Too much free speech on X – Major Swedish newspaper DN leaves platform

Published November 19, 2024 – By Editorial staff
Peter Wolodarski and the iconic "DN skyscraper" in Stockholm.

Under Elon Musk's ownership, censorship on X (formerly Twitter) has been greatly reduced and the entrepreneur himself states that freedom of expression is very important to him.

Not everyone is happy about this development, however, and Peter Wolodarski, editor-in-chief of the Bonnier-owned newspaper DN (Dagens Nyheter), has announced that DN is boycotting the platform.

– Since Elon Musk took over, the platform has increasingly merged with his own and Donald Trump's political ambitions, while the climate on X has become more harsh and extreme. Therefore, for the time being, we will not publish anything there from our official accounts, he told his own magazine.

While arbitrary censorship for political reasons used to be commonplace on Twitter, users are now relatively free to write what they really think about the often biased reporting of DN and other establishment media without much risk of banning or suspension - and this is not at all popular with media executives.

I think X is a lost platform, says Aftonbladet's editorial director Karin Schmidt, explaining that they left X already in 2023.

Unlike X, I think it is so important that we are on Tiktok, where we can be a counterflow to fake news, she continues.

“Musk - a free speech fundamentalist”

The editor-in-chief of Swedish online magazine Kvartal, Jörgen Huitfeldt, agrees that there is sometimes a “rude and unpleasant” climate of conversation on X, but he has no plans to leave the platform.

– After all, many people are there, not least those who share journalistic content. It's a way for us to reach out really, it's that simple.

– Musk is a free speech fundamentalist, and I find it hard to believe that he will start censoring people in the same way he did under the Jack Dorsey regime, he continues.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Windows games get dramatically improved Linux compatibility

Published yesterday 2:54 pm – By Editorial staff
Now you can ditch Microsoft from your gaming PC – 90 percent of all Windows games now work on Linux.

Nine out of ten Windows games can now run on Linux thanks to major improvements in compatibility tools. The proportion of games that don't work at all has dropped to historically low levels.

The gaming world is facing a shift where Linux is rapidly approaching Windows as a viable gaming platform. New statistics from ProtonDB, which has been compiled by the site Boiling Steam, show that around 90 percent of all Windows games now work on Linux systems, reports Sweclockers, a Swedish technology news site.

Behind this success is Proton, a tool developed by gaming company Valve that builds on the older Wine program. With Proton's help, the vast majority of Windows titles can be launched directly on Linux without complicated installations or extensive technical knowledge.

Particularly notable is that the proportion of games that won't start at all has decreased to around ten percent – the lowest figure ever measured. In many of these cases, it's not about technical barriers, but rather game developers deliberately blocking their products from being used via Proton. One example is March of Giants, which displays an explicit error message stating that Linux and Steam Deck are not supported.

The main remaining problem consists of anti-cheat programs that don't yet work well enough under Linux. However, Valve is working with game developers to resolve these obstacles.

The development has been rapid. In just a few years, Linux has evolved from a niche platform to an actual alternative for gamers, although the system is still not entirely problem-free.

Elon Musk: “Olof Palme destroyed Sweden”

Population replacement in the West

Updated yesterday at 2:55 pm, Published yesterday 12:18 pm – By Editorial staff
The idea of a multicultural Sweden was introduced partly through initiatives and debate articles by David Schwarz (far right in the image) and with support from the Bonnier family.

Elon Musk has once again entered the Swedish immigration debate. On X, he accuses former Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme of having "destroyed Sweden" by introducing multiculturalism in 1975.

The tech billionaire is responding to an X post by journalist Christian Peterson, who claims that Palme, through a 1975 legislative change (Proposition 1975:26), laid the foundation for today's multicultural society, reports Fria Tider.

Peterson argues that the decision was made without a referendum or extensive investigation and links it to current problems such as mass immigration, gun violence, parallel societies, and demographic changes.

"Multiculturalism was added to the Swedish constitution in 1975 (Prop. 1975:26) under Olof Palme — no referendum, no long-term review. 50 years later: mass migration, record gun violence, parallel societies, major demographic shifts. A turning point that no one voted for".

In response, Elon Musk writes briefly and concisely: "He destroyed Sweden" and also attaches an AI-generated summary of the 1975 parliamentary decision.

1975 – a political crossroads

The controversial 1975 proposition established that immigrants and minorities should be able to choose whether to adapt to a Swedish cultural identity or maintain their original cultural heritage.

The new policy also meant that the state would provide financial support to immigrant organizations and cultural projects. Critics argue that this became a political choice with long-term effects.

Musk and Peterson today link the decision to current concerns about integration, social division, and crime.

Elon Musk has previously engaged in Swedish legal matters. During the fall, he criticized an appeals court ruling where a man was acquitted of deportation after a rape conviction, calling the decision "insane".

His latest statement has once again touched on a deep ideological conflict within Swedish politics – a societal issue that remains a hot political topic in Sweden.

GrapheneOS exits France after threats and smear campaign

Totalitarianism

Published yesterday 11:06 am – By Editorial staff
GrapheneOS is considered the world's most secure mobile operating system while being nearly identical to Android, making it very user-friendly and popular.

The Canadian open-source organization behind the security-focused mobile operating system GrapheneOS announces it is ending all operations in France.

The background is an escalating conflict with French authorities, who according to the GrapheneOS team are spreading false accusations in the media and threatening arrests and server seizures.

GrapheneOS, a non-profit project that develops an operating system for Android phones with extra focus on privacy and security, has in recent days published a series of posts on the X platform about what they describe as a coordinated campaign by French police. According to the team, authorities have sent out internal messages to the country's police forces where all Google Pixel phones with GrapheneOS are labeled as suspicious. This has led to a wave of articles in French media, where claims that the system is used for criminal purposes are repeated without fact-checking or opportunity for GrapheneOS to respond.

"France's law enforcement are making outrageously false and unsubstantiated claims about GrapheneOS, which are being printed by both state and corporate media as facts when they're not", GrapheneOS writes in a post on X on November 23. The team emphasizes that they were not given any chance to review or respond to the accusations before publication. Instead, they have been forced into a defensive position, where they now plan to exercise their right of reply in French media.

Threats of intervention and demands for concessions

The conflict has escalated to direct threats, according to GrapheneOS. In contacts with French authorities, the team has been urged to assist with decryption of devices, something they technically cannot or will not do due to the system's design.

"They have made several quite direct threats of arrests and seizures of servers, just as they did with SkyECC and Encrochat", GrapheneOS emphasizes in an update on November 25. The reference refers to previous cases where French authorities intervened against encrypted communication networks.

The authorities are in practice demanding that GrapheneOS stop distributing functioning disk encryption, otherwise the project risks legal action. This is likened to the famous dispute between Apple and FBI in the United States, but with a twist: Google's hardware in Pixel phones is designed to resist such demands, and GrapheneOS builds further on that security. "They don't demand the same thing from Google for standard Pixel despite nearly identical encryption, because they are much less secure and can be exploited in advance". the team explains.

GrapheneOS emphasizes that their work is legal in countries like Canada, Germany, the United States, and the Netherlands. France, however, is pushing for laws that force backdoors in encryption, a policy that has not yet been implemented but which police are acting as if it already applies.

Dismantling of infrastructure and future plans

In response to the threats, GrapheneOS has initiated a rapid withdrawal of its presence in France. They are leaving the server provider OVH, a French company, and migrating their 15 servers – spread across Canada, Singapore, Germany, and the United States – to alternative locations.

"We are leaving France as a server location and OVH as a provider before they do anything", they announce in a post on Tuesday. Already now, ten servers have been replaced, including those used for standard updates. The remaining five, which handle email, forums, and other services in Beauharnois, Canada, are planned to be moved to colocation servers in Toronto.

For European users, GrapheneOS promises maintained performance through servers in Switzerland, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands – countries that do not support the EU's controversial "Chat Control" proposal on mass surveillance. "We can offer low latency and high throughput to users in France without servers there", the team assures. They also intend to avoid travel to France, including conferences, and discourage employees from working from the country.

The incident raises questions about the EU's future for open-source projects within privacy. GrapheneOS, which is financed through donations and sponsors, has built its reputation on open source and robust protections against exploits (security vulnerabilities that can be exploited). Now they see France as an "unsafe place for open-source privacy projects."

A spokesperson for the French Ministry of the Interior has not commented on the accusations, but previous statements from the government point to a harder line against encryption in the fight against organized crime.

Swedish company continues to invest in GrapheneOS despite conflict

In the midst of the ongoing conflict, the Swedish technology company Teuton Systems shows continued confidence in GrapheneOS. The company works exclusively with the system in its privacy-secure mobile phone, the Matrix phone, which is one of the first such products on the Nordic market. Teuton Systems emphasizes that the installation of GrapheneOS occurs only via the official source and with open-source tools like Aurora Store and F-Droid, to ensure transparency and maximum privacy without dependence on Google services.

The Matrix phone, based on Google Pixel phone hardware, is delivered with GrapheneOS pre-installed and prepared secure apps for everyday tasks. The product offers advanced features such as granular control over app permissions, sensor blocking, and automatic security updates. "GrapheneOS gives users full control over their data in a time of increasing surveillance, without compromising user-friendliness", Teuton Systems emphasizes on its website.

The company, which focuses on Nordic users, underscores the system's independent review and absence of backdoors, making it a reliable choice for privacy-conscious users.

Sweden Democrats voted against abolishing controversial hate speech law

Published yesterday 10:46 am – By Editorial staff
One of the Sweden Democrats' primary reasons for not pushing for a complete abolition of the heavily criticized law on incitement against ethnic groups (HMF), is the "increasing antisemitism" in Sweden (archive image).

The Sweden Democrats (SD) now wants to reform the country's hate speech law (hets mot folkgrupp). At the party congress in Örebro this past weekend, the party voted by a narrow margin for comprehensive reform – while proposals to completely abolish the law failed by the smallest possible difference.

The Sweden Democrats' party congress in Örebro, a city in central Sweden, resulted in a decision that the party should work toward a fundamental change to the hate speech law.

The vote was very close: 79 delegates supported the party leadership's position, while 78 voted to completely remove the law.

Prior to the decision, several motions had demanded that the law be abolished entirely. These motions received support from many delegates from the floor.

Julia Fält, a delegate from Fyrbodal in western Sweden, criticized the law's current application: — The law doesn't work as intended. It creates arbitrariness, silences debate and punishes statements that don't constitute any real threat.

Petter Nilsson, a delegate from Västerbotten in northern Sweden, joined the criticism: — Through legal precedent, it has more or less been established that Swedes cannot be subjected to hate speech. However, a large number of court cases have come to involve the 'group' of drag queens, which is quite telling.

Several speakers repeated the argument that the law doesn't protect the Swedish majority population and that it is currently applied arbitrarily in ways that limit freedom of speech.

Party leadership wants reform

Despite the criticism, the party leadership maintained that the hate speech law should not be abolished. Instead, they want to reform it so that it returns to dealing with ethnic groups in the proper sense.

Party Secretary Mattias Bäckström Johansson emphasized before the congress that the law should be streamlined and not linked to, for example, sexual orientation or religious affiliation.

Julia Kronlid, a member of the Swedish Parliament Riksdag and member of the party leadership, argued for the leadership's position and emphasized historical reasons for keeping the law.

I really understand the frustration that may exist. But we must not forget the background to the law, with the persecution of Jews and the Holocaust.

Kronlid also highlighted current societal developments as a reason for the party leadership's position.

Given the increasing antisemitism, I think it would be a major mistake to remove the law. It will be portrayed completely incorrectly. Our party leader Jimmie Åkesson will have to stand in interview after interview and answer the question 'why campaign on allowing hate speech'.