Friday, July 25, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

BRICS poised for expansion

Published 24 August 2023
– By Editorial Staff
Representatives of the five BRICS countries in Johannesburg.
3 minute read

The BRICS partnership could expand significantly. During the Johannesburg Summit, India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced his intention to pursue the accession of new countries.

More than 20 new countries have reportedly already submitted formal applications for membership.

BRICS was originally based on cooperation between the world’s five largest emerging economies – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa. However, the alliance is likely to grow much larger in the near future.

So far, Russia and China have been the most vocal proponents of expansion – but they have also received support from South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa. During the Johannesburg summit, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi also announced that he “fully supports the expansion” of the group. All BRICS leaders were physically present at the summit except Russian President Vladimir Putin, who participated via video link.

According to South African officials, more than 40 countries from the “global south” have expressed interest in joining BRICS – and more than 20 countries have submitted formal applications for membership, according to Qatar-based Al-Jazeera.

“Will be a multilateral institution”

However, full consensus has not been reached on all issues. Brazil, which also has close ties with the US, believes that BRICS should not try to compete with the US and the G7 economies, according to President Lula. Meanwhile, Lula welcomes Argentina’s entry into BRICS, saying it is “very important” for the country, which is struggling with historically high inflation, debt and large loans from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). If Argentina joins BRICS, it could potentially receive various financial support packages and loan offers from the alliance.

– We want BRICS to be a multilateral institution, not an exclusive club. Any new members would need to meet certain conditions, so the group does not become a “Tower of Babel”, Lula said.

Wants to change the global economic system

Priority issues raised included strengthening the partnership with Africa and developing proposals for changes to the global economic system.

– We are concerned that global financial and payment systems are increasingly being used as instruments of geopolitical contestation. Global economic recovery relies on predictable global payment systems and the smooth operating of banking, supply chains, trade, tourism, as well as financial flows, Ramaphosa said.

The South African leader went on to say that “development is not the privilege of the few” and that more focus should be placed on the challenges of the non-Western world.

Vladimir Putin criticized what he called “ongoing neocolonialism” that he said promotes its own hegemony. He also stressed that Russia wants to find a solution to the war in Ukraine and achieve a ceasefire, a view shared by other BRICS countries.

During the conference, Chinese President Xi Jinping welcomed the fact that so many countries are said to want to join the cooperation and stressed the importance of creating “stability and security”. He also called for deeper cooperation between countries to build long-term growth outside the Western bloc.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

WEF founder manipulated reports to protect political relationships

The globalist agenda

Published today 12:00
– By Editorial Staff
"We must protect our relationships with India before Davos 2019", Schwab is alleged to have said, manipulating the organization's prestigious "Global Competitiveness Report" for political reasons.
3 minute read

Klaus Schwab allegedly altered countries’ rankings in important economic reports to avoid affecting relationships with India, and to prevent Brexit supporters from being able to use positive figures for the United Kingdom. Meanwhile, extensive expenses of 900,000 Swiss francs that his wife charged through WEF are being scrutinized.

World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab is accused of manipulating the organization’s prestigious “Global Competitiveness Report” for political reasons. According to an ongoing investigation, he changed countries’ rankings to protect diplomatic relationships and thereby prevent the results from being used politically, reports the Swiss newspaper Tages-Anzeiger.

Changed to protect India relations

The serious incident occurred in 2017-2018 when a methodology change caused India to fall over 20 places in the ranking while the United Kingdom climbed from seventh to fourth place. Schwab then intervened directly and emailed those responsible with the justification: “We must protect our relationships with India before Davos 2019”.

He did not want to risk Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi canceling his visit. At the same time, he wrote that the United Kingdom “must not see any improvement” because this would be “exploited by the Brexit camp”.

Despite Schwab saying he supported the new methodology, he concluded: “This year we simply cannot implement this”. Otherwise, the good relationships with India, which he had “invested so much in during the year”, would be destroyed.

The report was eventually published, but with altered figures: India ended up in 40th place and the United Kingdom in eighth place – both only one place worse than in 2016.

Shared secret reports with governments

Even more serious is that Schwab in 2022 allegedly shared a secret draft of the report with a government representative from an Arab country whose ranking had deteriorated significantly. After receiving “critical feedback”, Schwab recommended to management that the report not be published at all.

The 2021-2022 report was never published, and no new versions have appeared since then.

Wife’s expenses without official role

In parallel, Schwab’s wife Hilde is now being scrutinized, who without an official function at WEF has had her travels charged through the organization. Lawyers from the firm Homburger have discovered questionable expenses totaling 900,000 Swiss francs (€970,000) over the past ten years.

Hilde Schwab runs her own foundation for social entrepreneurship but has no formal role within WEF. Despite this, her travels, which cannot always be explained by her activities, have been paid for by WEF.

Denies the allegations

Schwab has tried to defend himself against the manipulation allegations:

To construct this as a manipulation is an insult to my academic standing, he has said.

He claims that he only forwarded corrections from governments to use updated data or correct errors in the analysis.

Investigation ongoing

The Nordic Times already reported in April that Klaus Schwab was forced to resign from WEF and that a comprehensive investigation is ongoing. The federal foundation authority is also reviewing the use of WEF’s funds.

An important board meeting has been postponed, but time is running out. By the end of August at the latest, invitations to WEF 2026 must be sent out.

Schwab’s spokesman, Jörg Denzler, refuses to comment on the investigation:

— The June agreement is of central significance for Mr. Schwab. In contrast to some other parties, Mr. Schwab fully complies with the terms and does not comment publicly when approached by the media.

Russia rules out talks between Putin and Zelensky without final agreement

The war in Ukraine

Published today 10:10
– By Editorial Staff
Moscow says no to a meeting between Putin and Zelenskyj before a finished agreement is on the table.
2 minute read

Russia currently rules out a meeting between President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, unless the parties first agree on the draft of a finished memorandum. This was stated by Vladimir Medinsky, the Kremlin’s lead negotiator in talks with Ukraine, in connection with the latest peace talks in Turkey.

Medinsky, one of the most prominent representatives of the Kremlin in the ongoing peace negotiations, emphasized that a personal meeting between the two leaders is only meaningful if they have already agreed on the terms of a peace agreement and are ready to sign it.

There’s no point in meeting only to begin negotiations from square one, he said, referring to previous summits that in practice prolonged the conflict rather than resolved it.

He also brought up historical cases where heads of state only met to sign already negotiated agreements, not to initiate new processes.

As an example, Medinsky mentioned the Chinese civil war in the 1940s:

Chiang Kai-shek constantly insisted on meeting in person to discuss everything. I believe they met five times, smiled, and posed for photographs, but it did not bring an end to the civil war. The core issues remained unresolved, and the war went on.

The Kremlin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, confirmed Medinsky’s line and stated that Russia considers such a meeting relevant only when a final agreement is in place.

The statements come at a time when the question of a meeting between Putin and Zelensky is once again being discussed internationally as a possible path to peace in Ukraine.

Parties far apart from each other

Many diplomats and international actors, not least in the West, have for a long time advocated direct talks between the two leaders to break the diplomatic deadlock in the conflict.

Volodymyr Zelenskyj has previously expressed a willingness to meet Putin to discuss peace, but has also set demands including the withdrawal of Russian forces and confirmation of Ukraine’s sovereignty as prerequisites.

Russia, for its part, has consistently demanded that the talks should be based on Russian security interests, including control over certain territories – something that the Ukrainian government rejects.

Medinsky’s and Peskov’s statements underscore that Russia does not see any immediate room for a summit as long as the fundamental prerequisites for peace are not already established, which makes the conditions for direct dialogue continue to be difficult.

Gabbard accuses Obama of years-long coup against Trump

Donald Trump's USA

Published yesterday 12:21
– By Editorial Staff
There is indisputable evidence that shows in detail how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence assessment that they knew was false, according to Gabbard.
3 minute read

US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has released a previously classified report that she claims reveals how former President Barack Obama and his administration deliberately created false information about Russian interference in the 2016 election.

Gabbard describes it as “the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history”.

At a White House press conference on July 23, Gabbard presented the declassified report from the House Intelligence Committee, which was originally produced in September 2020.

The report questions the foundations for the assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin would have wanted to help Donald Trump win the election.

The stunning revelations that we are releasing today should be of concern to every American. This is not about Democrats or Republicans. This has to do with the integrity of our Democratic Republic, Gabbard said at the press conference.

Obama “knew the report was false”

Gabbard accuses the Obama administration of deliberately creating an intelligence assessment that they “knew was false”. She claims they created a fabricated narrative that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to help Trump win.

There is irrefutable evidence that detail how President Obama and his national security team directed the creation of an intelligence community assessment that they knew was false, Gabbard explained.

According to the report, Obama allegedly issued “unusual directives” to expedite the publication of the intelligence assessment before Trump’s inauguration, bypassing normal coordination procedures within the intelligence services.

CIA accused of inadequate sources

The report criticizes the CIA for failing to follow its own standards and for basing its conclusions on what is described as “scant, unclear, and unverifiable fragment of a sentence from one of the substandard reports”.

Gabbard claims that then-CIA Director John Brennan and the intelligence community deliberately suppressed information showing that Putin “held back from leaking compromising material on Hillary Clinton prior to the election”.

Brennan and the intelligence community mischaracterized intelligence and relied on dubious substandard sources to create a contrived false narrative that Putin developed a quote clear preference for Trump, she said.

Claims about Clinton’s health condition

The report describes extensive material that Russia allegedly had about Hillary Clinton, including documents that according to Gabbard showed “psycho-emotional problems, uncontrolled fits of anger, aggression” and claims that Clinton was “on a daily regimen of heavy tranquilizers”.

Gabbard also claims that the intelligence community excluded important information that would have contradicted their main conclusions, including reports that “some Russian intelligence officials were planning for candidate Hillary Clinton’s victory”.

Demands for judicial review

She has demanded a criminal investigation of officials from the Obama era and accuses them of manufacturing a false narrative to discredit a sitting president. Trump has supported her conclusions and demanded prosecution of Obama and senior officials in his administration.

They conspired to subvert the will of the American people who elected Donald Trump in that election in November of 2016 they worked with their partners in the media to promote this lie ultimately to undermine the legitimacy of President Trump and launching what would be a years-long coup against him and his administration, Gabbard said.

The report also claims that internal US intelligence assessments consistently concluded that Russia lacked both the capability and intent to intervene in the 2016 election, but that these findings were deliberately suppressed.

Russia has denied all involvement in American elections, and President Putin has repeatedly said that Moscow does not favor any particular American political candidate.

Trump accuses Obama of “treason” – urges justice department to act

Donald Trump's USA

Published yesterday 8:27
– By Editorial Staff
Donald Trump has made strong accusations against former President Barack Hussein Obama, now accusing him of treason and being responsible for "the Russiagate hoax."
2 minute read

US President Donald Trump has accused his predecessor Barack Obama of “treason”. Trump states that he wants the Justice Department to “go after” Obama and former intelligence chiefs for their alleged conspiracy to “manipulate elections” and stage what Trump calls “the Russiagate hoax”.

Trump made these statements during a meeting with reporters in the Oval Office on Tuesday. He was responding to questions about the report that Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard released last week, in which she claims that officials under the Obama administration fabricated intelligence to falsely accuse Trump of collusion with Russia.

This was treason. Barack Hussein Obama is the ringleader. Hillary Clinton was right there with him, and so was Sleepy Joe Biden, and so were the rest of them: Comey, Clapper, the whole group, Trump said, referring to former FBI Director James Comey and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper.

They tried to rig an election, and they got caught. And then they did rig the election in 2020. And then because I knew I won that election by a lot, I did it a third time, and I won in a landslide, he added.

Report with over 100 documents

Gabbard’s report was “irrefutable proof that Obama was seditious”, according to Trump, who accused his predecessor of “trying to lead a coup”.

— This is the biggest scandal in the history of our country, the president said.

The report, which contains over 100 declassified documents, suggests that Obama’s intelligence chiefs discarded all intelligence assessments that found no Russian involvement, and replaced them with fabricated claims. This paved the way for the Russia investigation, which Gabbard describes as a “multi-year coup” against Trump.

Obama denies the allegations

Obama has strongly denied the allegations and reiterated his position shortly after Trump’s latest statements from the Oval Office. Gabbard’s report contains nothing that “undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes”, Obama’s office said in a statement.

“Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response. But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction”, the statement claimed.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.