Friday, October 31, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

“A new direction for Sweden – join the Belt and Road and leave NATO”

The new multipolar world order

China's Belt and Road Initiative, which aims to eradicate poverty through infrastructure development, is more in line with the interests of the Swedish people than NATO's war policy. It is time for Sweden and the West to wake up and join the BRI in a spirit of cooperation and friendship, writes Stephen Brawer, chairman of BRIX Sweden.

Published April 18, 2024
Stephen Brawer speaks at the Forum on Global Human Rights Governance conference in Beijing last year.
This is an opinion piece. The author is responsible for the views expressed in the article.

A new international order is emerging. The world is moving from a unipolar world order to a multipolar order in which the self-determination and sovereign interests of individual countries must be respected. This is a very positive direction for world history, because it means that the old colonial system, which has unfortunately dominated the world until today, is coming to an end. No matter how the world develops in the future, there will be no place for, and no way to return to, the old-style colonial unipolar world order.

China has played a decisive role in this, thanks to the economic development that has taken place in the country over the past 40 years. It is China and the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) global development platform that has played a crucial role in realizing the new world order. At the time of writing, more than 150 countries, representing 75 percent of the world's population and 50 percent of its economic capacity, have joined the collaboration.

The old colonial system, which has unfortunately dominated the world until today, is coming to an end.

So it is time for the West to wake up and join China's BRI in a spirit of cooperation and friendship. But this may be easier said than done. There are forces that still defend the old unipolar world order, i.e. Anglo-American imperialist policies. They seem to prefer to risk serious conflicts and, in the worst case, a global war. If we want to avoid this, some adjustments have to be made in the way decision-makers in Western Europe, the US and the UK think and act. Joining NATO is a completely wrong decision by Sweden's decision-makers.

When President Xi Jinping launched the BRI in 2013, it was clear that he had plans for China's modernization and long-term economic development. Today, the country's large population and labor force are engaged in a variety of large-scale infrastructure projects, water projects, road construction and the world's largest manufacturing industry. China has lifted 800 million people out of extreme poverty. The transformation that China is undergoing is a unique feature of world history, unlike any other nation in history. And it will continue.

But the focus is not only internal. China is launching the BRI as a platform for infrastructure development to eradicate world poverty. But Western European politicians refuse to recognize China and the BRI as a positive basis for international cooperation. They continue to talk about trade barriers and "de-risking," suggesting that they are unwilling to contribute to these global changes. I believe this can change, and I will work to make it happen. But whether it succeeds or not, China's development will continue - I see no sign whatsoever that it will stop or slow down in any significant way.

The BRI means a world connected by infrastructure.

China is a brilliant model of international modernization and development for other countries in the world. It is not that other countries need to follow exactly the same recipe as China. China has its own history and civilization to build on, which is a great culture and civilization. But both in the past and in the present, it has made unique changes in development and modernization, not only in practical terms of the economy, water projects, energy and transportation, but China is now clearly becoming a leader in the research and development of fusion technology, which is the form of nuclear power that will provide virtually unlimited energy resources, and is playing a major leading role in new frontier areas such as the development of space technology.

One consequence of these advances is that the need to educate and raise the knowledge and thinking of Chinese citizens to new levels will only increase. I believe this is what makes the Chinese people happy, and I believe this kind of optimistic forward thinking can lift any nation. The idea of recognizing the pursuit of the common good as a guiding principle for the country was once fundamental to my own country, the United States. This idea was best expressed by President Lincoln as follows: Government of the people, by the people, for the people.

Unfortunately, this has not been the focus of current US policymakers since the end of World War II. But I believe we can restore this principle in the United States. When we do, the principle of representing the common good - a community for a common future for humanity - will reemerge. This is the central idea of the Belt and Road Initiative and the forward movement in China.

The idea of recognizing the pursuit of the common good as a guiding principle for the country was once fundamental to my own country, the United States.

In 2023, the BRI celebrated its 10th anniversary. The project has already had a profound impact in Africa. It is in many countries in South America. We have the connection from Kunming to Vientiane in Laos. We have the agreements between China and Indonesia, which has one of the largest populations in the world, to cooperate with the BRI. So in this relatively short period of ten years, we have seen changes in the world based on the idea of infrastructure development as a basis for poverty eradication. And there is no other way to do it.

The general failure of Western policymakers in the modern era, since World War II, but also since the 1970s and '80s until now, under the IMF and the World Bank, has meant that development in the world has not moved forward. In fact, it has generally been prevented. So we are already seeing that the rest of the world, whether the leaders in the West like it or not, are joining the Belt and Road Initiative and cooperating with the vast majority because it will lift their nations and the world in general out of poverty.

Sweden, in my opinion, would benefit enormously from this cooperation, much more than they are currently doing by insisting on military escalation and joining NATO, which will neither help the Swedish people nor contribute to peace and development in the rest of the world. So the Belt and Road Initiative is the direction humanity needs to work in, and it is time for Western European countries to wake up and realize this.

The criticism of the BRI as a debt trap, with accusations and descriptions of debt-ridden countries cooperating with China, is mainly aimed at Western people. This kind of rumor-mongering is a propaganda tool aimed at undermining China for geopolitical reasons. Western policymakers want to defend the current unipolar order, so they want to demonize China in this way.

The Belt and Road Institute in Sweden and my colleague Hussein Askary have researched this extensively and shown that these accusations have no substance whatsoever - they are a sham. This research is documented and available on our website.

Western policymakers want to defend the current unipolar order, so they want to demonize China in this way.

In addition to the BRI, China has launched three other initiatives. The GSI - Global Security Initiative, which was submitted to the UN to promote world stability; the GDI - Global Development Initiative, to further strengthen the development direction set by the BRI; and the GCI - Global Civilization Initiative, to promote cultural exchanges. The need for stability and development is evident in the dangerous conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza; unfortunately, there is too little interest in ending the devastating consequences for the populations of these areas.

The GCI - the Global Civilization Initiative - the latest of the initiatives, I think is particularly important, and my colleague and I are now highlighting this in a series of interviews. We are talking about one of the great universal thinkers in European history, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, who lived from 1646 to 1716, during the time of the Kangxi Emperor of the Qing Dynasty in China. During this time, there was an exchange between Europe and certain Jesuit missionaries who worked to share knowledge in astronomy, mathematics, and geography. Many of these missionaries adopted the ideas of Matteo Ricci. Matteo Ricci is known in China as one of the most respected Western thinkers because, in addition to being a missionary, he was fluent in written and spoken Chinese. He was admired by the leading Confucian intellectual circles in China at the time.

It is this kind of exchange that allows us to understand the deeper aspects of civilizations, both in China and in the West. It is, in my view, an important basis for overcoming political negativity, sometimes acrimonious exchanges, and arrogance by taking the thought processes back to a time and place where there was a real idea of what we have in common. We respect that there are differences, but we also see the common qualities, the respect for the common good and the goodness of human reason, which can be the bridge that reunites Europe and China in the way that Leibniz sought in his time.

I want to emphasize that these ideas are not academic, although there are many important ideas that scholars have put together that I can support and refer to. I bring this up because it is about creating a living dynamic of how we can overcome the demonization and hostility between East and West. These kinds of attitudes tend to break down communication - so we need to do the opposite.

It is about creating a living dynamic of how we can overcome the demonization and hostility between East and West.

Chinese civilization is on the verge of a historical rebirth. Those who have studied its history at all know that it is a very long and profound cultural history. China will draw on its entire history to move forward, as it has already done, and in addition to leading the unstoppable global economic development, it will pioneer space technology and new energy sources such as fusion power, which it is only a matter of time before they are commercialized.

With a greater awareness of its deep cultural history, people would not feel threatened by China - rather they would see this great civilization as a great asset.

 

Stephen Brawer,

Chairman of BRIX Sweden - The Belt and Road Institute in Sweden

BRIX Sweden - the Belt and Road Institute in Sweden, is a non-profit association founded by the organizers, speakers and participants of a seminar on the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its economic and strategic importance for Europe and Sweden, which took place in Stockholm on 30 May 2018. The seminar was jointly organized by the Schiller Institute and the China-Sweden Business Council.

BRIX members include entrepreneurs, economists and strategic experts with a wide range of expertise in Swedish and Chinese economic issues. Their common conclusion is that the BRI is not only important for good economic and political relations between China and Sweden, but also fundamentally favorable for economic development and peace among all countries.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

China surpasses US as Germany’s largest trading partner

The new multipolar world order

Published October 23, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Terminal Wharf in Bremerhaven, Germany, is one of Europe's largest and most significant ports.

Trump's tariffs have reversed trade patterns. China has now overtaken the US as Germany's most important trading partner – just one year after losing the top position.

China has reclaimed first place as Germany's largest trading partner. During the first eight months of the year, trade with China reached €163.4 billion, compared to €162.8 billion for the US, according to preliminary figures from the German statistical office, reports Reuters.

It's a rapid reversal. The US was Germany's largest trading partner in 2024, breaking an eight-year period of Chinese dominance. The shift came as Germany actively tried to reduce its dependence on China, citing political differences and unfair trade practices.

But Donald Trump's return to the White House and renewed tariffs have changed the dynamics.

Tariffs hit hard

German exports to the US fell by 7.4 percent during the first eight months of the year to €99.6 billion. In August, exports dropped by as much as 23.5 percent compared to the previous year.

There is no question that US tariff and trade policy is an important reason for the decline in sales, says Dirk Jandura, chairman of the German Association for Foreign Trade (BGA).

He notes that American demand for classic German export goods such as cars, machinery and chemicals has decreased.

Chinese imports increase

While exports to China fell by 13.5 percent, imports from China increased by 8.3 percent to €108.8 billion.

The renewed import boom from China is worrying, says Carsten Brzeski, global head of macroeconomics at ING. Particularly as data shows that these imports come at dumping prices.

He warns that this increases Germany's dependence on China and could put additional pressure on key industries where China has become a major competitor.

Ambassador warns: US has underestimated China’s strength

The new multipolar world order

Published October 18, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Former U.S. Ambassador to China Nicholas Burns believes that one of China's greatest advantages is the Chinese Communist Party's ability to think strategically and long-term.

Nicholas Burns, who served as U.S. Ambassador to China for three years, argues that the Western world has systematically underestimated the Chinese superpower's capabilities in technology, military, and infrastructure.

In a recent interview, the experienced diplomat highlights several areas where China is far ahead of the United States – and warns that American policymakers still fail to see the full gravity of the situation from the perspective of U.S. strategic interests.

Nicholas Burns, 68, concluded his tenure as U.S. Ambassador to China in January 2025 after three intense years in Beijing. With a long career in American diplomacy behind him – having served under six presidents and nine secretaries of state – he returned to Harvard University where he is a professor of diplomacy and international relations.

Now he speaks openly about his experiences and observations from his time in China. And the picture he paints is more alarming than many are willing to acknowledge.

Impressive infrastructure

We've underestimated Chinese power in the world, Burns states bluntly. As an example, he highlights China's high-speed rail system:

Those trains are fabulous. We rode those trains. You know, you can go from Beijing to Shanghai in four and a half hours.

The distance is over a thousand kilometers, he points out, drawing a clear comparison with the American rail system Amtrak:

We have Amtrak's just not like that.

But it is in scientific and technological capacity that Burns sees the greatest challenge.

That's the coin of the realm in our decade, he says and continues:

In the next few decades. Which society will turn out more scientists and engineers?

Former US ambassador to China Nicholas Burns shakes hands with Xu Kunlin, governor of Jiangsu Province in China during a meeting in 2023. Photo: US Department of State

"Alarming" education statistics

The statistics he presents are striking. 34 percent of first-year students at Chinese universities study engineering or STEM fields (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics). In the United States, the corresponding figure is 5.6 percent.

And they're a much bigger country, Burns adds.

He also points to a peculiar paradox in American society. At Harvard's graduation ceremony, where he himself teaches, the pattern is clear:

At Harvard graduation, where I teach, when we ask our graduate students to stand up as a class, chemistry majors, biology majors, physics majors, largely Asian Americans, Some American citizens, excuse me, Asians, American citizens of Asian ethnicity or Chinese.

The same pattern is visible in business.

Last week, when President Trump gathered all the tech titans of the United States in the White House, tremendous number of those tech titans are Indian Americans and Chinese Americans, Burns says.

His conclusion is scathing:

We're not competing when it really matters for the future. And that's on technology.

Overlooked military strength

Burns also addresses the Chinese military, the People's Liberation Army (PLA), whose capabilities he believes the Western world underestimates.

Some people have said, well, it hasn't fought since 1978. What is what it's worth? I've seen the PLA, he says firmly.

I think we've underestimated their military strength, their technology strength.

Strategic long-term thinking

One of China's greatest advantages, according to Burns, is the Chinese Communist Party's ability to think strategically and long-term.

The Communist Party of China is strategic and they don't have to worry about, you know, we want to worry about what the press says. I mean, that's a good thing to have the press challenging the government. They have nobody opposing them. And so they can make big bets over 10, 20, 30 years.

As an example, he mentions China's systematic Africa policy:

For 35 consecutive years, the Chinese foreign minister, whoever that person is, has made his first trip of the year in January to Africa to show the Africans you are our priority.

The contrast with the United States is striking.

I think President Trump never went to Africa in his first term. President Biden went once to Angola for two or three days in December, at the very end of his term, Burns says.

His conclusion is unequivocal:

They're strategic, and we're not competing on that level. So actually, I think the Chinese technology military economics are stronger than we think they are. And I think we've underestimated them, and we can't do that any longer.

China drops visa requirements for Swedes

The new multipolar world order

Published October 17, 2025 – By Editorial staff
Soon it will be easier for Swedes to visit the Great Wall of China and other Chinese travel destinations.

Swedish citizens will soon be able to travel to China without a visa. This was announced by Swedish Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergård (M) during a visit to Beijing.

Sweden has until now been one of few European countries lacking visa-free entry to China, despite most other nations on the continent having gained access to the new rules.

This is very welcome news, and businesses in particular have been requesting this for a long time. We don't know the details regarding implementation or exact design, but I expect we will have this shortly. But as I understand it, it will cover Swedish citizens, Stenergård told publicly funded broadcaster SVT.

In July this year, China expanded its visa-free policy to cover a total of 74 countries, where citizens can visit the country for up to 30 days without a visa. Nearly all of Europe is included in the agreement, but Sweden and the United Kingdom have until now remained outside.

For Swedish travelers and businesses, the change represents a major relief, as visa applications were previously time-consuming and costly.

Swedish companies have unfortunately been affected by excessive red tape for a long time, not least at the EU level, she says.

“A celebration of peace – not a show of force”

The new cold war

Published October 14, 2025
An air echelon attends the victory day parade in Beijing , capital of China, September 3, 2025.
This is an opinion piece. The author is responsible for the views expressed in the article.

China’s Victory Day parade in early September drew wide attention both at home and abroad. While Chinese audiences saw it as a solemn moment of remembrance and confidence, some foreign media outlets rushed to label it a “show of force,” a “signal to the West,” or even evidence of new global division.

These interpretations ignore the deeper significance of the event and the consistent principles guiding China’s approach to global affairs.

At its heart, the parade was an act of remembrance—marking China’s victory in the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the global triumph over fascism. It was a tribute to the sacrifices of millions and a powerful reminder that peace is never easily won.

The presence of numerous foreign leaders in Beijing during the parade was a statement in itself. They were there not to take sides or escalate tensions, but to stand together in honoring the past and fostering a future built on peace. Their participation underscored a shared commitment to dialogue, not division.

Building capabilities to uphold principles

The weapons and equipment displayed at the parade should be understood within the framework of China’s long-standing defense policy, one based on peace and restraint.

Consider China’s nuclear posture: China remains the only nuclear-weapon state to publicly commit to a No-First-Use policy under any circumstances. This reflects a profound belief that nuclear weapons must never be used, and that a nuclear war can have no winners. China’s nuclear arsenal is kept strictly at the minimum level required for national security.

In terms of conventional forces, the unveiling of new-generation tanks, aircraft, and missile systems such as hypersonic weapons does showcase progress in China’s military modernization. Yet this progress is guided by a doctrine of active self-defense. These systems are designed to protect sovereignty and territorial integrity, not to project power globally. They serve as an anchor for national security and a stabilizer for regional security, deterring interference rather than provoking conflict.

The parade also featured unmanned and AI-enabled systems, highlighting China’s progress in technology and innovation. Importantly, this display went hand-in-hand with China’s call for international dialogue on regulating military uses of artificial intelligence. China has consistently advocated for a balanced approach—one that prevents misuse and humanitarian risks without stifling beneficial technological progress.

A message for the future

Yes, the parade was grand in scale. Yes, it displayed advanced weaponry systems. But above all, it conveyed a message of responsibility, transparency, and an enduring commitment to peace.

In times of rising mistrust and uncertainty, that message carries weight. The real choice before the international community is not between holding parades or staying silent, but between pursuing dialogue or confrontation, cooperation or suspicion. By honoring history and demonstrating its defensive posture, China has extended a hand of reassurance, not a fist of provocation.

The lesson of history is clear: peace is built through openness, cooperation, and mutual respect. This parade was, in that spirit, a step forward—a visible pledge of China’s dedication to a peaceful and stable world.

 

Hua Gesheng

About the author

Hua Gesheng is a commentator on international and multilateral affairs, writing regularly for Xinhua News Agency, Global Times, China Daily, CGTN, etc.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.