Saturday, November 1, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Zelensky: Ready to talk to Putin

The war in Ukraine

Published February 8, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Vladimir Putin has also opened the door to negotiations with Kiev.

Ukraine's leader, Volodymyr Zelensky, says he is ready to sit at the negotiating table and talk to Russian President Vladimir Putin if that is the only way to bring peace to Ukraine.

However, Zelensky is careful to emphasize that he still considers Putin "an enemy" and "murderer" but that the most important thing now is to end the war quickly.

In a lengthy interview with British journalist Piers Morgan, published this week, the Ukrainian president confirmed that he has abandoned his previous position of not giving up any territory to Russia and that the focus is now on ending the war.

– Today, we cannot reclaim all our territories. We are reasonable people. We cannot sacrifice millions of our people for an outcome that is uncertain.

He also states that he is ready to negotiate with Russia and Putin something previously dismissed as unthinkable.

– If this is the only configuration in which we can bring peace to the citizens of Ukraine and not lose more lives, then, of course, we will proceed with a meeting involving these four parties (Ukraine, Russia, the US and Europe).

– Frankly, what difference does it make how I personally feel about him? (Putin) I still won’t regard him in a positive light. To be honest, I consider him an enemy. And, truthfully, I believe he sees me as an enemy as well. That’s all.

Demanding security guarantees

Zelensky claims Putin is "a murderer and a terrorist" but says he is ready to sit down at the negotiating table if his allies demand it.

– Talking to Putin at all – one conversation with this murderer – is already a compromise. Isn’t that true? I am convinced that engaging with him is already a compromise for the entire civilized world. Beyond that, everyone must stay strong, support Ukraine, strengthen Ukraine, and not betray Ukraine, he pleads.

Ukraine's leaders point out that Donald Trump wants to see results and hopes that the active phase of the war can soon be over but also emphasize that they want strong security guarantees to avoid a flare-up.

– Should we not think about our grandchildren? If the Russians decide to come back in 10 or 20 years, is that not a risk?

"NATO provides guarantees"

The solution, according to the President, is for Ukraine to be granted NATO membership very quickly but that is not enough. Ukraine, with the help of its allies, must also build "the largest professional army in Europe".

– NATO provides guarantees. It makes another Russian invasion highly unlikely. NATO is also a guarantee for NATO members themselves – Ukraine will strengthen the alliance with hundreds of thousands of highly trained troops, making NATO even stronger. That matters for everyone. And NATO is even a guarantee for Russians: it ensures that Ukraine, over time, will not wage war against them but will resolve all issues diplomatically.

NATO soldiers during an exercise. Photo: NATO/CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

In practice, however, Ukraine's membership of the US-led military pact is considered highly unlikely by many analysts and in such a scenario, according to Zelensky, "a million-strong army – at a minimum" is needed. However, such an effort is seen as very costly.

"Give us nuclear weapons"

If Ukraine's NATO membership remains a distant dream that is unlikely to materialize in the next few years, Zelensky suggests another solution that Ukraine's allies share their nuclear weapons with Kiev.

– What will protect us from this evil? All this time, or along this entire path, what support package will it be? What missiles? Will we get our nuclear weapons back? Let us get our nuclear weapons back, he demands.

When the Soviet Union fell, Ukraine inherited some 1,700 nuclear warheads, which however remained under Moscow's operational control and which were also handed over to Russia in 1994 in exchange for security guarantees. It is these nuclear weapons that Zelensky now wants back and describes as "his".

– Give us nuclear weapons back, give us strong missile systems, partners, help us fund a million-man army, and deploy your contingent to those parts of our country where we want the maximum stability, the president repeats.

Handing over Soviet nuclear weapons was a fatal mistake, says Zelensky. Photo: George Chernilevsky

"Deserves a just peace"

If Ukraine had not handed over Soviet nuclear weapons in the 1990s, Putin would never have dared to attack, according to Zelenskyj, who believes that this decision effectively left Ukraine completely unprotected without receiving anything of value in return.

– Those were our security guarantees. Undoubtedly, it was because of them that he invaded. They should have been exchanged, and if we were to give up nuclear weapons, that could have been discussed. There was certainly such a policy in the world. But for what? It should have been exchanged for NATO, it should have been exchanged for NATO weapons. We didn’t even start receiving NATO weapons, honestly, until after the full-scale invasion.

The interview ends with Zelensky stressing that the focus now must be on not just ending the war but ensuring it does not resume again.

– I believe it would be incredibly difficult for us to withstand another war if it were to return. That’s why I always emphasize the importance of security guarantees – guarantees strong enough to ensure that this man (Putin) never comes back. I simply don’t want the Ukrainian people to have to face another challenge like this.

– We deserve a just peace. And today, the timeline for these agreements, the strength of these agreements depend on President Trump. And they depend on us, on our dialogue, and on the pressure placed on Putin. I believe the sooner we do this, the happier people will be – everywhere.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Russia conducts nuclear drills – Sweden offers Gripen jets to Ukraine

The war in Ukraine

Published October 22, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy together with Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson during a visit to Saab in Linköping, Sweden, where a letter of intent regarding the export of around a hundred Gripen fighter jets to Ukraine was promised. Simultaneously, Russia conducted a large-scale nuclear weapons exercise, including the launch of a Yars intercontinental ballistic missile from the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in the Arkhangelsk region.

Russia carried out a large-scale nuclear missile exercise on Wednesday, while Sweden signed a letter of intent to export Gripen fighter jets to Ukraine. The announcement comes one day after the United States announced that a planned summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin has been postponed.

The Kremlin released video footage showing Chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov reporting to President Putin about the exercises. Russia launched missiles from ground-based platforms, submarines and aircraft, including intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of reaching the United States. However, the missiles did not contain live nuclear warheads.

During critical phases of the Ukraine war, Putin has repeatedly reminded the world of Russia's nuclear capabilities as a warning to Kyiv and its Western allies. NATO also conducted nuclear deterrence exercises in October.

Sweden offers fighter jets

Sweden announced that the country has signed a letter of intent to export Gripen fighter jets to Ukraine. The announcement comes as European governments intensify their efforts in the Ukraine war, which has now lasted three years and eight months.

Ukrainian pilots have been in Sweden to test the Gripen, a robust and cost-effective alternative to the American F-35.

— We have begun work to acquire Gripen and expect that the future contract will provide us with at least 100 such aircraft, said President Volodymyr Zelenskyy during a visit to Swedish defense company Saab.

Kyiv aims to receive and begin using the aircraft as early as next year.

Summit postponed

After months of stalled diplomacy, Putin and Trump spoke last week and unexpectedly announced that they would hold a summit in Hungary within a couple of weeks. But after a phone call between the countries' foreign ministers, the White House announced that Trump has no plans to meet Putin "in the foreseeable future".

Trump explained that he did not want a "wasted meeting" – something the Kremlin said Putin also wants to avoid.

— The dates have not been set yet, but thorough preparation is needed, and that takes time, said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov.

The delay came after Russia reiterated to the United States its conditions for peace, including that Ukraine should hand over control of the entire Donbas region, according to three sources to Reuters. This represented a rejection of Trump's statement that both sides should stop at the current front lines.

Shares in European defense companies rose on news of the postponed summit. Most European governments strongly support Kyiv and have pledged to increase their military spending for the war.

Trump pressures Zelensky to accept Russia’s peace terms

The war in Ukraine

Updated October 21, 2025, Published October 20, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Donald Trump has, according to multiple sources, urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to agree to Russia's demands to end the war in Ukraine. A stormy meeting at the White House on Friday was reportedly marked by raised voices, heated arguments, and Trump's repeated echoing of Putin's positions.

During the meeting, Trump allegedly warned Zelensky that Putin had threatened to "destroy Ukraine" if the country does not accept the terms, reports Financial Times.

Sources with insight say the meeting between the parties devolved several times into "shouting matches", where Donald Trump used profanities and threw frontline maps across the room.

Trump reportedly insisted that Zelensky must hand over the entire Donbass region to Moscow, and repeated arguments that Putin had made in a phone call the day before. At the same time, he later supported freezing the current frontlines, reflecting his shifting stance on the issue.

Zelensky and his delegation had hoped to convince Trump to deliver Tomahawk cruise missiles to Ukraine, but the US president refused.

If the reports are accurate, the meeting can be compared to the contentious meeting in February, where Trump and Vice President JD Vance criticized Zelensky for lack of gratitude toward the United States.

Donald Trump Volodymyr Zelenskyj
The meeting between Zelensky and Trump in February earlier this year ended in open quarreling. Facsimile: Fox4

Zelensky's position unchanged

European officials report that Trump repeatedly echoed Putin's arguments word for word on several occasions, even when they contradicted his own previous statements about Russia's weaknesses.

One official said Trump called the conflict a "special operation, not even a war" and warned Zelenskyy that Ukraine risked destruction.

Trump also expressed that Russia's economy "is doing well", which contrasts with his previous public statements that Putin's economy is near collapse.

Zelensky commented to journalists:  Trump wants a quick victory - an end to the war - and that would be a victory for all reasonable people. Putin, however, wants the total occupation of Ukraine.

After the meeting, Zelensky stated that he had made clear to Trump that Ukraine's position remains unchanged. Trump told Fox News on Sunday that he was convinced the conflict could be ended, adding that Putin "going to take something, he’s won certain property".

Ukraina - ryska drönarattacker - juni 2025
While peace negotiations between the parties are marked by disagreement and stubbornness, fighting continues with undiminished intensity (archive image June 2025). Photo: screenshot/Youtube/@CNN

Donbass in exchange for other regions

Putin has proposed in talks with Trump that Ukraine hand over all of Donbass in exchange for smaller areas in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. However, Zelenskyy stated that there is still no clarity about exactly what Russia is willing to give up in these regions.

Ukrainian officials warn that giving up the remaining Donbass would give Moscow territory that it only partially controls, since the war began over three years ago.

Oleksandr Merezhko, chairman of Ukraine's foreign affairs committee, says: – To give the Donbas to Russia without a fight is unacceptable for Ukrainian society, and Putin knows that. It’s not about getting more territory for Russia; it’s about how to destroy us from within.

Trump's repetition of Putin's rhetoric dampened hopes among many European allies for increased support to Kiev, despite him previously expressing frustration over Putin's unwillingness to negotiate directly with Zelensky.

Zelensky commented after returning home: – We have moved closer to a possible end to the war. That doesn’t mean it will definitely end, but President Trump has achieved a lot in the Middle East, and riding that wave he wants to end Russia’s war against Ukraine.

British field marshal: Ukraine cannot win against Russia

The war in Ukraine

Published October 19, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Even with expanded Western support, Lord David Richards assesses that Ukraine cannot win the war.

One of Britain's highest-ranking military officers assesses that Ukraine will never be able to defeat Russia on the battlefield and should instead negotiate for peace.

In an interview with The Independent's podcast World of Trouble, Field Marshal Lord David Richards argues that Ukraine simply does not have the capacity to drive Russian forces from its territory and should instead seek a negotiated solution.

Richards, who was promoted to the country's most prestigious five-star military rank earlier this year and led NATO forces during the troop surge in Afghanistan, is critical of how Ukraine's allies have managed their support.

— What we have done in the case of Ukraine is encourage Ukraine to fight, but not given them the means to win, says the former Chief of the Defence Staff.

When Richards is asked to reflect on Ukraine's chances of success against Russia, he is clear.

— My view is that they would not win.

When the interviewer asks whether Ukraine could win even with the right resources, the answer is brief.

— No.

Pressed further on whether the right resources could make a difference, he repeated his answer and added:

— No, they haven't got the manpower.

Not an existential issue for the West

Richards, who is the only British officer to have commanded large American combat forces since 1945, believes the prospects for Ukraine are bleak.

— Unless we were to go in with them – which we won't do because Ukraine is not an existential issue for us. It clearly is for the Russians, by the way.

— We've decided because it's not an existential issue, we will not go to war. We are, you can argue – and I absolutely accept it – in some sort of hybrid war. But that's not the same as a shooting war in which our soldiers are dying in large numbers, Richards continues.

He emphasizes that despite sympathy for the Ukrainians and their achievements, he still believes the war is not in the West's vital national interests.

— My instinct is that the best Ukraine can do, and you already see President Zelensky, who's an inspirational leader … the best they can do is a sort of a score draw.

Zelensky met Trump

The statement comes after Volodymyr Zelensky flew to Washington DC to meet Donald Trump and try to convince him to give Ukraine Tomahawk cruise missiles.

But Zelensky's plans to pressure Trump appear to have been undermined by Vladimir Putin, who spoke with the American president hours before the White House meeting with the Ukrainian leader.

At a packed press conference, Trump appeared hesitant to give away American weapons, while maintaining a friendly tone with Zelensky. The American president emphasized his own country's need to maintain stockpiles.

Zelensky said very little, except to politely suggest that Ukraine could offer its drone technology in an exchange deal. Trump seemed open to the idea.

After the summit, Zelensky said that Trump had not said no to the idea of Tomahawk missiles – but not yes either.

Iraq war built on lies

In the extensive interview about his military life, the field marshal revealed that although his career has been successful, there have been occasions when he came into conflict with the establishment and often disagreed with his military and political superiors.

As a major general and deputy chief of the army under General Sir Mike Jackson, he says it was obvious to him that British Prime Minister Tony Blair's government was lying about its claims that Saddam Hussein was developing nuclear weapons in Iraq.

Tony Blair's government lied about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction to legitimize the invasion. Photo: World Economic Forum/CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Together with other senior officers, he questioned the legality of Britain's decision to join American forces in the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Before the British joined the invasion, Blair presented an intelligence document to parliament claiming that the Iraqi dictator was developing nuclear weapons.

"This stinks"

The document, which has since been mocked as "the dodgy dossier" for its unfounded claims, caused dismay among senior officers who had access to the actual intelligence information.

— "I and others encouraged the chief of defence staff to query whether this was legal and what was the basis of this intelligence, says Lord Richards.

— I do remember one officer – who I won't name but was on the intelligence side – saying, 'Don't worry. We'll find something to put'. Yeah, 'don't worry. We'll find something about that. We'll justify what we were doing', he recounts.

— I went back to say to Mike Jackson, 'This stinks'.

Hegseth to Europe: Buy more American weapons for Ukraine

The war in Ukraine

Published October 15, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Pete Hegseth together with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.

Western military support to Ukraine has nearly halved over the summer. Now the US Secretary of Defense is demanding that NATO countries once again open their wallets for more American weapons deliveries – but several major European nations are hesitating.

Pete Hegseth had a clear message when he met with his NATO counterparts in Brussels on Wednesday: Europe must invest even more money in American weapons for Ukraine.

The US Secretary of Defense pointed to a report from the Kiel Institute for the World Economy showing that military support to Kiev fell dramatically during the summer months – a 43 percent decrease compared to the first half of the year.

Hegseth was explicit about his view on how peace is achieved.

— You get peace when you are strong. Not when you use strong words or wag your fingers, you get it when you have strong and real capabilities that adversaries respect, he declared to assembled journalists.

Zelensky wants more

At the center of discussions is the PURL program – Prioritized Ukraine Requirements List – which has fundamentally changed how the U.S. supports Ukraine militarily. Previously, Washington donated weapons directly, but now NATO countries must pay for the deliveries themselves.

According to Hegseth, the logic is simple: The more Europe buys, the faster the war can be concluded.

— Our expectation today is that more countries donate even more, that they purchase even more to provide for Ukraine, to bring that conflict to a peaceful conclusion, he said.

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte announced that $2 billion has been pledged so far through the PURL system, and that he expects additional contributions. But the figure falls far short of the $3.5 billion that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had hoped to secure by October.

Three countries made new pledges on Wednesday: Sweden, Estonia, and Finland. Corresponding commitments from European heavyweights such as Spain, Italy, France, and the United Kingdom are still lacking.

USA - the big winner?

The Russian government has accused Kiev's European financiers of prolonging the conflict at the expense of Ukrainian lives, and Moscow claims that European countries are unwilling to acknowledge the failure of their strategy.

Meanwhile, European NATO members continue to bear the economic consequences of their sanctions policy against Russia. After rejecting Russian energy, many EU economies have been hit by rising production costs and widespread bankruptcies in industry.

The United States, however, has benefited from developments through increased investment flows and higher sales of liquefied natural gas to Europe.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.