Tuesday, April 15, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

KTH School of Architecture Voted Stockholm’s Ugliest Building

Published 25 November 2022
– By Editorial Staff

Stockholm’s ugliest building has been crowned – and the winner is the School of Architecture. The building was built in 1967-1969 for the KTH School of Architecture and it will now compete with 99 other entries in the national final where, in addition to the shame, the winner also receives a demolition scholarship.

The architecture call is a people’s movement with almost 50,000 members who are tired of disgusting buildings and ugly concrete boxes being built on an ever-increasing scale and allowed to deface the surroundings.

In 2017 they voted Sweden’s most beautiful city and the following year they continued with Sweden’s ugliest city. In 2019, the country’s most beautiful buildings of all time were voted for, and this year it was time to do the opposite and to vote for the very ugliest buildings.

The ugliest in Stockholm was ironically considered to be the city’s school of architecture, even though the competition was fierce. In second place came Stockholm Waterfront and in third place Norra tornen. Now the School of Architecture will take part in the Swedish final, where you will finally have to choose which building is the ugliest in the whole country. A total of 100 ugly Swedish buildings around the country participate in the final.

In addition to the dishonorable appointment, the winner also receives a demolition grant, where the signatories of the Architecture Appeal jointly collect money so that the building can be demolished and stop the ugly city. If a demolition is still out of the question, suggestions for beautifying the building will be given.

As a curiosity, it can be mentioned that the Grand Hotel in Falun was named the ugliest building in Dalarna, the Brutalisthuset in Arvika the ugliest building in Värmland and the Teknikum in Växjö the ugliest building in Småland. For those who want to see the entire list of the country’s ugliest buildings, it is available here.

If you want to participate and vote in the final, you need a Facebook account and group membership here.

The architecture call has also made a summary of how the responsible architects in Sweden themselves choose to live, and it is noteworthy that it is almost exclusively about old stone houses, crofts or floors in the turn of the century style.

The hypocrisy turns out to be true when you do a little Googling on the individuals who take the liberty to destroy and deface the country’s finest views. When they are done with their modernist brutalization of public space, they can retire to exclusive penthouses and cozy suburban villas. Living as you learn is definitely not something that characterizes the architects and builders who have a monopoly on dictating how our present and future should be designed” it states.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Moderate Youth League: Raise the retirement age to finance Sweden’s rearmament

The new cold war

Published today 17:32
– By Editorial Staff
Raising the retirement age to fund the Swedish defense effort is not expected to be well received by the electorate.

As reported by The Nordic Times, Swedish politicians have decided to borrow at least SEK 300 billion (€26 billion) for what is described as the “biggest rearmament since the Cold War”.

Douglas Thor, chair of The Moderate Youth League (MUF), fully supports the military investment – but emphasizes that it should be paid for by older Swedes through a higher retirement age.

The governing politicians agree that it is reasonable to borrow the equivalent of €4,400 for each Swede of working age for the military project, and analysts have noted that it will largely be future generations of Swedes who will have to pay for the decisions made today.

– It’s clear that future generations will have to take a bigger hit than if we were to just go on this year’s budget. But it also seems reasonable that future generations should help finance reconstruction because it will also benefit them, commented, for example, Daniel Waldenström, professor of economics, and continued:

– It’s simply that they will have to pay a bit more tax as a result of this. They will have to pay taxes to finance our repayment of these loans.

“In the long run, everyone will pay”

Just like the other establishment parties’ youth wings, MUF applauds the military investment, but believes older Swedes must bear a greater share of the cost – not just the younger generation.

– Borrowing money is not free. The costs are postponed to the future, which means that the younger generation has to pay. We are happy to contribute, but it is unreasonable that we alone should bear the cost, they say.

Thor’s solution is to raise the age at which older people can start drawing their pension from the current 63 to 67.

– Today, people can start drawing their income and premium pensions at the age of 63. We believe it is reasonable to raise it. One possible age is 67, confirms the Muf leader, who states that raising the retirement age is a much better option than raising taxes.

– In the long run, everyone will pay because we are all getting older. When our country has faced difficult challenges in the past, we have coped by working more, Thor argues.

Unpopular measure

Raising the retirement age to fund military spending is not expected to be a particularly popular message with voters but Thor says this does not matter much.

– There are many issues that were previously unthinkable, but which have been reconsidered in this serious international situation. For example, loan financing has been reconsidered. It should be possible to do the same with regard to this issue.

According to Muf’s calculations, if older Swedes worked two years longer than they do today, this would mean around SEK 30 billion (€2.6 billion) extra to the public purse annually about half the contribution needed to meet the government’s target of spending 3.5% of GDP on defense.

Fewer Swedish women want to have children: “A societal change”

Population replacement in the West

Published today 14:11
– By Editorial Staff
Birth rates across the Western world are at alarming levels

One in four young women now say they are unwilling or reluctant to have children in the future, while birth rates are at historically low levels.

Midwife and professor Tanja Tydén points out that there are things that society can do to try to get the birth rate going again, if only the political will exists.

The Nordic Times has previously highlighted the study from Uppsala University, which shows that only 75 percent of young women in Sweden today say they want to have children a sharp decline from 91 percent just ten years ago.

Of those who answered why they did not want children, most said they simply had no desire to become parents. Health reasons were the second most common reason and the third most common was that they valued their freedom more than having children. Economic reasons came fourth and the fifth most common reason given by women was concern about alleged climate change and overpopulation.

– It’s a societal change… There are far more people now than before who do not want to have children. A quarter of women say they are hesitant or don’t want to, explains Tanja Tydén, a midwife and professor at the Department of Women’s and Children’s Health at Uppsala University.

“Some are afraid of the climate threat”

She points out that only in the last decade has there been a sharp decline in the proportion of women who want to have children, and that there are several different explanations for why family formation is less popular today.

– Some say they simply don’t want children, others say they value their freedom, and some say they fear the threat of climate change.

– One group has said that the economy is driving this, she continues.

Although some of the factors are difficult to change politically, she points out that society and politicians can actually create incentives to increase childbearing for example, by making parental benefits more favorable for certain groups.

– When it comes to an issue like the economy. If you have studied for a long time and become pregnant at the end of your studies, you receive the absolute lowest parental benefit. Society has the opportunity to make a change here.

Same trend throughout the Western world

Last year, Statistics Sweden noted that the number of children born per woman in Sweden had fallen to 1.43 the lowest figure ever recorded in the country. In order to avoid a negative population trend, an average of around 2.1 children per woman is needed.

Instead of focusing on increasing birth rates, both center-right and center-left governments in Sweden have over the past decades prioritized immigration from the third world resulting in population growth despite declining native birth rates.

Sweden is not unique either with the same trend visible across the Western world, and in the EU as a whole, the birth rate in 2023 stood at 1.38 children per woman and significantly lower than that in countries like Spain, Italy and Poland.

Swedish government: Unprecedented economic turbulence ahead

Published today 11:52
– By Editorial Staff
Elisabeth Svantesson during Tuesday's press conference.

Elisabeth Svantesson, the Moderate Party’s Minister for Finance, believes that Trump’s trade tariffs and the unrest they have caused will also affect the Swedish economy.

– We had good conditions for getting the economy going. But then this happened, which we’ve talked about a lot – the trade war has materialized, she emphasizes.

According to Svantesson, the Swedish economy was recovering at the end of 2024 but this recovery has now been interrupted, and the Americans are being blamed.

The finance minister says that confidence in the US has been badly damaged and will take a long time to rebuild and that the Trump administration’s actions have damaged both the US and European economies.

It is sad that one of Sweden’s partners, the United States, is acting in this way, she said:

– What we are experiencing now is unprecedented. We have a trade war at a time when markets are highly integrated.

“Higher costs for businesses and households”

Although the finance minister admits that the consequences of the trade war are difficult to determine in advance, she nevertheless maintains that Sweden remains strong “with world-class public finances” and the focus of the spring budget, according to Svantesson, is on getting “the wheels turning” through various economic measures such as increased tax deductions and increased funding for the Swedish Public Employment Service.

We don’t know all the consequences of the trade war yet, but we know that it is harmful… But with this budget we are protecting Sweden, and we are prepared to do more, she adds.

Despite the SEK 11.5 billion (€1 billion) in measures, unemployment is predicted to rise from 8.2% today to 8.6% by the end of the year, and inflation to 2.5%, from 1.9% previously.

The Ministry of Finance expects Sweden’s GDP to grow by 2.1% in 2025 lower than previous estimates. However, growth is expected to pick up in 2026 and 2027, according to the forecast, which may be revised in the future.

The announcement of increased import tariffs in the United States has caused turbulence in financial markets and sharp stock market declines. Higher tariffs are expected to lead to higher costs for businesses and households, which is expected to dampen demand. At the same time, increased uncertainty itself risks dampening economic activity as firms and households postpone investments, hiring and purchases”, the assessment says.

Mosque boom in Sweden: 4200% increase in 25 years

The Islamization of Europe

Published yesterday 7:14
– By Editorial Staff
Gothenburg is home to one of Sweden's many mosques (archive image).

Sweden’s religious landscape has been transformed in a quarter of a century. While churches have been quietly closed, the number of mosques has skyrocketed by some 4,200 percent, Samnytt reports, based on data from the Swedish Agency for Aid to Religious Communities.

From a handful in 2000 to around 300 today, Muslim prayer rooms are spreading across the country. But behind the numbers lie issues of funding, influence and a rapidly changing society.

What is a mosque? The definition varies. Permanent places of worship with a minaret and dome count, but so do simple prayer rooms in basements and community halls.

The lack of clarity means that the actual number may be much higher, making an objective debate difficult. Nevertheless, the trend is clear: mosques are growing in number and their role is becoming increasingly controversial.

Fear of the topic

In Vasastan in central Stockholm, for example, the Masjid Aysha mosque has grown into a central meeting place for many Muslims, and in Helsingborg, a large-scale mosque is currently being planned, financed by international fundraising.

In Skärholmen, a project is underway aiming to create Northern Europe’s largest Muslim center, backed by millions of kronor from foreign donors. But the mosques are not just spiritual spaces. they are also symbols of a development that, according to critics, raises concern.

Moské Malmö
One of Malmö’s many mosques. Photo: Johan Wessman/News Oresund

The construction projects testify to ambition but also to a growing dependency that few dare to scrutinize. There are many indications that countries such as Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey are pumping money into Swedish mosques.

Samnytt’s report suggests that some regimes see prayer rooms as tools for spreading ideological messages.

Critics warn that foreign influence can fuel polarization and, in the worst cases, radicalization, while mosque representatives instead emphasize a role as bridge builders in the local community.

The climate of debate is further complicated by the fear of being labeled Islamophobic. Those who question the mosque boom are often met with harsh words, which can silence legitimate concerns about integration and security.

Christian meeting places are declining

Internationally, Sweden is not alone. In France, for example, laws against “Islamic separatism” have made headlines, while the UK is struggling to balance religious freedom and security.

In Sweden, however, there is often no basis for even having the conversation. Official statistics on mosques are scarce, and funding flows remain shrouded in mystery.

In parallel with the mosque boom, Christian spaces are shrinking. For example, the Church of Sweden has closed dozens of churches in recent decades. This contrasts with the rise of the new minarets.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.