Friday, July 25, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Gina Carano sues Disney for breach of contract

Published 10 February 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Gina Carano at a fan convention in 2021.
2 minute read

Actress and former martial artist Gina Carano announced this week that she has filed a lawsuit against the Walt Disney Corporation and Lucasfilm. Carano claims she has been defamed and falsely accused of bigotry and intolerance by the companies.

X owner Elon Musk has endorsed the lawsuit and is encouraging others to join.

For two seasons, Gina Carano starred as former rebel soldier Cara Dune in the streaming series and Star Wars spin-off The Mandalorian.

But in February 2021, Lucasfilm and Disney announced her firing, accusing Carano of “social media posts denigrating people based on their cultural & religious identities” and calling them “abhorrent & unacceptable”.

Not only was Gina Carano fired from The Mandalorian, but plans for the rumored spin-off series Rangers of the New Republic (starring Cara Dune) were also shelved.

In an effort to help and support his cause, X owner Elon Musk, who has previously said that he would cover any legal costs for “anyone who feels they have been discriminated against because of their activity on X”, has said that he will help Gina Carano with her lawsuit.

In a post on X, Carano writes that she contacted Elon Musk after reading his request for financial and legal support. After several months of discussions with attorneys, they agreed to proceed with her lawsuit.

“Demonized and dehumanized”

Gina Carano urged people to look at the social media posts that Disney and Lucasfilm have condemned and released the following statement.

– The truth is I was being hunted down from everything I posted to every post I liked because I was not in line with the acceptable narrative of the time. My words were consistently twisted to demonize and dehumanize me. [This is] a bullying smear campaign aimed at silencing, destroying and making an example out of me.

While Carano was immediately signed to a movie role by conservative producer and political commentator Ben Shapiro, she says it has been difficult to work in the industry “with the lies and labels stuck on me, backed and encouraged by the most powerful entertainment company in the world”.

However, she stressed that she is not aware of any ill will on the part of any of her colleagues.

– Artists do not sign away our rights as American citizens when we enter into employment. I have spoken to all my co-stars since I was fired & there is nothing but care and kind words between us. I respect their right to free speech and do not have to think the same on every issue to be their friends and work with them and I know they feel the same towards me.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Israeli minister: “All of Gaza will be Jewish”

The genocide in Gaza

Published today 19:32
– By Editorial Staff
"Thank God, we are erasing this evil. All of Gaza will be Jewish," said Jewish Power representative Amichai Eliyahu recently on an Israeli radio program regarding the starving population in Gaza and the ongoing genocide. Right: The starving children in Gaza where the situation is becoming increasingly desperate.
2 minute read

Israeli Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu has drawn strong criticism after statements about Israel not needing to worry about starvation in Gaza. The statement is one in a series from officials within Israel’s far-right government in line with the genocidal ambitions expressed already at the beginning of the Gaza war.

The far-right politician Amichai Eliyahu from the Jewish Power party (Otzma Yehudit) dismissed renewed UN warnings about artificial famine in the besieged enclave on Thursday. In an interview with Radio Kol Barama, he claimed that the Israeli government is “rushing to erase Gaza”.

Thank God, we are erasing this evil. All of Gaza will be Jewish, Eliyahu said according to Israeli news site Ynet.

— We shouldn’t be dealing with hunger in Gaza – let the world take care of them. No nation feeds its enemies. Have we completely lost our minds? Should we care about their evening meal?, he added.

Strong criticism from government leadership

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly distanced himself from the statements and pointed out that Eliyahu is not a member of the security cabinet, which decides on warfare.

“This government’s policy is clear and unified. His statements do not represent it”, Netanyahu said.

Israel’s ambassador to the US, Yechiel Leiter, also condemned Eliyahu’s comments and called them “wrong, foolish and completely unrepresentative of Israel’s government and people”. In a post on X, he emphasized that Israel is committed to creating a mechanism to deliver humanitarian aid to civilians in Gaza “but not through Hamas”.

UN warns of mass starvation

According to local health authorities, more than 59,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since October 2023, including at least 113 who died of starvation. World Health Organization chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on Wednesday that Israel’s “blockade” has brought Gaza to the brink of “mass starvation”.

Philippe Lazzarini, head of the UN Palestinian refugee agency UNRWA, has urged Israel to allow access for the 6,000 aid transports currently stalled in Egypt and Jordan.

Israeli officials have in turn accused Hamas and other armed groups of hoarding supplies and attacking civilians at distribution sites.

WEF founder manipulated reports to protect political relationships

The globalist agenda

Published today 12:00
– By Editorial Staff
"We must protect our relationships with India before Davos 2019", Schwab is alleged to have said, manipulating the organization's prestigious "Global Competitiveness Report" for political reasons.
3 minute read

Klaus Schwab allegedly altered countries’ rankings in important economic reports to avoid affecting relationships with India, and to prevent Brexit supporters from being able to use positive figures for the United Kingdom. Meanwhile, extensive expenses of 900,000 Swiss francs that his wife charged through WEF are being scrutinized.

World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab is accused of manipulating the organization’s prestigious “Global Competitiveness Report” for political reasons. According to an ongoing investigation, he changed countries’ rankings to protect diplomatic relationships and thereby prevent the results from being used politically, reports the Swiss newspaper Tages-Anzeiger.

Changed to protect India relations

The serious incident occurred in 2017-2018 when a methodology change caused India to fall over 20 places in the ranking while the United Kingdom climbed from seventh to fourth place. Schwab then intervened directly and emailed those responsible with the justification: “We must protect our relationships with India before Davos 2019”.

He did not want to risk Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi canceling his visit. At the same time, he wrote that the United Kingdom “must not see any improvement” because this would be “exploited by the Brexit camp”.

Despite Schwab saying he supported the new methodology, he concluded: “This year we simply cannot implement this”. Otherwise, the good relationships with India, which he had “invested so much in during the year”, would be destroyed.

The report was eventually published, but with altered figures: India ended up in 40th place and the United Kingdom in eighth place – both only one place worse than in 2016.

Shared secret reports with governments

Even more serious is that Schwab in 2022 allegedly shared a secret draft of the report with a government representative from an Arab country whose ranking had deteriorated significantly. After receiving “critical feedback”, Schwab recommended to management that the report not be published at all.

The 2021-2022 report was never published, and no new versions have appeared since then.

Wife’s expenses without official role

In parallel, Schwab’s wife Hilde is now being scrutinized, who without an official function at WEF has had her travels charged through the organization. Lawyers from the firm Homburger have discovered questionable expenses totaling 900,000 Swiss francs (€970,000) over the past ten years.

Hilde Schwab runs her own foundation for social entrepreneurship but has no formal role within WEF. Despite this, her travels, which cannot always be explained by her activities, have been paid for by WEF.

Denies the allegations

Schwab has tried to defend himself against the manipulation allegations:

To construct this as a manipulation is an insult to my academic standing, he has said.

He claims that he only forwarded corrections from governments to use updated data or correct errors in the analysis.

Investigation ongoing

The Nordic Times already reported in April that Klaus Schwab was forced to resign from WEF and that a comprehensive investigation is ongoing. The federal foundation authority is also reviewing the use of WEF’s funds.

An important board meeting has been postponed, but time is running out. By the end of August at the latest, invitations to WEF 2026 must be sent out.

Schwab’s spokesman, Jörg Denzler, refuses to comment on the investigation:

— The June agreement is of central significance for Mr. Schwab. In contrast to some other parties, Mr. Schwab fully complies with the terms and does not comment publicly when approached by the media.

Russia rules out talks between Putin and Zelensky without final agreement

The war in Ukraine

Published today 10:10
– By Editorial Staff
Moscow says no to a meeting between Putin and Zelenskyj before a finished agreement is on the table.
2 minute read

Russia currently rules out a meeting between President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, unless the parties first agree on the draft of a finished memorandum. This was stated by Vladimir Medinsky, the Kremlin’s lead negotiator in talks with Ukraine, in connection with the latest peace talks in Turkey.

Medinsky, one of the most prominent representatives of the Kremlin in the ongoing peace negotiations, emphasized that a personal meeting between the two leaders is only meaningful if they have already agreed on the terms of a peace agreement and are ready to sign it.

There’s no point in meeting only to begin negotiations from square one, he said, referring to previous summits that in practice prolonged the conflict rather than resolved it.

He also brought up historical cases where heads of state only met to sign already negotiated agreements, not to initiate new processes.

As an example, Medinsky mentioned the Chinese civil war in the 1940s:

Chiang Kai-shek constantly insisted on meeting in person to discuss everything. I believe they met five times, smiled, and posed for photographs, but it did not bring an end to the civil war. The core issues remained unresolved, and the war went on.

The Kremlin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, confirmed Medinsky’s line and stated that Russia considers such a meeting relevant only when a final agreement is in place.

The statements come at a time when the question of a meeting between Putin and Zelensky is once again being discussed internationally as a possible path to peace in Ukraine.

Parties far apart from each other

Many diplomats and international actors, not least in the West, have for a long time advocated direct talks between the two leaders to break the diplomatic deadlock in the conflict.

Volodymyr Zelenskyj has previously expressed a willingness to meet Putin to discuss peace, but has also set demands including the withdrawal of Russian forces and confirmation of Ukraine’s sovereignty as prerequisites.

Russia, for its part, has consistently demanded that the talks should be based on Russian security interests, including control over certain territories – something that the Ukrainian government rejects.

Medinsky’s and Peskov’s statements underscore that Russia does not see any immediate room for a summit as long as the fundamental prerequisites for peace are not already established, which makes the conditions for direct dialogue continue to be difficult.

Gabbard accuses Obama of years-long coup against Trump

Donald Trump's USA

Published yesterday 12:21
– By Editorial Staff
There is indisputable evidence that shows in detail how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence assessment that they knew was false, according to Gabbard.
3 minute read

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released a previously classified report that she claims reveals how former President Barack Obama and his administration deliberately created false information about Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Gabbard describes it as “the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history”.

At a White House press conference on July 23, Gabbard presented the declassified report from the House Intelligence Committee, which was originally produced in September 2020.

The report questions the foundations for the assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin would have wanted to help Donald Trump win the election.

The stunning revelations that we are releasing today should be of concern to every American. This is not about Democrats or Republicans. This has to do with the integrity of our Democratic Republic, Gabbard said at the press conference.

Obama “knew the report was false”

Gabbard accuses the Obama administration of deliberately creating an intelligence assessment that they “knew was false”. She claims they created a fabricated narrative that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Trump win.

There is irrefutable evidence that detail how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false, Gabbard explained.

According to the report, Obama allegedly issued “unusual directives” to expedite the publication of the intelligence assessment before Trump’s inauguration, bypassing normal coordination procedures within the intelligence services.

CIA accused of inadequate sources

The report criticizes the CIA for failing to follow its own standards and for basing its conclusions on what is described as “scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment of a sentence from one of the substandard reports”.

Gabbard claims that then-CIA Director John Brennan and the intelligence community deliberately suppressed information showing that Putin “held back from leaking compromising material on Hillary Clinton prior to the election”.

Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a quote clear preference for Trump, she said.

Claims about Clinton’s health condition

The report describes extensive material that Russia allegedly had about Hillary Clinton, including documents that according to Gabbard showed “psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression” and claims that Clinton was “on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers”.

Gabbard also claims that the intelligence community excluded important information that would have contradicted their main conclusions, including reports that “some Russian intelligence officials were planning for candidate Hillary Clinton’s victory”.

Demands for judicial review

She has demanded a criminal investigation of officials from the Obama era and accuses them of manufacturing a false narrative to discredit a sitting president. Trump has supported her conclusions and demanded prosecution of Obama and senior officials in his administration.

They conspired to subvert the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump in that election in November of 2016 they worked with their partners in the media to promote this lie ultimately to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump and launching what would be a years-long coup against him and his administration, Gabbard said.

The report also claims that internal US intelligence assessments consistently concluded that Russia lacked both the capability and intent to intervene in the 2016 election, but that these findings were deliberately suppressed.

Russia has denied all involvement in American elections, and President Putin has repeatedly said that Moscow does not favor any particular American political candidate.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.