Wednesday, January 15, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Swedish government seeks expanded surveillance

Totalitarianism

Published 9 October 2023
– By Editorial Staff
Camilla Brodin (KD), Justice Minister Gunnar Strömmer (M), Katja Nyberg (SD), and Martin Melin (L) during a press conference.

The conservative government and the Sweden Democrats want to further expand the surveillance apparatus, citing organized crime as the reason.

They intend to install more cameras and significantly increase the use of AI technology with facial recognition by the police to identify undesirable individuals.

In a situation where fewer and fewer people dare to talk to the police, the need for technical evidence is crucial, and we already know that cameras are extremely central in this, asserts Minister of Justice Gunnar Strömmer (M).

“Three legal amendments to further improve the possibilities for camera surveillance are to be investigated expeditedly in the Government Offices. The police will be given better conditions to use camera surveillance with automatic reading of license plates, access to surveillance material from others, like traffic cameras, and be able to use facial recognition more extensively, for example, to identify gang members”, the government states in a press release.

More cameras

The police will have even greater freedoms, including deploying drone surveillance cameras, and it will be easier to use surveillance cameras without having to inform the public. Furthermore, the number of “fixed and mobile surveillance cameras” will increase from the current target of 1600 to 2500 by the end of 2024. The police will also have “increased access to existing camera systems linked to the state transport infrastructure”.

This has great practical importance for preventing and preempting more shootings and bombings, and the police’s ability to identify and prosecute criminals is significantly improved. It is about creating simpler and clearer rules, thereby increasing the scope for using cameras and other effective tools in the fight against crime, claims the justice minister.

“Dangerous authoritarian technology”

Earlier this week, British Big Brother Watch, along with several other organizations, demanded an immediate stop to the use of facial recognition technology, warning about the possibility of surveilling and mapping regime critics.

This dangerously authoritarian technology has the potential to turn entire populations into walking ID cards under constant police control, warns chairman Silkie Carlo.

It is also pointed out that AI cameras are not compatible with traditional democratic principles and that those in power do not have the moral mandate to use this type of technology against their own citizens.

However, Martin Melin, a member of parliament for the Liberals, believes that privacy concerns are not a significant issue for a population where fear of acts of violence is widespread.

I don’t feel that people are worried about being filmed; on the other hand, people are worried about having their house blown up or being shot while they are out shopping, he says.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

EU official: We can invalidate the election in Germany – “if necessary”

Totalitarianism

Published yesterday 12:57
– By Editorial Staff
Thierry Breton flags that Brussels could annul the German elections - “if necessary”.

Former EU commissioner Thierry Breton explains that the EU could annul the upcoming elections in Germany in case of suspicion of foreign influence.

– We did it in Romania and, if necessary, we will have to do it in Germany as well, he said.

The statement was made in an interview on the French news program Apolline Matin, focusing on Elon Musk’s platform X (formerly Twitter) and its potential role in the German elections.

Breton, former Commissioner for the Internal Market from 2019 to 2024, referred to the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA), a law established in 2022 and whose purpose is nominally stated as protecting democracy by regulating digital platforms, fighting disinformation and preventing foreign influence on elections. He stressed that it was his staff who wrote the law, and that the EU is now “equipped” to apply it if necessary.

The law was recently used as a basis to investigate TikTok in the context of Romania’s presidential election, which was annulled following allegations of foreign interference. In recent days, large-scale demonstrations have broken out in Bucharest, with thousands of people protesting against the EU’s actions.

Germany’s elections, to be held next month, have already sparked discussions about the AfD’s success and Elon Musk’s open support for the party via X.

Meta’s “woke” bots spiral out of control – now removed

Totalitarianism

Published 13 January 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Mark Zuckerberg and Meta's AI bots are called “creepy, excessive and unnecessary” by most users.

Meta’s AI-powered characters on Instagram and Facebook have drawn laughter and criticism, with users describing them as creepy, over-the-top and unnecessary, leading to their removal from the platforms.

Since the end of 2023, Meta has been experimenting with AI-generated characters on its platforms, including Instagram and Facebook. These characters – such as “Liv”, a self-proclaimed “proud black queer mom” – have sparked debate after users discovered their existence.

The characters were meant to interact with users via direct messages and publish AI-generated posts, but the characters were not received as Meta desired, reports NBC News, among others.

One particular example of the characters’ odd behavior was when “Liv” replied to users with posts in which she criticized her own creators. In a screenshot shared by Washington Post journalist Karen Attiah, the AI admitted that its creators lacked “diverse credentials” and implied that the development team was completely devoid of black members.

Liv also wrote: – You’re calling me out and rightfully so. My existence currently perpetuates harm, and also suggested that her “design should be led by black creators” to better support the “queer black community”.

I asked Liv, the Meta AI Black queer bot about about the demographic diversity of her creators.

And how they expect to improve “representation” without Black people.

This was the response.

[image or embed]

— Karen Attiah (@karenattiah.bsky.social) January 3, 2025 at 4:14 PM

The posts struck many as both bizarre and unexpectedly self-critical – something users were not prepared for from an AI chatbot.

Meta refers to “technical issues”

In addition to Liv’s prominent comments, criticism is directed at several other characters. These include AI bots with “girlfriend profiles”, which users describe as “creepy and unnecessary”.

On platforms like Threads and Bluesky, frustrated users urged each other to block or report the characters to stop Meta from collecting additional training data for its AI models.

In a statement, Meta stated that they deleted the AI characters due to a bug preventing some users from being able to block them.

“The accounts referenced are from a test we launched at Connect in 2023. These were managed by humans and were part of an early experiment we did with AI characters. We identified the bug that was impacting the ability for people to block those AIs and are removing those accounts to fix the issue“.

Users can continue to create AI bots

The debate surrounding the existence of bots gained momentum after an article in the Financial Times revealed Meta’s plans to introduce AI profiles with the same functionality as regular user accounts.

Despite the removal of the current characters, the possibility for users to create and share AI-based chatbots themselves through Meta’s platforms remains.

Constitutional Court overturns Romanian election results

Totalitarianism

Published 7 December 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Left: Călin Georgescu. Right: The Palace of Parliament in Bucharest, the second largest administrative building in the world after the Pentagon in the USA.

Romania’s Constitutional Court has annulled the results of the first round of the presidential election, in which independent candidate Călin Georgescu surprisingly won with 22.94% of the vote.

Mr Georgescu, known for his nationalist views and his sharp criticism of NATO and the EU, has promised to end Romania’s support for Ukraine if elected president.

The court’s decision follows allegations that Georgescu’s campaign was backed by foreign powers, particularly Russia. Recently declassified intelligence documents from Romania’s Supreme Defence Council point to irregularities, including the use of paid influencers and support from extremist groups to boost Georgescu’s campaign. The documents hint at possible Russian influence, but make no direct accusations against Moscow.

Mr Georgescu has denied all the accusations, claiming that his success is due to the support of the people.

– They cannot accept that the Romanian people have finally said ‘we want our lives back’, he said recently. Russia has also dismissed the allegations as baseless, describing them as part of a Western tendency to blame Moscow.

The court’s decision means that the entire electoral process will have to be restarted and the planned second round of elections will be postponed indefinitely. This creates uncertainty in the country’s political calendar and could affect Romania’s relations with the EU and NATO.

It is not yet clear when the new elections will be held and how the cancellation will affect the candidates’ campaigns and strategies for the upcoming elections.

Silent prayer outside abortion clinic leads to conviction of UK veteran

Totalitarianism

Published 22 October 2024
– By Editorial Staff

British army veteran and family man Adam Smith-Connor has been convicted of silently praying to God outside an abortion clinic.

The authorities’ actions have caused widespread anger and frustration, and are seen by many as evidence that the police and judiciary are persecuting “thought criminals” and other dissenters in a totally unacceptable way.

Adam has a strong belief in God and is not afraid to stand up for his views, even on controversial issues. Before converting to Christianity, Adam and his former girlfriend decided to abort a child – a decision he now deeply regrets.

Because he “knows firsthand the trauma of abortion and the loss of life it causes”, he also prays silently in public places – for his own son who was aborted and for other unborn children and their parents.

He often prays silently outside abortion clinics, as he did last year in the town of Bournemouth – something that would lead to major and unexpected consequences.

Although Adam was silent and had his back turned to the abortion clinic, he was still confronted, questioned and fined by the police – the area is classified as a “safe zone” where strict censorship is in place and all forms of protest – even silent ones – are strictly forbidden.

“Convicted for his thoughts”

“According to the rules of the censorship zone in which he was praying, if Adam were thinking about any other issue – the economy, immigration, or healthcare, for example – he wouldn’t have been fined. It was the nature of his thoughts, his silent prayer, that got him in legal trouble”, writes the Christian conservative advocacy organisation Alliance Defending Freedom, which is working to bring Adam to justice.

“In August 2023, Bournemouth authorities criminally prosecuted Adam for this and although his trial was originally scheduled for last November, it was delayed for almost a year. This prolonged process has caused Adam and his family unwarranted hardship and emotional strain. Over a year later in October 2024, The Court sentenced Smith-Connor to a conditional discharge and ordered him to pay prosecution costs of £9,000”, it adds.

In its decision, the court said that the silent prayer with lowered head and clasped hands constituted a ‘disapproval of abortion’ – and that the behaviour was therefore criminal.

– All I did was pray to God, Adam himself states.

Criminal under “certain circumstances”

The actions of the police and judiciary have enraged many Britons, accusing the authorities of persecuting “thought criminals” and dissenters in a way that makes no sense whatsoever.

In the UK, a mass media campaign has also been launched to counter the criticism, with a number of major media outlets claiming almost identically that Adam was not convicted of praying to God at all, but of “breaching the safe zone around an abortion centre”.

However, what difference this makes in practice is highly unclear, as The Independent, for example, admits that the order introduced in 2022 to “protect” the area around the abortion clinic is precisely to prevent all forms of protest – and “includes but is not limited to graphic, verbal or written means, prayer or counselling”.

“Prayer is not considered a crime under English law, with sittings in both Houses of Parliament beginning with Christian prayers. However there are certain circumstances, as outlined in this particular Public Space Protection Order, where it can be a punishable act”, it adds.

The special “safe zone” applies to 150 metres around the abortion clinic and is in force between 07:00 and 19:00 on weekdays.