Saturday, October 11, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Sources: Mossad tried to pressure ICC prosecutor to drop war crimes investigation

Published 2 June 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Mossad chief Yossi Cohen allegedly tried to influence ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda for several years.
4 minute read

Yossi Cohen, the former head of Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency, is alleged to have threatened the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court in a series of secret meetings aimed at influencing and pressuring her not to open an investigation into Israeli war crimes.

Cohen’s secret contacts with then ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda reportedly took place over several years before she decided in 2021 to open a formal investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity in the occupied Palestinian territories, according to a review by The Guardian.

Recently, Bensouda’s successor, Karim Khan, also announced that he wants Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant arrested for abuses and crimes committed during the ongoing invasion of Gaza.

Yossi Cohen served as the head of the Mossad between 2016 and 2021, and before that as Israel’s national security adviser. According to sources, he was tasked with pressuring the ICC prosecutor not to open an investigation into Israel on the grounds that Israeli military personnel would be at risk of prosecution.

Yossi Cohen with Benjamin Netanyahu and then US Secretary of State John Kerry (2015). Photo: U.S. Department of State

Another source says the Mossad’s goal was to get Bensouda to agree to Israeli demands, and a third describes Cohen as Netanyahu’s “unofficial messenger”. The Mossad chief’s attempts to pressure the prosecutor are said to have gone on for years, and she is also said to have informed other senior ICC officials of Cohen’s threatening behavior.

“You should help us and let us take care of you. You don’t want to be getting into things that could compromise your security or that of your family”, and similar threats were allegedly made by the chief of intelligence, among others.

“Threats and manipulation”

The goal of allegedly intimidating Bensouda was also directed at her family members, with transcripts of secret recordings of her husband then used to discredit the prosecutor.

The Mossad also enlisted the help of former Congolese President Joseph Kabila to pressure the prosecutor. When Bensouda went to meet him in his New York hotel room, the prosecutor’s staff was suddenly asked to leave the room – and the Mossad chief entered through a door instead. Again, the situation was reportedly perceived as threatening.

On another occasion, Cohen allegedly called Bensouda repeatedly, and when she asked him how he got her number, the spy chief allegedly replied, “did you forget what I do for a living?”

Initially, Yossi Cohen also allegedly tried to “build a relationship” with the ICC prosecutor, but when that did not work, he began using “threats and manipulation” instead, according to a person with insight into the meetings.

Targeted the family

In December 2019, the prosecutor announced that she had grounds to open a full criminal investigation into allegations of war crimes in Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem. However, she delayed the opening of the investigation and decided to first request a decision from the ICC’s Pre-Trial Chamber to confirm that the Court has jurisdiction over Palestine.

At this point, Cohen allegedly escalated his attempts to pressure Bensouda not to pursue a full investigation. Between 2019 and 2021, the spy chief allegedly initiated at least three physical meetings and displayed behavior so threatening and obsessive that he was likened to a stalker.

Netanyahu with former Mossad top brass. Cohen is on the far left. Photo: Haim Zach/Israeli President

A source familiar with Bensouda’s accounts of her last two meetings with Cohen said he raised questions about her and her family’s safety in a way she found threatening.

On another occasion, Cohen allegedly showed Bensouda copies of photographs of her husband that had been secretly taken when the couple visited London. On another occasion, Cohen allegedly suggested to the prosecutor that a decision to open a full investigation would be detrimental to her career.

The Mossad is said to have actively sought leverage and compromising information on the prosecutor and her family, as well as attempting to smear Bensouda’s husband through diplomatic channels. Someone also spied on her husband and secretly recorded his conversations – but it is unclear whether the Mossad itself was behind the operation or whether the material was simply accessed.

Getting Trump on board

However, the attempts to undermine and smear the prosecutor were largely unsuccessful – although they did prompt then-US President Donald Trump and his administration to also publicly and privately pressure Bensouda and her staff.

Between 2019 and 2020, in an unprecedented move, the Trump administration imposed visa restrictions and sanctions on the attorney general. Officially, this was because Bensouda was conducting a separate investigation into US war crimes in Afghanistan – but analysts say the sanctions were actually a joint Israeli-US action.

Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu. Photo: White House

In February 2021, the ICC’s Pre-Trial Chamber issued a decision confirming that the ICC had jurisdiction over the occupied Palestinian territories. The following month, Bensouda announced the opening of the investigation.

Her successor also under threat

Three months later, she left her post and was replaced by Karim Khan, who recently requested an arrest warrant for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

According to the Guardian’s sources, this “was the conclusion Israel’s political, military and intelligence establishment had feared”.

“The fact they chose the head of Mossad to be the prime minister’s unofficial messenger to [Bensouda] was to intimidate, by definition”, said a source with insight into Cohen’s operation. “It failed”, the source concludes.

It should also be noted that the new ICC prosecutor, Karim Khan, has been subjected to veiled threats and influence campaigns by both Israeli and American politicians to prevent him from investigating Netanyahu or other Israeli officials for war crimes.

Bensouda’s successor, Karim Khan. Photo: UN International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia/CC BY 2.0

The Nordic Times previously reported on how a group of pro-Israeli republicans threatened the prosecutor’s staff and family, promising in part, “If you target Israel, we will target you”.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Harsh criticism of Nobel Peace Prize to Maria Corina Machado

The globalist agenda

Published today 15:18
– By Editorial Staff
Maria Corina Machado has previously participated in the globalist forum World Economic Forum.
3 minute read

American journalist Max Blumenthal sharply criticizes the Nobel Committee’s decision to award the 2025 Peace Prize to Venezuelan opposition politician Maria Corina Machado.

In a statement on social media, he accuses the laureate of being a US-funded regime change activist and argues that the prize is a green light for military action against Venezuela.

Max Blumenthal, a journalist at the US-based news website The Grayzone, has in a lengthy post on X questioned the Nobel Committee’s decision to award the Peace Prize to Maria Corina Machado, leader of Venezuela’s opposition.

Blumenthal describes Machado as a political actor working in US interests rather than for peace. “The Nobel Committee has decided to make the case for Trump’s war on Venezuela, giving its ‘Peace Prize’ to Maria Corina Machado, a US govt-funded regime change activist who’s helped lead failed military coups, violent street riots, and has likely promised her country’s oil and mineral wealth to a consortium of MAGA aligned billionaires in exchange for financing her political arsonism,” he writes.

Comparisons to Pinochet and Netanyahu

The journalist harshly attacks the laureate, calling her “a marionette for Marco Rubio, a creation of the CIA-sponsored Gusano Industrial Complex that has brought violent terror and siege to any Latin American country defying the Washington Consensus of privatization and austerity, and a would-be Pinochet in a skirt.”

Blumenthal also claims that Machado has turned to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for support. “This icon of peace has even appealed to Benjamin Netanyahu to help her lead a military invasion of Venezuela,” he writes.

Criticism for supporting sanctions

A central part of Blumenthal’s criticism concerns Machado’s alleged lobbying for economic sanctions against her own country. He argues that she “has spent years lobbying for US and EU starvation sanctions on her own country, resulting in waves of migration to the US, fueling the nativist resentment that gave rise to Trump.”

Blumenthal also points to Machado’s response when Donald Trump sent Venezuelan migrants to a detention camp in El Salvador earlier this year. “When Trump shipped Venezuelan migrants to a torture camp in El Salvador this year, Machado predictably sided with Trump, the main sponsor of her putschist career, over her countrymen,” he writes.

Committee’s role a “soft power instrument”

The journalist draws parallels to previous controversial awards and argues that the decision regarding Machado is consistent with the Committee’s role as a power instrument for the Western world. “Giving the Nobel to Machado is a green light for regime change war on Venezuela, and then Cuba. But the decision is consistent with the Committee’s role as a soft power instrument of the Western empire,” he states.

He recalls the prize to Barack Obama at the beginning of his first presidential term: “Just recall its award to Obama at the beginning of his first term, granting him infinite legitimacy in advance of his destruction of Libya, escalation of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and facilitation of Gaza’s decimation.”

Blumenthal concludes with an interpretation of what he sees as the real purpose behind the award: “Given that nothing has happened in Machado’s career without the support and guidance of Washington, the Committee’s decision must be seen as the result of another Western op – a coup in Oslo to pave the way for one in Caracas.”

Kirk’s final words about Israel lobby: “I cannot and will not be bullied”

Assassination of Charlie Kirk

Published 8 October 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Released text messages reveal that the conservative commentator was under strong pressure from Jewish donors.
4 minute read

Two days before his death, conservative commentator Charlie Kirk expressed strong frustration over pressure from Jewish donors in a group chat. This is shown by text messages now made public by former colleague and commentator Candace Owens.

“Jewish donors play into all of the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this, leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause.”

The messages have been confirmed as authentic by Turning Point USA.

Conservative commentator Charlie Kirk’s final weeks were marked by intense pressure from major Jewish donors, according to text messages published by former Turning Point colleague Candace Owens in a video analysis on her X channel. The messages, sent in a group chat with nine people just 48 hours before Kirk’s death on September 10, 2025, provide insight into the political and financial dilemmas Kirk was grappling with.

Turning Point USA spokesperson Andrew Kolvet has confirmed the authenticity of the text messages and stated that he himself originally took the screenshot of the conversation.

Lost millions after refusing to “cancel Tucker”

In the text conversation, which included pastor Rob McCoy – who leads Turning Point USA’s religious branch TPUSA Faith – and conservative author Josh Hammer, Kirk writes: “Just lost another huge Jewish donor. $2 million a year because we won’t cancel Tucker. I’m thinking of inviting Candace.”

Kirk continues to express his frustration: “Jewish donors play into all of the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this, leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause.”

According to Owens’ video analysis, the messages show that Kirk was under significant financial pressure due to his refusal to disinvite Tucker Carlson, known for his critical stance on Israel, from Turning Point USA events.

Another person in the chat, identified as Sedona, responds and advises against it: “Please do not invite Candace. That might feel good short term, but it’s not good long term.”

“He was done with Israel bullying him”

In her video analysis, Owens describes a long-running conversation she had with Kirk about his changing views on religion and politics. She recounts that Kirk contacted her as early as February 2024 with the words: “Catholicism is sounding better and better.”

We talked a lot about the political pressure, about how I felt it functioned more like a cult than a true theology or religion, Owens says in the video.

She is particularly critical of pastor Rob McCoy’s handling of the situation after Kirk’s death. McCoy, whose son and daughter-in-law work for Turning Point USA, published a post on Instagram urging Owens to pause her investigation into the events before the murder.

Rob McCoy knew for an absolute fact that Charlie was done with Israel bullying him. That’s what bothers me so much about this man, Owens says and continues:

If Charlie was a friend of mine, I really hope he would raise hell to figure out what actually happened that day if I was assassinated. It’s not being a friend to stay silent when lies are being told.

Confirmation from Turning Point USA

Andrew Kolvet from Turning Point USA confirmed the authenticity of the text messages on Tuesday in an episode of “The Charlie Kirk Show”.

“That was a text grab, a screen grab, that I had shared with people, so it is authentic,” said Kolvet, who explained that he shared the screenshot with authorities after the murder to ensure a thorough investigation.

Kolvet described Kirk’s relationship with Israel as “complicated” and referred to a previous podcast episode with Megyn Kelly where Kirk openly discussed his frustration: “I don’t want to judge an entire group, because there’s been many people in the pro-Israel group that have been very sweet, very kind, very nuanced… however, the behavior by a lot—both privately and publicly—are pushing people like you and me away.”

“Why are you hearing it from me and Tucker Carlson?”

In her analysis, Owens questions why so few other voices within the conservative movement have spoken openly about the pressure Kirk experienced.

You have people hosting a show. Have they done one honorable thing and come out and said something like: you know what, F a couple of these donors who made his life a living hell in the last couple of weeks? Why haven’t they done that? she says.

She points out that she herself, Tucker Carlson, and Megyn Kelly have tried to tell the truth about Kirk’s situation, while others have remained silent.

That registers to me as very suspicious. It makes me think that in the same way Charlie was being pressured by money, that you might now be run by that same money, Owens says.

Criticism of pastors’ handling

Owens also expresses broader concern about how pastors and others within the conservative movement have handled the situation after Kirk’s death.

I feel like a lot this year I have been feeling as though these pastors are just not as honest as they should be. A lot of pastors are not really so concerned with the truth is what I would say, she notes.

She concludes her analysis with an appeal:

You should not grieve by lying or by gaslighting. Is that fair? Can we all agree? You should not grieve by lying and gaslighting the public.

Charlie Kirk, 31, was shot to death on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University. Tyler Robinson, 22, has been arrested and charged with the murder.

Journalist Kim Iversen has previously pointed out that the murder may have connections to the Israeli government.

Israel pays influencers $7,000 per post in secret propaganda campaign

The genocide in Gaza

Published 8 October 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has previously stated that social media is a very important weapon in Israel's information warfare.
6 minute read

While the genocide in Gaza continues, the Israeli government is running an extensive influence campaign on social media. Millions of Americans are exposed to political propaganda without knowing that the content is financed by a foreign warring state.

None of the involved influencers have registered as foreign agents – a likely violation of the United States’ primary law against covert foreign influence.

When Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu met with a group of pro-Israeli influencers last Friday, the message was clear:

— We have to fight back. How do we fight back? Our influencers. I think you should also talk to them if you have a chance, to that community, they are very important, he stated.

What Netanyahu didn’t mention was how lucrative it is to be one of “our influencers” – or that these influence campaigns are systematically hidden from the American public.

Documents reviewed and analyzed by Nick Cleveland-Stout at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft think tank show that a group of 14-18 influencers receive around $7,000 per post on platforms like TikTok and Instagram to shape American citizens’ opinions about Israel and the war in Gaza.

Secret propaganda campaign

The campaign, codenamed “Esther Project,” is coordinated by the company Bridges Partners on behalf of the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Between June and November this year, Israel pumped a total of $900,000 into the project during the ongoing genocide in Gaza.

Invoices that the company sent to media conglomerate Havas Media Group Germany show that an estimated $553,000 has been paid directly to the influencers for the period June to September. With an expected production of 75-90 posts, this means between $6,143 and $7,372 per post that reaches thousands or millions of American followers.

But despite the influencers being contractually obligated to start publishing in July, none of them have registered as foreign agents. They have also not labeled their posts with information that the content is financed by the Israeli government. This is a likely violation of the United States’ Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) – the country’s primary law against covert foreign influence.

“If they do it knowingly, it’s punishable”

— If you’re being paid by a foreign government to influence the American public on that government’s behalf you should register under FARA, says Ben Freeman, director of the Democratizing Foreign Policy program at the Quincy Institute.

— If these influencers are knowingly accepting money from the Israeli government to produce content for the Israeli government that’s being viewed by thousands or millions of their followers in the US, it’s not at all clear why they would not be required to register.

According to the law, FARA violations must be done “knowingly” to lead to criminal penalties. In other words: if the influencers are aware that they are receiving Israeli state funds to influence American citizens, they are committing a crime.

A lawyer who specializes in FARA and who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive issue is clear:

— Anyone who is distributing material propaganda and other informational materials aimed at the United States audience on behalf of a foreign government agency would need to be disclosed somewhere, including potentially by filing a short form registration.

Systematic concealment

In addition to not registering as foreign agents, the influencers are violating another basic requirement: they must clearly label their posts so that viewers understand that the content is financed by the Israeli government – either in the post itself or on their profile.

A search on X, TikTok and Instagram yields no results showing that any of the 14-18 influencers working for Bridges Partners have included such labeling. This is despite the labeling requirement being standard practice for all registered foreign agents on social media.

— It’s basically the foreign influence equivalent of the standard sponsorship flagged posts you see all over social media. It just lets social media users know that what they’re seeing is being paid for by the Israeli government, and then they can judge it accordingly.

The difference is crucial: when an influencer markets a commercial brand, there should always be clear labeling. But when the same influencer markets a foreign government’s political agenda in the middle of an ongoing war, there is no information at all showing how they are financed by a foreign power.

Wall of silence

The identity of the 14-18 influencers participating in the propaganda campaign has not been made public. Bridges Partners refuses to comment on the matter and Havas Media Group Germany, which oversees the entire campaign, has not responded to repeated requests from journalists about which influencers are participating or how much each one is paid. Uri Steinberg, who owns 50 percent of Bridges Partners, has also chosen not to respond to requests to comment on the influence campaign.

Currently, only Steinberg himself is registered as a foreign agent – despite it being the influencers who reach millions of Americans with the propaganda.

Bridges Partners, which is based in a townhouse on Capitol Hill in Washington D.C., has hired Nadav Shtrauchler – a former major from the IDF’s information unit. As legal counsel, the company has turned to the law firm Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, the same firm that previously represented the notorious Israeli spyware company NSO Group.

The name “Esther Project” resembles the Heritage Foundation’s “Project Esther” – a campaign that systematically labels critics of Israel as part of a network supporting “terrorists”. However, the Heritage Foundation itself claims there is no formal connection between the projects.

“It’s not just friendly relations”

Several influencers have made trips to Israel in recent months, partly financed through contracts with the Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Israel365 Action organized a trip in August that cost $86,000 in state funds. After the visit, influencer Lance Johnston declared that he was now “fine with sending them weapons”.

Republican politicians have also reacted to the revelations.

“Any social media influencer, if they are getting paid by a foreign country, they have to register under FARA”, states US Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene.

Former Congressman Matt Gaetz was even clearer:

“In this particular case, the foreign government is pursuing a specific agenda, it is not just friendly relations between our countries. There is a war going on in Gaza”.

Critical timing

Millions of Americans are thus exposed daily to political content without knowing that what they see is paid propaganda from a foreign warring state. The influencers who receive $7,000 per post consciously choose to hide from their followers who pays for the words they spread.

The campaign also comes at a critical time when young Americans are becoming increasingly critical of Israel, the genocide in Gaza and the unlimited American support for the country.

When public opinion turns against Israel, driven by images of Palestinian suffering on social media, a secret influence campaign on the same platforms becomes an important strategic weapon for shaping the narrative and portraying the destruction of Gaza as a noble and necessary defensive war.

Islamist leader monitored by Swedish security police – now celebrated drone specialist in Ukraine

The war in Ukraine

Published 8 October 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Viktor Gaziev is clear that he would never have joined the war without the involvement of Swedish authorities.
3 minute read

Sweden’s security police (Säpo) considered him such a dangerous threat that he was kept under daily surveillance. But in June 2023, Viktor Gaziev disappeared – and now he has been found in Ukraine where he has become a celebrated drone expert, received awards and met President Zelensky.

He claims that Swedish authorities pressured him to go to war and escorted him there.

Viktor Gaziev was one of the so-called six imams who in 2019 were classified as a serious threat to Sweden’s national security. The Swedish government decided to deport him, but the deportation was never carried out – Gaziev was deemed at risk of torture and persecution in his homeland Russia.

Instead, the radical Islamist was kept under extensive surveillance with daily reporting requirements to police. Until he suddenly disappeared.

Swedish public television SVT’s investigative program Uppdrag granskning has now tracked him down – not in Sweden, but as a drone specialist in the Ukrainian army.

Pressured to go to war

How did an internationally wanted person without travel documents and with daily reporting requirements at Gävle police station in central Sweden end up in Ukraine?

Gaziev himself describes it as the result of pressure from Sweden’s Security Police (Säpo). He claims that Säpo arranged a private meeting with his ex-wife and urged her to persuade him to leave. The incentive was allegedly a promise that the agency would not hinder her application for Swedish citizenship.

Several other people classified as security threats confirm to Uppdrag granskning that they received similar proposals to go to Ukraine.

However, Security Police operational chief Fredrik Hallström completely rejects the claims: “We do not conduct the type of activities alleged here”, he maintains, continuing:

— We do not suggest or try to persuade anyone to travel to a specific place. Least of all to war-torn Ukraine.

Military intelligence contact planned the trip

In chat conversations that Uppdrag granskning has accessed, it emerges how the trip to Ukraine was planned in detail. A person who identifies himself as a Swedish soldier discusses flight tickets to Poland and which border crossing they should use. Gaziev claims the person works for MUST, Sweden’s military intelligence service.

In the chat, Gaziev sends his bank details and shows military equipment he bought for the war. According to Gaziev, it was his contact person at the Security Police who gave him the contact to MUST.

— They talked to the military service in Poland. It was a man and a woman who flew with me to Warsaw without documents, without a passport, just a Swedish driver’s license.

MUST has refused to comment on the allegations at all.

Ukrainian commander confirms Swedish involvement

However, Murad Zumzo, a commander in the Ukrainian army, gives a completely different picture than Säpo. He says he spoke on the phone with a Swedish person who matched the name in the chat – and that the Swede had a central role in getting Gaziev to Ukraine.

— He made contact and took him to the Polish-Ukrainian border. I sent two of my guys there. The Swedes and Poles handed him over, says Zumzo.

Viktor Gaziev is clear that he would not have joined the war without Swedish authorities’ involvement and he took Säpo’s alleged promise about citizenship for his ex-wife very seriously.

But today he believes he was manipulated – his ex-wife was denied her citizenship application with reference to information from the Security Police itself.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.