Tuesday, July 1, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

European Commission: Ukraine soon ready for membership negotiations

Published 3 November 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Volodymyr Zelensky and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen.
2 minute read

Recently, the European Commission presented a progress report on the ten countries that had previously expressed interest in joining the European Union.

If Ukraine meets all the conditions, the Commission wants to start membership negotiations “as soon as possible in 2025″.

It notes that Montenegro is the country that has made the most progress in the negotiations – while negotiations with Turkey have stalled and countries such as Georgia are considered to have moved in a more anti-EU direction and are now further away from EU membership than they have been for a long time.

As for Ukraine, the Commission wants membership negotiations to start early next year – but for the process to move forward, Kiev will have to meet a series of EU requirements and conditions, to demonstrate that it is “ready” to be granted membership of the Union.

The opening of accession negotiations with Ukraine has been an important recognition of Ukraine’s determination to pursue reforms on the path of EU accession. Following the first intergovernmental conference in June 2024, the analytical examination of the acquis (the screening) is progressing smoothly”, it states.

Kosovo must “strengthen the rule of law”

Subject to Ukraine meeting all the conditions, the Commission is looking forward to the opening of negotiations on clusters, starting with the fundamentals, as soon as possible in 2025“, the statement said, adding that it also hopes to start negotiations with Moldova early next year.

The Commission also states that several countries have much to do before membership can be considered. For example, it points out that Kosovo “needs to intensify its efforts to strengthen the rule of law and public administration and to protect freedom of expression“.

The 10 countries that have expressed varying degrees of interest in joining the EU are Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, Georgia, Moldova, Ukraine and Turkey.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Wave of anti-government protests in Serbia – accused of inciting civil war

Published today 10:22
– By Editorial Staff
Clashes between police and protesters have occurred in multiple locations, with the Serbian government accusing foreign interests of escalating the situation.
3 minute read

Anti-government protests in Serbia have intensified after demonstrators erected barricades in Belgrade and Novi Sad over the weekend. The unrest stems from a deadly accident last year, but tensions have now escalated with accusations of attempts to start a civil war and claims of foreign interference.

Sunday’s barricades followed a mass meeting where demands for new elections were presented. The student group Blokada FON simultaneously published a map of roadblocks in the capital and urged opposition members to boycott parliament.

The protest movement emerged after a concrete roof collapsed at the newly renovated railway station in Novi Sad in November 2024. The accident killed 16 people, sparking strong criticism from anti-government activists who describe it as evidence of corruption and government mismanagement.

The night before, clashes had already occurred between protesters and police in Belgrade. Police responded with pepper spray and riot gear while demonstrators threw eggs, bottles, and other objects near a park where government supporters were holding a vigil.

Serbian Interior Minister Ivica Dacic called for calm and warned against further confrontations.

– Maintain peace and do not provoke conflicts with the police, he said.

 

“A monstrous call for civil war”

Meanwhile, Dacic reported that eight people had been arrested on suspicion of planning attacks on state institutions from university areas. A total of 77 people have been detained in connection with the unrest, and at least six police officers and two civilians were injured, according to Dacic, who labeled several of those arrested as “hooligans”.

Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic has dismissed demands for his resignation and elections, describing the protesters as foreign-funded and orchestrated.

“Serbia has won. You cannot defeat Serbia with violence”, he told reporters on Sunday, and wrote on social media that “Serbia always wins in the end”.

The Speaker of the Serbian Parliament, Ana Brnabic, accused the protesters of wanting to start a civil war.

“They didn’t end their gathering by shouting ‘Long live Serbia’. They ended it with a chilling call to murder Serbia – a monstrous and open call for civil war“, she wrote on X.

The statement followed a protest held on the symbolically charged holiday of Vidovdan, which commemorates the 1389 Battle of Kosovo Field. Brnabic also published a video where a protest leader urges participants to “take freedom into your own hands”. In a separate post, she accused Croatia of supporting the unrest and attempting to overthrow President Vucic.

95 percent of Hungarians reject Ukraine’s EU membership

Published yesterday 12:58
– By Editorial Staff
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán claims that Hungary has now "blocked" Ukraine's accession to the European Union.
2 minute read

Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orbán announced late last week that the country opposes Ukraine’s application for European Union membership. The announcement follows a consultative referendum where 95 percent of Hungarian voters voted against Ukrainian EU membership.

– I will say today, in the voice of more than two million Hungarians, that Hungary does not support Ukraine’s accession to the EU. These are the bare facts, Orbán stated before the EU foreign ministers’ meeting in Brussels.

The referendum, called Voks 2025, ran from mid-April to June 20. Voters were asked a single question: “Do you support Ukraine’s membership in the European Union?”

According to Orbán, 2,168,431 Hungarians voted no (95 percent of voters) while only five percent voted yes.

Orbán also emphasized that Hungary’s rejection cannot be ignored, as EU rules require unanimous approval from all 27 member states for a country to begin membership negotiations.

– A unanimous decision is needed even to launch negotiations on the matter. We don’t have it, therefore they should not happen. Nothing can happen today that has a legal effect on the matter of Ukraine’s EU membership… because Hungary does not support it, he stressed.

“2.2 million standing in the way”

Ukraine made EU membership a national goal in 2019 and submitted its formal application in 2022, shortly after the war with Russia intensified. The country was granted candidate status in June of the same year, and the EU has mentioned 2030 as a possible entry year.

However, support for Ukraine’s membership has decreased in several EU countries. A recent opinion poll in Poland shows that support has dropped from 85 to 35 percent since 2022.

Orbán accuses EU leaders of trying to bypass Hungary to push forward Ukraine’s application:

– They have not been able to do that so far, even though I was standing alone in their way, like the famous lone Chinese protester in front of the Chinese tanks in Tiananmen Square in the old video, but now there were 2.2 million of us standing in their way, saying that this is not the way forward.

Enormous cost for the EU

According to Orbán, Ukrainian membership risks drawing the EU into an “endless war” and imposing the responsibility of financing Ukraine’s defense on EU taxpayers.

– With over two million votes in the 2025 referendum, we stopped Ukraine’s accession to the European Union, the Prime Minister further declared.

His advisor, Balázs Orbán, has previously estimated that full membership for Ukraine would cost the EU approximately 2,500 billion euros, which is more than twelve times larger than the union’s current budget.

Crisis for von der Leyen – no-confidence vote expected

Published 26 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Ursula von der Leyen (archive photo).
2 minute read

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen now faces a potential no-confidence vote following the so-called “Pfizergate” scandal.

The initiative comes from right-wing members of the European Parliament but has also gained support from certain social democratic and liberal party groups, who criticize the lack of transparency in the Commission’s work.

The background is a court decision from May this year, where the European Court of Justice ruled that the Commission wrongfully refused to release text messages between von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla regarding vaccine procurement during the COVID-19 pandemic.

These contracts were totally unprecedented in a totally unprecedented context, said an EU official before the ruling.

The court found that the Commission’s claim that the messages had “disappeared” was not sufficiently substantiated, which violates EU administrative statutes on transparency and oversight.

The no-confidence motion was initiated by Romanian MEP Gheorghe Piperea, who has secured over 72 signatures – enough to force a vote in parliament.

Two-thirds majority required

Dismissing the entire Commission requires a two-thirds majority, which is currently considered unlikely. Despite this, the no-confidence vote is expected to create political repercussions.

Von der Leyen may, for instance, be forced to make concessions to Parliament in light of the situation. Particularly regarding issues of transparency, document management, and openness in decision-making.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla. Montage: TNT-Manuel Lopez/Pascal Bitz/CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

The scandal has also highlighted a broader debate about how EU leadership handles documentation and accountability. Many argue that digital communications – such as text messages and chat messages – must be included in public records when concerning decisions of major public interest.

The vote on the no-confidence motion is preliminarily planned for the coming months. No official date has been set yet, but expectations are that the vote will take place shortly after sufficient members have backed the initiative.

According to current EU legal procedures, the European Commission normally has two months to appeal the European Court of Justice’s decision from when the ruling was issued. This gives the Commission an opportunity to formally challenge the court’s assessment before any further actions are taken.

Even if Ursula von der Leyen survives the vote, it will likely leave lingering concerns about the Commission’s transparency and her ability to pursue her policies without internal resistance.

What does a motion of no confidence against the European Commission mean?

  • A motion of no confidence is directed at the entire European Commission, not just the President.
  • If the European Parliament approves the motion, the entire Commission must resign collectively.
  • To dismiss the Commission, a two-thirds majority of Members of the European Parliament is required.
  • A motion of no confidence is rare and is considered a serious political expression of lack of confidence.
  • Even if a motion of no confidence does not lead to resignation, it can weaken the Commission's leadership and force political concessions, particularly on issues of transparency and accountability.

German police raids target 170 suspected thought criminals

The threat to freedom of speech

Published 26 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
10,732 hate-related cybercrimes were registered during 2024 - a 34 percent increase compared to 2023 and almost a fourfold increase since 2021.
2 minute read

Early morning on June 25, German police conducted over 170 house searches in a coordinated operation targeting individuals suspected of insulting government officials or expressing political views that violate current legislation.

The operation was led by the Federal Criminal Police Office (Bundeskriminalamt) and marked the twelfth national operation against so-called politically motivated crimes of this nature.

The operation primarily targeted individuals who had published nationalist and immigration-critical content, but also individuals with links to alleged religious extremism and left-wing extremist movements.

According to reports, two-thirds of the suspects had made “far-right” statements. Several are also being investigated for violations of a paragraph in the German Criminal Code that prohibits insults against politicians – a law that has been increasingly applied in recent years.

Particularly politicians from The Green Party have, according to media reports, chosen to pursue legal action against individuals who have insulted them. The current legislation has resulted in fines for people who have called politicians “idiots” or published derogatory images.

“Digital arsonists”

The raids began at six o’clock in the morning, during which a large number of computers, mobile phones, and tablets were seized.

– Digital arsonists must not be able to hide behind their cell phones or computers, declared Herbert Reul (CDU), Interior Minister of North Rhine-Westphalia, in a comment.

– Many people have forgotten the difference between hatred and opinion, but it’s so simple: If you don’t do it in the real world, it’s not appropriate to do it digitally. It’s time for more attitude, offline and online.

According to Germany’s Federal Police, a total of 10,732 crimes related to so-called hate posts online were registered during 2024 – an increase of about 34 percent compared to the previous year. Compared to 2021, the number has almost quadrupled.

Harsh criticism

German legislation regarding alleged hate propaganda and insults has long been subject to international criticism, and high-ranking U.S. politicians have repeatedly expressed concern about how these laws affect freedom of expression. U.S. Vice President JD Vance has called them stifling and claimed they limit the possibility of free opinion formation.

At the Munich Security Conference earlier this year, Vance suggested that U.S. support for NATO could be affected by how Germany handles freedom of speech issues.

– Insulting someone is not a crime, and criminalizing speech is going to put real strain on European-US relationships. This is Orwellian, and everyone in Europe and the US must reject this lunacy, he urged on another occasion when German repression against dissidents came to light.

German politicians have defended their legal practice, claiming that the legislation aims to counter harmful rhetoric while maintaining a balance between freedom of expression and protection against hate crimes.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.