Serbian president: “NATO wanted to destroy our country”

Published April 3, 2024 – By Editorial staff
President Aleksandar Vucic and the Serbian city of Novi Sad in flames in 1999.

– They (NATO) wanted to destroy our homeland, destroy Serbia and dismember it - but they failed, President Aleksandar Vučić declared at a memorial ceremony commemorating the NATO bombing 25 years ago and honoring its victims.

– 25 years have passed and we are and will remain unbroken... We will never accept the division of Serbia! Kosovo and Metohija will never be taken from us voluntarily, he continued.

On the annual day of remembrance for the victims of NATO's bombing of the former Yugoslavia, a large crowd gathered as usual in Prokuplje, 26 miles south of Belgrade, to pay tribute to those killed.

In 2008, Kosovo declared independence and broke away from Serbia - a declaration of independence that Serbia rejects and continues to consider Kosovo a Serbian province.

The event began with a memorial service led by Patriarch Porfirije of the Serbian Orthodox Church, who later emphasized in his speech that the bombing revealed "the depth of human cruelty when one chooses to give up one's humanity".

"Defending our freedom"

After the national anthem and a minute of silence, Andjelka Tosovic, whose house was hit by a projectile during the NATO bombing that killed her 11-month-old sister and her father, said that "time will not heal".

Milorad Dodik, president of Republika Srpska (one of Bosnia and Herzegovina's two entities), also condemned the NATO bombing, the killing of civilians, and violations of international law.

– We are and will remain a dignified people defending our freedom, he said, stressing the importance of continuing to pay close attention to the Day of Remembrance.

Thousands killed

In 1999, US-led NATO carried out an extensive bombing campaign in the former Yugoslavia for less than three months. As a result, at least 8,000 people were killed and more than a million were forced to flee their homes.

The bombing included the use of cluster bombs and depleted uranium bombs - weapons banned by international conventions. Other targets included the Chinese Embassy and Serbian state television and radio stations.

It was also recently reported that agents of the CIA are in close proximity to President Vučić.

– He (Vucic) is the one who will decide whether we will ever tell the whole truth and what we will do in this matter. There are people in President Vucic's government circle who are not working in the interest of this country, but against it, former intelligence chief Aleksandar Vulin said in an interview last week.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

American academics propose nuclear weapons for US allies

Published today 1:27 pm – By Editorial staff
Professors Mark Raymond (left) and Moritz Graefrath write in a joint opinion piece that US allies should be allowed to acquire their own nuclear arsenals.

The American journal Foreign Affairs has published a debate article by two professors at the University of Oklahoma that challenges prevailing security policy principles. The professors suggest that the United States' closest allies should consider acquiring nuclear weapons themselves.

The article, authored by professors Moritz S. Graefrath and Mark A. Raymond, has received extensive international attention and sparked controversy, though no Western country has yet officially endorsed the proposal.

In the widely discussed text, the duo argues that countries such as Canada, Germany, and Japan have both the technical capacity and security interests to develop nuclear weapons themselves – thereby reducing their dependence on US military protection.

The article states that "America’s allies should go nuclear. Selective proliferation will strengthen the global order, not end it".

The text highlights that these countries already participate in advanced military cooperation with the US and have access to the resources required for developing nuclear weapons.

The authors continue: "What the three allies would need – and what the United States can and should provide – is public support and diplomatic cover for their transition to becoming nuclear-armed states, as well as technical and doctrinal guidance to ensure robust command and control safeguards".

The debate surrounding the article has quickly gained momentum, and so far none of the countries mentioned in the text have officially endorsed the proposal, instead maintaining strong support for international disarmament and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

Critical reactions

Germany, for example, based on official statements, policy decisions and debate contributions, stands firm in its policy against nuclear proliferation and emphasizes that the country has no plans to change this principle.

Government representatives have expressed that Germany's position continues to support international disarmament agreements and that they reject all proposals to develop their own nuclear weapons.

Meanwhile, American and European experts have criticized the authors' reasoning as risky and have warned that such a development could trigger a new global arms race.

The background to the Foreign Affairs article is the increased geopolitically tense situation, where US commitments regarding the so-called nuclear umbrella are being questioned in several places in Europe and Asia.

Several European leaders have recently requested discussions about independent deterrence and nuclear weapons cooperation within NATO.

The US and other nuclear powers have so far rejected such discussions, continuing to insist on diplomacy and disarmament as the fundamental strategy.

Marjorie Taylor Greene leaves Congress after conflict with Trump

Donald Trump's USA

Published yesterday 11:47 am – By Editorial staff
Marjorie Taylor Greene explained her withdrawal in a video on X.

Marjorie Taylor Greene, formerly one of Donald Trump's most loyal allies in Congress, announced on Friday that she is resigning from the House of Representatives. She said she refused to be "a battered wife hoping everything goes away and gets better" and face a primary campaign against a Trump-backed challenger.

The resignation marks a dramatic turn for the Republican congresswoman from Georgia, who was once among Trump's closest allies and a vocal advocate for his "America First" agenda. The relationship between the two has deteriorated sharply in recent months, primarily due to disagreements over the release of investigation documents linked to American-Jewish sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

In a ten-minute video on social media, Greene explained that the decision to resign was due to the prospect of facing a Trump-backed Republican challenger in the primary and the risk of Democrats taking over the House of Representatives in next year's midterm elections. She also complained that Congress has largely been "sidelined" since Trump returned to the presidency in January.

I have too much self-respect and dignity, love my family way too much, and don't want my sweet district to have to endure a hurtful and hateful primary against me from the president we all fought for, only to then fight and win my election while Republicans likely lose the midterms, Greene said.

I refuse to be a ‘battered wife’ hoping it all goes away and gets better, she added.

Trump's reaction and internal concerns

In an interview with ABC News, Trump called Greene's resignation, which takes effect on January 5, "fantastic news for the country".

The conflict between Trump and Greene has raised concerns among some Republicans that Trump's "Make America Great Again" base could split ahead of the midterm elections, when Democrats hope to regain control of Congress.

Greene's resignation will reduce the Republican majority in the House of Representatives to 218 members versus the Democrats' 213. In the Senate, Republicans hold a 53-47 majority.

Growing independence from Trump

Recently, Greene has shown increased independence from Trump. She joined an initiative in the House of Representatives to force the release of Epstein documents despite Trump's objections, criticized party leadership for poor handling of healthcare costs during the recent government crisis, has demanded that the US stop sending American taxpayer money to the Ukraine war, and called Israel's attacks on Gaza genocide.

Trump, in turn, became increasingly critical. Before the House voted overwhelmingly to release the Epstein documents, he called her a "traitor" and "disgrace" to the Republican Party. He withdrew his support and called her a "ranting lunatic".

In her video, Greene defended her Epstein vote.

Standing up for American women who were raped at 14, trafficked and used by rich powerful men, should not result in me being called a traitor and threatened by the President of the United States, whom I fought for, she said.

Greene said she was proud of her conservative voting record and added, in a jab at Trump, that "loyalty should be a two-way street".

Greene won her district in northwestern Georgia with 64 percent of the vote in 2024.

China brings Taiwan dispute with Japan to UN

Published yesterday 10:16 am – By Editorial staff
On October 31, 2025, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, who was visiting Gyeongju, South Korea to attend APEC, held a summit meeting with Xi Jinping.

China has taken the recently flared-up dispute with Japan to the UN. In a letter to the UN Secretary-General, Beijing accuses Tokyo of threatening armed intervention regarding Taiwan and vows to exercise its right to self-defense.

China's UN Ambassador Fu Cong wrote on Friday to UN Secretary-General António Guterres that Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi committed "a grave violation of international law" when she said that a Chinese attack on Taiwan could trigger a military response from Japan, reports Reuters.

"If Japan dares to attempt an armed intervention in the cross-Strait situation, it would be an act of aggression", Fu wrote according to a statement from China's UN mission.

China vows to "resolutely exercise its right of self-defence" under the UN Charter and international law to defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity.

Biggest bilateral crisis in years

Beijing regards Taiwan as part of the People's Republic of China and has not ruled out military action to regain control over the island. Taiwan's government rejects Beijing's claims and maintains that only the island's population can determine its future.

Japan's Foreign Ministry confirmed that it had received Fu's letter, which is the sharpest criticism of Takaichi from a senior Chinese official to date. The ministry emphasized that Japan's commitment remains unchanged and rejected China's claims as "entirely unacceptable".

Takaichi, a conservative nationalist who took office last month, abandoned the ambiguity that Japan and the United States have long maintained regarding Taiwan when she said on November 7 that a hypothetical Chinese attack on Taiwan could be considered "a situation threatening Japan's survival" – a legal designation that allows a Japanese prime minister to deploy the military.

The conflict has spread beyond diplomacy. China claims that trade cooperation has been seriously damaged, while concerts by Japanese musicians in China have been canceled.

Fu demanded that Japan "cease provocations and violations and retract its erroneous statements," which he said "openly challenge China's core interests."

Trump and Putin’s peace plan leaked

The war in Ukraine

  • Ukraine will not be allowed to host NATO troops on its territory, and foreign combat aircraft may only be stationed in Poland.
  • To ensure peace, they demand that Ukraine reduce its army to 600,000 troops and refrain from missiles that can reach Moscow.
  • Ukraine will not be allowed to invade Russia, nor will it be permitted to use military force to reclaim territorial areas.
Published November 21, 2025 – By Editorial staff
According to The Telegraph, the leaked peace plan can be interpreted as a significant defeat for Ukraine and, not least, Brussels.

The United States and Russia have, according to reports from British newspaper The Telegraph, negotiated a secret peace plan to end the war in Ukraine.

The plan, consisting of 28 points, has been kept secret during negotiations between American and Russian officials and reportedly contains several radical proposals.

For example, Ukraine would hand over the entire Donbas region and Crimea, which would be recognized as Russian territories.

In exchange, the US and its allies promise to take decisive military action and reimpose sanctions if Russia breaks the ceasefire and attacks Ukraine again.

At the same time, Russia would be reinstated in the G7, which would then become the G8, and almost all frozen assets would be returned – except for $100 billion that would go toward Ukraine's reconstruction.

The agreement means that Ukraine would lose important security guarantees if the country violates the agreement.

Volodymyr Zelenskyj
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. Photo: President Of Ukraine/Public Domain

Heavy pressure on Zelensky

According to Ukrainian sources speaking to the Financial Times, the Trump administration is exerting strong pressure on Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

Washington has, according to unconfirmed sources, informed Zelenskyy that the negotiations follow an "aggressive timeline", with the goal of ending the war before the new year.

Meanwhile, Zelensky is expected to hold elections within 100 days after a ceasefire, while Vladimir Putin promises not to invade a NATO country.

Neither the White House nor the Kremlin has shared the complete list of points.

Kiev-friendly governments in Europe argue that the plan involves excessive concessions regarding Ukraine's territorial integrity and represents a capitulation to the Kremlin.

The full details of the plan are now expected to lead to intense debates in Europe and among Ukraine's allies.

The peace plan

  1. Ukraine's sovereignty shall be confirmed.
  2. A comprehensive non-aggression agreement between Russia, Ukraine and Europe shall be concluded. All ambiguities from the past 30 years shall be considered resolved.
  3. Russia is not expected to invade neighboring countries and NATO shall not expand further.
  4. A dialogue between Russia and NATO, with the United States as mediator, shall resolve security issues and create conditions for détente, global security and future cooperation.
  5. Ukraine shall receive reliable security guarantees.
  6. Ukraine's armed forces shall be limited to 600,000 personnel.
  7. Ukraine shall renounce NATO membership in its constitution, and NATO shall include in its statutes that Ukraine cannot be admitted in the future.
  8. NATO shall not deploy troops in Ukraine.
  9. European fighter aircraft shall be stationed in Poland.
  10. American guarantees:
    – The US receives compensation for the guarantee.
    – If Ukraine invades Russia, the country loses the guarantee.
    – If Russia invades Ukraine, all global sanctions are reinstated, recognition of new territory and other benefits in the agreement are revoked.
    – If Ukraine fires missiles at Moscow or St. Petersburg without reason, the guarantee ceases.
  11. Ukraine is entitled to EU membership and receives short-term priority access to the European market during the evaluation.
  12. A global reconstruction package for Ukraine, including:
    a. Creation of a development fund for fast-growing industries.
    b. The US shall cooperate with Ukraine to rebuild, develop and operate gas infrastructure.
    c. Joint efforts to restore war-affected areas.
    d. Infrastructure development
    e. Extraction of minerals and natural resources.
    f. The World Bank develops special financing packages.
  13. Russia is reintegrated into the global economy:
    a. Sanctions can be lifted gradually and case by case.
    b. The US and Russia can enter into long-term economic cooperation in energy, infrastructure, AI, data centers and mining projects.
    c. Russia is invited to return to the G8.
  14. Frozen Russian assets:
    – $100 billion of frozen Russian assets are invested in Ukraine's reconstruction under American leadership, the US receives 50% of the profits. Europe contributes $100 billion. Remaining frozen Russian funds are returned or placed in a joint investment fund for the US and Russia.
  15. A joint US-Russian working group on security issues shall be established.
  16. Russia shall legislate its non-aggression policy toward Europe and Ukraine.
  17. The US and Russia shall extend the validity of nuclear arms limitation agreements, including START I.
  18. Ukraine shall be a non-nuclear weapons state under the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
  19. The Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant shall be operated under IAEA supervision, with electricity divided 50/50 between Russia and Ukraine.
  20. Both countries shall implement educational programs in schools and society to promote understanding and tolerance between cultures and counter racism and prejudice.
    a. Ukraine shall follow EU rules on religious and linguistic minority protection.
    b. Both countries shall abolish discriminatory measures and guarantee media and educational rights.
    c. All Nazi ideology and activities shall be prohibited.
  21. Territories:
    a. Crimea, Luhansk and Donetsk are recognized as de facto Russian, including by the US.
    b. Kherson and Zaporizhzhia shall be frozen along the contact line.
    c. Russia relinquishes other agreed territories outside the five regions.
    d. Ukrainian forces shall withdraw from the parts of Donetsk Oblast they currently control. The area becomes a neutral, demilitarized buffer zone internationally recognized as Russian territory. Russian forces may not enter this zone.
  22. Both countries commit not to change future territorial arrangements by force.
  23. Russia shall not prevent Ukraine from using the Dnipro River for trade, and free transport of grain across the Black Sea shall be guaranteed.
  24. A humanitarian committee shall be established to resolve remaining issues:
    a. All prisoners and bodies shall be returned on an "all for all" basis.
    b. All civilian prisoners and hostages will be returned, including children.
    c. Family reunification programs shall be implemented.
    d. Measures to alleviate conflict damage.
  25. Ukraine shall hold elections within 100 days.
  26. All parties receive full amnesty and waive future claims related to the war.
  27. The agreement becomes legally binding and is monitored by the Peace Council, led by Donald Trump. Sanctions for violations.
  28. Ceasefire takes effect immediately when parties have withdrawn to agreed positions.

 

Source: The Telegraph via SVT (Swedish public broadcaster)