Saturday, June 21, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Trudeau forced to resign after growing discontent

Published 7 January 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Trudeau announces that he is leaving his post.
4 minute read

Demands for the removal of Canada’s deeply unpopular prime minister grew during the fall and eventually the situation became untenable. Now Justin Trudeau has announced that he will resign as soon as his party (the Liberal Party of Canada) has appointed a new leader.

Already in early fall, the social democratic NDP chose to leave the coalition government after several conflicts. The left-liberal government then also lost its majority in parliament – which is why it has not been able to pass many of its policy proposals.

– Parliament has been paralyzed for months, after what has been the longest session of a minority parliament in Canadian history, Trudeau himself admits.

The Canadian Parliament was supposed to resume its work on January 27 but the recess is now extended to March 24 while a new leader is elected.

The opposition, led by the liberal-conservative Tory Party, has called several votes of no confidence in Trudeau during the fall and tried to bring about a new election. According to opinion polls, they are also the ones who would win big if there were an election today.

Martial law against citizens

Although the Prime Minister has survived the no-confidence votes, criticism from his own party colleagues has become increasingly harsh and many voices within his own party have called for his resignation.

If I’m having to fight internal battles, I cannot be the best option in that election, he said.

The reasons why many Canadians want Trudeau gone are many and vary depending on who you ask. Some are unhappy with the borderless mass immigration policy pursued by his government – while others point out that his government has contributed greatly to the economic crisis in which a large part of the population is now struggling to cope with everyday life.

During COVID-19, Trudeau also pursued an extremely harsh policy, including martial law and a state of emergency against his own people when they protested against the lockdown policy.

Trudeau was accused of pursuing an almost dictatorial policy and citizens who showed their displeasure were subjected to police violence, had their bank accounts frozen or were otherwise harassed.

Klaus Schwab’s disciple

Another reason why Trudeau is a very unpopular leader in many camps is his links to globalist networks and organizations not least Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum. Many have pointed out that Trudeau does not seem to serve the Canadian people first and foremost, but completely different interests, and seems to be Klaus Schwab’s follower, something the aging globalist himself has confirmed.

– I must say that when I mention our names like Mrs. Merkel and even Vladimir Putin, and so on. All of them have been Young Global Leaders at the World Economic Forum. But what we are very proud of right now is the young generation as Prime Minister, President of Argentina and so on, that we are penetrating the governments, he told us in 2017.

– Yesterday I was at a reception for Prime Minister and I should know that half of his cabinet or even more than half of his cabinet are from the World Economic Forum’s Young Global Leaders, he continued.

Left-liberal identity politics

Schwab has also proclaimed that humanity is facing “a fourth industrial revolution” that will “lead to a fusion of our physical, digital and biological identities“, and Trudeau in particular has been praised as an ultimate representative of this world order.

– I couldn’t imagine anybody (than Trudeau) who could represent more the world which will come out of this fourth industrial revolution, Schwab said back in 2016.

Perhaps more than any other Western leader, Trudeau has also profiled himself as a proponent of left-liberal identity politics with an explicit focus on LGBTQ issues, feminism and the fight against alleged racism and discrimination.

Critics have also pointed out that throughout his career, the prime minister has had a habit of behaving in an overly activist and theatrical manner for example, kneeling in public in support of the pro-violence Black Lives Matter movement a behavior that many consider unworthy of a national leader.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Trump voters oppose US involvement in Israel’s war

Donald Trump's USA

Published 19 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Many Trump voters were attracted by his promises to avoid expensive and unnecessary wars.
3 minute read

A majority of Donald Trump’s supporters oppose US military intervention in Israel’s war against Iran. This is according to a new opinion poll published on Wednesday.

According to the comprehensive survey by The Economist/YouGov, conducted over the weekend, 53 percent of voters who supported Trump in the 2024 presidential election want the US to stay out of Israel’s attacks.

Only 19 percent of Trump’s supporters advocate US military intervention, while 63 percent prefer the administration to try to negotiate with Iran over its nuclear program.

Among all voters in the survey, 60 percent believed that the US should refrain from using military force in the conflict.

The results reflect long-standing public support for peaceful solutions to the Iran issue. An April poll by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs-Ipsos showed that eight in ten Americans preferred diplomacy or tougher economic sanctions to military action to stop Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

And even if diplomacy or sanctions were to fail, many Americans prefer other methods. The same Ipsos poll showed that 60 percent could envisage US cyberattacks against Iranian systems, but only 48 percent of Americans supported air strikes against nuclear facilities.

“A terrible mistake”

Opposition to military escalation is also evident among several Republican politicians.

This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution“, Thomas Massie, a Republican congressman from Kentucky, wrote on X earlier this week. He expressed his support for an attempt to gather support in the House of Representatives for a bipartisan resolution to limit the president’s war powers.

Libertarian Senator Rand Paul is also a very vocal opponent of dragging the US into yet another unnecessary war.

– I will not vote to send american kids to Iran. I think its a terrible mistake, every way is not our war. Our country is bankrupting itself over our own obligations to our own people. We should not ever send one soldier to Iran and I hope I am pretty clear on that, he recently declared in an interview.

Tim Burchett, Republican congressman from Tennessee, told CNN on Wednesday that he wanted to see “very little” US involvement in the escalating conflict.

– We don’t need another endless war in the Middle East. Old men make decisions and young men die, and that’s the history of war, he said.

– We need to take a deep breath and slow down this thing and let the Israelis do their thing. We do not need a three-front war in our lifetime.

At the same time, powerful neoconservative actors and the Israel lobby are waging an intense campaign to get the Trump administration to drag the US into the war – despite popular opposition and the president’s earlier promises to be a “peacemaker” and end all wars.

Republican Senator: The Bible commands us to support Israel

The escalation in the Middle East

Published 19 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Ted Cruz believes that Christians have a biblical duty to support Israel—otherwise, they risk incurring God's wrath.
3 minute read

Influential Republican Senator Ted Cruz justifies his support for Israel’s war against Iran by referring to the Bible and what he learned in Sunday school as a child.

During a heated conversation with former Fox News personality Tucker Carlson, Cruz revealed that his stance on the conflict is based more on religious dogma than on political analysis and judgment.

– Growing up in Sunday school I was taught from the Bible, those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who curse Israel will be cursed, and from my perspective, I want to be on the blessing side of things, Cruz explained.

The senator emphasized that his support for Israel is rooted in the belief that the US is commanded by God to stand behind the country.

– Where does my support for Israel come from? Number one, because biblically we are commanded to support IsraelIt doesn’t say the government of Israel, it says the nation of Israel. So that’s in the Bible. As a Christian, I believe that, he emphasized.

But Carlson questioned Cruz’s knowledge of the Bible and asked him to specify where in the Bible the verse can be found.

– I don’t have the scripture off the tip of mypull out your phone, Cruz replied, to which Carlson quickly pointed out:

– It’s in Genesis. You’re quoting a Bible phrase you don’t have context for, you don’t know where in the Bible it is… that’s your theology?’

Must Christians support Netanyahu?

The conversation quickly became more heated when Carlson continued to demand an answer as to why Christians must support Israel:

– We’re commanded as Christians to support the government of Israel? Define Israel. This is important. Are you kidding? This is a majority Christian country.

Cruz responded irritably:

– Define Israel? Do you not know what Israel is? That would be the country you’ve asked like 49 questions about.

Carlson pressed on:

– So that’s what Genesis—that’s what God is talking about? Is that the current borders, the current leadership, he’s talking about the political entity of Israel? Is the nation God is referring to in Genesis the same country Benjamin Netanyahu is running now?

Is the US at war or not?

Carlson, who had previously criticized Trump for abandoning his “America First” policy in connection with the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, then put Cruz under further pressure. The senator had previously made a surprising statement about the US’s role in the conflict.

– I’ve said we. Israel is leading them, but we’re supporting them, Cruz said when Carlson pointed out that he had previously said that the US was carrying out attacks against Iran.

Carlson reacted strongly to the fact that the US position in the conflict seems to vary depending on which politician you ask:

– You’re breaking news here. The US government last night denied… on behalf of Trump, that we’re acting on Israel’s behalf in any offensive capacity.

Cruz tried to backtrack:

– No, we’re not bombing them. Israel is bombing them.

You just said we were. This is high stakes. You’re a senator. If you’re saying the United States is at war with Iran right now, people are listening, Carlson pointed out.

No deeper knowledge of Iran

The host also took the opportunity to reveal Cruz’s ignorance about Iran when he asked the Republican politician how many people live in Iran.

– I don’t know the population, Cruz admitted, prompting Carlson to exclaim:

– Not at all? You don’t know the population of the people you’re trying to topple?

Cruz tried to turn the question back on Carlson, who quickly replied, “92 million”.

– How could you not know that? It’s kind of relevant because you’re calling for the overthrow of the government.

Cruz also admitted that he had no deeper knowledge of Iran’s ethnic composition and conceded that he was no expert on the country whose government he wants to overthrow. He also argued that this type of detailed knowledge was irrelevant in this context.

Islam set to become world’s largest religion

Published 18 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Today, there are approximately two billion Muslims, compared to 2.3 billion Christians.
2 minute read

Islam grew about three times faster than Christianity between 2010 and 2020. This is according to new data from the Pew Research Center, which points to higher birth rates and lower rates of conversion as the main explanations.

The global Muslim population increased by almost 21 percent over the past decade. Christianity grew significantly slower, at around 6 percent over the same period. Islam thus grew twice as fast as the world’s population as a whole, which increased by 10 percent.

According to the study, Islam also gained more new followers than all non-Muslim religions combined during the period.

Among the reasons for this development, the higher fertility rate among Muslim women and the lower average age of the Muslim population are particularly mentioned. Between 2015 and 2020, a Muslim woman had an average of 2.9 children, compared with 2.2 children for women who did not belong to Islam.

The net effect of people joining or leaving Islam was small – both groups accounted for about 1 percent in the 2010s.

Distribution based on region. Photo: Pew Research Center

Expanding rapidly

Christianity remains the world’s largest religion, with 2.3 billion followers in 2020. Islam is the second largest, with 2 billion. But while the number of Christians increased, the religion’s share of the world’s population declined by almost 2 percent during the period.

According to the study, the growth of Christianity has been slowed by a large number of people leaving the religion to become non-religious. For every 100 adults who grew up as Christians, the religion lost an average of 11.6 people.

– Islam is set to grow to become the world’s largest religion in years ahead, unless trend lines shift, said Conrad Hackett, senior researcher at the Pew Research Center and one of the report’s authors, according to The Washington Post.

He describes the development as “striking” and notes that Muslims and Christians are now much closer in number because Islam is expanding faster than any other major religion.

The survey is based on thousands of census data and surveys in 201 countries. It covers seven groups: Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, other religions, and people with no specific religious affiliation.

Iran used “undetectable” missile in attack on Israeli intelligence facility

The escalation in the Middle East

Published 17 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Images of what is believed to be the missile strike on Mossad headquarters in the capital Tel Aviv.
1 minute read

Iran’s Defense Ministry says it used a new, untraceable missile in the attack on the headquarters of the infamous Israeli intelligence agency Mossad in Tel Aviv and claims that the attack penetrated several layers of air defenses.

In today’s attack, we used missiles that could not be tracked or shot down, said Iranian Brigadier General Reza Talaei-Nik, according to the Iranian state news agency IRNA.

He described the operation as a surprise for the Israelis and warned that they would see more.

Earlier today, Iran said its missile strikes hit a military intelligence center and an operations planning center for Mossad located in the capital Tel Aviv. Images show a column of smoke at what is believed to be the site.

Talaei-Nik added that Israel is not prepared for a prolonged conflict.

– The Zionist regime cannot withstand a long war, he said, adding that Iran’s military has been equipped with advanced systems, some of which “have not even been put into use yet.”

At the same time, the Israeli military has introduced new strict censorship guidelines that severely restrict local media from reporting on missile and drone attacks on Israeli territory, which is believed to be a way of concealing Iran’s actual capacity to strike back and give the appearance of military superiority.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.