Monday, May 19, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Royal Library to review ‘offensive’ material

Published 18 June 2024
– By Editorial Staff
The Royal Library in Stockholm.

The Royal Library in Stockholm is setting up a new Council for National Minorities. One of the aims is to draw attention to material that is considered “offensive” or “objectionable”.

The library has several collections of books, movies, newspapers, etc. that are several hundred years old. Now it feels it must “take responsibility for the older collections by calling attention to the fact that material may be offensive or objectionable.

– We know that there are parts of the Royal Library’s collections and descriptions that can be considered offensive today because they were created at a time when the view of minorities was different, says National Librarian Karin Grönvall in a press release.

This can include describing the material, how it should be presented or that an explanatory text should be added. For example, work has already been done on “Sápmi on film”, which has been provided with ethical recommendations.

– We hope that this work will lead to interesting discoveries in the collections or better descriptions, where the national minorities’ part in the common history becomes more visible and clearer, says Grönvall.

The library is now looking for members of the Jewish, Roma, Sami, Swedish-Finnish and Tornedalian communities to join the council.

Facts: The National Library of Sweden (KB)

It is Sweden's national library, located in Humlegården in Stockholm. The library collects and preserves all printed material published in Sweden since 1661.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

No ideological motives behind mass shooting in Örebro

Published today 7:18
– By Editorial Staff
Sometime in the fall of 2024, Rickard Andersson is estimated to have started planning a major attack.

There is nothing to suggest that Rickard Andersson was driven by any political or ideological motives when he carried out the massacre at the Campus Risbergska adult education center in Örebro on February 4.

– We believe that his life situation and the frustration it created were the underlying motives. The motive we see is his desire to take his own life, said Henrik Dahlström, head of the police investigation.

Ten people were killed and six injured in what has been described as the worst mass shooting in Swedish history, and there has been much speculation about the perpetrator’s motives.

Since the shooter was Swedish and several of the victims had immigrant backgrounds, it has been claimed that he was driven by xenophobic or racist motives, but the police do not give much credence to this explanation.

– Based on what we have found, there is a complete lack of communication or signs of involvement with ideological or political motives. Nothing in the act suggests that this was an act of revenge against a specific person or group of people, Dahlström explains.

”Long-term and repeated setbacks”

Instead, it is believed that the perpetrator’s miserable life situation led him to commit the act.

The suspected perpetrator experienced prolonged and repeated setbacks in his livelihood. He was dependent on certificates from the healthcare system to secure it. His life situation meant uncertainty, reassessments, and rejections over a long period of time, as well as a livelihood that was never permanent or stable”, the police wrote, among other things.

– We see that it is his life situation and the frustration it creates that are the basis for the motive. The motive we see is his desire to take his own life. In connection with this, he chose to take out his perceived frustration and aggression on the people around him in a place he had a connection to – Campus Risbergska, the commanding officer continues.

Shot “at everyone he saw”

There is nothing to indicate that Andersson selected the people he shot at – instead, he “in an almost methodical manner, shot at everyone he saw” and the victims are described as random.

The people who died and those who survived with serious injuries represent the majority of the students and staff who were at the school”, the report continues.

However, the police add a caveat to their assessment, stating that there could be connections that have been overlooked during the investigation, as Andersson’s mobile phone and two hard drives are missing and have not been analyzed.

“Wanted to create chaos”

Between 2019 and 2021, Andersson was enrolled at Komvux to retake his high school mathematics exams. However, he failed and dropped out on his own initiative.

He obtained a gun license in 2011, citing his interest in hunting, and in the fall of 2024, according to the police, he began planning his attack including purchasing ammunition and smoke grenades, as well as the guitar case in which he transported his weapons.

– The suspect had prepared himself with weapons and ammunition to be able to act against a very large number of people. The use of smoke gives the impression that he wanted to create chaos in order to cause as much damage as possible and hinder the rescue efforts, said Henrik Dahlström.

It should be noted that the TV channel TV4 attempted at an early stage to sell a racist motive by claiming that Andersson had uttered the phraseyou must leave Europe”. However, critics were quick to point out that the channel itself seemed to have invented this interpretation, and it soon spread widely as a textbook example of how disinformation by the establishment media can look.

All Stockholm parties approve parachute deal for ex-politician accused of sex crime

The corruption in Sweden

Published 16 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Gustav Hemming himself has admitted the deed - but denies the crime.

All parties in Region Stockholm have decided that the suspected sex offender and former Centre Party top Gustav Hemming should be granted a tax-funded parachute of almost SEK 12 million (€1.1 million). This is as long as he is not convicted of crimes that are considered particularly serious.

The Nordic Times has previously highlighted the Center Party’s former regional councilor in Stockholm, who was forced to resign after it was discovered that he masturbated in front of a 13-year-old boy on public transport.

The newspaper has also reported on how Hemming has been very upset about the delayed announcement of the multi-million dollar parachute he applied for when he left office. The C-top has, among other things, troubled Region Stockholm with repeated emails demanding to know whether or not he will receive taxpayers’ money.

However, it is now clear that all parties in Region Stockholm support the suspected sex offender being granted  €1.1 million of taxpayers’ money – as long as he is not convicted of a crime that is considered particularly serious.

Gustav Hemming has been charged with a crime. If he is convicted of crimes of a certain severity committed during his time as an elected official, the conditions exist for the regional council to decide, under the terms of PRF-KL, that fixed-term pensions should no longer be paid”, reads the decision, which the Bonnier newspaper Expressen has taken note of in its entirety.

Has admitted the deed

What “crime of a certain degree of severity” means in practice is not clear, but the parachute agreement is about a fixed-term pension of SEK 77,594 (€7,100) a month from December 1, 2024 to September 30, 2037 – that is, for the rest of Gustav Hemming’s professional life.

It can also be mentioned that Hemming admitted that he masturbated in front of the boy, but that he himself claims that he perceived the 13-year-old as much older and describes the whole thing as a “unplanned sexualized flirtation“.

– I perceived a reciprocity that can be sexually arousing in an anonymous environment, he claims in interrogation.

Swedish government pledges to deport more criminals

Migration crisis in Europe

Published 14 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
According to Johan Forsell, the proposed changes are "ultimately about redress for victims of crime".

More people will be deported for crimes – and fewer will be able to return to Sweden after deportation. That was the government’s message when a new report was presented on Wednesday.

Migration Minister Johan Forssell (M) believes that the number of deported criminals will be “sixfold” and claims that “Sweden will now have the toughest regulations for criminal deportations in the entire Nordic region”.

The governing parties and the Sweden Democrats have long argued that they want to deport more foreigners who commit crimes in Sweden – and now a report has been produced with proposals on how this should be done in practice.

One of the proposals is that perpetrators should be deported for all crimes carrying a more severe penalty than a fine – regardless of whether there is considered to be a risk of reoffending or not.

Another proposal is that prosecutors should be required by law to seek deportation “if the crime is grounds for deportation” – which would be a major change from the current situation, where each prosecutor makes this assessment themselves.

Furthermore, there is a desire to “strengthen the balance between the reasons for and against deportation” and to base future decisions on the minimum requirements set by the EU, without making more generous interpretations than necessary.

More lifetime re-entry bans

It will also be easier than today to deport criminals who came to Sweden before the age of 15. In future, it will not be a general court but the Swedish Migration Agency that will examine any obstacles to enforcement in connection with the expulsion decision.

The fact that deported criminals have been able to return to Sweden freely just a few years after their deportation has long been a source of frustration in society, and it is now proposed that re-entry bans should in many cases be longer or completely permanent.

If the severity of the crime corresponds to imprisonment for less than six months, the re-entry ban shall normally be set at five years. If the punishment corresponds to imprisonment for six months or more but not imprisonment for one year and six months, the re-entry ban shall normally be set at ten years. For higher penalties than this, i.e., imprisonment for one year and six months or more, the re-entry ban shall, as a general rule, not be limited in time”, the government writes in a press release.

“Justice for the victims”

Finally, the penalties for staying in the country in violation of a re-entry ban will be tightened, and anyone who employs a person who does not have the right to stay in Sweden will also be punished more severely than is currently the case. The constitutional amendments are proposed to enter into force on January 1, 2027.

It’s time to stop coddling people who come to Sweden and commit crimes. The number of deportations due to criminal offenses is expected to increase sixfold under the inquiry’s proposals. Step by step, we are making Swedish migration policy more just. Ultimately, this is about justice for the victims, said Migration Minister Johan Forssell.

Sweden will now have the toughest regulations for criminal deportations in the entire Nordic region, he continues.

If the number of people sentenced to deportation for crimes were to increase sixfold, this would mean around 3,000 deportation decisions per year, compared with around 500 today.

Home countries do not want to take back their citizens

However, a recurring problem has long been that the former home countries do not want to accept their criminal citizens.

Many criminals in Sweden today come from countries such as Afghanistan, Iraq, and Somalia, but despite deportation orders, it is usually not possible to enforce deportations to these and many other countries – and they instead remain in Sweden. The parties in the current coalition have not yet presented any concrete solution to this problem.

It should also be noted that under the Moderate Party’s leadership, Sweden has continued to receive around 100,000 migrants annually, and critics argue that stricter deportation measures will have limited effect as long as mass immigration is not also stopped. Under current legislation, migrants who have been convicted of crimes and have obtained Swedish citizenship cannot be deported.

Swedish state secretary bought Saab shares day before Hungary Gripen deal announcement

The corruption in Sweden

Published 14 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Many defend Janse on the grounds that the sums involved are relatively small - but experts say that doesn't matter.

The day before it was announced that Hungary would purchase four Jas 39 Gripen aircraft from Sweden – a deal worth around SEK 2 billion (€180 million) – State Secretary Diana Janse (M) bought shares in Saab, the company that manufactures the aircraft.

Although the sums involved are relatively small, experts believe that this action is deeply inappropriate and risks damaging public confidence in the government.

Hungary was the last country to approve Sweden’s heavily criticized NATO application, and an agreement was also reached between the countries that included a deal on the sale of Swedish fighter jets.

Saab’s shares also rose sharply when the deal became known – something that benefited State Secretary Diana Janse, who had bought shares in the arms manufacturer for just under SEK 10,000 (€900) the day before the announcement.

She bought several shares that day and did not give any special consideration to the timing, commented Trade Minister Benjamin Dousas (M) press secretary to the tabloid Aftonbladet, which first reported the share purchase.

At the time, Janse was working for the then Minister for Foreign Affairs and Trade, Johan Forssell, and today she holds the same position, but under Benjamin Dousa. She denies that she had any prior knowledge of the deal.

A state secretary participates in preparations within their area of responsibility. This means that not all state secretaries participate in or are informed about all preparations that come to the ministry. At the Ministry for Foreign Affairs, the cabinet secretary is responsible for issues relating to NATO, said her press secretary.

“Should keep a safe distance”

However, not everyone is impressed by the explanations, and Claes Sandgren, senior professor of law at Stockholm University and former chairman of the Swedish Anti-Corruption Institute, believes that the action is directly damaging to public trust.

– Considering that she was State Secretary with political responsibility for trade issues at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and that the agreement was coordinated with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, her share purchase appears clearly inappropriate.

There is a ban on insider trading for anyone with insider information. They must keep a safe distance from anything that could be perceived as improper. According to the guidelines, such actions can damage confidence in the government, he continues.

It is often difficult to determine exactly who had insider information and who did not, especially since those accused almost always deny such allegations. However, Sandgren believes that similar allegations of corruption can easily be avoided and that neither politicians nor state secretaries should manage their own share purchases.

– Given her central position, she should, like ministers, not engage in share trading herself but place her holdings in an independent custody account with a bank.

Recurring scandals

It is worth noting that this is not the first time that high-ranking representatives of the Moderate-led government have made questionable private share purchases in companies with which the Swedish state does business. In March, the newspaper reported how Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard (M) bought shares in the Swedish defense and IT company Mildef.

This purchase took place at the same time as the Swedish government was negotiating a multi-billion order from the arms industry – where Mildef was one of the companies that benefited financially from the deal.

As in the case of Diana Janse, many supporters defended the purchase on the grounds that the amounts involved were relatively small – around SEK 10,000 (€900)– arguing that this is pocket change for a minister.

However, according to Daniel Stattin, professor of civil law at Uppsala University, the size of the purchase is of little significance in this context: “The principle is really the same: make sure you don’t do business where independence or self-interest can be called into question”.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.