.

Took credit for the election victory

The conflict stems from Trump’s controversial budget proposal, which includes extensive tax cuts and increased defense spending. The proposal was approved by the House of Representatives in May and is now being considered by the Senate.

Musk, who was previously one of Trump’s biggest financiers and donated the most to the 2024 presidential campaign, recently left his position at the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) after only 129 days.

During the public feud, Musk accused Trump, without presenting any evidence, of appearing in unpublished government documents linked to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein – a claim that the White House has dismissed.

After Trump made it clear in the interview that their relationship was over and that he was not interested in reconciliation, Musk began deleting several of his most high-profile posts. Among those deleted were a post in which Musk called for the president to be impeached, and another in which he claimed that he himself had won the election for Trump.

Survey: Swedes are the world’s fifth most critical of Israel

The situation in Gaza

Published yesterday 8:27
– By Editorial Staff
Trust in corruption accused Benjamin Netanyahu is also very low in most countries.
3 minute read

A survey by the American research institute Pew Research Center shows that the world has a predominantly negative attitude toward Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Swedes are among the most critical in the world – only four other countries have a more negative opinion. A full 75 percent of those surveyed in Sweden say they have a somewhat or very negative image of Israel.

The survey was conducted last spring, and in 20 of the 24 countries surveyed, at least half of adults have a negative attitude toward Israel. In countries such as Australia, Greece, Indonesia, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey, the proportion is particularly high, with around 75 percent or more expressing a negative attitude.

Support for Israel is lowest in Turkey, where 93 percent say they have a somewhat or very negative view of the country.

In India, opinions are more evenly divided, with 34 percent having a positive view and 29 percent a negative view. In African countries such as Kenya and Nigeria, the trend is different, with about half or more of those surveyed having a positive attitude toward Israel.

Illustration: Pew Research Center

Age and political affiliation influence

Compared to previous surveys, critical attitudes toward Israel have increased in several countries. In the US, the proportion of adults with a negative attitude has risen by 11 percentage points since March 2022. In the UK, the proportion has increased from 44 percent in 2013 to 61 percent this year.

The survey also shows clear differences based on age and political ideology. In high-income countries such as Australia, Canada, France, Poland, South Korea, and the US, younger people are more likely than older people to take a critical view of Israel, and in the US, the age difference is particularly clear.

Politically, people on the left are more likely to have a negative view than those on the right. In Australia, 90 percent of left-wingers have an unfavorable view, compared with 46 percent of right-wingers. In the US, the figures are 74 percent among liberals and 30 percent among conservatives.

Illustration: Pew Research Center

Low confidence in Netanyahu

Confidence in Benjamin Netanyahu is low in most countries surveyed. Except for Kenya and Nigeria, no more than one-third of adults in any country say they have confidence in his handling of international affairs.

In countries such as Australia, France, Germany, Greece, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey, around 75 percent or more have little or no confidence in him. In several of these countries, a majority completely lack confidence in the corruption-accused prime minister.

Here too, there are differences linked to age and ideology. In Hungary, for example, people over the age of 50 are twice as likely to have confidence in Netanyahu as those between the ages of 18 and 34 (40 percent versus 20 percent).

Illustration: Pew Research Center

Ideologically speaking, right-wingers are more likely to support Netanyahu than left-wingers. In France, 25 percent of right-wingers trust him, compared to 12 percent in the center and 8 percent on the left.

Israelis are not particularly happy with developments either. In Israel, 58 percent of residents believe that their country is not very respected, or not respected at all, internationally, while 39 percent believe that it is.

These views are largely unchanged since last year, although the proportion saying that the country is not respected at all has increased from 15 to 24 percent.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.