Sunday, August 24, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Privacy is about choice

Mass surveillance

Not about living like a hermit.

Published 23 October 2024
– By Naomi Brockwell
3 minute read

In today’s digital world, the concepts of privacy and anonymity are often used interchangeably, but they’re not the same thing. Privacy is about having control over your personal information – choosing what you share and with whom. Anonymity, on the other hand, is about completely concealing your identity. While both have their place, many people shy away from even basic privacy practices because they believe they can’t achieve full anonymity. But that’s a common misconception.

Not everyone needs to be anonymous, nor does everyone’s threat model demand it. The reality is, reclaiming your privacy isn’t about disappearing from the world or living in isolation. It’s about having the right to decide who has access to your data and how much you want to protect. But in the modern age, we’ve lost much of that control. We’re often coerced into signing away our data rights through lengthy terms of service agreements that give companies and governments permission to do what they want with our information.

The good news is that we do have a choice. Today, there are platforms that won’t demand you sign 60-pages of legalese, or even collect your data in the first place. A decade ago, privacy-focused companies barely existed, and those that did offered subpar solutions. But today, we have amazing alternatives that truly protect your privacy. It’s just a matter of learning about them and reminding ourselves that we still hold the power to choose.

Why privacy matters even if you’re not anonymous

For many people, the idea of online privacy seems overwhelming because it feels like an all-or-nothing game. If you can’t be 100% anonymous, why even try? But privacy isn’t about disappearing – it’s about minimizing risk and gaining more control over your personal information. Sometimes, we might choose to give certain companies our data because their services genuinely help us, and they need access to certain information to do that. That’s a perfectly valid choice. Privacy is not about never sharing information; it’s about thinking carefully about what data we want to share, with whom, and being allowed to make that decision.

The current norm is to throw our hands up in the air, feeling powerless in this data free-for-all we’ve found ourselves in. We’ve become desensitized to pervasive data collection in almost everything we do. Privacy is about shifting back to a norm where we realize we don’t have to give everyone our data. We can opt into some services, opt out of others, and choose companies that respect their usersrather than those that monetize our most sensitive information and hide it behind vague privacy policies.

You don’t have to go to extreme lengths to make a difference. Whether you’re reducing data collection on social media, switching to more secure messaging apps, or avoiding unnecessary location tracking, every step you take toward privacy empowers you and helps you reassert control over your digital life. Each action is another way to regain control over the information you share and the freedom to decide how your data is used.

A good analogy is locking your doors at night. It won’t stop the most determined intruders, but it deters most threats and gives you peace of mind. Similarly, small actions like using encrypted email or blocking trackers can shield you from everyday digital threats, even if complete anonymity isn’t your goal.

The privacy spectrum where do you fall?

Not everyone’s privacy needs are the same. Some people may want to go fully anonymous, avoiding any traceable digital footprint, while others may just want to make sure they aren’t oversharing personal details on social media. And that’s perfectly fine! The goal is not to push everyone toward total anonymity but to help you find the level of privacy that fits your life.

At NBTV, we recognize that privacy is personal, and there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. We give people the tools to protect themselves, whether they’re looking for something as simple as secure email or more advanced solutions like de-Googling their phone. If you’re extreme and want anonymity, we explain that it can be possible. If you’re just starting to care about privacy, we guide you through easy, impactful steps.

 

Yours in privacy,
Naomi Brockwell

Naomi Brockwell is a privacy advocacy and professional speaker, MC, interviewer, producer, podcaster, specialising in blockchain, cryptocurrency and economics. She runs the NBTV channel on Rumble.

Key takeaways

  • Privacy vs. Anonymity: Privacy is about control, while anonymity is about concealment. You can increase your privacy, and hence the control you have over your digital life, without becoming anonymous.
  • Every Step Counts: You don’t need to achieve full anonymity to make meaningful improvements to your privacy. Even small changes can make a difference.
  • You Have a Choice: In today’s world, we’ve been conditioned to sign away our data, but there are platforms that respect your privacy and don't require you to sacrifice control. These platforms exist, and they're better than ever.
  • Privacy Spectrum: Whether you’re seeking complete anonymity or just looking to protect basic personal information, there’s a level of privacy that fits your needs.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Wifi signals can identify people with 95 percent accuracy

Mass surveillance

Published 21 August 2025
– By Editorial Staff
2 minute read

Italian researchers have developed a technique that can track and identify individuals by analyzing how wifi signals reflect off human bodies. The method works even when people change clothes and can be used for surveillance.

Researchers at La Sapienza University in Rome have developed a new method for identifying and tracking people using wifi signals. The technique, which the researchers call “WhoFi”, can recognize people with an accuracy rate of up to 95 percent, reports Sweclockers.

The method is based on the fact that wifi signals reflect and refract in different ways when they hit human bodies. By analyzing these reflection patterns using machine learning and artificial neural networks, researchers can create unique “fingerprints” for each individual.

Works despite clothing changes

Experiments show that these digital fingerprints are stable enough to identify people even when they change clothes or carry backpacks. The average recognition rate is 88 percent, which researchers say is comparable to other automatic identification methods.

The research results were published in mid-July and describe how the technology could be used in surveillance contexts. According to the researchers, WhoFi can solve the problem of re-identifying people who were first observed via a surveillance camera in one location and then need to be found in footage from cameras in other locations.

Can be used for surveillance

The technology opens up new possibilities in security surveillance, but simultaneously raises questions about privacy and personal security. The fact that wifi networks, which are ubiquitous in today’s society, can be used to track people without their knowledge represents a new dimension of digital surveillance.

The researchers present their discovery as a breakthrough in the field of automatic person identification, but do not address the ethical implications that the technology may have for individuals’ privacy.

Facebook’s insidious surveillance: VPN app spied on users

Mass surveillance

Published 9 August 2025
– By Editorial Staff
2 minute read

In 2013, Facebook acquired the Israeli company Onavo for approximately 120 million dollars. Onavo was marketed as a VPN app that would protect users’ data, reduce mobile usage, and secure online activities. Over 33 million people downloaded the app believing it would strengthen their privacy.

In reality, Onavo gave Facebook complete insight into users’ phones – including which apps were used, how long they were open, and which websites were visited.

According to court documents and regulatory authorities, Facebook used this data to identify trends and map potential competitors. By analyzing user patterns in apps like Houseparty, YouTube, Amazon, and Snapchat, the company could determine which platforms posed a threat to its market dominance.

When Snapchat’s popularity began to explode in 2016, Facebook encountered a problem: encrypted traffic prevented insight into users’ behavior, reports Business Today. To circumvent this, Facebook launched an internal operation called “Project Ghostbusters”.

Facebook engineers developed specially adapted code based on Onavo’s infrastructure. The app installed a so-called root certificate on users’ phones – consent was hidden in legal documentation – which enabled Facebook to create fake certificates that mimicked Snapchat’s servers.

This made it possible to decrypt and analyze Snapchat’s traffic internally. The purpose was to use the information as a basis for strategic decisions, product development, or potential acquisitions.

Snapchat said no – Facebook copied instead

Based on data from Onavo, Facebook offered to buy Snapchat for 3 billion dollars. When Snapchat CEO Evan Spiegel declined, Facebook responded by launching Instagram Stories – a direct copy of Snapchat’s most popular feature. This became a decisive move in the competition between the two platforms.

In 2018, Apple removed Onavo from the App Store, citing that the app violated the company’s data protection rules. Facebook responded by launching a new app: Facebook Research, internally called Project Atlas, which offered similar surveillance functions. This time, the company paid users – some as young as 13 – up to 20 dollars per month to install the app.

When Apple discovered this, the company acted forcefully and revoked Facebook’s enterprise development certificates. This meant that all internal iOS apps were temporarily stopped – one of Apple’s most far-reaching measures ever.

In 2020, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) sued Facebook, now called Meta, for misleading users with false promises about privacy. In 2023, Meta’s subsidiaries were fined a total of 20 million Australian dollars (approximately €11 million) for misleading behavior.

Why it still matters

Business Insider emphasizes that the Onavo story is not just about a misleading app. It also illustrates how one of the world’s most powerful tech companies built a surveillance system disguised as a privacy tool.

The fact that Facebook used the data to map competitors, copy features, and maintain control over the social media market – and also targeted underage users for data collection – raises additional ethical questions.

“Even a decade later, Onavo remains a case study in how ‘data is power’ and how far companies are willing to go to get it”, the publication concludes.

Amazon acquires AI company that records everything you say

Mass surveillance

Published 27 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
3 minute read

Tech giant Amazon has acquired the Swedish AI company Bee, which develops wearable devices that continuously record users’ conversations. The deal signals Amazon’s ambitions to expand within AI-driven hardware beyond its voice-controlled home assistants.

The acquisition was confirmed by Bee founder Maria de Lourdes Zollo in a LinkedIn post, while Amazon told tech site TechCrunch that the deal has not yet been completed. Bee employees have been offered positions within Amazon.

AI wristband that listens constantly

Bee, which raised €6.4 million in venture capital last year, manufactures both a standalone wristband similar to Fitbit and an Apple Watch app. The product costs €46 (approximately $50) plus a monthly subscription of €17 ($18).

The device records everything it hears – unless the user manually turns it off – with the goal of listening to conversations to create reminders and to-do lists. According to the company’s website, they want “everyone to have access to a personal, ambient intelligence that feels less like a tool and more like a trusted companion.”

Bee has previously expressed plans to create a “cloud phone” that mirrors the user’s phone and gives the device access to accounts and notifications, which would enable reminders about events or sending messages.

Competitors struggle in the market

Other companies like Rabbit and Humane AI have tried to create similar AI-driven wearable devices but so far without major success. However, Bee’s device is significantly more affordable than competitors’ – the Humane AI Pin cost €458 – making it more accessible to curious consumers who don’t want to make a large financial investment.

The acquisition marks Amazon’s interest in wearable AI devices, a different direction from the company’s voice-controlled home assistants like Echo speakers. Meanwhile, ChatGPT creator OpenAI is working on its own AI hardware, while Meta is integrating its AI into smart glasses and Apple is rumored to be working on the same thing.

Privacy concerns remain

Products that continuously record the environment carry significant security and privacy risks. Different companies have varying policies for how voice recordings are processed, stored, and used for AI training.

In its current privacy policy, Bee says users can delete their data at any time and that audio recordings are not saved, stored, or used for AI training. However, the app does store data that the AI learns about the user, which is necessary for the assistant function.

Bee has previously indicated plans to only record voices from people who have verbally given consent. The company is also working on a feature that lets users define boundaries – both based on topic and location – that automatically pause the device’s learning. They also plan to build AI processing directly into the device, which generally involves fewer privacy risks than cloud-based data processing.

However, it’s unclear whether these policies will change when Bee is integrated into Amazon. Amazon has previously had mixed results when it comes to handling user data from customers’ devices.

The company has shared video clips with law enforcement from people’s Ring security cameras without the owner’s consent or court order. Ring also reached a settlement in 2023 with the Federal Trade Commission after allegations that employees and contractors had broad and unrestricted access to customers’ video recordings.

Now you’re forced to pay for Facebook or be tracked by Meta

Mass surveillance

Published 22 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
2 minute read

Social media giant Meta is now implementing its criticized “pay or be tracked” model for Swedish users. Starting Thursday, Facebook users in Sweden and some other EU-countries are forced to choose between paying €7 per month for an ad-free experience or accepting extensive data collection. Meanwhile, the company faces daily fines from the EU if the model isn’t changed.

Swedish Facebook users have been greeted since Thursday morning with a new choice when logging into the platform. A message informs them that “you must make a choice to use Facebook” and explains that users “have a legal right to choose whether you want to consent to us processing your personal data to show you ads.”

Screenshot from Facebook.

The choice is between two alternatives: either pay €7 monthly for an ad-free Facebook account where personal data isn’t processed for advertising, or consent to Meta collecting and using personal data for targeted ads.

As a third alternative, “less personalized ads” is offered, which means Meta uses somewhat less personal data for advertising purposes.

Screenshot from Facebook.

Background in EU legislation

The introduction of the payment model comes after the European Commission in March launched investigations of Meta along with Apple and Google for suspected violations of the DMA (Digital Markets Act). For Meta’s part, the investigation specifically concerns the new payment model.

In April, Meta was fined under DMA legislation and ordered to pay €200 million in fines because the payment model was not considered to meet legal requirements. Meta has appealed the decision.

According to reports from Reuters at the end of June, the social media giant now risks daily penalties if the company doesn’t make necessary changes to its payment model to comply with EU regulations.

The new model represents Meta’s attempt to adapt to stricter European data legislation while the company tries to maintain its advertising revenue through the alternative payment route.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.