Friday, June 20, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Argentina’s BRICS rejection: A gamble amid economic turmoil

Published 29 November 2023
– By Sukanya Saha
3 minute read

In the labyrinth of Argentina’s economic woes, President Javier Milei’s recent rejection of BRICS membership adds a new layer of complexity to the nation’s uphill battle against inflation, dwindling foreign reserves, and a looming debt crisis.

Argentina’s economic narrative reads like a tale of multiple currencies and a precarious financial tightrope. With inflation rates soaring well above 140 per cent, and an official exchange rate at odds with the elusive “blue dollar,” Argentina’s economic landscape is a patchwork of uncertainty.

The recent decision to pay international debts in Chinese yuan, leveraging a standing swap line with China, reflects the urgency and creativity required to navigate this financial maze.

As Argentina grapples with a severe shortage of foreign exchange, exacerbated by drought conditions and a poor harvest, the rejection of BRICS+ membership raises eyebrows. The BRICS alliance, with its economic prowess and diverse resources, could potentially offer Argentina a lifeline to weather the storm.

One of the primary advantages of BRICS+ membership lies in the access to a diverse array of markets and resources. For a nation like Argentina, grappling with inflation and a shortage of foreign exchange reserves, the benefits of aligning with a coalition of emerging economic giants are hard to ignore. These nations collectively represent a vast consumer market and a rich tapestry of industries, offering Argentina the prospect of new trade avenues and investment opportunities.

President Milei’s libertarian ideals emphasise a minimalistic approach to government intervention, but the rejection of BRICS+ raises questions about the administration’s commitment to fostering economic growth. In an era where economic interdependence is the norm, opting for isolation might hinder Argentina’s ability to attract foreign investment and forge mutually beneficial partnerships.

It’s also crucial to consider the geopolitical chessboard. In rejecting BRICS+, Argentina may find itself sidelined in discussions that shape the rules of the global economic game. As this alliance solidifies its influence, decisions made within its confines could impact trade agreements, currency valuations, and economic policies worldwide. By refusing a seat at this table, Argentina may inadvertently forfeit a voice in shaping the rules that govern its economic destiny.

However, President Milei’s administration appears to be steering towards economic autonomy, even as the nation faces the pressing need for external support.

The urgent need for Argentina is crystal clear: reduce inflation. Yet, the path to achieving this goal is riddled with challenges. The central bank, burdened with short-term, peso-denominated treasury bills and a precarious interest income scenario, must navigate the balance between controlling inflation and preventing a currency freefall.

The question of debt is paramount. Argentina’s outstanding international bonds, valued at a mere 30 cents on the dollar, signal an impending restructuring. While the global market might not be shocked by Argentina’s restructuring, the country’s $45 billion debt to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) underscores the critical importance of a realistic repayment plan.

Argentina’s actions and policies resonate far beyond its borders, influencing the IMF’s lending approach and potentially setting legal precedents in sovereign debt enforcement.

The real-world experiment lies in the hands of the Argentine president. If Milei’s proposal to dollarise the economy becomes reality, it could redefine the understanding of a country’s debt carrying capacity. Dollarisation may offer a semblance of stability, but the risk of a deep default looms large, turning all domestic debts into a claim on Argentina’s non-existent dollar reserves.

In rejecting BRICS+, Argentina appears to be charting its own course. Whether this bold move proves to be a masterstroke or a miscalculation remains to be seen. As the world watches, Argentina stands at the intersection of economic uncertainty and the quest for autonomy, navigating uncharted waters with the hopes of finding a solution that will reshape its destiny.

Sukanya Saha is a contributing editor at The Nordic Times. Based in New Delhi, she is an accomplished journalist who has previously worked with several major Indian media outlets such as NDTV, India Today, IANS, and Jagran English. Currently, she is associated with Hindustan Times. In 2022, she topped the BRICS International Journalism Programme from India. Committed to understanding the complex dynamics that shape our world, Sukanya's passions range from world politics to science and space exploration.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Trump voters oppose US involvement in Israel’s war

Donald Trump's USA

Published yesterday 11:48
– By Editorial Staff
Many Trump voters were attracted by his promises to avoid expensive and unnecessary wars.
3 minute read

A majority of Donald Trump’s supporters oppose US military intervention in Israel’s war against Iran. This is according to a new opinion poll published on Wednesday.

According to the comprehensive survey by The Economist/YouGov, conducted over the weekend, 53 percent of voters who supported Trump in the 2024 presidential election want the US to stay out of Israel’s attacks.

Only 19 percent of Trump’s supporters advocate US military intervention, while 63 percent prefer the administration to try to negotiate with Iran over its nuclear program.

Among all voters in the survey, 60 percent believed that the US should refrain from using military force in the conflict.

The results reflect long-standing public support for peaceful solutions to the Iran issue. An April poll by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs-Ipsos showed that eight in ten Americans preferred diplomacy or tougher economic sanctions to military action to stop Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

And even if diplomacy or sanctions were to fail, many Americans prefer other methods. The same Ipsos poll showed that 60 percent could envisage US cyberattacks against Iranian systems, but only 48 percent of Americans supported air strikes against nuclear facilities.

“A terrible mistake”

Opposition to military escalation is also evident among several Republican politicians.

This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution“, Thomas Massie, a Republican congressman from Kentucky, wrote on X earlier this week. He expressed his support for an attempt to gather support in the House of Representatives for a bipartisan resolution to limit the president’s war powers.

Libertarian Senator Rand Paul is also a very vocal opponent of dragging the US into yet another unnecessary war.

– I will not vote to send american kids to Iran. I think its a terrible mistake, every way is not our war. Our country is bankrupting itself over our own obligations to our own people. We should not ever send one soldier to Iran and I hope I am pretty clear on that, he recently declared in an interview.

Tim Burchett, Republican congressman from Tennessee, told CNN on Wednesday that he wanted to see “very little” US involvement in the escalating conflict.

– We don’t need another endless war in the Middle East. Old men make decisions and young men die, and that’s the history of war, he said.

– We need to take a deep breath and slow down this thing and let the Israelis do their thing. We do not need a three-front war in our lifetime.

At the same time, powerful neoconservative actors and the Israel lobby are waging an intense campaign to get the Trump administration to drag the US into the war – despite popular opposition and the president’s earlier promises to be a “peacemaker” and end all wars.

Republican Senator: The Bible commands us to support Israel

The escalation in the Middle East

Published yesterday 10:34
– By Editorial Staff
Ted Cruz believes that Christians have a biblical duty to support Israel—otherwise, they risk incurring God's wrath.
3 minute read

Influential Republican Senator Ted Cruz justifies his support for Israel’s war against Iran by referring to the Bible and what he learned in Sunday school as a child.

During a heated conversation with former Fox News personality Tucker Carlson, Cruz revealed that his stance on the conflict is based more on religious dogma than on political analysis and judgment.

– Growing up in Sunday school I was taught from the Bible, those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who curse Israel will be cursed, and from my perspective, I want to be on the blessing side of things, Cruz explained.

The senator emphasized that his support for Israel is rooted in the belief that the US is commanded by God to stand behind the country.

– Where does my support for Israel come from? Number one, because biblically we are commanded to support IsraelIt doesn’t say the government of Israel, it says the nation of Israel. So that’s in the Bible. As a Christian, I believe that, he emphasized.

But Carlson questioned Cruz’s knowledge of the Bible and asked him to specify where in the Bible the verse can be found.

– I don’t have the scripture off the tip of mypull out your phone, Cruz replied, to which Carlson quickly pointed out:

– It’s in Genesis. You’re quoting a Bible phrase you don’t have context for, you don’t know where in the Bible it is… that’s your theology?’

Must Christians support Netanyahu?

The conversation quickly became more heated when Carlson continued to demand an answer as to why Christians must support Israel:

– We’re commanded as Christians to support the government of Israel? Define Israel. This is important. Are you kidding? This is a majority Christian country.

Cruz responded irritably:

– Define Israel? Do you not know what Israel is? That would be the country you’ve asked like 49 questions about.

Carlson pressed on:

– So that’s what Genesis—that’s what God is talking about? Is that the current borders, the current leadership, he’s talking about the political entity of Israel? Is the nation God is referring to in Genesis the same country Benjamin Netanyahu is running now?

Is the US at war or not?

Carlson, who had previously criticized Trump for abandoning his “America First” policy in connection with the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, then put Cruz under further pressure. The senator had previously made a surprising statement about the US’s role in the conflict.

– I’ve said we. Israel is leading them, but we’re supporting them, Cruz said when Carlson pointed out that he had previously said that the US was carrying out attacks against Iran.

Carlson reacted strongly to the fact that the US position in the conflict seems to vary depending on which politician you ask:

– You’re breaking news here. The US government last night denied… on behalf of Trump, that we’re acting on Israel’s behalf in any offensive capacity.

Cruz tried to backtrack:

– No, we’re not bombing them. Israel is bombing them.

You just said we were. This is high stakes. You’re a senator. If you’re saying the United States is at war with Iran right now, people are listening, Carlson pointed out.

No deeper knowledge of Iran

The host also took the opportunity to reveal Cruz’s ignorance about Iran when he asked the Republican politician how many people live in Iran.

– I don’t know the population, Cruz admitted, prompting Carlson to exclaim:

– Not at all? You don’t know the population of the people you’re trying to topple?

Cruz tried to turn the question back on Carlson, who quickly replied, “92 million”.

– How could you not know that? It’s kind of relevant because you’re calling for the overthrow of the government.

Cruz also admitted that he had no deeper knowledge of Iran’s ethnic composition and conceded that he was no expert on the country whose government he wants to overthrow. He also argued that this type of detailed knowledge was irrelevant in this context.

Islam set to become world’s largest religion

Published 18 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Today, there are approximately two billion Muslims, compared to 2.3 billion Christians.
2 minute read

Islam grew about three times faster than Christianity between 2010 and 2020. This is according to new data from the Pew Research Center, which points to higher birth rates and lower rates of conversion as the main explanations.

The global Muslim population increased by almost 21 percent over the past decade. Christianity grew significantly slower, at around 6 percent over the same period. Islam thus grew twice as fast as the world’s population as a whole, which increased by 10 percent.

According to the study, Islam also gained more new followers than all non-Muslim religions combined during the period.

Among the reasons for this development, the higher fertility rate among Muslim women and the lower average age of the Muslim population are particularly mentioned. Between 2015 and 2020, a Muslim woman had an average of 2.9 children, compared with 2.2 children for women who did not belong to Islam.

The net effect of people joining or leaving Islam was small – both groups accounted for about 1 percent in the 2010s.

Distribution based on region. Photo: Pew Research Center

Expanding rapidly

Christianity remains the world’s largest religion, with 2.3 billion followers in 2020. Islam is the second largest, with 2 billion. But while the number of Christians increased, the religion’s share of the world’s population declined by almost 2 percent during the period.

According to the study, the growth of Christianity has been slowed by a large number of people leaving the religion to become non-religious. For every 100 adults who grew up as Christians, the religion lost an average of 11.6 people.

– Islam is set to grow to become the world’s largest religion in years ahead, unless trend lines shift, said Conrad Hackett, senior researcher at the Pew Research Center and one of the report’s authors, according to The Washington Post.

He describes the development as “striking” and notes that Muslims and Christians are now much closer in number because Islam is expanding faster than any other major religion.

The survey is based on thousands of census data and surveys in 201 countries. It covers seven groups: Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, other religions, and people with no specific religious affiliation.

Iran used “undetectable” missile in attack on Israeli intelligence facility

The escalation in the Middle East

Published 17 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Images of what is believed to be the missile strike on Mossad headquarters in the capital Tel Aviv.
1 minute read

Iran’s Defense Ministry says it used a new, untraceable missile in the attack on the headquarters of the infamous Israeli intelligence agency Mossad in Tel Aviv and claims that the attack penetrated several layers of air defenses.

In today’s attack, we used missiles that could not be tracked or shot down, said Iranian Brigadier General Reza Talaei-Nik, according to the Iranian state news agency IRNA.

He described the operation as a surprise for the Israelis and warned that they would see more.

Earlier today, Iran said its missile strikes hit a military intelligence center and an operations planning center for Mossad located in the capital Tel Aviv. Images show a column of smoke at what is believed to be the site.

Talaei-Nik added that Israel is not prepared for a prolonged conflict.

– The Zionist regime cannot withstand a long war, he said, adding that Iran’s military has been equipped with advanced systems, some of which “have not even been put into use yet.”

At the same time, the Israeli military has introduced new strict censorship guidelines that severely restrict local media from reporting on missile and drone attacks on Israeli territory, which is believed to be a way of concealing Iran’s actual capacity to strike back and give the appearance of military superiority.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.