Monday, June 23, 2025
The Nordic Times

Polaris of Enlightenment

Monday, June 23, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Breaking News

https://nordictimes.com/world/ritter-the-maga-movement-is-dead/

World

Ritter: The MAGA movement is dead

Donald Trump's USA

Published today 11:23
– By Editorial Staff
Scott Ritter says it is clear that Trump is putting Israel's interests first.
2 minute read
Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

Former UN weapons inspector and Marine Corps officer Scott Ritter condemns Donald Trump’s decision to drag the US into a new war in the Middle East.

On social media, Ritter asserts that Trump has not only broken his own promises of peace, but also dragged the entire MAGA movement down with him.

“MAGA is officially dead as a movement”, Ritter writes, arguing that by wearing his trademark red MAGA cap while allowing the US to enter yet another war, Trump has stripped the movement of all meaningful content and turned it into an empty symbol.

“When a President wears a MAGA hat while conspiring to take America to war after promising that, as the leader of MAGA, he would pursue peace, MAGA stands for nothing”, Ritter concludes.

Ritter, who became known for his fearless stance during the UN weapons inspections in Iraq in the 1990s, is now directing his message directly to Trump’s voters. He urges them to openly distance themselves from the president and those who stand by him, whom he believes are pursuing a dangerous agenda that has nothing to do with the original ideas of MAGA.

“If you’re MAGA, then you must disassociate yourself from this President and everyone who stands with him. They are not MAGA. They are Israel first. And that’s the most dangerous ideology facing America today”, he writes.

“A national disgrace”

The former UN inspector dismisses Trump’s bombing of Iran as a pointless and pathetic attempt to save face after talking himself into a corner.

“An act of theater. Trump’s big mouth had boxed him into a corner. Iran wouldn’t play his game. So he had to bomb Iran to save face”.

The action itself, Ritter argues, was as ineffective as it was cynical.

“He bombed two empty facilities that had been previously struck by Israel. And he bounced six bombs off an indestructible facility (Firdos), claiming destruction despite the opposite being the case. That’s it. A ‘contained’ strike. A nothing burger”.

The outspoken commentator concludes his criticism by describing Trump as a leader unworthy of both his office and the trust of his voters.

“And this is the man whose supporters call the greatest leader in the world. He’s a national disgrace”.

Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

https://nordictimes.com/analysis/trumps-ambition-to-end-forever-wars-appears-at-a-standstill/

Analysis

Trump’s ambition to end forever wars appears at a standstill

The escalation in the Middle East

Jenny Piper

The US "anti-war" president, recently recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize, can forget that thought after last night's war of aggression.

Published yesterday 22:18
– By Jenny Piper
Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu have long been close - a friendship that looks to have cost him the "America First" election promise.
3 minute read

It is ironic that yesterday the Pakistani government formally recommended US President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing his mediation efforts to end the latest military conflict between Islamabad and New Delhi. Considering that Trump ordered attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan just a few hours later, he can definitely forget about receiving that award. That said, Obama did receive the Peace Prize despite the increase in US military interventions around the world during his time in the White House, so anything is possible.

Trump thus did the dirty work for Israel, which started the problem, and the US will take the blame for the consequences. Smart.

After the attacks, Trump warned Iran that if they do not make peace, more and harsher attacks will follow. Iran, for its part, has already announced that it will not bow down.

Trump has been criticized for his decision to actively enter the war by other US congressmen, some of whom say that the attacks on Iran are grounds for impeaching Trump.

Iran has accused the US of violating international law and the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) with its nighttime attacks on important nuclear facilities, while assuring the public that no radioactive contamination has been detected at the sites attacked.

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi has condemned the US air strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities as a serious violation of international law and writes on X that Tehran reserves all options to respond in accordance with its right to self-defense.

“The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences. Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behavior. The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT by attacking Iran’s peaceful nuclear installations. In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defense, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people”.

Iran is now demanding that the UN Security Council hold an emergency meeting, but everyone already knows that this is just a show, as both the US and Israel have carte blanche in this toothless organization.

At the same time, other forces may wake up when third parties allied with Iran want to get involved. Although major powers such as Russia, North Korea, and China, together with neighboring countries in the Middle East, have so far taken a wait-and-see position because Iran has not wanted support, a spokesman for Yemen’s Houthis has already warned that if the US gets involved, the group will attack their warships in the Red Sea.

Another unpleasant thought is the many dormant “cells” around the world that may now be activated, with consequences for ordinary people as well. So all those who are now praising Trump’s “bravery” may find themselves eating their words if they start thinking more long term.

Glenn Diesen, professor at the University of Southeast Norway, sums it up well in a post on X, where he stated that US President Donald Trump has once again dragged the country into a conflict in the Middle East.

“Bush ran on a peace platform against nation-building, Obama promised ‘change’, Biden would ‘bring the adults back’, and Trump would get the US out of the forever wars in the Middle East. They all started wars… It does not matter who you vote for, when they do not work for you”.

But there is at least one winner here: the arms industry, whose shares will once again rise when the stock market opens.

 

Jenny Piper

All Jenny Piper's articles can be found on her blog.

https://nordictimes.com/world/trump-voters-oppose-us-involvement-in-israels-war/

World

Trump voters oppose US involvement in Israel’s war

Donald Trump's USA

Published 19 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Many Trump voters were attracted by his promises to avoid expensive and unnecessary wars.
3 minute read
Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

A majority of Donald Trump’s supporters oppose US military intervention in Israel’s war against Iran. This is according to a new opinion poll published on Wednesday.

According to the comprehensive survey by The Economist/YouGov, conducted over the weekend, 53 percent of voters who supported Trump in the 2024 presidential election want the US to stay out of Israel’s attacks.

Only 19 percent of Trump’s supporters advocate US military intervention, while 63 percent prefer the administration to try to negotiate with Iran over its nuclear program.

Among all voters in the survey, 60 percent believed that the US should refrain from using military force in the conflict.

The results reflect long-standing public support for peaceful solutions to the Iran issue. An April poll by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs-Ipsos showed that eight in ten Americans preferred diplomacy or tougher economic sanctions to military action to stop Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

And even if diplomacy or sanctions were to fail, many Americans prefer other methods. The same Ipsos poll showed that 60 percent could envisage US cyberattacks against Iranian systems, but only 48 percent of Americans supported air strikes against nuclear facilities.

“A terrible mistake”

Opposition to military escalation is also evident among several Republican politicians.

“This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution“, Thomas Massie, a Republican congressman from Kentucky, wrote on X earlier this week. He expressed his support for an attempt to gather support in the House of Representatives for a bipartisan resolution to limit the president’s war powers.

Libertarian Senator Rand Paul is also a very vocal opponent of dragging the US into yet another unnecessary war.

– I will not vote to send american kids to Iran. I think its a terrible mistake, every way is not our war. Our country is bankrupting itself over our own obligations to our own people. We should not ever send one soldier to Iran and I hope I am pretty clear on that, he recently declared in an interview.

Tim Burchett, Republican congressman from Tennessee, told CNN on Wednesday that he wanted to see “very little” US involvement in the escalating conflict.

– We don’t need another endless war in the Middle East. Old men make decisions and young men die, and that’s the history of war, he said.

– We need to take a deep breath and slow down this thing and let the Israelis do their thing. We do not need a three-front war in our lifetime.

At the same time, powerful neoconservative actors and the Israel lobby are waging an intense campaign to get the Trump administration to drag the US into the war – despite popular opposition and the president’s earlier promises to be a “peacemaker” and end all wars.

Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

https://nordictimes.com/world/trump-g7-could-become-g9-with-russia-and-china/

World

Trump: G7 could become G9 with Russia and China

Donald Trump's USA

Published 17 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump during a meeting in Moscow in 2019.
2 minute read
Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

US President Donald Trump has opened the door for Russia, and possibly China, to be included in the G7. At the same time, he criticizes the decision to exclude Russia in 2014 and argues that the war in Ukraine would never have broken out if Russia had not been isolated.

The announcement came during the G7 summit in Canada, where Trump is also preparing for a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

The president told reporters that he could envisage expanding the group from G7 to G8, or even G9, with Russia and China joining the current group consisting of France, Italy, Japan, Canada, the UK, Germany, and the US.

– They threw Russia out, which I claimed was a big mistake, even though I wasn’t involved in politics at the time, Trump said.

– I think you wouldn’t have a war right now if you had Russia in, and you wouldn’t have a war right now if Trump were president four years ago.

“Was very insulted”

Trump emphasized that dialogue with leaders such as Vladimir Putin is crucial to ending the war in Ukraine.

– Putin speaks to me. He doesn’t speak to anyone else. He doesn’t want to talk because he was very insulted when he was thrown out of the G8, as I would be, as you would be, just like anybody would be.

When a reporter asked if China should be invited to the G7, Trump replied:

– It’s not a bad idea. I don’t mind if anyone wants to see China come in.”

Formerly known as the G8

Trump plans to meet with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday to discuss how to end the war.

In addition to Ukraine, the G7 leaders will also discuss the conflict between Israel and Iran, with a focus on Tehran’s nuclear program. At the same time, Trump’s trade policy, including high tariffs on several countries, has created tensions within the group.

However, the host country’s Prime Minister Mark Carney emphasized the role of the US, saying that “the G7 is nothing without American leadership”.

The G7, which has held annual summits since the 1970s, was called the G8 when Russia was a member between 1997 and 2014.

Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

https://nordictimes.com/world/tucker-carlson-let-israel-fight-its-own-wars/

World

Tucker Carlson: “Let Israel fight its own wars”

Donald Trump's USA

Published 16 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Tucker Carlson urges Trump not to betray his voter base and not to sacrifice American lives for Israel.
3 minute read
Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

Talk show host and opinion maker Tucker Carlson harshly criticized President Donald Trump’s stance on Iran on Friday, writing in a sharply critical commentary that the US should “drop Israel” and “let them fight their own wars”.

“If Israel wants to wage this war, it has every right to do so. It is a sovereign country, and it can do as it pleases”, Carlson wrote in his newsletter, adding: “But not with America’s backing”.

Trump, for his part, has expressed support for Israel’s attacks, which he called “very successful”, and emphasized in an interview with Fox News that the US will defend Israel if Iran retaliates. He also warned that the situation “will only get worse” if Iran does not agree to a nuclear deal “before there is nothing left”.

In recent days, Carlson has argued that fears that Iran will soon acquire nuclear weapons are unfounded and said that a war with the Islamic republic would not only lead to “thousands” of American deaths in the Middle East, but also “amount to a profound betrayal” of Trump’s voter base and effectively “mean the end of his presidency”.

He repeated this in his newsletter, accusing Trump of “being complicit in the act of war” through “years of funding and sending weapons to Israel”. Direct US involvement in a war with Iran, Carlson said, “would be a middle finger in the faces of the millions of voters who cast their ballots in hopes of creating a government that would finally put the United States first”,

“What happens next will define Donald Trump’s presidency”, he concluded.

“Americans don’t want to bomb Iran”

Republican Senator Rand Paul also expressed opposition to a possible war with Iran and directed criticism at the hawkish neoconservatives in Washington.

“The American people overwhelmingly oppose our endless wars, and they showed that when they voted for Donald Trump in 2024″, Paul wrote on social media.

“I urge President Trump to stay the course, keep putting America first, and avoid getting involved in another foreign war.”, he continued.

Republican figure Marjorie Taylor Greene also spoke out against US involvement, emphasizing on Twitter that “Americans don’t want to bomb Iran because the secular government of Israel says that Iran is on the verge of developing a nuclear bomb any day now”.

Greene added that she doesn’t even know any American voters who are thinking about Iran.

Promised to “end all wars”

After being sworn in for his second term in January, President Trump promised to “stop all wars” and be remembered as a “peacemaker and unifier”. But six months later, tensions in the Middle East are escalating sharply following Israel’s attack on Iran, increasing the risk of a regional conflict that could draw in US forces.

Trump’s support for the Israeli attacks is now testing his promise of peace and creating divisions within his voter base. Many right-wing politicians and commentators argue that unconditional support for Israel runs counter to the “America First” principles that got Trump elected in the first place.

– There’s a strong sense of betrayal and anger within much of the ‘America First’ base, said Swedish-Iranian Trita Parsi, vice president of the Quincy Institute, an American think tank focusing on diplomacy.

– They’ve grown increasingly skeptical of Israel and believe wars like this are what turn Republican presidencies into failures – and derail their domestic agendas.

Editorial Staff
editorial@nordictimes.com

N

Polaris of Enlightenment

News

Other

Subscribe to our newsletter!

Follow TNT socials!

X-twitter Facebook Telegram Instagram

© 2022-2025 The Nordic Times TNT.
All rights reserved.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Donate

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Donate
Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.