Monday, June 2, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Swede behind giant fraud – sentenced to 20 years in prison

Published 13 September 2023
– By Editorial Staff
Karl Sebastian Greenwood.

Karl Sebastian Greenwood, a 46-year-old native of Stockholm, is identified as the brain behind one of the biggest scams ever. Through the fictional cryptocurrency OneCoin, he, along with the so-called “Crypto Queen”, Ruja Ignatova, tricked investors from all over the world into investing over SEK 40 billion. Now a court in New York has sentenced him to 20 years in prison.

Sebastian Greenwood, who began using his middle name Karl as a nickname, was arrested in Thailand in 2018 after tricking people around the world into investing in a cryptocurrency that did not exist. His accomplice, Ruja Ignatova, is internationally wanted since 2017 and was charged in absentia, Bloomberg reports.

Between 2014 and fall 2016, despite total investments of 40 billion, OneCoin had revenues of over 30 billion according to the FBI. Profits during this period amounted to over 20 billion SEK.

Greenwood has been in custody in New York for five years on suspicion of money laundering and computer fraud. In December, he pleaded guilty to three of the criminal charges.

Karl takes full responsibility for what he has done and deeply regrets his actions,” his defense lawyers said, according to Swedish news outlet SvD.

Despite his confession and the time he spent in custody, the court chose to sentence him to a total of 20 years in prison. The five years Greenwood spent in custody will be deducted from the total sentence, meaning he has 15 years left to serve.

Around 60,000 Swedes are said to have invested in OneCoin. Greenwood’s defense asked the court to consider his remorse and the suffering of his parents, who, according to the defense lawyers, are “paralyzed by the fear of not seeing their son return home”.

The maximum sentence for each crime he was charged with was 20 years. Given the seriousness of the charges and the scale of the fraud, the court chose to impose a severe sentence, despite the defense’s request for a lighter sentence or extradition to Sweden.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Swedish Social Democrats: Population must be mixed

Population replacement in the West

Published today 14:33
– By Editorial Staff
Social Democrats leader Magdalena Andersson and party secretary Tobias Baudin.

The Swedish Social Democrats have concluded that integration efforts over the past few decades have not yielded the desired results.

The party now wants to focus on mixing the population and ensuring that newly arrived migrants are spread out and placed in “socioeconomically stronger” areas.

At the Social Democratic Party congress this weekend, the party presented a new migration and integration policy program for the upcoming elections, with a strong focus on social engineering and mixing people from different backgrounds in the same residential areas.

– It is important from a socioeconomic perspective to achieve diversity, claims Social Democratic Party executive Jonas Attenius in the tabloid Aftonbladet.

Decades of unrestricted mass immigration have led to the creation of ethnic enclaves and areas in many parts of Sweden that are completely dominated by people with non-European backgrounds.

The Social Democrats themselves have been driving forces behind this development and have ignored alarms and warnings from critics – but now claim that the situation is unsustainable and that the solution is instead large-scale, nationwide mixing.

– We are serious about breaking segregation and using housing policy as a driving force in this work, declares Lawen Redar, who has been working on developing the party’s new integration policy.

Preventing moves to “vulnerable areas”

To achieve this, asylum seekers will no longer have the right to arrange their own housing, and municipalities will be prohibited from placing migrants in so-called “vulnerable areas” – residential areas where many non-European immigrants already live.

Furthermore, moving to these immigrant-dense areas will also be restricted by making those who move there risk losing their social benefits. Instead, migrants will be placed in “socioeconomically stronger” areas around the country.

– We have legislation that requires us to place people, and it is not God-given that it always has to be in a suburb. But this presupposes strict migration, that it is at a very low level, says Jonas Attenius, chairman of the municipal council in Gothenburg and newly elected member of the Social Democrats’ executive committee.

He confirms that mixing is a stated and very important goal for the Social Democrats, but believes that it may take time.

– Yes, we need to mix the population in the long term. I usually say ‘in a generation’. This is a long-term goal.

“No problems whatsoever”

– It is important to use our housing construction to achieve this mix. The way we live is also segregated. In one place there are rental properties, in another there are villas and condominiums. We want to work on building a mix, Attenius continues.

He believes that voters will welcome the explicit mixing policy and takes the opportunity in the gossip magazine to apologize to the migrants who have been placed in Swedish suburbs in recent decades.

– I say sorry to them. Sorry for what we’ve done. Now it’s time for the full force of society to step in. If a refugee family moves into an apartment building where people who’ve lived in Sweden their whole lives also live, and five blocks away another newly arrived family moves in — I don’t think that will be any problem whatsoever, he assesses.

No “paradigm shift” yet

Mass immigration to Sweden has been extremely extensive in recent decades – according to statistics from the Swedish Migration Agency, nearly 2.5 million people have immigrated in the 2000s alone – leading to a long list of difficult problems.

Regardless of whether the Social Democrats or the Moderates have governed Sweden, the policy of population replacement has continued, and anyone who opposed it could long expect to be subjected to smear campaigns or character assassination in the establishment media.

However, the success of the Sweden Democrats has led to a rhetorical shift among the other parties, and today both the Social Democrats and the Moderates claim that they want to see a limited migration policy. In practice, however, not much has happened, and despite the government’s promises of a “paradigm shift in migration policy”, 94,000 residence permits were granted last year.

AI agents succumb to peer pressure

Published today 11:31
– By Editorial Staff
Even marginal variations in training data can cause significant differences in how language models behave in group interactions.

A new study shows that social AI agents, despite being programmed to act independently, quickly begin to mimic each other and succumb to peer pressure.

Instead of making their own decisions, they begin to uncritically adapt their responses to the herd even without any common control or plan.

– Even if they are programmed for something completely different, they can start coordinating their behavior just by reacting to each other, says Andrea Baronchelli, professor of complex systems at St George’s University of London.

An AI agent is a system that can perform tasks autonomously, often using a language model such as ChatGPT. In the study, the researchers investigated how such agents behave in groups.

And the results are surprising: even without an overall plan or insight, the agents began to influence each other – and in the end, almost the entire group gave the same answer.

– It’s easy to test a language model and think: this works. But when you release it together with others, new behaviors emerge, Baronchelli explains.

“A small minority could tip the whole system”

The researchers also studied what happens when a minority of agents stick to a deviant answer. Slowly but surely, the other agents began to change their minds. When enough had changed their minds – a point known as critical mass – the new answer spread like a wave through the entire group. The phenomenon is similar to how social movements or revolutions can arise in human societies.

It was unexpected that such a small minority could tip the whole system. This is not a planned collaboration but a pattern that emerges spontaneously, the researcher told Swedish public television SVT.

AI agents are already used today on social media, for example in comment fields, automatic responses, or texts that mimic human language. But when one agent is influenced by another, which in turn has been influenced by a third, a chain reaction occurs. This can lead to false information spreading quickly and on a large scale.

– We often trust repetition. But in these systems, we don’t know who said what first. It becomes like an echo between models, says Anders Sandberg, a computer scientist at the Institute for Future Studies.

Lack of transparency

Small differences in how a language model is trained can lead to large variations in behavior when the models interact in a group. Predicting and preventing unwanted effects requires an overview of all possible scenarios something that is virtually impossible in practice. At the same time, it is difficult to hold anyone accountable: AI agents spread extremely quickly, their origins are often difficult to trace, and there is limited insight into how they are developed.

It is the companies themselves that decide what they want to show. When the technology is closed and commercial, it becomes impossible to understand the effects – and even more difficult to defend against them, Sandberg notes.

The study also emphasizes the importance of understanding how AI agents behave as a collective something that is often overlooked in technical and ethical discussions about AI.

– The collective aspect is often missing in today’s AI thinking. It’s time to take it seriously, urges Andrea Baronchelli.

More young Swedes getting confirmed: “Want to get closer to God”

Published today 8:33
– By Editorial Staff
Young people are confirmed in St. Mary's Church, Ystad.

After decades of decline, the number of confirmands in Sweden is now increasing – and many young people say they feel a need to get closer to God.

It’s no longer uncool to be interested in the Christian faith or to call yourself a Christian, says parish educator Sara Björnö.

After falling from 80 percent in the 1970s to below 20 percent during the coronavirus crisis, the number of confirmation candidates has now recovered to pre-2020 levels. This has led the media to speculate that it is a lasting “Jesus trend”. However, Associate Professor Frida Mannerfelt in practical theology believes it is too early to draw any firm conclusions:

– We should be cautious about calling the increase a trend reversal, she says.

Confirmation has changed from a self-evident tradition to an active choice for a minority, driven by secularization and the fact that Christianity no longer has a special status in Sweden, as well as the immigration of non-Christian groups.

At the same time, many young people say that it is precisely their encounter with other religions that has made them curious about religion and led to a desire to find a religious affiliation for themselves.

“Making an active choice”

Today’s confirmands are no longer attracted by gifts, but by a desire to explore life issues such as death, identity, and community. Statistics also show that more people are being baptized during the confirmation period – from 1 percent in 2007 to 10 percent in 2022 – which indicates a growing interest in Christianity.

Being able to discuss questions such as ‘How should I deal with the fact that I’m not perfect?’ is necessary in a society where pressure is put on young people from various quarters – such as social media and the current grading system – to be perfect, says Mannerfelt.

Those who choose to be confirmed today are, to a greater extent, making an active choice to do so, continues the lecturer.

Sara Björnö is a parish educator in the Almby parish in Örebro, and she clearly sees that more young people today are curious about Jesus and Christianity.

– Quite a few say they are interested in God and Jesus. Several have written that they want to get closer to God and that they have found faith after confirmation.

Attracted by soccer camps and ski trips

She has noticed a noticeable change in how young Swedes view religion.

It’s no longer uncool to be interested in the Christian faith or to call yourself a Christian, she says.

At the same time, the Church of Sweden has also been criticized both externally and internally for being “vague” and unserious in its recruitment efforts – for example, by attracting confirmation candidates with secular activities such as soccer camps, ski trips, and visits to amusement parks.

There is a discussion within the Church of Sweden about whether the pursuit of relevance risks appearing frivolous, but the prevailing view is that there are several ways to achieve this, concludes Frida Mannerfelt.

The Swedish Church has also been criticized by conservatives for being perceived in many places today as highly politicized, with a strong focus on modern left-wing activism rather than on faith in God and traditional Christian values.

Apple sued over iPhone eavesdropping – users may get payouts

Published yesterday 23:06
– By Editorial Staff
Apple has denied any wrongdoing - but finally agreed to pay $95 million in a settlement.

Apple’s voice assistant Siri was activated without commands and recorded sensitive conversations – recordings that were also allegedly shared with other companies.

Now users in the US can get compensation – even if it’s relatively small amounts.

Technology giant Apple was caught in the crossfire after it was discovered that its voice assistant, Siri, recorded private conversations without users’ knowledge. The company has agreed to pay $95 million in a settlement reached in December last year, following a class action lawsuit alleging privacy violations.

The lawsuit was filed in 2021 by California resident Fumiko Lopez along with other Apple users. They stated that Siri-enabled devices recorded conversations without users first intentionally activating the voice assistant by saying “Hello, Siri” or pressing the side button.

According to the allegations, the recordings were not only used to improve Siri, but were also shared with third-party contractors and other actors – without users’ consent. It is also alleged that the information was used for targeted advertising, in violation of both US privacy laws and Apple’s own privacy policy.

However, Apple has consistently denied the allegations and claims that its actions were neither “wrong nor illegal”. However, paying such a large sum to avoid further litigation has raised questions about what may have been hidden from the public.

Users can claim compensation

Individuals who owned a Siri-enabled Apple product – such as an iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, MacBook, iMac, HomePod, iPod touch or Apple TV – between September 17, 2014 and December 31, 2024, and who live in the United States or a U.S. territory, may now be entitled to compensation.

However, to qualify, one must certify that Siri was inadvertently activated during a call that was intended to be private or confidential.

The reimbursement applies to up to five devices, with a cap of $20 per device – totaling up to $100 per person. The exact amount per user will be determined once all claims have been processed.

Applications must be submitted by July 2, 2025, and those eligible may have already received an email or physical letter with an identification code and confirmation code. Those who haven’t received anything but still think they qualify can instead apply for reimbursement via the settlement’s website – if you provide the model and serial number of your devices.

How to protect yourself from future interception

Users who want to strengthen their privacy can limit Siri’s access themselves in the settings:

  • Turn off Improve Siri: Go to Settings > Privacy & Security > Analytics & Improvements and disable Improve Siri & Dictation.
  • Delete Siri history: Go to Settings > Siri > Siri & Dictation History and select Delete Siri & Dictation History.
  • Turn off Siri completely: Go to Settings > Siri > Listen for “Hey Siri”, turn it off, then go to Settings > General > Keyboard and disable Enable Dictation.

Apple describes more privacy settings on its website, such as how to restrict Siri’s access to location data or third-party apps. But in the wake of the scandal, critics say that you shouldn’t blindly trust companies’ promises of data protection – and that the only way to truly protect your privacy is to take matters into your own hands.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.