Thursday, March 27, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Concerns over Bilderberg executive’s influence on Trump

Donald Trump's USA

Published 11 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Tech billionaire Peter Thiel funded JD Vance's campaign and is often described as his mentor.

Tech mogul and multi-billionaire Peter Thiel wields significant influence over US President Donald Trump’s administration, according to a new Bloomberg review.

At least 15 representatives in the new US administration have clear ties to the Palantir founder, who, unlike adviser Elon Musk, prefers to keep a low profile in the background.

To the public, Thiel is perhaps best known as the co-founder of Paypal and the technology company Palantir Technologies. Palantir’s technology has been used by the US intelligence community to analyze data from surveillance tools, in the Ukraine war to help Ukrainian drones identify Russian soldiers, and to develop technology to automate the killing of human targets, with the AI making the final decision on who lives and who dies.

Peter Thiel has also been a very generous financier of the Republican Party and has funded several of the party’s presidential candidates’ election campaigns over the years – not least Trump’s. He also sits on the steering committee of the shadowy Bilderberg Group power network and is listed as one of the World Economic Forum’s “Young Global Leaders”.

The tech mogul himself has claimed that he is not as politically engaged today and that he would go “crazy” if he went around thinking about politics all the time. Nevertheless, the Trump administration is full of his friends, former partners and employees, and the multi-billionaire is seen as having great power to shape White House policy.

The vice president’s mentor

Trump’s “crypto tsar” David Sacks and Vice President J.D. Vance are two of the people who have a very close relationship with Thiel and the tech mogul is described as Vance’s mentor ever since he worked at Thiel’s venture capital firm Mithril Capitals. Later, the Paypal founder came to finance Vance’s election campaign and it is also said to have been Thiel who brought Vance and Trump together.

Although Thiel has no official position in the Trump administration, his voice is considered very important and Quinn Slobodian, a professor of international history at Boston University, believes that the influence of the tech establishment on the US government under Trump is “unprecedented in the modern era”.

According to the historian, representatives of big business have previously focused on making as much money as possible from government contracts – whereas now they are working to radically change the way government works and how the US is run.

Hundreds of government agencies could be shut down

Trump’s chief efficiency officer Elon Musk also has long-standing ties to Thiel and is highlighted as a clear example of the tech billionaires’ influence and changing political role.

Musk, now the world’s richest man, heads the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), tasked with overseeing and streamlining the spending of a number of agencies within the US government – often through unprecedented budget cuts.

The work is still in its early stages, but there has been talk of saving 2 trillion annually and laying off a majority of US government employees. Musk himself believes that more than 75 percent of the US authorities should be completely closed down or merged with others.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Trump imposes 25% tariffs on foreign cars

Donald Trump's USA

Published today 11:32
– By Editorial Staff

US President Donald Trump has announced that he will impose tariffs of 25% on all cars not manufactured in the US.

According to Trump, the executive order is a step to grow the domestic auto industry while providing a powerful incentive for foreign automakers to move their production to the United States.

The tariffs, which are expected to take effect from April 3, target both fully assembled cars and key auto parts such as engines and transmissions, Reuters reports.

The president says there will be no tariff at all on vehicles made in the US. A move he believes will strengthen the domestic industry and create new jobs.

Donald Trump describes his decision as the beginning of “Liberation Day” in the United States, a signal that the country will no longer tolerate what he calls an unfair trade policy.

– We’re going to charge countries for doing business in our country and taking our jobs, taking our wealth, taking a lot of the things that they’ve been taking over the years, Trump said in the Oval Office on Wednesday.

– They’ve taken so much out of our country, friend and foe and frankly, friend has been oftentimes much worse than foe.

Economic consequences and reactions

However, several analysts warn that the tariffs could have far-reaching consequences. Markets around the world have initially reacted negatively, with significant stock market declines for companies that rely on international supply chains, both major US automakers and foreign players.

According to White House estimates, the new tariffs could generate up to $100 billion in tax revenue per year, but at the same time risk driving up car prices by several thousand dollars per vehicle.

Outside the US, the EU in particular has expressed dissatisfaction with the decision. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has called the measure “bad for business, worse for consumers”, and warns that the tariffs will have negative effects on both European exporters and US consumers.

Sources: Trump may fire national security advisor

Donald Trump's USA

Published 25 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Waltz (center) with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.

The other powers that be in the White House are reportedly furious with Trump’s National Security Advisor Mike Waltz after he inadvertently added an outside journalist to an internal chat group where US war plans were discussed.

According to anonymous government sources, the gaffe is considered highly embarrassing and risks casting a pall of ridicule over the Trump administration and they are considering firing Waltz.

The Nordic Times recently reported that The Atlantic’s American-Jewish editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg was suddenly invited to the group and could read in real time the discussions of those in power about bombing the Houthi rebels in Syria.

Despite the sensitivity of the discussions, no one seemed to care about controlling who could see the plans, and it was Goldberg who eventually left the group of his own accord, drawing attention to the security flaws.

The revelation has enraged both the opposition and his own party colleagues, with many saying it is extremely frivolous and potentially very dangerous for conversations concerning the country’s interests and military resources to be conducted in such a casual and indiscriminate manner without any security considerations.

“Can’t have recklessness”

According to White House sources, the Trump administration considers the whole thing very embarrassing and Waltz, who invited the journalist to the group, is now reportedly hanging loose.

An anonymous administration official told Politico that the national security adviser’s future will be decided in a couple of days but that there are strong indications that he will be fired.

– It was reckless not to check who was on the thread. It was reckless to be having that conversation on Signal. You can’t have recklessness as the national security adviser.

Another person close to the White House is even more blunt, claiming that “everyone in the White House can agree on one thing: Mike Waltz is a fucking idiot“.

No political consequences for Trump

According to reports, at least two of Trump’s close aides have already called on the President to force Waltz to resign as soon as possible so that he alone can bear the blame for what happened before Congress, the voters and the American people.

– I don’t think there are any long term political consequences for Trump or the Administration, outside of this potentially costing Waltz his job, one of the sources clarified.

It is also worth noting that Speaker Mike Johnson and several other prominent Republicans have so far come to Waltz’s defense and publicly declared that he should absolutely not resign from his post.

US security breach – war plans shared with journalist

Donald Trump's USA

Published 25 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, and Vice President JD Vance were three of the group's participants.

Jewish-American editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg, thought someone was making fun of him when he was suddenly added to a secret chat group, along with what appeared to be the top US political leadership.

However, he soon realized that the chat group was real and he witnessed the powers-that-be discussing a secret military operation against the Houthi rebels in Yemen.

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Vice President JD Vance reportedly discussed details of a sensitive bombing operation against Houthi targets in Yemen in an encrypted Signal chat – which inadvertently included Jeffrey Goldberg. The editor-in-chief revealed this himself in an article published Monday, while a Cabinet meeting was underway at the White House.

According to Goldberg, on March 11, he was added to a Signal group of 18 participants by a user who identified himself as national security adviser Mike Waltz. The group, titled “Houthi PC small group,” included profiles that appeared to belong to Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hetseth and CIA Director John Ratcliffe.

Initially, Goldberg was skeptical, thinking at first that he had been the victim of some kind of disinformation campaign.

– I had very strong doubts that this text group was real, because I could not believe that the national-security leadership of the United States would communicate on Signal about imminent war plans, he explains.

On March 14, participants began discussing the exact timing of the military operation.

“Hate bailing Europe out again”

I think we are making a mistake”, wrote a user named JD Vance, arguing that Europe benefits more from the attacks than the US.

3 percent of US trade runs through the suez. 40 percent of European trade does. There is a real risk that the public doesn’t understand this or why it’s necessary. The strongest reason to do this is, as POTUS said, to send a message”, he continued.

Vance added, however, that he was willing to agree to support the plans if the others were in favor of an attack but added that he is “not sure the president is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now” and pointed to the risk of increased oil prices.

Security adviser Mike Waltz also declared that it will be the Europeans who will pay for the attacks, and Vance expressed that he “just hate bailing Europe out again”.

I fully share your loathing of European free-loading. It’s PATHETIC”, Hegseth replied.

White House confirms miss

On March 15 at 1:45 p.m. ET (according to Hegseth’s message in the chats), attacks also began against the Houthi rebels. Goldberg described checking social media at 1:55 p.m. and seeing reports of explosions in the Yemeni capital of Sanaa. The chat feed then featured congratulatory messages from Mike Waltz and others.

The existence of the secret chat group was real, Goldberg said, and he had apparently been invited by mistake, without any close scrutiny and without any of the top security officials seeming to realize he was even there. He also states that a large amount of highly sensitive information was disseminated in the group, but that he himself does not want to publish it further for US security reasons.

Shortly after the attacks, Goldberg left the chat and on the same day, Donald Trump declared on his Truth Social platform that he had “ordered the United States Military to launch decisive and powerful Military action against the Houthi terrorists in Yemen”.

The White House has confirmed that an outside user was accidentally added to the secret chat group but not why covert military operations and decisions were discussed in such an uncertain and casual manner.

According to the US National Security Council (NSC), the messages appear to be “authentic” but the chat group posed “no threats to our service members or our national security”.

“Stunning carelessness”

At a press conference, Trump dismissed knowledge of the incident – and instead pointed out that he did not like The Atlantic newspaper. His press secretary also emphasized that the president has full confidence in his security team.

Democratic Senator Jack Reed is not as impressed, calling it “one of the most egregious failures of operational security and common sense I have ever seen”  and calling for an immediate investigation.

– Military operations need to be handled with utmost discretion, using approved, secure lines of communication, because American lives are on the line. The carelessness shown by President Trump’s cabinet is stunning and dangerous, he continued in a statement.

Nebraska Republican Don Bacon is also highly critical, saying it is deeply problematic that the security team does not even appear to have used secure phones or been protected from outside interception.

Goldberg also stated that Waltz set up for some messages to be deleted after one and four weeks respectively a potential violation of law since federal rules require the archiving of official documents.

Others are more skeptical about the scandal, arguing that it is highly unlikely that a complete outsider and a journalist at that would be invited to a group like this by mistake. Instead, they speculate that the intention from the outset was for the information to get out though it is unclear why.

Biden and Harris lose security clearance

Donald Trump's USA

Published 24 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are two of the half-dozen former officials who will now lose access to classified information.

On Friday evening, President Donald Trump revoked the security clearances of Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton and a number of other former US political figures.

Trump justifies the move by saying that it is “no longer in the national interest” for the individuals in question to have access to classified information.

Former US President Donald Trump has revoked the security clearances of several former Democratic political opponents, including Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton, as well as people linked to Joe Biden’s administration and family. This is according to a memorandum published on Friday, May 24.

The decision follows Trump’s statement in February that he would “immediately” withdraw Joe Biden’s access to classified information and stop the former president’s daily intelligence briefings. The document now formalizes the revocation of security clearances for Biden, as well as his family members and several former officials previously named by the White House in the context.

Among the more than dozen people affected by the action are former Secretary of State Antony Blinken, former National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, Biden’s Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, and two former Republican members of Congress – Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger – who served on the House committee investigating Trump’s alleged involvement in the January 6, 2021 protests and occupation of the Capitol.

Denied “unescorted access” to Government Facilities

In the memorandum, Trump justifies the decision by stating that he has “determined that it is no longer in the national interest for the following individuals to access classified information”.

According to Trump, he has instructed heads of government agencies to take all necessary steps to “revoke any active security clearances held by the aforementioned individuals and to immediately rescind their access to classified information”.

This means that Biden, Harris, Clinton and others concerned will no longer be able to access classified government information – or access classified information from US intelligence agencies. They will also be prohibited from “unescorted access” to sensitive government facilities, according to the document.

Trump has previously pointed to Joe Biden’s long history of confusion – arguing that even when he was younger and healthier, the ex-president was not fit to be entrusted with sensitive information.

The incumbent’s opponents see the decision as a kind of revenge for the Biden administration revoking Trump’s security clearance after the events at the Capitol in January 2021.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.