Monday, September 29, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Pro-Brussels party won disputed election in Moldova

Published today 18:52
– By Editorial Staff
Moldovan Prime Minister Dorin Recean shakes hands with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
3 minute read

Prime Minister Dorin Recean’s Action and Solidarity party (PAS) has won Sunday’s parliamentary election in Moldova with around 50 percent of the votes. The victory secures a continued majority for the Pro-EU government, but the electoral process has created major controversy after two opposition parties were banned from participating shortly before election day.

According to the country’s electoral authority, which has counted more than 99.9 percent of the votes, PAS can now continue to lead Moldova with its own majority in parliament. This means that Prime Minister Dorin Recean receives a continued mandate to drive the country closer to EU membership.

The election result has been welcomed by EU leadership, but opposition forces in Moldova accuse the authorities of electoral fraud and are planning demonstrations.

Dramatic ban just over a day before the election

Late Friday evening, barely two days before polling stations opened and after overseas votes had already been cast, Moldova’s electoral authority announced that two parties were disqualified from participating in the election.

One of the banned parties, the Heart of Moldova Party, is part of the so-called Patriotic Bloc – a cooperation between four opposition parties that has been described by EU-friendly actors as “pro-Russian.” The electoral authority’s press release gave no explicit reason, but referred to a decision from the country’s constitutional court where the party was accused of money laundering and receiving Russian funds.

The second banned party, the Greater Moldova Party, would likely not have cleared the five percent parliamentary threshold.

The decision created acute problems for the Patriotic Bloc, which on Saturday was forced to make changes to its ballot papers because the requirement for at least 40 percent female candidates was no longer met after the exclusion. The situation was further complicated by the fact that ballot papers had already been printed, meaning votes for the banned parties were counted as invalid.

“A dictatorship that doesn’t want to give up power”

Irina Vlah, party leader of the Heart of Moldova Party, calls the ban “a dirty game” and dismisses the accusations as “fabrications.” In a Facebook post, she writes that she “condemns the illegal and politically motivated decision.”

Patriotic Bloc leader Igor Dodon is even more forceful in his criticism and describes the ruling PAS as “a dictatorship that doesn’t want to give up power.” On Monday, the opposition is organizing a demonstration outside parliament in the capital Chișinău.

We will come without political flags, only with the country’s flag, to defend voting rights and democracy, Igor Dodon urges.

According to official figures, the Patriotic Bloc received just over 25 percent of the votes.

EU leaders praise the result

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen quickly congratulated Moldova on the election outcome. On platform X, she wrote: “Moldova, you did it again” and continued: “You made your choice clear: Europe. Democracy. Freedom. Our door is open. And we are with you every step of the way. The future is yours.”

EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs Kaja Kallas had already announced in the summer that the union was deeply engaged in the Moldovan election. She stated then that the EU had expanded its partnership mission with specialist teams on the ground to “support Moldova and address illegal financing around the election.”

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Telegram founder reveals blackmail attempt by French intelligence service

Totalitarianism

Published today 14:51
– By Editorial Staff
Pavel Durov resisted when France demanded censorship of Moldovan opposition channels on Telegram.
2 minute read

Telegram co-founder Pavel Durov claims that French intelligence services tried to get him to censor opposition channels ahead of Moldova’s presidential election – in exchange for help with his French legal case.

In a social media post, Pavel Durov reveals a blackmail attempt by French intelligence services that allegedly took place about a year ago, when he was detained in Paris, France, accused of inadequate control over criminal content on the Telegram platform.

“About a year ago, while I was stuck in Paris, the French intelligence services reached out to me through an intermediary, asking me to help the Moldovan government censor certain Telegram channels ahead of the presidential elections in Moldova”, he writes.

After reviewing the channels flagged by French and Moldovan authorities, the Telegram team identified some that clearly violated the platform’s rules, and these were removed. But then came an unexpected offer.

“The intermediary then informed me that, in exchange for this cooperation, French intelligence would ‘say good things’ about me to the judge who had ordered my arrest in August last year”, Durov reveals.

“Unacceptable on multiple levels”

Durov describes the offer as “unacceptable on multiple levels” and points to serious problems regardless of whether the claim was true or false.

“If the agency did in fact approach the judge – it constituted an attempt to interfere in the judicial process. If it did not, and merely claimed to have done so, then it was exploiting my legal situation in France to influence political developments in Eastern Europe – a pattern we have also observed in Romania”, he states.

Shortly thereafter, the Telegram team received a second list of so-called “problematic” Moldovan channels. But this time the situation was different.

“Unlike the first, nearly all of these channels were legitimate and fully compliant with our rules. Their only commonality was that they voiced political positions disliked by the French and Moldovan governments”, Durov explains.

Refused to remove political content

The Telegram chief claims they refused to comply with the French intelligence service’s demands this time.

“We refused to act on this request. Telegram is committed to freedom of speech and will not remove content for political reasons”, Durov declares.

He concludes with a promise to Telegram users about transparency regarding future pressure attempts.

“I will continue to expose every attempt to pressure Telegram into censoring our platform. Stay tuned”.

The allegations come amid Moldova’s crucial parliamentary elections, where President Maia Sandu’s strongly pro-EU party faces the opposition bloc BEP, which advocates for the country’s neutrality and accuses the government of silencing opposition voices.

Antifa added to Hungary’s terrorist list

Published today 10:12
– By Editorial Staff
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán follows in Trump's footsteps – Antifa now classified as terrorist organization in Hungary as well.
2 minute read

The Hungarian government has officially classified Antifa as a terrorist organization.

Prime Minister Viktor Orbán calls the movement a “terrorist network” and promises to use the strictest measures available to authorities to prosecute members of the far-left network.

The decision, made on Wednesday and announced by Orbán on Friday, means that the notorious movement is now added to a national list of banned terrorist organizations.

“Antifa is not an activist group; it is a terrorist network. We have officially designated Antifa as a terrorist organisation and will establish a national list of banned groups. Hungary will bring terrorists to justice and use the strictest measures to keep our country and citizens safe”, writes Viktor Orbán on X.

During an interview on Kossuth Radio’s program Good Morning, Hungary!, the prime minister elaborated on the government’s position. He explained that the national list of terrorist organizations is now being established and that the government will take very strong action to combat these groups.

Orbán emphasized that the government must lead by example and ensure that illegal actions and threats of crime always lead to legal consequences.

The prime minister expressed concern about the situation in Europe, which he believes is characterized by growing instability and aggression. This development also affects politics, and Orbán emphasized that politicians must prevent the tense and violent atmosphere from taking over public debates.

“Slowly, only Central Europe – and within it, especially Hungary – can be considered an ‘island of peace and security'”, Orbán emphasized, underlining that the government must show leadership and clearly signal that Hungary should remain a peaceful and secure country.

Legal questions

Groups and individuals acting under the Antifa name have systematically used violence as a political method – from physical attacks against opponents and dissidents to extensive property damage and riots.

These violent acts have included murders, attempted murders, assaults on demonstrators from right-wing groups, attacks on journalists, arson attacks on buildings, and systematic intimidation of political opponents. Advocates for the terrorist classification argue that this is classic terrorism – systematic violence aimed at creating fear and silencing political opponents – making the terrorist designation highly justified.

At the same time, Orbán’s opponents argue that “Antifa” is not a formal, centralized organization but rather a loose, decentralized movement without official membership, leadership, or unified structure.

This, they argue, makes it legally complicated to classify the network as terrorist and risks undermining legal security – as people could theoretically be convicted of terrorism based on vague connections to an ideology rather than proven involvement in terrorist activities.

The Nordic Times has previously reported on how Dutch authorities also want to classify the violence-embracing movement as terrorist.

Microsoft stops Israel’s use of technology for mass surveillance of Palestinians

The genocide in Gaza

Published 27 September 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Microsoft's research and development division in Matam Business Park in Haifa, Israel.
5 minute read

The tech giant has shut down the Israeli military’s access to cloud services and AI tools following revelations about a secret spy project that collected millions of phone calls from Palestinian civilians.

Microsoft has shut down the Israeli military’s access to technology that was used to power an extensive surveillance system that collected millions of Palestinian civilian phone calls daily from Gaza and the West Bank, The Guardian can reveal.

Microsoft informed Israeli officials last week that Unit 8200, the military’s elite intelligence agency, had violated the company’s terms of service by storing the enormous amount of surveillance data on its Azure cloud platform, according to sources with insight into the situation.

The decision to cut off Unit 8200’s ability to use parts of the technology is a direct result of an investigation that The Guardian published last month. It revealed how Azure was used to store and process the enormous amount of Palestinian communications in a mass surveillance program.

Secret project after summit meeting

In a joint investigation with the Israeli-Palestinian publication +972 Magazine and the Hebrew-language newspaper Local Call, The Guardian revealed how Microsoft and Unit 8200 had worked together on a plan to move large volumes of sensitive intelligence material to Azure.

The project began after a 2021 meeting between Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and the unit’s then-commander Yossi Sariel.

In response to the investigation, Microsoft ordered an urgent external review to examine its relationship with Unit 8200. The initial results have now led to the company cutting off the unit’s access to certain of its cloud storage and AI services.

Equipped with Azure’s virtually unlimited storage capacity and computing power, Unit 8200 had built an indiscriminate new system that allowed its intelligence officers to collect, replay, and analyze the content of mobile calls from an entire population.

The project was so extensive that, according to sources from Unit 8200 – which is equivalent to the US National Security Agency – an internal motto emerged that captured its scope and ambition: “One million calls per hour.”

According to several sources, the enormous archive of intercepted calls – amounting to as much as 8,000 terabytes of data – was held in a Microsoft data center in the Netherlands. Within days of The Guardian publishing the investigation, Unit 8200 appears to have quickly moved surveillance data out of the country.

Data moved to Amazon

According to sources with knowledge of the enormous data transfer out of the EU country, it occurred in early August. Intelligence sources said that Unit 8200 planned to transfer data to Amazon Web Services cloud platform. Neither the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) nor Amazon responded to a request for comment.

Microsoft’s extraordinary decision to terminate the spy agency’s access to key technology was taken amid pressure from employees and investors over its work for the Israeli military and the role its technology has played in the nearly two-year-long offensive in Gaza.

A UN commission of inquiry recently concluded that Israel had committed genocide in Gaza, an allegation denied by Israel but supported by many experts in international law.

The Guardian’s joint investigation led to protests at Microsoft’s US headquarters and one of its European data centers, as well as demands from a worker-led campaign group, No Azure for Apartheid, to end all ties to the Israeli military.

Clear message from Microsoft

On Thursday, Microsoft Vice Chairman and President Brad Smith informed staff about the decision. In an email that The Guardian has seen, he said the company had “terminated and deactivated a set of services to a unit within Israel’s Ministry of Defense,” including cloud storage and AI services.

Smith wrote: “We do not provide technology to facilitate mass surveillance of civilians. We have applied this principle in all countries around the world, and we have insisted on it repeatedly for more than two decades.”

The decision brings an abrupt end to a three-year period during which the spy agency operated its surveillance program using Microsoft’s technology.

Unit 8200 used its own extensive surveillance capabilities to intercept and collect the calls. The spy agency then used a customized and segregated area within the Azure platform, enabling data to be retained for longer periods and analyzed with AI-driven techniques.

Used for bombing targets in Gaza

Although the initial focus of the surveillance system was the West Bank, where an estimated 3 million Palestinians live under Israeli military occupation, intelligence sources said the cloud-based storage platform had been used in the Gaza offensive to facilitate the preparation of deadly airstrikes.

The revelations highlighted how Israel has relied on services and infrastructure from major US tech companies to support its bombardment of Gaza, which has killed more than 65,000 Palestinians, mostly civilians, and created a deep humanitarian crisis and famine catastrophe.

According to a document seen by The Guardian, a senior Microsoft executive told Israel’s Ministry of Defense last week:

While our review is ongoing, we have at this point identified evidence supporting parts of The Guardian’s reporting.

The executive told Israeli officials that Microsoft “is not in the business of facilitating mass surveillance of civilians” and informed them that it would “deactivate” access to services supporting Unit 8200’s surveillance project and shut down its use of certain AI products.

First time since the war began

The termination is the first known case of a US tech company withdrawing services provided to the Israeli military since the beginning of its war in Gaza.

The decision has not affected Microsoft’s broader commercial relationship with the IDF, which is a long-standing client and will retain access to other services. The termination will raise questions within Israel about the policy of keeping sensitive military data in a third-party cloud operated abroad.

Last month’s revelations about Unit 8200’s use of Microsoft technology followed an earlier investigation by The Guardian and its partners about the broader relationship between the company and the Israeli military.

That story, published in January and based on leaked files, showed how the IDF’s reliance on Azure and its AI systems increased dramatically in the most intensive phase of its Gaza campaign.

Following that report, Microsoft launched its first review of how the IDF uses its services. It said in May that it had “found no evidence to date” that the military had failed to comply with its terms of service, or used Azure and its AI technology “to target or harm people” in Gaza.

But The Guardian’s investigation with +972 and Local Call published in August, which revealed that the cloud-based surveillance project had been used to investigate and identify bombing targets in Gaza, led to the company reassessing its conclusions.

The revelations caused alarm among senior Microsoft executives and raised concerns that some of its Israel-based employees may not have been fully transparent about their knowledge of how Unit 8200 used Azure when questioned as part of the review.

The company said its executives, including Nadella, were not aware that Unit 8200 planned to use, or ultimately used, Azure to store the content of intercepted Palestinian calls.

Microsoft then launched its second and more targeted review, which was overseen by lawyers at the US firm Covington & Burling. In his note to staff, Smith said the investigation did not have access to any customer data but its findings were based on a review of internal Microsoft documents, emails and messages between personnel.

I want to note our appreciation for The Guardian’s reporting, Smith wrote, noting that it had illuminated “information we could not access given our customer confidentiality commitments.” He added: “Our review is ongoing.”

Moldova bans opposition party days before parliamentary election

Published 27 September 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Irina Vlah, leader of the Heart of Moldova party, speaks to voters ahead of the 2024 presidential election.
2 minute read

Moldova’s Central Election Commission has banned the opposition party Heart of Moldova from participating in this weekend’s parliamentary election, just days before the crucial vote. The decision is described by the opposition as political persecution.

The ban came after a court on Thursday backed the government’s request to suspend Heart of Moldova, which is accused of electoral fraud. The Central Election Commission announced on Friday that all candidates from the party will be removed from the ballots, according to reports from local media.

The party is led by Irina Vlah, who previously served as governor of the autonomous region of Gagauzia between 2015 and 2023. Vlah has accused the government of using “lawfare” – legal warfare – as part of a broader campaign against political opponents.

Affects opposition coalition

The ban deals a heavy blow to the patriotic electoral bloc, a coalition that Vlah helped found to challenge President Maia Sandu’s ruling party Action and Solidarity. The coalition was given 24 hours to adjust its candidate lists.

President Sandu, who is strongly pro-EU, has often described her opponents as “Russian agents” with ties to organized crime. She has called Sunday’s election a decisive moment for Moldova. However, Moscow has dismissed her claims about secret Russian financing as “ridiculous”.

Criticism of previous election

Sandu’s re-election as president in October last year has been criticized as flawed. Her victory was secured primarily through votes from Moldovans living in EU countries, while thousands of citizens in Russia were allegedly denied the right to vote due to a limited number of polling stations, according to Moscow.

Residents of the breakaway region of Transnistria have also faced significant obstacles when trying to vote. Vlah’s successor as governor of Gagauzia, Evgenia Gutsul, was sentenced in August to seven years in prison for money laundering – charges she denies.

Facts about the party

Inima Moldovei (Heart of Moldova) is a political party in Moldova led by Irina Vlah, the former governor of the autonomous region of Gagauzia and 2024 presidential candidate. The party was formally founded in late 2024 and positions itself as a pro-Russian party with a left-conservative ideology that advocates for diplomatic neutrality for Moldova.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.