Saturday, October 4, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Opt-in childhood

What we signed them up for before they could object.

Published 7 June 2025
– By Naomi Brockwell
6 minute read

A few weeks ago, we published an article about oversharing on social media, and how posting photos, milestones, and personal details can quietly build a digital footprint for your child that follows them for life.

But social media isn’t the only culprit.

Today, I want to talk about the devices we give our kids: the toys that talk, the tablets that teach, the monitors that watch while they sleep.

These aren’t just tools of convenience or connection. Often, they’re Trojan horses, collecting and transmitting data in ways most parents never realize.

We think we’re protecting our kids.
But in many cases, we’re signing them up for surveillance systems they can’t understand, and wouldn’t consent to if they could.

How much do you know about the toys your child is playing with?

What data are they collecting?
With whom are they sharing it?
How safely are they storing it to protect against hackers?

Take VTech, for example — a hugely popular toy company, marketed as safe, educational, and kid-friendly.

In 2015, VTech was hacked. The breach wasn’t small:

  • 6.3 million children’s profiles were exposed, along with nearly 5 million parent accounts
  • The stolen data included birthdays, home addresses, chat logs, voice recordings… even photos children had taken on their tablets

Terms no child can understand—but every parent accepts

It’s not just hackers we should be mindful of — often, these companies are allowed to do almost anything they want with the data they collect, including selling it to third parties.

When you hand your child a toy that connects to Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, you might be agreeing to terms that say:

  • Their speech can be used for targeted advertising
  • Their conversations may be retained indefinitely
  • The company can change the terms at any time, without notice

And most parents will never know.

“Safe” Devices With Open Doors

What about things like baby monitors and nanny cams?

Years ago, we did a deep dive into home cameras, and almost all popular models were built without end-to-end encryption. That means the companies that make them can access your video feed.
How much do you know about that company?
How well do you trust every employee who might be able to access that feed?

But it’s not just insiders you should worry about.
Many of these kiddy cams are notoriously easy to hack. The internet is full of real-world examples of strangers breaking into monitors, watching, and even speaking to infants.

There are even publicly available tools that scan the internet and map thousands of unsecured camera feeds, sortable by country, type, and brand.
If your monitor isn’t properly secured, it’s not just vulnerable — it’s visible.

Mozilla, through its Privacy Not Included campaign, audited dozens of smart home devices and baby monitors. They assessed whether products had basic security features like encryption, secure logins, and clear data-use policies. The verdict? Even many top-selling monitors had zero safeguards in place.

These are the products we’re told are protecting our kids.

Apps that glitch, and let you track other people’s kids

A T-Mobile child-tracking app recently glitched.
A mother refreshed the screen—expecting to see her kids’ location.
Instead, she saw a stranger’s child. Then another. Then another.

Each refresh revealed a new kid in real time.

The app was broken, but the consequences weren’t abstract.
That’s dozens of children’s locations broadcast to the wrong person.
The feature that was supposed to provide control did the opposite.

Schools are part of the problem, too

Your child’s school likely collects and stores sensitive data—without strong protections or meaningful consent.

  • In Virginia, thousands of student records were accidentally made public
  • In Seattle, a mental health survey led to deeply personal data being stored in unsecured systems

And it’s not just accidents.

A 2015 study investigated “K–12 data broker” marketplaces that trade in everything from ethnicity and affluence to personality traits and reproductive health status.
Some companies offer data on children as young as two.
Others admit they’ve sold lists of 14- and 15-year-old girls for “family planning services.”

Surveillance disguised as protection

Let’s be clear: the internet is a minefield, filled with ways children can be tracked, profiled, or preyed upon. Protecting them is more important than ever.

One category of tools that’s exploded in popularity is the parental control app—software that lets you see everything happening on your child’s device:
The messages they send. The photos they take. The websites they visit.

The intention might be good. But the execution is often disastrous.

Most of these apps are not end-to-end encrypted, meaning:

  • Faceless companies gain full access to your child’s messages, photos, and GPS
  • They operate in stealth mode, functionally indistinguishable from spyware
  • And they rarely protect that data with strong security

Again, how much do you know about these companies?
And even if you trust them, how well are they protecting this data from everyone else?

The “KidSecurity” app left 300 million records exposed, including real-time child locations and fragments of parent credit cards.
The “mSpy” app leaked private messages and movement histories in multiple breaches.

When you install one of these apps, you’re not just gaining access to your child’s world.
So is the company that built it… and everyone they fail to protect it from.

What these breaches really teach us

Here’s the takeaway from all these hacks and security failures:

Tech fails.

We don’t expect it to be perfect.
But when the stakes are this high — when we’re talking about the private lives of our children — we should be mindful of a few things:

1) Maybe companies shouldn’t be collecting so much information if they can’t properly protect it.
2) Maybe we shouldn’t be so quick to hand that information over in the first place.

When the data involves our kids, the margin for error disappears.

Your old phone might still be spying

Finally, let’s talk about hand-me-downs.

When kids get their first phone, it’s often filled with tracking, sharing, and background data collection from years of use. What you’re really passing on may be a lifetime of surveillance baked into the settings.

  • App permissions often remain intact
  • Advertising IDs stay tied to previous behavior
  • Pre-installed tracking software may still be active

The moment it connects to Wi-Fi, that “starter phone” might begin broadcasting location data and device identifiers — linked to both your past and your child’s present.

Don’t opt them in by default: 8 ways to push back

So how do we protect children in the digital age?

You don’t need to abandon technology. But you do need to understand what it’s doing, and make conscious choices about how much of your child’s life you expose.

Here are 8 tips:

1: Stop oversharing
Data brokers don’t wait for your kid to grow up. They’re already building the file.
Reconsider publicly posting their photos, location, and milestones. You’re building a permanent, searchable, biometric record of your child—without their consent.
If you want to share with friends or family, do it privately through tools like Signal stories or Ente photo sharing.

2: Avoid spyware
Sometimes the best way to protect your child is to foster a relationship of trust, and educate them about the dangers.
If monitoring is essential, use self-hosted tools. Don’t give third parties backend access to your child’s life.

3: Teach consent
Make digital consent a part of your parenting. Help your child understand their identity—and that it belongs to them.

4: Use aliases and VoIP numbers
Don’t link their real identity across platforms. Compartmentalization is protection.

5: Audit tech
Reset hand-me-down devices. Remove unnecessary apps. Disable default permissions.

6: Limit permissions
If an app asks for mic or camera access and doesn’t need it—deny it. Always audit.

7: Set boundaries with family
Ask relatives not to post about your child. You’re not overreacting—you’re defending someone who can’t yet opt in or out.

8: Ask hard questions
Ask your school how data is collected, stored, and shared. Push back on invasive platforms. Speak up when things don’t feel right.

Let Them Write Their Own Story

We’re not saying throw out your devices.
We’re saying understand what they really do.

This isn’t about fear. It’s about safety. It’s about giving your child the freedom to grow up and explore ideas without every version of themselves being permanently archived, and without being boxed in by a digital record they never chose to create.

Our job is to protect that freedom.
To give them the chance to write their own story.

Privacy is protection.
It’s autonomy.
It’s dignity.

And in a world where data compounds, links, and lives forever, every choice you make today shapes the freedom your child has tomorrow.

 

Yours in privacy,
Naomi

Naomi Brockwell is a privacy advocacy and professional speaker, MC, interviewer, producer, podcaster, specialising in blockchain, cryptocurrency and economics. She runs the NBTV channel on Rumble.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Your battery life reveals more than you think

Published today 8:21
– By Naomi Brockwell
5 minute read

I’ve been running a little experiment the past 10 days.
I carried two phones everywhere: my Google Fi device and my GrapheneOS device.

Every night, here’s how the batteries compared:
• Google Fi: about 5% left
• GrapheneOS: about 50–75% left

What’s going on here? Am I really using the Google Fi phone 2–4x more?

Actually it’s the opposite.
My GrapheneOS phone is my daily driver. That’s where I use Signal, Brave, podcasts, audiobooks, email, camera, notes, calendar, my language app, and other things.

Meanwhile, on my Google Fi phone, I’ve installed exactly two apps: Signal and Google Maps, and I also use it as an internet hotspot. I deleted as many preinstalled apps as I could without breaking the phone, but there are countless ones I can’t remove.

At first glance you might think the hotspot is what’s draining the battery. That’s certainly a factor, but for context I turn the device to airplane mode (and shutting off the hotspot) whenever I’m not using it.

Even with “aggressive battery saver” enabled and hours in airplane mode, the Google phone churned through its battery like crazy.

The fact that the Google phone’s battery still dies so quickly is revealing. Battery drain can actually be a useful indicator of how private your device is. Some of this comes down to deliberate privacy choices, and some of it comes from the inherent design of each operating system.

Why battery drain is a privacy clue

Battery life is a rough but useful proxy for what’s happening under the hood.
If your phone is dead by dinnertime even when you barely use it, something else is doing the work. And “something else” usually means:
• Background services constantly phoning home
• Analytics trackers collecting usage data
• System-level apps pinging servers even when you think they’re off
• Push notification frameworks that keep connections alive 24/7

That invisible activity not only kills your battery, it shows how much your phone is reporting back without your consent.

Your privacy choices also matter

The way I use my devices also makes a huge impact on how much background activity is happening.

On Graphene, I silo apps across six profiles. My main profile has all the functionality I mentioned before. And I’m constantly using the device, but a lot of what I do doesn’t require connectivity. I can take pictures, listen to music, write notes, and listen to audiobooks all without needing to be online.

When I want to check messages, email, or browse the internet, I simply turn WiFi on, and when I’m done I turn it off again (like turning off a light switch when I leave a room).

I also have other apps I rarely use, some of which are more privacy-invasive, like Uber or others that require sandboxed Google Play Services. These are kept in secondary profiles, and when those profiles are inactive, they’re effectively powered off. This means there’s no chance of these apps running in the background.

Meanwhile, on the Google Fi phone, even though I tried to delete as much bloatware as possible, there are countless apps I can’t uninstall and processes I can’t turn off.

Google Play Services is the biggest offender: It’s a hugely invasive process with elevated system permissions that is always on. You can think of it as a hidden operating system layered on top of Android, handling push notifications, location data, updates, and telemetry. It’s not optional.

In some cases it can actually make your battery more efficient by centralizing notifications instead of having each app run its own system. But that depends entirely on how you use your device.

For example, I don’t have a ton of apps on that device that need all their processes to be centralized in a single, more efficient system. I just have 2 apps.

And I don’t use notifications at all, which means that the centralization of push notification services isn’t helpful to me. And even if I did use notifications, Signal is capable of handling its own push notifications without Google Play Services. So for my setup, having Play Services constantly pinging servers and running countless background processes is overkill. It makes a data-minimalist setup impossible.

Why GrapheneOS performs differently

Unlike most Android phones, and especially Google Fi, GrapheneOS doesn’t come with bloatware. It doesn’t have the same preinstalled junk running in the background — it’s an incredibly stripped down OS. If you want Google play services you can install it, but it’s sandboxed just like any other app, without elevated permissions. That means it doesn’t get special system access to spy on everything you do like it does on Android.

On top of that, GrapheneOS lets you isolate apps into separate profiles, each with its own encryption key and background permissions. Apps in one profile can’t see or interact with apps in another.

This not only improves security, it massively reduces unnecessary background chatter. Most of the Graphene phone spends its day idle, instead of phoning home.

Background activity = surveillance

This comparison proved to me that even on a pared-down Google phone with limited use, there are countless processes running behind the scenes that I don’t control and don’t need.

And those processes make a huge difference in how fast the battery disappears.

Other phones show the same pattern

I compared my results with others in my travel group. Their iPhones drained quickly too, even with moderate use. Apple is better than Android on privacy, but iPhones are still packed with system services constantly talking to Apple and 3rd party servers. Background iCloud sync, location lookups, telemetry reporting, Siri analytics etc all adds up.

In short: if your phone battery is always gasping for air, it’s because it’s working for someone else.

Battery life is a window into privacy. If your phone is constantly trying to talk to servers you didn’t ask it to, it’s both:

  1. Bad for your battery
  2. Bad for your privacy

Why this matters

When I travel, I want peace of mind that my phone won’t die halfway through the day. But even more than that, I want confidence that it isn’t secretly working for someone else.

I don’t pretend to know every technical reason that Google Fi and Apple drain so fast, but I do know that I have far less control over their processes than I do on Graphene. On Graphene, I can granularly control which apps access the internet, I can eliminate Google Play Services entirely, I can block apps from accessing sensors they don’t need. I can essentially be a data minimalist, while still having all the connectivity I want on the go.

And the difference in performance is stark. My Graphene phone lasts all day, even with heavy use. It’s calm, efficient, and private. The others are invasive, have hidden connections, and more background processes.

Battery life and privacy are more connected that we might realize, and GrapheneOS is winning on both. It’s another reason why switching to Graphene was one of my favorite privacy choices I’ve ever made.

Check out our video here if you’d like to learn how to install it:

 

Yours in privacy,
Naomi

Naomi Brockwell is a privacy advocacy and professional speaker, MC, interviewer, producer, podcaster, specialising in blockchain, cryptocurrency and economics. She runs the NBTV channel on Rumble.

Elon Musk plans Wikipedia rival – building encyclopedia with AI

Published yesterday 11:08
– By Editorial Staff
Musk has long criticized Wikipedia for being extremely politically correct and urged people to stop donating to the encyclopedia.
2 minute read

Tech billionaire Elon Musk has announced plans to launch Grokipedia, an AI-based encyclopedia that will compete with and according to Musk be a “massive improvement” over Wikipedia. The project builds on his xAI chatbot Grok.

Musk announced the plans on X on Tuesday. Grokipedia will be built using his AI chatbot Grok, which was developed as an alternative to ChatGPT and trained on web data, including public tweets.

In a podcast earlier this month, Musk described how the technology will work.

— Grok is using heavy amounts of inference compute to look at, as an example, a Wikipedia page, what is true, partially true, or false, or missing in this page.

— Now rewrite the page to correct, remove the falsehoods, correct the half-truths, and add the missing context.

Musk has long criticized Wikipedia for being extremely politically correct and urged people to stop donating to the encyclopedia.

Critics often accuse the site of having transformed into a political weapon with a strong left-liberal bias. Conservative and nationalist perspectives are deliberately portrayed as extreme and dangerous, while left-wing and liberal positions are presented as positive or objective facts.

Grokipedia is expected to attract an audience among Musk’s followers and others who agree that Wikipedia has transformed into a politically biased propaganda tool rather than a neutral reference source.

Wikipedia – a propaganda weapon?

In an interview with Tucker Carlson, Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger recently launched a harsh attack on what his creation has become.

— Wikipedia became a weapon of ideological theological war, used to destroy its enemies, Sanger stated in the interview published on X.

He described how the encyclopedia he founded in 2001 together with Jimmy Wales to bring together people with different perspectives has now become a propaganda tool.

— The left has its march through the institutions. And when Wikipedia appeared, it was one of the institutions that they marched through, Sanger explained.

Controlled by anonymous editors

He also criticized the fact that the most powerful editors are anonymous, that conservative sources are blacklisted and that intelligence services have been involved in editing content on Wikipedia.

— We don’t know who they are. They can libel people with impunity, because they’re anonymous, Sanger said about the anonymous editors.

Wikipedia has encountered internal conflicts among editors about how certain events should be presented. The site is the seventh most visited website in the world. When Grokipedia will be launched has not yet been announced.

Austrian armed forces switch to open source

Digital freedom

Published 1 October 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Austrian soldiers during an alpine exercise.
2 minute read

After an extensive planning process that began in 2020, the Austrian armed forces have now transitioned from Microsoft Office to the open source-based LibreOffice across all 16,000 workstations. The decision was not based on economic considerations but on a pursuit of increased digital sovereignty and independence from external cloud services.

The transition to LibreOffice is the result of a long-term strategy that began five years ago, when it became clear that Microsoft would move its office suite to cloud-based solutions. For an organization like the Austrian armed forces, where security around data handling is of the highest priority, this was a decisive turning point, writes Heise Online.

It was very important for us to show that we are doing this primarily to strengthen our digital sovereignty, to maintain our independence in terms of ICT infrastructure and to ensure that data is only processed in-house, explains Michael Hillebrand from the armed forces’ Directive 6 for ICT and cybersecurity in an interview with Austrian radio station Ö1.

Long-term planning and in-house development

The decision process began in 2020 and was completed the following year. During 2022, detailed planning commenced in parallel with training internal developers to be able to implement improvements and complementary software development. Already then, employees were given the opportunity to voluntarily start using LibreOffice.

In 2023, the project gained further momentum when a German company was hired for external support and development. At the same time, internal e-learning in LibreOffice was introduced, and the software became mandatory within the first departments.

Contributing to the global user base

The armed forces’ commitment to open source is not merely consuming. The adaptations and improvements required for military purposes have been programmed and integrated into the LibreOffice project. So far, over five person-years of work have been financed for this effort – contributions that all LibreOffice users worldwide can benefit from.

We are not doing this to save money, Hillebrand emphasizes to ORF (Austrian Broadcasting Corporation). — We are doing this so that the Armed Forces as an organization, which is there to function when everything else is down, can continue to have products that work within our sphere of influence.

In early September, Hillebrand together with his colleague Nikolaus Stocker presented the transition process at LibreOffice Conference 2025.

Extract of the features that the Austrian armed forces programmed for their own use and then contributed to the LibreOffice project. Image: Bundesheer/heise online

From Microsoft dependency to own control

The starting point in 2021 was Microsoft Office 2016 Professional with a large number of VBA and Access solutions deeply embedded in IT workflows. At the same time, the armed forces were already using their own Linux servers with Samba for email and collaboration solutions, rather than Microsoft’s alternatives.

This year, MS Office 2016 has been removed from all military computers. Those who still believe they need Microsoft Office for their duties can, however, apply internally to have the corresponding module from MS Office 2024 LTSC installed.

The transition underscores a growing trend among European government agencies to prioritize digital independence and control over sensitive information over the convenience of commercial cloud services.

Anthropic challenges Google and OpenAI with new AI flagship model

The future of AI

Published 30 September 2025
– By Editorial Staff
AI companies' race continues at a rapid pace, now with a new model from Anthropic.
2 minute read

AI company Anthropic launches Claude Sonnet 4.5, described as the company’s most advanced AI system to date and market-leading for programming. According to the company, the model performs better than competitors from Google and OpenAI.

Anthropic has released its new flagship model Claude Sonnet 4.5, which the company claims is the best on the market for coding. According to reports, the model outperforms both Google’s Gemini 2.5 Pro and OpenAI’s GPT-5 on several coding benchmarks, writes TechCrunch.

One of the most remarkable features is the model’s ability to work independently for extended periods. During early testing with enterprise customers, Claude Sonnet 4.5 has been observed coding autonomously for up to 30 hours. During these work sessions, the AI model has not only built applications but also set up database services, purchased domain names, and conducted security audits.

Focus on safety and reliability

Anthropic emphasizes that Claude Sonnet 4.5 is also their safest model to date, with enhanced protection against manipulation and barriers against harmful content. The company states that the model can create “production-ready” applications rather than just prototypes, representing a step forward in reliability.

The model is available via the Claude API and in the Claude chatbot. Pricing for developers is set at 3 dollars per million input tokens and 15 dollars per million output tokens.

Fast pace in the AI race

The launch comes less than two months after the company’s previous flagship model, Claude Opus 4.1. This rapid development pace illustrates, according to TechCrunch, how difficult it is for AI companies to maintain an advantage in the intense competition.

Anthropic’s models have become popular among developers, and major tech companies like Apple and Meta are reported to use Claude internally.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.