Thursday, October 2, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Swiss journalist: EU representatives fed up with “toxic” von der Leyen

Published 29 April 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Ursula von Der Leyen has long been a highly criticized figure.
2 minute read

Several high-ranking EU representatives have grown tired of Ursula von der Leyen’s substandard leadership and now want to remove the President of the European Commission.

This is according to Swiss media, which argues that a change in leadership could steer Europe in a much more positive direction again.

Journalist Philipp Gut argues in Die Weltwoche that EU policy is in an “obvious crisis” – with the trade war with the US in the West and the war in Ukraine in the East – while at the same time there is “a protracted and, for Europe, unflattering power struggle with China”.

Internally, there is disagreement, division and constant harassment of member states such as Hungary, which assert their sovereignty and democratic rights. Giorgia Meloni is breaking away from the anti-Trump camp and moving closer to the US president. Relations with rebellious Switzerland are also strained”, he notes, continuing:

As is sometimes brutally expressed: the fish rots from the head down. In this case, the head of the EU is personified by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen”.

Failed in most respects

He points out that von der Leyen has on several occasions opposed the US, not least with regard to the peace process in Ukraine. She has also taken a clear stand against Donald Trump and his opponents in several respects.

All this has a background that hardly speaks for von der Leyen’s diplomatic skills or statesmanship. She interfered in the US presidential election and took a resolute stand for Biden – a diplomatic faux pas with repercussions”, Gut continues.

Philipp Gut believes that von der Leyen has failed time and time again. Photo: Private/FB

He also points out that the economic outlook is bleak and that the EU’s stance toward the US hardly strengthens the Union’s position on trade issues.

Added to this are tendencies toward a surveillance society and continuing problems with respect for democracy. EU diplomats are openly threatening to strip Hungary of its voting rights. Her handling of the coronavirus pandemic has also left deep scars: secret messages and a refusal to provide transparency on agreements concluded behind closed doors have not been forgotten”, he argues.

“A departure could unlock a lot”

According to the journalist, the EU is currently in a “deplorable state” and, if it were a normal state, people would be asking whether it was time to replace its leadership.

But the EU is not a state – let alone a normal one. Nevertheless, there are now voices in diplomatic circles who believe that Ursula von der Leyen has become an increasingly toxic figure. A departure could unlock a lot”, he assesses, concluding:

A change of leadership would at least give European politics the chance to become more diverse and open again – both towards the West and the East. An idea worth reflecting on”.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Norwegian-led training base for Ukrainian soldiers opened in Poland

The new cold war

Published today 14:55
– By Editorial Staff
EU representatives visit Camp Jomsborg during the opening ceremony.
2 minute read

A Norwegian-led training center for Ukrainian troops has opened in southeastern Poland. Camp Jomsborg can accommodate up to 1,200 soldiers at a time and will focus on drone warfare.

The facility in Nowa Dęba-Lipa was inaugurated on Wednesday in the presence of defense ministers from Norway and Estonia, as well as representatives from Lithuania, Latvia, Sweden, Finland, Iceland and Denmark.

Camp Jomsborg, built by engineers from Norway’s Brigade Nord, represents another escalation of Western support for Ukraine since the war with Russia broke out in 2022. Poland has since become a central hub for logistics and training of Ukrainian forces.

According to Polish Defense Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz, the training will be conducted by instructors from allied NATO countries, with particular focus on modern drone technology.

— There is no other army in the world as well trained in drones and counter-drone systems as Ukraine’s, he claimed at the inauguration ceremony.

Around 250 Norwegian soldiers are already stationed at the site, and five rotations of 500 troops each are planned for next year. Estonia has also sent personnel, and more nations are expected to follow.

“Not a one-way street”

Kosiniak-Kamysz argued that the cooperation not only benefits Ukraine, but that the allied countries also benefit from Ukrainian combat experience.

— This is not a one-way street. An important element is that we will draw on Ukrainian experience. Right next to us is a drone launch strip, the defense minister said.

He emphasized that the base symbolizes NATO countries’ unity and claimed that “peace requires strength, skill, training, a well-prepared army, a strong alliance and resilient societies”.

On the same day as the inauguration, EU leaders agreed to create a so-called “drone wall” along the bloc’s eastern flank, following claims from Poland and Estonia about Russian airspace violations. Moscow has dismissed the accusations as groundless and accused the EU of trying to incite a war against Russia.

Stoltenberg’s call: Sacrifice welfare to stop Putin

The war in Ukraine

Published yesterday 16:26
– By Editorial Staff
Jens Stoltenberg meets Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
2 minute read

Norway’s finance minister and former NATO chief Jens Stoltenberg says that Western Europe must continue sending billions to Ukraine – even if this comes at the expense of citizens’ healthcare and welfare.

— I know that one additional billion to Ukraine or one billion extra to national defense is one billion less to other good purposes like health, education and infrastructure. But we must remember that the highest cost is to let Putin win, said Stoltenberg during the conference Warsaw Security Forum on Tuesday.

Stoltenberg, who led the US-led military alliance from 2014 to 2024, is now Norway’s finance minister and during the forum he revealed that Norway under his leadership has tripled military support to Ukraine and significantly increased its own defense spending.

His statements align with the military alliance’s current Secretary-General Mark Rutte, who has previously urged member countries to cut welfare in order to increase support to Kiev further.

Stoltenberg was NATO chief when the Ukraine conflict escalated into a full-scale war in February 2022. Even before the invasion, he had pushed for Ukrainian NATO membership and NATO-adapted infrastructure in the country – measures that according to Russia provoked the war.

“Starting to talk about a third world war”

After the 2022 invasion, Stoltenberg intensified demands that Ukraine should be admitted to the alliance and urged member countries to increase their military and financial support to the country.

Several Western European governments have dramatically increased their military spending over the past year, citing the alleged threat from Russia. At the same time, many European countries are struggling with strained welfare systems and demands for savings at home.

Moscow categorically denies plans to attack NATO or EU countries and claims that these allegations are used as a pretext to justify military investments at the expense of welfare.

— Some officials in NATO and the EU are beginning to seriously talk about a third world war as a potential scenario, warns Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, accusing the West of fueling anti-Russian hysteria.

Wikipedia’s founder on his life’s work: “A propaganda tool”

Internet censorship

Published yesterday 14:41
– By Editorial Staff
Larry Sanger believes that Wikipedia has been kidnapped and presents nine measures to "save" the encyclopedia.
4 minute read

Larry Sanger, co-founder of Wikipedia, presents nine radical theses to save his life’s work from what he calls ideological kidnapping.

In a comprehensive interview with Tucker Carlson, he reveals that anonymous editors can defame with impunity, that conservative news sources are systematically blocked, and that intelligence services have manipulated the encyclopedia’s content.

Larry Sanger, the philosopher who together with Jimmy Wales founded Wikipedia in 2001, paints a grim picture of what has happened to the world’s largest encyclopedia. In Tucker Carlson’s interview, published on X, he describes how the encyclopedia he created to bring together people with different perspectives has now become a propaganda tool.

— Wikipedia became a weapon of ideological theological war, used to destroy its enemies, Sanger states in the interview.

Tucker Carlson, who himself discovers during the interview that he is described as “a leading voice of white grievance politics” in his Wikipedia article, expresses his frustration over the platform’s development.

— I have sent money, like significant money to Wikipedia because I was so thrilled by its existence, Carlson recounts and continues:

— Now it’s like the leading source of dishonesty or I would say disinformation. They lie. They leave out key information.

Left early – saw where it was heading

Sanger left Wikipedia as early as 2002, explaining that he saw early signs that Jimmy Wales was allowing “troublemakers and left-wing activists” to take over the platform.

— The left has its march through the institutions. And when Wikipedia appeared, it was one of the institutions that they marched through, Sanger observes.

The original neutrality principle, which Sanger himself formulated, has according to him been distorted into its opposite. Where they previously strived to present all significant perspectives fairly, terms like “minority opinions” and “conspiracy theories” are now used to exclude certain viewpoints.

85 percent anonymous power holders

One of the interview’s most astonishing revelations concerns the identity of Wikipedia’s editors. According to Sanger’s investigation, 85 percent of the 62 most powerful accounts on Wikipedia are anonymous.

— We don’t know who they are. They can libel people with impunity, because they’re anonymous, says Sanger.

Tucker Carlson compares the situation to if history professors at Harvard and Yale suddenly refused to give their names:

— If all of a sudden every history professor at Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Columbia, Dartmouth, Cornell, et cetera, decided, I’m not telling you my name, as I teach your kids about the Renaissance or whatever, we would say, that’s freaking nuts.

Blacklisted news sources

Wikipedia has maintained since 2017 a list of “recurring sources” that in practice functions as an ideological blacklist. During the interview, Carlson goes through the list and discovers that while The New York Times, The Washington Post and CNN get the green light, sources like Fox News, Daily Caller, Breitbart and New York Post are blacklisted.

— You can’t cite New York Post on Wikipedia as a factual source, Sanger confirms.

He points out the irony that this blacklist was established the same year Donald Trump took office as president.

Intelligence services’ influence

Both Carlson and Sanger discuss the possibility that intelligence services manipulate Wikipedia. Sanger tells about research from 2006-2007 that showed edits made from IP addresses in Langley, Virginia, where the CIA has its headquarters.

— Wikipedia is like just a goldmine for the intelligence agencies of the world because it’s like a one-stop shop. You know, you can just like type in the things that you want people to believe, says Sanger.

Nine theses for reformation

Inspired by Martin Luther, Sanger presents nine theses to reform Wikipedia:

  1. Abolish consensus decision-making – The current system allows ideologues to silence dissidents by falsely claiming unanimity.
  2. Enable competing articles – Allow multiple articles on the same topic written from different perspectives.
  3. Abolish source blacklists – The ideologically one-sided blacklist must be removed.
  4. Revive the original neutrality principle – Wikipedia must return to genuine neutrality.
  5. Repeal the “ignore all rules” rule – This rule has been abused to protect insiders from accountability.
  6. Expose Wikipedia’s leaders – The anonymous power holders must be publicly identified.
  7. Let the public rate articles – Implement a system where readers can evaluate articles.
  8. End permanent blocking – The practice of permanently blocking accounts is unfair and ideologically motivated.
  9. Adopt a legislative process – Wikipedia needs an elected council to implement reforms.

“It’s about our civilization”

Tucker Carlson concludes the interview by emphasizing the importance of Sanger’s reform proposals:

— It has to do with history and the collective memory, which is another way of saying you’re civilization. It can’t exist unless it understands itself.

Sanger, who says he feels personal responsibility for what Wikipedia has become, hopes that his theses will start a broad debate about the platform’s future. He has published the proposals on his user page on Wikipedia to take the debate directly to the editor community.

— I hope this starts what Luther started – a return to honesty, says Sanger.

Wikipedia’s founding ideals of bringing together the world’s knowledge in a neutral way stand, according to Sanger, in sharp contrast to what the platform has become today. The question is whether his reform proposals can reverse the development or whether the encyclopedia, as he puts it, will forever remain “a tool for the ruling class”.

Tony Blair could gain power over Gaza

The globalist agenda

Published yesterday 12:42
– By Editorial Staff
Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair at the World Economic Forum power conference in Davos, earlier this summer.
3 minute read

The notorious globalist and war hawk Tony Blair now wants to govern post-war Gaza for up to five years. According to WikiLeaks, the plan would give outside forces control over everything from laws to money flows.

Tony Blair, the architect behind Britain’s participation in the Iraq War that cost hundreds of thousands of lives, now wants to lead an international transitional authority for Gaza after the war ends. According to people with insight into the Trump administration’s peace plan, Blair could become chairman of a “Gaza International Transitional Authority”.

The plan has been developed together with Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and is primarily financed by tech billionaire Larry Ellison. According to reports, Blair would lead a secretariat of 25 people that would administer Gaza for up to five years.

WikiLeaks comments on the development in sharp terms:

“A battle is brewing over who will run the wasteland. Into this vacuum steps Tony Blair, lined up to head a US-backed Gaza International Transitional Authority”, the organization writes.

The organization describes the arrangement as something far more comprehensive than traditional post-war governance:

This is not postwar governance in a conventional sense but a model of neo-trusteeship; external control over territory, law, and the flows of reconstruction, data, and capital“.

WikiLeaks also points to the economic interests behind the plan and notes that Blair is backed by principal funder Larry Ellison and plans to lead the administration for up to five years.

Notorious war instigator

Tony Blair is one of modern times’ most notorious British politicians. As Prime Minister from 1997-2007, he gave his full support to US invasions of both Afghanistan in 2001 and Iraq in 2003.

Blair was accused of misleading the British Parliament and population about Iraq’s alleged weapons of mass destruction – weapons that were never found and whose existence is now questioned. The Chilcot Inquiry in 2016 established that Blair had exaggerated the threat from Saddam Hussein and that the British government had acted on inadequate or falsified intelligence information.

His close relationship with George W. Bush and unconditional support for American foreign policy earned him the nickname “Bush’s poodle” from critics. Over one million demonstrated in London against the Iraq War in February 2003, but Blair still pushed through British participation.

Long-standing Israel support

Blair has been an outspoken Israel supporter over the years. As peace envoy for the Quartet – the UN, US, EU and Russia – he was responsible from 2007-2015 for promoting the peace process between Israel and the Palestinians.

During his time, however, illegal settlement construction in the West Bank continued and the Gaza blockade remained. Palestinian leaders and human rights organizations repeatedly accused him of favoring Israel and functioning as a partisan political actor instead of a neutral mediator.

During Israel’s war in Gaza, which has so far killed over 65,000 Palestinians according to local health authorities, Blair has been working on his plan for international governance of the area. He met President Trump at the White House last month to present the proposal.

Resistance from the Arab world

European and Arab states have already expressed opposition to the idea of an international trusteeship for Gaza. They argue that such an arrangement would further marginalize Palestinians and lack legitimacy in the eyes of Gaza residents. Instead, they advocate that Gaza should be governed by a committee consisting of Palestinian technocrats with support from the Palestinian Authority, which currently administers parts of the West Bank.

Trump presented his Gaza plan to Arab leaders in New York this week. The proposal gives Palestinians limited administrative power, but real control would lie with an international board – potentially led by Tony Blair.

However, everything could collapse as early as Monday. That’s when Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu meets President Trump in Washington – and Netanyahu has already made his position clear: the Palestinian Authority will have no role in Gaza’s future and Hamas must be completely eliminated.

Without Israeli approval, the plan cannot be implemented, which would stop both Trump’s peace attempt and Blair’s return to Middle East politics.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.