Saturday, April 19, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Sources: Mossad tried to pressure ICC prosecutor to drop war crimes investigation

Published 2 June 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Mossad chief Yossi Cohen allegedly tried to influence ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda for several years.

Yossi Cohen, the former head of Israel’s Mossad intelligence agency, is alleged to have threatened the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court in a series of secret meetings aimed at influencing and pressuring her not to open an investigation into Israeli war crimes.

Cohen’s secret contacts with then ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda reportedly took place over several years before she decided in 2021 to open a formal investigation into alleged Israeli war crimes and crimes against humanity in the occupied Palestinian territories, according to a review by The Guardian.

Recently, Bensouda’s successor, Karim Khan, also announced that he wants Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant arrested for abuses and crimes committed during the ongoing invasion of Gaza.

Yossi Cohen served as the head of the Mossad between 2016 and 2021, and before that as Israel’s national security adviser. According to sources, he was tasked with pressuring the ICC prosecutor not to open an investigation into Israel on the grounds that Israeli military personnel would be at risk of prosecution.

Yossi Cohen with Benjamin Netanyahu and then US Secretary of State John Kerry (2015). Photo: U.S. Department of State

Another source says the Mossad’s goal was to get Bensouda to agree to Israeli demands, and a third describes Cohen as Netanyahu’s “unofficial messenger”. The Mossad chief’s attempts to pressure the prosecutor are said to have gone on for years, and she is also said to have informed other senior ICC officials of Cohen’s threatening behavior.

“You should help us and let us take care of you. You don’t want to be getting into things that could compromise your security or that of your family”, and similar threats were allegedly made by the chief of intelligence, among others.

“Threats and manipulation”

The goal of allegedly intimidating Bensouda was also directed at her family members, with transcripts of secret recordings of her husband then used to discredit the prosecutor.

The Mossad also enlisted the help of former Congolese President Joseph Kabila to pressure the prosecutor. When Bensouda went to meet him in his New York hotel room, the prosecutor’s staff was suddenly asked to leave the room – and the Mossad chief entered through a door instead. Again, the situation was reportedly perceived as threatening.

On another occasion, Cohen allegedly called Bensouda repeatedly, and when she asked him how he got her number, the spy chief allegedly replied, “did you forget what I do for a living?”

Initially, Yossi Cohen also allegedly tried to “build a relationship” with the ICC prosecutor, but when that did not work, he began using “threats and manipulation” instead, according to a person with insight into the meetings.

Targeted the family

In December 2019, the prosecutor announced that she had grounds to open a full criminal investigation into allegations of war crimes in Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem. However, she delayed the opening of the investigation and decided to first request a decision from the ICC’s Pre-Trial Chamber to confirm that the Court has jurisdiction over Palestine.

At this point, Cohen allegedly escalated his attempts to pressure Bensouda not to pursue a full investigation. Between 2019 and 2021, the spy chief allegedly initiated at least three physical meetings and displayed behavior so threatening and obsessive that he was likened to a stalker.

Netanyahu with former Mossad top brass. Cohen is on the far left. Photo: Haim Zach/Israeli President

A source familiar with Bensouda’s accounts of her last two meetings with Cohen said he raised questions about her and her family’s safety in a way she found threatening.

On another occasion, Cohen allegedly showed Bensouda copies of photographs of her husband that had been secretly taken when the couple visited London. On another occasion, Cohen allegedly suggested to the prosecutor that a decision to open a full investigation would be detrimental to her career.

The Mossad is said to have actively sought leverage and compromising information on the prosecutor and her family, as well as attempting to smear Bensouda’s husband through diplomatic channels. Someone also spied on her husband and secretly recorded his conversations – but it is unclear whether the Mossad itself was behind the operation or whether the material was simply accessed.

Getting Trump on board

However, the attempts to undermine and smear the prosecutor were largely unsuccessful – although they did prompt then-US President Donald Trump and his administration to also publicly and privately pressure Bensouda and her staff.

Between 2019 and 2020, in an unprecedented move, the Trump administration imposed visa restrictions and sanctions on the attorney general. Officially, this was because Bensouda was conducting a separate investigation into US war crimes in Afghanistan – but analysts say the sanctions were actually a joint Israeli-US action.

Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu. Photo: White House

In February 2021, the ICC’s Pre-Trial Chamber issued a decision confirming that the ICC had jurisdiction over the occupied Palestinian territories. The following month, Bensouda announced the opening of the investigation.

Her successor also under threat

Three months later, she left her post and was replaced by Karim Khan, who recently requested an arrest warrant for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

According to the Guardian’s sources, this “was the conclusion Israel’s political, military and intelligence establishment had feared”.

“The fact they chose the head of Mossad to be the prime minister’s unofficial messenger to [Bensouda] was to intimidate, by definition”, said a source with insight into Cohen’s operation. “It failed”, the source concludes.

It should also be noted that the new ICC prosecutor, Karim Khan, has been subjected to veiled threats and influence campaigns by both Israeli and American politicians to prevent him from investigating Netanyahu or other Israeli officials for war crimes.

Bensouda’s successor, Karim Khan. Photo: UN International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia/CC BY 2.0

The Nordic Times previously reported on how a group of pro-Israeli republicans threatened the prosecutor’s staff and family, promising in part, “If you target Israel, we will target you”.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

US shuts down Biden’s censorship agency

Donald Trump's USA

Published today 9:57
– By Editorial Staff
Members of the Trump administration have long expressed concerns about how freedom of expression is being restricted and curtailed in various ways.

The United States has now officially shut down an agency that, according to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, was used by the Biden administration to systematically censor US citizens with uncomfortable views.

The Global Engagement Center (GEC) was established in 2016 within the US Department of State, with a mission to “recognize, understand, expose, and counter foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation”.

In December, the center was renamed Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (R/FIMI), but on Wednesday, Marco Rubio announced that it had been permanently shut down.

– Under the previous administration, this office, which cost taxpayers more than $50 million per year, spent millions of dollars to actively silence and censor the voices of Americans they were supposed to be serving, Rubio said.

– This is antithetical to the very principles we should be upholding and inconceivable it was taking place in America.

In an interview published Wednesday with conservative activist Mike Benz, Rubio explained that the GEC was initially intended as a tool to combat extremist propaganda from groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS, but that the operation later began “going after individual American voices”.

– We ended government-sponsored censorship in the United States through the State Department, he declared.

“Worst offender in US government censorship”

Rubio added that the Biden administration had supported groups that “literally tagging and labeling voices in American politics – Ben Shapiro, The Federalist, others – tagging them as foreign agents”.

The GEC had an annual budget of $61 million and employed about 120 people. In December, Republican members of Congress refused to provide continued funding for the unit.

President Donald Trump and his supporters have long accused Democrats of using government institutions to silence conservative views online. In 2023, tech billionaire Elon Musk also criticized the GEC, calling it “worst offender in US government censorship & media manipulation” and “a threat to our democracy”.

Journalist Matt Taibbi also accused the center of trying to suppress discussions on COVID-19 under the pretext of fighting “Russian personas and proxies”.

Already last year, a group of Republican members of Congress harshly criticized the GEC in a letter to then Secretary of State Antony Blinken. The letter accused the Center of bias in favor of “American progressives” and of trying to silence opinions that were “deemed politically inconvenient or disagreeable”.

Reports: The White House demands UK abolish hate speech laws

Published yesterday 19:32
– By Editorial Staff
Donald Trump's administration is reportedly very concerned about the repression of dissent in the UK.

According to reports in The Independent, Donald Trump’s administration is demanding that the United Kingdom abolish the law on incitement to racial hatred as a condition for the conclusion of a new trade agreement between the two countries.

The demand, which is linked to Vice President JD Vance’s view of freedom of expression as fundamental to democracy, has reportedly met with resistance from the UK government.

An anonymous source close to the US administration told The Independent that Trump is “obsessed by the fall of Western civilisation” and that the president is deeply concerned that free speech is being undermined in the UK.

The source claims that the White House wants the Labour government to withdraw hate speech laws, including those targeting LGBTQ groups or various ethnic minorities, in order for a deal to be reached.

– No free speech, no deal. It is as simple as that, the source told the newspaper.

Britons arrested for social media posts

Vance, who is leading the negotiations from the US side, has previously expressed optimism about a new agreement:

– I think there’s a good chance that, yes, we’ll come to a great agreement that’s in the best interest of both countries, he said in an interview with UnHerd.

The UK authorities’ crackdown on ‘opinion criminals’ has long been seen as a major problem by people close to Trump.

The president’s adviser, Elon Musk, has been one of the most vocal critics and has repeatedly highlighted the fact that British authorities arrest people for posts they make on social media.

During Keir Starmer’s first visit to the White House, Vance also warned that freedom of expression was under attack, pointing to how US tech companies are being forced into unacceptable censorship by new European laws introduced under the pretext of protecting citizens from “cyber hate”.

An elite afraid of its own people

The Nordic Times has previously reported how Vance during the security conference in Munich also attacked the European establishment politicians.

– I look to Brussels, where EU commissars warn citizens that they intend to shut down social media during times of civil unrest the moment they spot what they’ve judged to be, quote, “hateful content”

Mr. Vance also touched on Sweden’s verdict against the murdered Iraqi Quran burner Salwan Momika’s colleague who was convicted of participating in the actions.

– As the judge in his case chillingly noted, Sweden’s laws to supposedly protect free expression do not, in fact, grant, and I’m quoting, ‘a free pass to do or say anything without risking offending the group that holds that belief’.

UK Supreme Court: Womanhood is something one is born into

The LGBT lobby

Published yesterday 9:03
– By Editorial Staff
Many British women consider the court's decision a great victory.

The UK Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that the term “woman” in the country’s equality legislation refers to biological sex and nothing else.

The ruling rejects the Scottish Government’s interpretation, which included trans women in the definition and quotas for biological men who have “changed sex” as women in the workplace.

A panel of five judges, led by Justice Patrick Hodge, ruled that the words “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act refer to a biological woman and biological sex.

The ruling means, among other things, that transgender people should not be counted as women for the purposes of the Equality Act’s quotas although the court was careful to emphasize that they should continue to be protected from discrimination on the basis of their gender identity.

The case stems from a 2018 Scottish law requiring public authorities in Scotland to have at least 50% women on their boards. According to the Scottish Government’s interpretation, trans women were included in this quota. However, the women’s rights group For Women Scotland (FWS) disputed this, arguing that the definition of woman cannot be extended beyond biological sex.

“Refers to reality –  not to paperwork”

An early court ruling in 2022 was appealed to the Supreme Court, which has now agreed with FWS.

Maya Forstater of the group Sex Matters considers the ruling a “great victory”:

– The court has given us the right answer: the protected characteristic of sex – male and female – refers to reality, not to paperwork, she says.

FWS director Trina Budge previously warned that a broader interpretation of gender risks filling quotas with “50% men, and 50% men with certificates”, which would undermine the purpose of the law.

Supported by J.K. Rowling

The group also highlighted that transgender access to women’s toilets, women’s prisons and women’s wards in hospitals can have very negative consequences and create insecurity.

FWS lawyer Aidan O’Neill argued during the trial that gender must be understood in law as a “expression of one’s bodily reality. It is an immutable biological state”.

For Women Scotland has received support from well-known author J.K. Rowling, who has reportedly donated hundreds of thousands of pounds to the group. Rowling has long argued in the past that it is unreasonable for trans women’s rights to be at the expense of biological women.

However, not everyone is applauding the ruling on the contrary, the human rights organization Amnesty International is highly critical and claims that transgender people now risk having their human rights violated.

US tightens visa controls – social media to be scrutinized

Published 16 April 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Anyone who has expressed support for any of Israel's enemies is expected to be denied entry to the United States.

The U.S. will begin denying visas based on the content of applicants’ social media – including posts, shares, and messages that express support for what are considered anti-Semitic messages, for example.

The country’s immigration agency, USCIS, will begin reviewing social media for all immigrants applying for lawful permanent residence, work authorization, visas, as well as foreign students and people affiliated with educational institutions.

What will be looked for are, for example, posts or messages supporting groups labeled terrorist in the United States, such as Hamas, Hezbollah in Lebanon or the Houthi movement in Yemen. Anti-Semitic messages are also included and will constitute “negative factors” when deciding on a visa or residence permit.

– There is no room in the United States for the rest of the world’s terrorist sympathizers, and we are under no obligation to admit them or let them stay here, said Tricia McLaughlin, Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at DHS, in a press release.

The proposal has raised concerns among immigration and free speech advocates because it could also affect people already in the country legally not just those applying for entry. Critics also point out that it is unclear how “anti-Semitism”, for example, should be defined, and there is concern that virtually all criticism of Israel will be rejected.

According to AP News, social media monitoring by immigration authorities has been going on for over a decade, starting under the Obama administration and expanding during Donald Trump’s first term.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.