Sunday, June 1, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Anonymous person donates record Viking treasure in Sweden

Published 28 November 2024
– By Editorial Staff

An unknown individual has donated an extensive silver treasure from the Viking Age to the County Administrative Board in Jönköping.

The treasure is the largest of its kind ever found in the county and consists of a very large number of Arab silver coins.

In Jönköping County, only one comparable find has been made before and that was in the 1800s in Forsheda in Värnamo municipality. Then an agricultural worker found about a hundred English and German silver coins, as well as an Arabic coin and a small piece of jewelry. The treasure that has come in now is more abundant”, writes the county administrative board in a press release.

In addition to the silver coins, the treasure consists of various jewelry, cut pieces of silver and an amulet ring, but the county administrative board is critical of the fact that the treasure was excavated illegally several years ago.

Since the treasure was found by metal detecting without permission, no archaeologist was involved in the excavation. This means that much scientific information has been lost forever. If you find ancient finds and try to clean them yourself and then leave them at home in a drawer, they are destroyed. But it is good that the find has now been submitted”, they continue.

They emphasize that it is important to know what applies to ancient monuments and the use of metal detectors, and that ancient monuments are protected by the Cultural Environment Act and must be preserved in the ground until something has to be built on the site.

Permission from the County Administrative Board is then required to intervene. Permission is also required to use metal detectors, even on beaches and your own property. If you find an ancient find, you must stop immediately and contact the County Administrative Board. Illegal searches are reported to the police”.

“Miniature Roman wine bucket”

Some of the silver coins have holes in them so that they can be threaded onto straps. There is also a braided silver neck ring, a pendant, parts of ring pins, an amulet ring and several pieces of silver that have been cut into pieces, probably to be used as currency by weight.

The pendant is small, bowl-shaped and decorated with filigree and granulation, that is, decoration of threads and small balls of silver. It may have been designed to resemble a miniature Roman wine bucket. A ring pin is a costume buckle, here the ring does not remain but only parts of the pin itself and it is ornamented with triangles, rhombuses and points”.

The amulet ring is the size of a bracelet and has several smaller rings attached to it. Amulet rings are believed to be ritual objects that were deposited in the ground to positively influence the future”, it concludes.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Tests reveal imported honey in Sweden is fake

Published today 11:34
– By Editorial Staff
According to EU rules, real honey should only contain honey - and nothing else.

All honey imported into Sweden is fake, new tests show. Instead, the “honey” contains mostly sugar and syrup.

The industry organization Biodlingsföretagarna has tested 40 honey products available on the Swedish market. A new form of DNA technology was used to test the honey.

36 of the products, all imported, did not contain real honey, the tests showed. Instead, the products contained sugar and syrup. Only four of the products tested contained real honey and all were produced in Sweden.

We consider this to be extremely serious. We knew there were fake products on the market, but we are shocked by the scale of it, says Yngve Kihlberg, chairman of the Swedish Beekeepers’ Association, to the tax-funded SVT.

“Must await EU decision”

In the EU, a product called “honey” must contain only honey. It is okay to mix honey from different origins, but not to add other ingredients. According to the trade association, most of the imported “honey” comes from China, where they have found ways to cheat to allow products to pass controls even though they contain very little honey.

Swedish grocery retailers will not replace the honey products identified as fake at this stage, as they have passed the current controls.

We would like to replace the current testing methods if they do not work. But we have to wait for the EU’s decision on the accreditation of the DNA tests, says Martin Andersson, who is responsible for industrial policy at the Swedish grocery trade, to SVT.

The theater king’s dramatic revolution of Sweden

  • For several decades, the two party blocs, the Hats and the Caps, had pursued a policy that had brought Sweden to its knees.
  • By the early 1770s, the treasury had been emptied and the country almost completely sold out to foreign powers. Dissatisfaction in the Swedish Empire was boiling under the surface.
  • One of the people who most deeply despised the state Sweden had fallen into was the new king Gustav III, who ascended to the throne in 1771 at the age of just 25.
  • Just one year later, the corrupt reign of the party bloc would come to an abrupt end as the "theater king" now staged a well-directed revolution.
Published yesterday 15:47
– By Editorial Staff
Royal portrait of King Gustav III from 1777.

After the death of Charles XII in 1718, the Swedish monarchy weakened considerably. The decline was so severe that power slipped into the hands of a parliament controlled by two parties, the Hats and the Caps, both of which were openly financed by foreign powers. Under the rule of the Hats and the Caps, Sweden was transformed from an independent nation into a puppet state for the geopolitical interests of the great powers.

The Hats, who dominated the Riksdag during the 1740s and 1760s, received direct bribes from the French embassy. Archives from Versailles state that the party’s leading representatives received large sums of money, among other things to pursue an anti-Russian policy. This also led to disastrous military campaigns for Sweden, first in the Hats’ failed Russian War of 1741–1743, in which Sweden suffered heavy losses and which, ironically, would instead strengthen Russian influence over Swedish politics. The Pomeranian War between 1757 and 1762, in which Swedish soldiers were sent to fight for French interests in Germany, was a conflict that emptied the Swedish treasury.

This paved the way for the party bloc known as the Caps, which was financed by Russia and Great Britain, to take power in Sweden in 1765. Advisers to Catherine II of Russia are also said to have argued openly that Sweden was easier to control through the easily manipulated Riksdag than through a king. Immediately after taking power from the Hats, the Caps decided in 1765 – partly under Russian pressure – to reduce the Swedish army to 17,000 men, which was a significant security risk for a country that had not long ago been a military superpower and had recently lost further territory to its enemies.

The Swedish government became so corrupt that foreign ambassadors could effectively buy votes in the Riksdag. British diplomats are said to have rejoiced in the 1760s that it was possible to push through virtually any motion they wanted, as long as they paid enough. Sweden’s foreign policy was no longer controlled from Stockholm, but from London, St. Petersburg, and Paris.

Gustav III makes a revolution

By the early 1770s, Sweden had become a bankrupt, divided, and internationally marginalized country. The power struggle between the Hats and Caps during the Age of Liberty had left the country weakened and despised – both by its own people and by the outside world. The Riksdag was paralyzed by factional strife, the army was degraded and underfunded, and power was in the hands of a parliament that resembled more a cackling court than a state institution. The riksdaler (Swedish currency) was virtually worthless, and the dominant nobility refused to contribute to the state treasury.

Beneath the surface, popular discontent was simmering. One of those who most deeply despised the state Sweden had been reduced to was the new, only 25-year-old Swedish king, Gustav III, who ascended the throne in 1771. During his upbringing, he had noticed and been outraged by how foreign powers systematically exploited the Swedish government’s weakness and was appalled that the Swedish kingdom had been transformed into a political marketplace where foreign ambassadors could buy laws and regulations that favored their masters.

A young Gustav III and his brothers Karl and Fredrik Adolf. Illustration: Alexander Roslin (1771)

His father, Adolf Fredrik, had neither the strength nor the ability to break the corrupt power of the political parties, but Gustav, as it turned out, was of a completely different caliber. He later earned his nickname, “the theater king”, in the history books for his deep cultural interest in theater, opera, and art, and it was also with a theater king’s flair for direction that, just over a year after his accession, he staged a spectacular revolution that would radically change Sweden’s political course.

Early in the morning of August 19, 1772, loyal officers gathered in the capital and, under the leadership of the young Gustav, they took the castle, arrested reluctant councilors, and took control of the kingdom’s institutions. Everything happened quickly and without a single drop of blood being shed.

The very next day, a new form of government came into force, which had been carefully formulated in advance by the new king. This abolished the Riksdag’s dominance over politics and instead restored supreme executive power to the king, who now regained control over lawmaking, appointing ministers, and foreign policy.

The new form of government was particularly strong in its opposition to the lobby in Sweden that had gained a foothold in the country’s institutions.

Foreigners – whether princes, dukes or other persons – shall henceforth neither be employed nor appointed to any office of the realm, whether civil or military, with the exception of His Majesty’s court, unless they can, through their outstanding and great qualities, bring great honor and tangible benefit to the kingdom”, the text declared, among other things.

Gustav III begins his coup d’état. Illustration: Pehr Hillerström (1732-1816)

The revolutionary change of power brought Sweden into what history books describe as the Gustavian era.

“Hatred and division have torn the kingdom apart”

In his speech to the Riksdag two days after the coup, Gustav criticized how the country had been ruled by the Hats and the Caps. He emphasized that it was not freedom he intended to abolish through the revolution, but rather to end the misrule that had plagued Sweden for so long.

It is a sad but well-known truth that hatred and division have torn the kingdom apart. For a long time, the nation has been divided into two parties, which in practice have made it into two different peoples, united only in tearing apart their fatherland. You know how this division gave rise to resentment, how resentment led to revenge, how revenge led to persecution, and how persecution in turn led to new revolutions – something that has ultimately become like a recurring disease, which has scarred and degraded the whole of society”, proclaimed the king, continuing:

These upheavals have shaken the realm due to the power hunger of a few individuals. Streams of blood have flowed – at times shed by one side, at times by the other – and the people have always been the victims of conflicts that barely concerned them, but whose unfortunate consequences they were the first and most to feel. Securing their rule has been the sole aim of those in power; everything has been adapted to serve that goal – often at the expense of other citizens, always at the expense of the realm.”.

Securing their rule has been the sole aim of those in power.

When the laws did not suit those in power, they were distorted and ignored, argued Gustav III, who stated that “nothing has been sacred to a people’s assembly inflamed by hatred and revenge” which was ultimately convinced that it stood above the law.

Thus, freedom – the noblest of human rights – has been transformed into unbearable aristocratic oppression in the hands of the ruling party, which itself has been subjugated and ruled at the whim of a few men within it. People have trembled before every new parliament, and instead of thinking about how the affairs of the kingdom could best be managed, they have only been concerned with securing a majority for their own party – to protect themselves against the lawless abuses and violence of the other party”.

“An aristocratic yoke – unbearable for every Swede”

Born a Swede and King of Sweden, it should be unthinkable for me to believe that foreign interests could rule over Swedish men – worse still, that the lowest and most degrading means would have been used to achieve it. You know what I am referring to, and my modesty is enough for you to understand the shame into which your internal conflicts have plunged the realm”, continued the young king, lamenting how Swedish politicians had been seduced by both “foreign gold” and ”domestic hatred and self-will.”

The king’s revolutionary uniform is still preserved today at the Royal Armoury in Stockholm. Montage. Illustration: Lorens Pasch the Younger (1733-1805), photo: LSH

He further pointed out how he had previously tried to get those in power to change course – but without success, and that the “most virtuous, dignified, and foremost citizens” who tried to stop the misrule in various ways were opposed and sacrificed.

Yes, even the people have been oppressed – their complaints have been seen as rebellion, and freedom has ultimately been transformed into an aristocratic yoke, unbearable for every Swede”.

Some of the people have borne the yoke with sighs and complaints, but without resistance – they did not know where salvation lay, or how it could be attained”, continued the king, pointing to others who instead “lost hope and took up arms”.

Today, Gustav III watches over Skeppsbrokajen in Stockholm – albeit in immobile form. Photo: Manfred Werner/CC BY-SA 4.0

Gustav Vasa and Engelbrekt

According to Gustav III, not only were the freedom and security of the citizens in grave danger, but so was the very existence of the kingdom – and this, according to him, was the reason why he “resorted to the means that had helped other courageous peoples, and which had once helped Sweden itself under the banner of Gustav Vasa, to rise up against unbearable oppression”.

God has blessed my work. I have seen how love for the fatherland has been rekindled among the people – the same fervor that once burned in the hearts of Engelbrekt and Gustav Eriksson. All has gone well, and I have saved both myself and the kingdom – without a single citizen coming to harm”, he continued, asserting that Sweden can only be ruled by an “unshakeable law – whose words must not be distorted”.

Great and immortal kings have carried the scepter I now hold in my hand. It would be truly bold of me to try to resemble them in any way – but in my zeal and love for you, I compete with them all, and when you carry the same heart for your country, I hope that the Swedish name will once again gain the honor and respect it once earned in the time of our ancestors”, he concluded his famous speech.

Culture – and war

In many ways, Gustav III soon laid the foundations for a Swedish cultural treasure that is still present in Sweden today. He not only founded the Swedish Academy (1786) to promote the Swedish language and literature, but also the Royal Opera (1773). His passion for theater and art made Stockholm something of a Nordic cultural center.

Gustav III founded the Royal Opera House in Stockholm. Photo: Frankie Fouganthin/CC BY-SA 4.0

The king was at the same time no classic aristocrat but rather inspired by French Enlightenment ideals, introducing early versions of freedom of the press and abolishing torture as a method of interrogation reforms that strengthened citizens’ rights.

He also often looked back at the Sweden that once was and dreamed of restoring it as a great power. Hoping to reclaim previously lost Swedish territories and to prevent further Russian interference in Swedish politics, he declared war on Russia in 1788.

According to some contemporary accounts and later historians, Gustav III allegedly had Swedish soldiers dress in Russian uniforms or Cossack-like clothing and staged an attack to create a legitimate and popularly accepted reason for war claims that have not been substantiated and which other historians have dismissed as mere slander and propaganda.

The war began with mixed results, and discontent among officers led to the formation of the so-called Anjala League in 1788 a group of commanders who opposed the war and demanded peace with Russia. The fighting continued, primarily at sea, where the Swedish navy won an important victory at the Battle of Svensksund in 1790, strengthening Sweden’s negotiating position.

The Peace of Värälä was concluded that same year and meant that the borders remained unchanged. Sweden managed to maintain its territorial integrity but did not regain any previously lost lands. Despite this, the king still tried to present the outcome of the war as a political success, but his questionable military venture had also shaken his position of power.

Stockholm. Swedish ships being equipped for war. Illustration: Louis Jean Desprez (1788)

The nobility conspires

Tensions between Gustav III and the nobility grew, not least because of the Act of Union and Security of 1789, which, among other things, stripped the nobility of their exclusive right to high office and privileges, and gave the king even greater powers to make decisions on foreign and military matters without the approval of the Riksdag. However, the changes were supported by priests, burghers, and peasants alike.

Dissatisfaction among the nobility continued to grow as Gustav III strengthened his power at their expense. Criticism of the king’s rule, his handling of foreign policy, and his attempts to reform society without the consent of the nobility had created deep divisions within the upper classes.

On March 16, 1792, the conflict reached its climax when Gustav III was shot at a masked ball at the opera in Stockholm. The attack was carried out by Captain Jakob Johan Anckarström, but the planning behind the assassination involved a broader conspiracy among disaffected noblemen.  Among those implicated were prominent figures such as Adolf Ribbing, Claes Horn, and Carl Fredrik Pechlin all with connections to oppositional circles within the aristocracy.

Pechlin, who is considered one of the masterminds behind the conspiracy, had long been involved in political intrigues against the king and acted as a mediator between the conspirators. Secret meetings were held where the king’s deposition – and ultimately his death – was discussed as the only solution to what was described as a threat to the rule of the kingdom and the rights of the nobility.

The official motives for the act were political: the conspirators believed that the king’s rule had violated the 1720 constitution, threatened the constitutional order of the kingdom, and undermined the traditional power of the nobility. By removing the king, the conspirators hoped to restore the old balance of power and put an end to the Gustavian autocracy.

Anckarström as a scapegoat?

Gustav III survived the initial shot, but suffered an infection and died of his injuries on March 29 of the same year.

The assassination was followed by extensive legal and political repercussions. Jakob Johan Anckarström was arrested the day after the crime, after being identified by several witnesses. During questioning, he confessed to his role as the assassin but initially refused to reveal the names of others involved. Over time, however, evidence and witness statements pointed to a wider network of conspirators behind the assassination.

Contemporary German interpretation of the murder, in which the king is surrounded and shot by a group of masked conspirators. Illustration: Abraham Wolfgang Küfner (circa 1792)

Adolf Ribbing and Claes Horn were arrested and exiled, while the politically influential Carl Fredrik Pechlin – whom many consider to be the actual organizer – escaped harsher punishment by withholding direct evidence. He was sentenced by the Supreme Court to be held in custody for the purpose of investigating his possible involvement, first at Karlsten Fortress and then at Varberg Fortress, where, according to sources, he was allowed to move relatively freely and remained until his death four years later.

Although several people were proven to have been involved in the planning, the authorities chose to focus on Anckarström as the main perpetrator. Anckarström was sentenced to death and publicly executed on April 27, 1792, after undergoing a prolonged and symbolically harsh punishment: he was flogged daily for three days in various locations in Stockholm before being beheaded and having his right hand cut off. His body was dismembered and parts were nailed up as a warning to others.

In retrospect, many historians have generally regarded Anckarström as a scapegoat, a man who admittedly fired the shot but who was acting on behalf of more powerful forces. The trial was also marked by a desire to quickly restore order rather than fully expose the political conspiracy behind the murder.

Copperplate engraving depicting Jacob Johan Anckarström and the mask, knife, and pistols he wore on the night of the murder. Montage. Photo: LSH/CC BY 3.0, Illustration: Unknown

The deeper they dug, the more names appeared in the investigation, but several of the others involved escaped prosecution altogether, which also contributed to the impression that Anckarström was in fact sacrificed to conceal a broader rebellion within the absolute upper echelons of the kingdom.

Popular cultural vindication

The Gustavian era came to an end with the murder, but Gustav III’s reforms, new institutions, and cultural policy initiatives had, in a short time, made an impression that would shape Sweden long after his death.

Although Gustav III is often praised by more conservative commentators as a strong leader and national defender who fought corruption and misrule, he remains controversial even among patriots. Like many other enlightenment-minded rulers of his time, he was a Freemason just like his father Adolf Frederick, and the highest patron of the order in Sweden. According to sources, several of his closest allies were also members of the same Masonic networks. The motivations remain somewhat unclear, but Freemasonry evidently offered Gustav not only a vital platform and a network of influential men and international contacts his defenders argue that his membership was rather a strategic move to monitor and influence the emerging Masonic movement in Sweden, and to ensure it did not become an independent power.

With this in mind, some critics have pointed out that Gustav III, despite his stated desire to reduce foreign influence over Sweden, was himself strongly influenced by French culture and the French political model. He was deeply fascinated by the French court and sought both diplomatic and financial support from France, which he saw as a model for how the Swedish monarchy could be and how the kingdom could be modernized, inspired by the ideals of the Enlightenment.

In modern historiography, historical figures who do not conform to the ideas of contemporary rainbow parties are rarely highlighted. Despite his inspiration from the French Enlightenment, Gustav III has often been perceived as belonging to this category and has been described by some as an anti-democratic despot or even a tyrant.

However, the theater king’s presence remains in contemporary popular culture. A prominent example is Stefan Andersson’s historical concept album Teaterkungen kronologiskt i text och musik (The Theater King Chronologically in Text and Music), which describes his revolution in 1772 until his death in 1792.

Sweden lost Finland and his son was deposed

In practice, Gustav III’s idea of an enlightened monarchy with supreme power had died with him. Despite strengthening his influence through the 1772 constitution and the 1789 Act of Union and Security, Gustav III failed to lay the foundations for lasting royal absolutism in Sweden, and his dreams of a powerful monarchy that could rise above party strife and the privileges of the nobility never came to fruition in the long run.

His son, Gustav IV Adolf, was only 13 years old when his father died, which meant that power passed to a regency government led by Gustav III’s brother, Duke Karl (later Karl XIII). The regency government ruled more cautiously and returned some power to the Riksdag and the nobility, which was a first step away from the model that Gustav III had sought.

Gustav IV (pictured here as a teenager) was a significantly weaker monarch than his father. Illustration: Per Krafft the Elder (1724–1793)

When Gustav IV Adolf took over the reins of power in 1796, he proved to be a weak and, among many, unpopular ruler, whose failed foreign policy – particularly the conflict with Napoleon – led to a catastrophic defeat: the loss of Sweden’s eastern half (Finland) to Russia in 1809. Gustav IV Adolf was deposed in a coup d’état, and Sweden adopted a new form of government that same year, which entailed a clear division of power between the king and the Riksdag. The king would still reign, but no longer alone.

His son lost both the throne and the trust of the people and his important allies, and his family was eventually replaced by the French Bernadotte family, which came to power with Charles XIV John in 1818. Sweden thus entered a new political era – still with a monarchy, but now in constitutional form, with the king today fulfilling an almost symbolic and politically insignificant role.

Swedish researchers sail like Vikings

Published yesterday 13:54
– By Editorial Staff
Archaeologist Greer Jarrett has led the Viking voyages.

Over the past three years, researchers at Lund University have been sailing like Vikings to better understand how the Norse traveled. In their latest study, they have identified four possible ports used by our ancestors a thousand years ago.

Archaeologist Greer Jarret and her fellow researchers have sailed along the coast of Norway in boats similar to those used during the Viking Age (c. 800–c. 1050 AD). The first trip was a round trip to the Arctic Circle in 2022, and since then the researchers have sailed over 5,000 kilometers in search of answers about the Vikings’ routes.

Previous discoveries have shown, for example, that it was probably possible for the Vikings to reach remote parts of the Arctic with this type of boat to hunt walrus, suggesting that the Vikings encountered indigenous peoples long before Columbus “discovered” North America.

Smaller harbors

During their voyages, based on their experience of sailing Viking boats, they have developed various criteria for determining whether a place is suitable as a harbor or not. The researchers have also interviewed sailors and fishermen about the routes traditionally used in the 19th and early 20th centuries, when sailing boats without engines were still common in Norway. Digital reconstructions of what the landscape looked like at the time have then been used to identify four possible Viking harbors along the Norwegian coast.

The hypothesis is that it must have been easy to enter and leave the harbors in all wind conditions, so there must have been several ways in and out. Furthermore, there were probably a multitude of smaller harbors on small islands or peninsulas where the Vikings could stop and rest.

We often only know the starting and ending points of the trade that took place during the Viking Age. Large ports such as Bergen and Trondheim in Norway, Ribe in Denmark, and Dublin in Ireland. What interests me is what happened on the voyages between these major trading hubs. My hypothesis is that this decentralized network of ports, located on small islands and peninsulas, was central to making trade efficient during the Viking Age, says Jarret in a press release.

Navigating with stories

Researchers believe that the Vikings did not navigate using maps or compasses, but instead had mental maps. They used their memories and experiences, as well as myths associated with different places. These stories were then passed down through generations of sailors.

– For example, there are Viking stories about Kullaberg in Sweden and the mountain Torghatten and the islands Hestmona and Skrova along the Norwegian coast. These stories describe the dangers lurking in the waters below the mountain.

The research expeditions have not been entirely without risk. It has often been freezing cold, and once a minke whale surfaced and slapped its tail just a few meters from the boat. In 2022, the spar (pole) holding up the sail broke when the researchers were 25 kilometers out at sea.

We had to tie two oars together to hold the sail and hope it would hold. We made it back to port safely, but then had to wait there for two days before we could sail again because the boat needed repairs.

The researchers also conclude that while it is important to have a durable boat, the relationships on board are even more important.

You need a boat that can withstand all kinds of weather conditions. But if you don’t have a crew that can work together and put up with each other for long periods of time, then you’re screwed, concludes Jarret.

Worrying trend: More people driving under the influence of drugs

Published 30 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Genre image - traffic accident. There is no information that drugs are related to this particular incident.

In Sweden, it is now more common for drivers to be under the influence of drugs than alcohol, while in Finland it is still more common to drive drunk than under the influence of drugs.

Between 2018 and 2022, 81 people died in Finland in traffic accidents where the driver who caused the accident was under the influence of at least one drug. This corresponds to 11 percent of all fatal traffic accidents during the period when drug testing was possible.

– Alcohol is still the most common intoxicant in fatal traffic accidents, but drugs are becoming increasingly common. This is particularly true of amphetamines, which are often linked to high speeds and risky decisions. Cannabis is also common among those who drive while intoxicated, says Kalle Parkkari, Director of Traffic Safety at the Finnish Accident Investigation Board, to Swedish Yle.

Statistics show that drivers under the influence of drugs are more likely to collide with other vehicles, while drivers under the influence of alcohol tend to drive off the road or crash in off-road terrain. However, Parkkari points out that the number of cases is so limited that it is difficult to draw firm conclusions.

– There is nevertheless a slight trend indicating an increase in drug-related driving under the influence. Traffic is part of society, and drug use in society appears to be on the rise. It is therefore inevitable that drugs will also begin to appear more frequently in traffic, Parkkari notes.

Sweden stands out in the statistics

In Sweden, the trend is more alarming. Between 2012 and 2022, 23 percent of drivers who died in traffic accidents were under the influence of drugs, compared to 11 percent who had alcohol in their system. Drug-related drunk driving has thus overtaken alcohol as the most common cause.

Lars-Olov Sjöström, traffic safety manager at the Swedish Motorists’ Sobriety Association, points to a change in attitude among young people as a possible explanation.

– For a hundred years, we have taught people not to drive with alcohol in their system, but the surveys we have conducted in collaboration with authorities in Norway show that the same young people who refrain from driving when under the influence of alcohol do not think as carefully when it comes to cannabis. We are lagging behind in providing information about cannabis and other drugs.

“We can learn from each other”

He believes that a more liberal and permissive view of “recreational drugs” among young people makes the work more difficult, but still sees hope for change within five to ten years. Both Parkkari and Sjöström emphasize the importance of cross-border cooperation to manage the development.

– It would be enormously helpful if we could learn from other countries’ experiences in this area. While the situation in Finland is still under control, it is very important to ensure that it does not get worse, says Parkkari.

Sjöström agrees, adding:

– We are seeing the same pattern in Finland as we have seen in Sweden, so we can learn from each other and discuss methods for dealing with the problem.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.