Monday, March 24, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Foreign investors becoming “nervous Nellies”: Carlyle Thayer on Vietnam’s deepening political turmoil

In an exclusive interview with TNT, Emeritus Professor Carlyle Thayer of The University of New South Wales discussed Vietnam's anti-corruption efforts, their effects on domestic politics, economy, foreign investment potential, and the nation's global image.

Published 1 May 2024
– By Sukanya Saha
Left: Former President Võ Văn Thưởng during a visit to Japan. Right: Current President Võ Thị Ánh Xuân at the Presidential Palace in Hanoi.

Vietnam’s previously stable one-party Communist regime has been known for its consistency. However, President Võ Văn Thưởng’s sudden resignation on March 20, merely a year into his tenure, making him the shortest-serving president in the nation’s Communist history, indicates a growing tumult in Hanoi’s political landscape.

For weeks, several experts had been forecasting his downfall. Now, Thưởng has joined the ranks as the second president to step down within the span of two years amid a sweeping anti-corruption campaign that has ousted numerous high-ranking politicians in the Southeast Asian country.

During an interview exclusively with The Nordic Times, Carlyle Thayer, Emeritus Professor of Politics at The University of New South Wales, discussed Vietnam’s anti-corruption drive, its impact on internal politics, economic outlook, the potential for foreign investment, and the country’s image on the global stage.

Foreign investors becoming ‘nervous Nellies’

Vietnam’s political instability coincides with a period of heightened foreign investment, fuelled by a global trend among manufacturers seeking to reduce reliance on China amid increasing tensions between Washington and Beijing. Investors are growing increasingly anxious as the anti-corruption campaign extends to private enterprises, causing delays and uncertainties in government approvals for projects and licenses. Officials are hesitant to grant approvals due to concerns about potential corruption investigations.

Deliberating on whether Vietnam’s political instability would concern its foreign investors, Thayer said, “Beijing’s economy is in the doldrums and Vietnam heavily relies on the Chinese market. Vietnam wants science and technology to be the driver.

“They want innovation, clean energy transition, protected supply chains, help the semiconductor industry, and more. They want to modernise. So, to do that, they are going to have to encourage investment and make decisions. They already have had at least 50 US businesses visit the largest US trade mission.

“But investors are understandably apprehensive about potential shifts in leadership. And the closer you get to a party congress, you see a slowdown in the process of decision-making and approvals. However, it will be up to Prime Minister Phạm Minh Chính and his cabinet to drive progress.

“Vietnam, being risk-averse, will avoid unnerving investors who might hastily withdraw their support. The last thing they want the investors to become is nervous Nellies and scare the horses. They need foreign investment, including from China. It is crucial for Vietnam’s economic stability and they are not trying to move to the West only.

“Therefore, Vietnam has a pragmatic approach that involves constant self-reflection to drive economic progress and maintain political stability. It recently expressed interest in establishing trade offices in five major Chinese cities and aims to collaborate with India, particularly in high-tech sectors.”

Impact on domestic politics

On March 20, the Vietnamese Communist Party acknowledged the resignation of President Võ Văn Thưởng, citing “shortcomings”, according to a government statement. The statement specified that Thưởng, who was widely perceived as having a close relationship with the General Secretary of the Communist Party, Nguyễn Phú, Vietnam’s most influential figure and the main architect of the anti-corruption drive, had breached party regulations, and these “shortcomings” had led to adverse public perceptions, tarnishing the reputation of both the party and the State, as well as his own personal standing.

Discussing how Thưởng’s sudden resignation could impact Vietnam’s domestic politics and its image on the global stage, the professor opined, “Well, Thưởng has resigned and there are 20 months left in his term of office, actually a bit more, till May of 2026. So, at the moment, Vietnam has appointed Vice President Võ Thị Ánh Xuân to replace him. But she is not a member of the so-called four pillars of the Vietnamese leadership and one has to be a permanent member of the political bureau.

“So, the Central Committee must decide who will fill the president’s term. Earlier, the party secretary general assumed the presidency after a president’s death but relinquished it upon the term’s end. But it’s unlikely the current Secretary General (Nguyễn Phú Trọng) will do the same due to age and health concerns.

“Therefore, they have two options: Appointing a caretaker or someone to serve the term without major shifts in foreign or economic policy. But despite the transition period, I expect Vietnamese politics to remain stable, with leadership changes every five years, with a significant turnover, organised by age groups and regional representation.

“Of course, navigating their internal procedures can be cumbersome. Moreover, regardless of their actions, the outgoing leadership will review candidates. But once we get this interim decision made, it’s a steady state.”

Selection of future leaders

Transitioning power is a complex task in any nation, and Vietnam is no different. Following the conclusion of the 13th Congress of the Communist Party of Vietnam, a new leadership team was selected to guide the country for the next five years. However, rather than rejuvenating national leadership to confront looming strategic, human security, and economic challenges, the party failed to deliver on its pledge for a generational change with several high-profile dismisses and prosecutions within the party.

Highlighting why there has been no significant change in the party’s internal dynamics, particularly regarding the selection of future leaders, Thayer explained, “With around 180 full voting members alongside alternatives, vacancies still exist within the central committee, primarily due to retirements. Vietnam systematically appoints people by age groups. It’s like an escalator. You have under 50, 50 to 60, 60 to 65.

“So, every five years, a new group, comprising provincial representatives, military, public security, and party officials, ascends to form the core of leadership, although gender representation remains low and there is only 10-14 per cent of women. Nevertheless, apart from occasional exceptions, structural composition, and sectoral representation ensure stability, as we have seen in regular party congresses since 1976. Therefore, the structural makeup and sectoral representation are ingrained, like DNA.”

He further suggested that Vietnam’s default stance leans heavily towards stability. Therefore, there are rarely any radical shifts, as the provinces, although under the same party umbrella, function independently. This setup provides a stabilising effect on the overall system. Since the reunification in 1976, party congresses have occurred regularly every five years.

“I’ve conducted analyses on turnover by age group and sector that show a remarkable level of stability. While there may be some fluctuations, the system’s foundation remains robust,” he added.

Who will be Thưởng’s successor?

The President’s role is largely ceremonial but ranks among the top four political positions in Vietnam. Recent shifts in leadership within the single-party system have all been associated with the extensive “blazing furnace” antigraft campaign, aimed at eradicating pervasive corruption but also suspected of being used for internal political struggles.

When former President Nguyễn Xuân Phúc resigned last year following allegations of “violations and wrongdoing” by officials under his jurisdiction, it took lawmakers a month and a half to appoint Thưởng as his successor. Therefore, the upcoming elections for a new president in Vietnam carry significant implications for the country’s political stability.

Underscoring the importance of the forthcoming elections in the Southeast Asian nation, the professor stated, “To host a head of state or government, you need a president who sits at the top political body, granting some authority but not independent policymaking power. The president essentially acts as the perfect salesman for what’s already been agreed collectively.

“Therefore, Vietnam must promptly fill this role to engage in meetings and summits in the region effectively as it significantly elevated its partnerships last year, aligning with the US, Japan, and Australia as comprehensive strategic partners, followed by South Korea the year before. This places them alongside China, Russia, and India, long-standing traditional allies and partners of Vietnam.”

Speaking of the Communist Party’s criteria for selecting Thưởng’s successor, Thayer said, “It will heavily influence Vietnam’s trajectory leading up to the 2026 National Congress. Typically, the Secretary General oversees the nomination process for a successor, by conducting straw polls to gauge support within the central committee. And now this process has been expedited due to Thưởng’s resignation, likely resulting in a smooth transition to the 14th Congress in early 2026.”

Is Vietnam losing its ‘China plus one’ tag?

Vietnam’s proactive approach in encouraging both Chinese and international companies to relocate operations to its territory and diversify their investments has played a significant role in its successful implementation of the “China plus one” strategy.

However, some experts feel that the government must now establish a clear and transparent legal framework to sustain its endeavours in combating corruption across both public and private domains. Otherwise, the lustre that the Southeast Asian nation has gained as being “China’s plus one” may fade away before long.

Mulling over the possibility of Vietnam losing its “China Plus One” status, Thayer remarked, “Well, the whole ‘China Plus One’ concept hinges on whether Donald Trump comes back after the November elections (in the US). It refers to businesses, both foreign and Chinese, moving some operations to Vietnam to avoid potential US sanctions or tariffs on Chinese goods. But it’s a tricky situation.

“But despite these challenges, I don’t think it could lose its ‘China plus one’ status. In fact, Vietnam’s status as a non-market economy could change soon, potentially leading to more favourable trade terms with the US.”

Sukanya Saha is a contributing editor at The Nordic Times. Based in New Delhi, she is an accomplished journalist who has previously worked with several major Indian media outlets such as NDTV, India Today, IANS, and Jagran English. Currently, she is associated with Hindustan Times. In 2022, she topped the BRICS International Journalism Programme from India. Committed to understanding the complex dynamics that shape our world, Sukanya's passions range from world politics to science and space exploration.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Would Israel take the world with it in its demise?

The escalation in the Middle East

The Israeli nuclear arsenal and the so-called "Samson option" have become increasingly discussed in the context of the escalating situation in the Middle East.

Published 18 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Will nuclear weapons be used as large-scale retaliation if Israel is threatened?

In 1986, Israel’s nuclear weapons program was revealed – although to this day the country’s authorities have refused to acknowledge that it possesses any weapons of mass destruction. Israel’s nuclear arsenal has even been called “the world’s worst-kept secret” and, with French help, began to be developed in great secrecy as early as the 1950s.

Israeli nuclear engineer Mordechai Vanunu was the one who exposed the program in the British press, before he was kidnapped by the Mossad intelligence service, brought back to Israel and spent the next 18 years in an Israeli prison. To this day, Vanunu is banned from leaving the country and has also been sentenced to several short prison terms for “forbidden speech” related to the nuclear weapons program.

It is difficult to say with certainty how many nuclear weapons Israel actually has. In 2008, former US President Jimmy Carter speculated that at the time there were at least 150 warheads “or more”.

Samson and the Philistines

Closely related to the Israeli nuclear doctrine is the so-called “Samson option” – which refers to Israel’s strategy of retaliation in the event of a major attack on its own country, or in a situation where the very existence of the nation is deemed to be under threat.

The name is taken from the biblical character Samson, who, blinded and captured by the Philistines, finally managed to tear apart the pillars of the temple in which he was held captive – whereupon the roof collapsed, killing not only him, but also thousands of the Philistines who had tormented him.

Samson destroys the Philistine temple. Painting: Giovanni Benedetto Castiglione.

The Samson option, according to many analysts, is something like this – that Israel would respond with large-scale nuclear attacks if its existence were threatened or if, for example, Jerusalem were bombed to pieces.

Threatening Nixon with nuclear weapons

As early as 1967, during the Six-Day War, Israel planned to detonate a nuclear device on a mountain in the Sinai Desert to warn the surrounding Arab states in the area. However, this never materialized, as Israel was able to defeat its opponents through conventional warfare.

During the Yom Kippur War in 1973, it was time again when the then Prime Minister Golda Meir chose to blackmail the US and President Nixon by preparing and threatening to use nuclear weapons against his enemies – unless the US immediately delivered war material and assistance of various kinds. Again, no nuclear bombs were detonated – according to analysts, simply because Nixon agreed to the demands.

Richard Nixon and Golda Meir. Montage. Photo: Willem van de Poll/Nationaal Archief/CC BY-SA 4.0

According to award-winning investigative journalist Seymour Hersh, during the 1970s, Israel considered the Soviet Union as the main threat, and a number of nuclear warheads were also aimed at Soviet cities – while the Soviets had several Israeli cities on their list of potential nuclear targets.

Hersh argues that the nuclear doctrine changed when right-wing leader Menachem Begin took power in 1977, and that an ambition emerged not only to acquire a large number of nuclear weapons to respond to a possible attack, but also with the aim to “use Israeli might to redraw the political map of the Middle East”.

“The power to destroy the world”

After all, the most commonly held view is that the purpose of the so-called Samson option is to destroy or annihilate states that attack Israel. However, others go further and argue that it is instead about “taking revenge on the world” and that Israel, if it perceives an existential threat, wants to cause as much damage and devastation as possible even to countries not directly involved in the attack against them. For example, Jewish professor David Perlmutter of Louisiana State University expressed such a view in the LA Times in 2002.

Israel has been building nuclear weapons for 30 years. The Jews understand what passive and powerless acceptance of doom has meant for them in the past, and they have ensured against it. Masada was not an example to follow – it hurt the Romans not a whit, but Samson in Gaza? What would serve the Jew-hating world better in repayment for thousands of years of massacres but a Nuclear Winter. Or invite all those tut-tutting European statesmen and peace activists to join us in the ovens?” wrote Perlmutter.

For the first time in history, a people facing extermination while the world either cackles or looks away – unlike the Armenians, Tibetans, World War II European Jews or Rwandans – have the power to destroy the world. The ultimate justice?” Perlmutter asked himself further.

“Destroying the pillars of the world”

Jewish writer and journalist Ron Rosenbaum also argues that Israel, in the “aftermath of a second Holocaust”, could not only attack its aggressors but also “bring down the pillars of the world (attack Moscow and European capitals for instance)” on the grounds that anti-Semitism associated with past persecutions in history must be avenged. Even “the holy places of Islam” could be attacked with nuclear weapons in such a situation, according to Rosenbaum, who emphasizes that “abandonment of proportionality is the essence” of the Samson option.

Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld takes a similar line. In the context of the second intifada, he said that Israel had “hundreds of nuclear weapons” – and that these could also be aimed at European capitals, which he said were in the line of fire of the Israeli military.

We possess several hundred atomic warheads and rockets and can launch them at targets in all directions, perhaps even at Rome. Most European capitals are targets for our air force. Let me quote General Moshe Dayan: ‘Israel must be like a mad dog, too dangerous to bother'”.

I consider it all hopeless at this point. We shall have to try to prevent things from coming to that, if at all possible. Our armed forces, however, are not the thirtieth strongest in the world, but rather the second or third. We have the capability to take the world down with us. And I can assure you that that will happen before Israel goes under”, Mr. van Creveld further declared.

Moshe Dayan (former Minister of Defense and Foreign Affairs) said that Israel must act “like a mad dog”. Photo: National Library of Israel/ CC BY 4.0

Jerusalem Post journalist Gil Ronen has also described the Samson option as a way for Israel to annihilate its enemies and “possibly causing irreparable damage to the entire world” in a situation where “Israel faces annihilation”.

Unwavering support from the West?

Since Israeli officials will not even acknowledge that they have nuclear weapons – or how many, it is of course impossible at this stage for the country’s leaders to be clear about their strategy with regard to them. Furthermore, it is of course unlikely that Israel – or any other country for that matter – would admit that it intends to “take the world with it if it falls” – even if that were the case. This is rarely the case, although Russian President Vladimir Putin, for example, admitted during Oliver Stone’s visit to Moscow that he believes a nuclear war between Russia and the United States “would probably have no winners”.

What the Samson option actually means in a “worst case scenario” will be the subject of further discussion – not least as the situation across the Middle East continues to become increasingly risky and escalatory, with Israel now attacking Iranian targets (and vice versa).

Western support for Israel seems unwavering – despite the tens of thousands of civilian deaths in Gaza and alerts from human rights organizations about violations of international law. Can this be explained by historical loyalty to Israel alone? Or is there possibly also a fear somewhere in the picture, a fear that, to quote Moshe Dayan, the country’s political leadership would actually act “like a mad dog” if left to its own devices?

Welcome back to Poor Sweden

The destruction of the European economy

We live in a system that is showing increasingly clear signs of bankruptcy, not only morally but also in practical economic terms.

Published 15 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The return of "Poor Sweden" is largely the result of decisions by those in power.

The little guy is struggling harder and harder to pay the rent, buy food and avoid getting into debt. Meanwhile, the political establishment in Stockholm and Brussels continues to throw money around like the boy with the gold pants.

Taxpayers’ money is being spent on huge projects that seem increasingly disconnected from reality, in the form of sums of money that are almost unfathomable. Recently, for example, the European Commission, headed by Ursula von der Leyen, announced that it wants to spend an additional €800 billion on the military in the proxy war against Russia. For some concrete reference, this is more than seven times the entire Swedish state budget. It is also stressed that “Europe is ready to massively increase its defense spending”.

On the editorial pages of the establishment media, the mood is mostly excited about the line that Europe is cutting back on welfare and spending the money on military rearmament instead. Part of the funding, von der Leyen explains, will come from even more loans (what else?). At home in Sweden, Swedes must be reminded that it is for freedom that this war is being waged, not for the benefit of big business or the military-industrial complex, no not at all. For what could be more democratically invaluable for Sweden and Europe than to lull the countries of Europe deeper into the safe embrace of Wall Street and buy weapons with the money?

The specifically Swedish contributions in the form of money and material being channelled out of the country to war-torn Ukraine, alongside the fact that we, like other EU countries, are bearing the brunt of Miss Ursula’s generous donations, have now surpassed the state budget’s item for pensions.

Against this backdrop, it is hardly surprising that alarms are sounding about the increasing number of families with children being evicted, single parents and pensioners not being able to afford to eat, and many people resorting to desperate measures such as text message loans or turning to the church and voluntary organizations to help them cope with everyday life.

Rent increases, electricity price shocks, soaring food costs and eroding wages are examples of economic phenomena that can all be directly linked to the policies being pursued. All in all, this has made it impossible for many people to live with dignity and has driven households into acute debt. Last spring, Swedes owed almost €11 billion to the Swedish Enforcement Authority – a 17% increase in just one year. For many young couples who want to start a family, a house, something that used to be a given, is now almost a naive utopia. It is a sign of the times that neoliberal think tanks such as Timbro want the government to open up for the construction of slum housing without kitchens or windows.

One idea that has characterized the Nordic countries for a long time has been that subsequent generations have generally had better material conditions than their parents and grandparents. However, it is difficult to interpret this development in any other way than to say that we are in fact living in a time when the Poor Sweden of the history books is now on its way back, and with a vengeance.

For this we can thank all those in power who have consistently shown that they prioritize opportunistic ideology and short-term self-interest over the long-term welfare of the people. “What the hell do I get for my money?”, as the industrialist Leif Östling put it, is a question that more and more Swedes are rightly asking themselves.

War, “climate” and covid

The price of the breakneck investments that those in power have embarked on just since the turn of the millennium, or even in the last five years, is difficult to grasp at all. It involves thousands upon thousands of citizens’ billions being pumped into projects where inputs and costs are distributed in many different ways and levels. Although they are often difficult to grasp in their complexity, it is not rocket science to establish where the money has gone, because they are very open about it.

Before 2022, the Ukraine debacle was widely regarded as one of Europe’s most failed and corrupt countries. Unsurprisingly, it is now correctly stated that a large part of the money sent to the country has “disappeared”, as well as that the military equipment sent is now in the hands of criminal networks in Latin America, among other places, and certainly also in Europe. In this context, the media does not, of course, remind us that the last three years of war have been a completely pointless enterprise in themselves and, especially against this background, were very close to ending with a peace agreement as early as March 2022 with largely unanimous diplomatic delegations from Ukraine and Russia after the talks in Istanbul. The fact that credible testimonies have stated that the agreement was sabotaged by the Western bloc, with UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson as the hitman, is an increasingly heavy burden to bear.

Meanwhile, the habit of the political coterie to spend money on national economic black holes precedes, and unfortunately will also follow, Ukraine. Among previous investments made, to the benefit of democracy, we must assume, is the mass immigration policy, which, according to estimates, has cost the Swedes at least €22.5 billion annually. Apart from sweeping humanitarian reasons, this has generally been justified above all by the need for a greater choice of new restaurants.

Tens of billions of euros are paid to the EU colossus in Brussels, which, in addition to war, has now developed its civic offer into new and innovative forms of totalitarianism, such as the Chat Control project. Mention should also be made, of course, of the billions that have been spent, and continue to be spent, on “climate initiatives” at EU level, such as giving strong drugs to dairy cows to try to stop them farting. The reason is that this is environmentally friendly, guaranteed healthy for the cows and certainly, by extension, good for the dairy products and the people who eat them.

The food supply is well on the way to being destroyed and it is now not only in the Netherlands that there are good reasons for farmers to revolt. In the name of climate policy, sanctions and the energy crisis, Swedish farms are being forced to close down on a regular basis, and how the situation for dairy farmers in Norrland is critical and that there will soon be no dairy farms left in the northern parts of the country.

The “compensation” that we are offered for this by those in power, alongside vague promises to avoid the end of the world, consists primarily of wind farms that are very poorly adapted to the actual needs of the economy. For some segments of the population, part of the compensation also consists of improved night’s sleep over the fact that the bad guy in the Kremlin cannot buy Swedish crispbread, at least not without importing it via transit countries, in other words, in much the same way as we buy Russian oil.

The lockdown policy during the coronavirus was not free either, or rather, it damaged the economy at its foundations. In retrospect, it is also clear that, as many critics pointed out at the time, it was largely irrelevant in epidemiological terms. If you also take into account public health aspects, mental and physical, the final bill for the covid policy is still very unclear – that is, alongside the installment plan for the pharmaceutical giants that Ursula von der Leyen imposed on the EU member states via her text message shopping with Pfizer boss Albert Bourla.

This, it should be added, is only a superficial look at a system that shows far more signs of turning its moral bankruptcy into an economic one.

A crisis of leadership

Sweden and many other European countries have historically experienced periods of extreme poverty – although no one alive today is old enough to remember this. There was a time when poverty was so widespread that almost a third of the population no longer saw a future in their home country and chose to flee famine and deprivation in search of a better life on the other side of the Atlantic.

There are, of course, significant differences between contemporary and 19th-century Sweden, but even the basic economic standards we take for granted can and do get taken away. All trends also indicate that we are at the beginning of a similar period of economic decline, but this time it is not due to agricultural failure, but to the failure of the ruling class.

There is, unfortunately, no easy or quick (realistic) solution to that problem – but nonetheless, it is of the utmost importance that a radical change takes place. The basic principle is simple and well known to anyone who can see beyond the fog of the mainstream media: as long as those in power do not have the will or the competence to serve the good of the citizens, the citizens will not benefit from the policies pursued.

The little people will pay for Ulf Kristersson’s poor decisions. Montage. Photo: Magnus Liljegren/Government Offices of Sweden, Monkeybusinessimages/iStock

Today’s Swedish and European establishments have long since shown beyond reasonable doubt that they are driven by motives other than serving the people of Sweden and Europe, regardless of whether their names are Ulf Kristersson, Magdalena Andersson or Ursula von der Leyen. Unfortunately, the same type of inept leaders can be found not only in politics, but also in other sectors of society such as big banks and mass media. Their spiritual poverty manifests itself in many ways, now also on an increasingly tangible economic level.

It would be quite possible to point to a long list of individual reforms that could change the economic situation, but that is secondary in a situation where what is really needed is a profound systemic change. What is needed is a political leadership that fulfills its real responsibility and function to serve citizens rather than superficial mass media narratives and ultra-globalist interest groups.

It does not have to be this way. Of course, if and when the will is there, it will be perfectly possible to prioritize the same money in areas and projects that genuinely benefit the national interest and development. The example of El Salvador, previously highlighted on TNT Analysis, is of particular relevance in this context because it shows that a political change of this magnitude is not only possible, but can also happen very quickly, especially in a small country like Sweden.

A Solution for Gaza and Palestine in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative

The situation in Gaza

Based on the concept of "peace through development", where there is no peace without development and no development without peace, and where the two issues must go in parallel, Hussein Askary writes in a guest analysis.

Published 28 February 2025
Schematic description of the Oasis Plan with water (blue) and transportation project (red). To the right: infrastructure map - West Asia connectivity plan.

The absurd statements made by U.S. President Donald Trump on relocating the Palestinians from Gaza, followed by the insults directed by Benjamin Netanyahu to some important Arab countries, have opened a window of opportunity for the Arab countries and the Global South to put forward an alternative plan that is realistic, humanitarian, and compatible with international law to save the Palestinian people in Gaza and the West Bank, resolve the Palestinian issue, and establish peace and development in the West Asian region (erroneously called the Middle East).

But this requires guarantees and cooperation from international powers, most importantly the US Administration, but not alone. China, Russia, the BRICS countries, that were joined this year by Egypt, the UAE, Iran and Ethiopia (and potentially Indonesia), and many other countries in the Global South have risen economically, militarily and politically today.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently recognized that the era of unipolarity is over and has been replaced by an era of multipolarity. This historical fact must be exploited by Arab countries, not to play the East against the East, but to build bridges through Arab countries between them.

First, it is imperative to uphold the two-state solution and the right of the Palestinian people to establish their own state with East Jerusalem as its capital on Palestinian lands in accordance with UN Resolution 242 of 1967 and the Arab Peace Initiative of 2002. However, for this state to be sustainable, there must be an economic policy for reconstruction and development and to compensate the Palestinian people and their younger generations for the tragedies and horrors they have faced so far.

The gates of humanitarian relief must be opened immediately to prevent hundreds of thousands of Palestinians in Gaza from dying of hunger, immunodeficiency and infectious diseases due to water contamination and lack of sanitation and health care.

Perhaps this is what the extremist Israeli government is counting on to drive the Palestinian people out of Gaza voluntarily. We must remember what happened in Iraq after Desert Storm in 1991, where nearly one million Iraqis, half of them children, were killed not by Anglo-American bombing, but by the consequences of the destruction of basic infrastructure and the economic blockade that led to malnutrition and the spread of diseases.

Planen för återuppbyggnad av oasen Gaza
Schematic description of the Oasis Plan with water (blue) and transportation project (red).

The Oasis Plan

As for the long-term plan, we are pleased with the statements made by the Egyptian government that there are two plans that will be discussed with the Arab countries before the upcoming summit at the end of this month.

While we do not know the details of these plans, we would like to put forward a set of ideas within what we call the “Oasis Plan”, an idea launched by the late American economist Lyndon LaRouche in the 1970s and based on the concept of “peace through development”, where there is no peace without development and no development without peace, and where the two issues must go in parallel.

This is what did not happen in the Oslo Agreement, as the economic decisions in Annexes III and IV were neglected, albeit insufficient, and the focus was on political solutions only. This is what prompted LaRouche to predict the failure of the Oslo Accord and to warn of the role of the Israeli extreme right and its supporters from the Christian Zionist movements in the United States and Britain in destroying any foundations for peace and assassinating and imprisoning its advocates on both sides.

The Oasis Plan is to address the issues of water shortage and desertification in the region, the lack of modern basic infrastructure for development, and the lack of agricultural and industrial capabilities despite the existence of natural resources, geographical location, financial and human resources in the region but are unevenly distributed.

The plan sees the issue of reconstruction in Gaza, Palestine, and the entire region (especially Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen) in a larger context. It is not possible to find solutions to local issues whose causes are global.

The plan in its new form developed by this author and his colleagues at the Schiller Institute in the last two years evolves in the context of the Belt and Road Initiative or the New Silk Road and the connectivity of West Asia’s infrastructure and its utilization as a bridge between Asia, Europe and Africa on the one hand and the Indian Ocean and the Mediterranean on the other.

This is done by building development corridors throughout the region consisting mainly of transportation lines such as railways, highways, water, electric power, oil and gas pipelines, and building new agricultural and industrial zones and cities on both sides of these development corridors, which will extend to Palestine (from Jordan to the West Bank, to Gaza, to the Mediterranean Sea, and from there to Egypt).

 

Infrastrukturkarta: Anslutningsplan för Västasien
Infrastructure map: West Asia connectivity plan.

Water and agriculture

The plan first aims to solve the issue of water shortage, underdeveloped agriculture and desertification. The amount of water naturally available in this part of the region, especially the Golan Hights, South Lebanon, and the West Bank, most of which is appropriated by Israel, cannot be relied upon, even if it were hypothetically divided fairly. There is a need throughout the region to increase the amount of water available exponentially, and this can only be done through seawater desalination.

There are two major projects for desalination:

First: Building two canals to the Dead Sea, one from the Red Sea and the other from the Mediterranean. The purpose of these two canals is not for maritime transportation, as is rumored, and they can be replaced by large diameter pipes. Rather, their purpose is to take advantage of the huge difference in elevation between the Red and Mediterranean Seas on the one hand and the Dead Sea on the other. The Dead Sea is four hundred meters below sea level. The rapid flow of water in the two channels sloping towards the Dead Sea can be used to generate energy for desalination and other uses.

Second: In the future, nuclear plants with small modular reactors could be built to desalinate water and produce electricity. Similar plants powered by either natural gas or nuclear power should be built in the future on the Mediterranean coast and along the Suez Canal as well.

Agriculture must be significantly developed, using modern irrigation and seed development techniques in the Palestinian territories and in neighboring Arab countries to achieve food security and economic, political, and stability because a large part of the Arab countries’ resources are wasted on importing foodstuffs.

Social and political shocks occur in Arab countries whenever there is a global crisis that leads to a rise in food prices, as happened in 2008 and 2009 and after the outbreak of the Ukraine war in 2022. Therefore, the cultivation and afforestation of dry and desert areas must be expanded throughout the Arab region.

Industries

Lyndon LaRouche proposed at an international conference on oil and gas in global politics in Abu Dhabi in May 2002 that oil-producing countries should build nuclear power plants both for water desalination and also to use their oil and gas resources for petrochemical, chemical and other industries that increase the added value of crude oil and gas exponentially.

A few years later, the UAE launched its own peaceful nuclear program and completed the construction of four large-scale nuclear reactors in cooperation with South Korea last year. Egypt is currently building the Dabaa nuclear plant in cooperation with Russia.

China’s industrial and technological progress has also enabled it to localize some advanced industries in Arab countries such as Saudi Arabia, Oman, the United Arab Emirates, and Egypt. All Arab countries should build industrial parks and special economic zones, in addition to establishing industries in Gaza and the West Bank, taking advantage of their geographical location, availability of raw materials and labor, and proximity to markets.

The construction of a world-class port in Gaza, an airport, and rail and metro line should be implemented. The tunnel systems that were used for war fighting can be replaced by a metro system in time of peace.

Financing

We cannot rely solely on foreign aid to sustain the economic situation of the Palestinian people and their future state. The Oasis Plan includes the establishment of an Arab or regional development bank modeled after the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) with a capital of $100 billion.

The Arab countries should collectively establish such a bank. Its purpose would be not only to issue low-interest, long-term credits to finance basic infrastructure projects throughout the region, especially in Jordan, Palestine, Lebanon and Syria, but also to provide financial leverage for national development banks to be established, such as the Palestinian Development Bank (which was envisioned in the Oslo Accords but has not been established).

National banks would be able to finance local projects for housing, agriculture and industry. This would save poor Arab countries and the Palestinian people from relying on foreign aid with strings attached including political concessions.

Funding could in addition be obtained from the AIIB and through bilateral “oil-for-construction” and “oil-for-technology” agreements, where a small portion of the region’s oil and gas exports (5% to 10%) could be used to finance the proposed Arab Development Bank and to obtain bilateral credits from oil and gas importing countries such as China, Japan, Korea, India, and European countries and utilize these credits in infrastructure, industry, and agriculture projects. We have explained this in detail in a previous article.

How can Gaza be rebuilt without relocating its population?

There are many simple solutions, but they need good organization and joint funding. For example, Asian countries, including China, have the capacity to manufacture small prefabricated mobile houses the size of a typical shipping container cheaply and quickly.

The Palestinian people in Gaza cannot continue to live in tents without experiencing all sorts of health, psychological and social issues. Communal sanitation facilities could be built around clusters of such housing along Gaza’s coastline, supplied with water, electricity and sewage treatment via floating power and desalination plants that are available in many parts of the world or can be built quickly. Likewise, field hospitals and schools must be built.

The Oasis Plan is a plan that, although it is regionally comprehensive and needs global consensus, is capable of finding solutions to even local and national issues. Its details can be expanded upon in collaboration with local planners and engineers to adapt it to the local situation of each region and country.

Our purpose in proposing the Oasis Plan is not to design precise policies for each country, but to develop a general but scientific and conceptual framework that reflects the economic, technical and political developments in today’s new world.

 

Hussein Askary
Vice-Chairman of the Belt and Road Institute in Sweden

The men’s movement that wants to live without women

Cultural revolution in the West

The MGTOW movement is described as a backlash and a male mirror image of the feminist movement. However, its "masculinism" is in practice as destructive to men as feminism has been to women.

Published 23 February 2025
– By Editorial Staff

We live in a time characterized by what can almost be described as a gender war that has broken out of the Marxist cultural struggle and postmodernist confusion about gender roles. The MGTOW (Men Going Their Own Way) movement is strongly linked to this social development and has emerged in recent decades as a kind of reactionary counterpoint to the feminist movement.

Advocating that men should “go their own way” – away from romantic relationships and societal expectations – MGTOW is in many ways a complex mirror image of feminism and a form of protest movement against a society where more and more men feel marginalized, discriminated against and outright unwanted.

MGTOW has its roots in so-called men’s rights groups and anti-feminist forums from the early 2000s, where criticism grew against family law systems, the #MeToo movement and what is generally referred to as “toxic feminism”. Central to this is a perception that society is increasingly demonizing men and masculinity in general, which is linked to the feminist analysis of “patriarchy” as a main cause of structural oppression.

Supporters of the movement point out that men are currently being punished for historical and collective sins, and that this has created a culture where men’s voices and needs are trivialized. In response, they advocate “opting out” – living in voluntary celibacy, avoiding marriage and sometimes even avoiding social relationships with women altogether.

The movement’s ideas have since spread from internet forums into popular culture via YouTube channels and social media. Key “vanguard” figures known by names such as Barbarossaa, Sandman and Turd Flinging Monkey have popularized MGTOW’s message by mixing humour, provocation and analysis of social issues. The rhetoric overlaps to some extent with other social critique movements, for example with metaphors such as the “red pill” – a reference to the movie The Matrix that symbolizes the awakening to what is perceived as a hard truth about a sick society, in MGTOW’s case with particular reference to the impact of feminism and the role of women in modern society.

The four stages: a path to total separation

MGTOW often describes its philosophy as a progression through four stages, with each stage involving deeper and deeper separation from society and from women:

1. Situational awareness

This initial stage is described as men beginning to question their relationships with women and also with society at large. This is described as being associated with a perception of being exploited, often with reference to marriages and legal systems that they consider to be unequal. Men at this stage still believe in the value of marriage but at the same time have started to “realize” that they are being manipulated by women.

2. Rejection of long-term relationships

In the second stage, men reject long-term relationships, cohabitation and marriage. They see these institutions as traps that limit their freedom and expose them to great financial and emotional risks. However, short-term relationships and sexual encounters are still accepted because they do not involve the same degree of commitment.

3. Rejection of short-term relationships

In the third stage, as MGTOW adherents often see it, men reduce their interactions with women to a minimum. They avoid not only romantic relationships but also friendly or even professional relationships with women. This stage is characterized by a strong suspicion and a belief that women, regardless of the context, pose a threat to their freedom and well-being.

4. “Going Ghost”

The final stage, called “going ghost”, involves a complete separation from modern society. Men in this stage try to minimize their involvement in “everyday society” and often resign from their jobs. They strive to live as individually as possible, often by moving to remote locations or living as anonymously as they can.

Marriage becomes a “legal threat”

MGTOW is often highlighted by its members as a counterweight to what they see as a one-sided feminist narrative in mainstream social debate. Feminist theory often highlights “patriarchy” as a systemic cause of all sorts of injustices – from gender-based violence to pay gaps and power imbalances – an analysis that MGTOW supporters dismiss as inaccurate and misogynistic.

Feminism has gone from fighting for gender equality to scapegoating men for all of society’s problems”, writes one anonymous MGTOW member in a forum. Other supporters say the movement offers “brotherhood” and male “solidarity” – something that is perceived to be in short supply in modern society.

One of the primary reasons why MGTOW is good for men is that it provides a way for them to maintain their independence and freedom. In today’s society, men are often expected to provide for their partners, both financially and emotionally. This can be a significant source of stress and anxiety for many men, leading to feelings of resentment and frustration. By choosing to go their own way, men can focus on their own needs and desires, rather than trying to meet the expectations of others”, argues one supporter.

Critics of the movement, such as Canadian psychologist Jordan Peterson, argue, among other things, that despite pointing to real problems, such as men’s loneliness or unfair custody disputes, it fails to offer constructive solutions. Instead of addressing issues that need to be resolved or promoting understanding and cooperation between the sexes, the movement romanticizes a life of suspicion, isolation and gender-based segregation.

Viewing women as a collective enemy or a “legal threat” (a common MGTOW term for marriage) naturally risks reinforcing polarization rather than healing it. Others note that withdrawing from the community is an act of powerlessness rather than empowerment and self-determination, and that many of the members seem to be mostly resentful and have difficulty processing wrongs they have suffered in previous relationships.

Who benefits from the split?

Jordan Peterson has drawn attention to the MGTOW movement on several occasions, commenting that he understands some of the factors behind its origins, but has also noted the destructive impact it has, particularly on younger men.

A central question regarding the criticism of MGTOW is also who actually benefits from this division, since neither men nor women actually benefit from seeing each other as enemies or competitors. Creating an “us versus them” mentality undermines the conditions for healthy relationships and cooperation, while those who instead want to divide the people benefit – whether it is oligarchs and politically driven actors or algorithm-driven social media that benefit from the conflict.

There is an understandable notion that creating lasting relationships and families has never been as difficult as it is today, not only because society is based on both parties preferably having some kind of career, which in practice of course makes family formation more difficult – but also because the view of what a relationship actually means has changed radically. The liberal view of relationships has been highlighted in the public debate as something that can promote “freedom”, individualism and self-fulfillment – but at the societal level, it is also apparently a strong contributing factor to the fact that half of all marriages today end in divorce, that Swedes are the loneliest people in the world – and to an alarmingly low birth rate. Who would dare to start a family with someone if both men and women feel that they can be replaced or exploited at any time for almost any reason? Who really dares to invest when everything feels so uncertain?

Breaking up a relationship as soon as any form of dissatisfaction or conflict arises is often seen as as reasonable a solution as throwing away a malfunctioning product. What is the point of trying to repair something when you can just get a new one?

This ultra-individualistic reality is also something that is often discussed in MGTOW circles, in both positive and negative terms. While many members feel scared, betrayed and deceived by women who have rejected them, they themselves often emphasize the importance of being “free” and “independent” and focusing on themselves rather than on anyone else.

As Peterson also points out, MGTOW is in many ways an unfortunate symptom of a time of great, and in some cases legitimate, discontent or fear among many men – in many cases outright despair. However, the movement’s response – to collectively reject women and turn its back on society – is to throw the baby out with the bathwater, inevitably consigning men to a damaging existence of isolation and growing resentment.

Critics of both extreme misogynist men’s movements and anti-male feminist ideologies note that the solution is not to run away from each other or to live in various shades of destructive enmity. The solution is for both men and women to take responsibility for seeking a better understanding of our natural differences and in this way respect and affirm them, focusing on building healthy relationships and complementing each other in small and large ways.

Social engineering, including destructive ideology, can disrupt the natural state of normality that both the individual and society thrive on. Historical evidence suggests that togetherness has been the established norm among the peoples of Europe since prehistoric times, and that it is itself the foundation of Western civilization as we know it.

Perhaps we can simply allow ourselves to assume that nature and providence have created us in two sexes for good reason.

Share via

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.

Send this to a friend