Friday, January 24, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Whistleblower: CIA bosses despise Christians

Published 31 December 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Kevin Shipp worked for the US intelligence community for 17 years.

Kevin Shipp, a retired CIA officer, tells how the US intelligence community has for decades been an arena for Soviet-inspired indoctrination and left-wing political activism – where anyone who spoke out risked being punished.

– When I was in The CIA. We ordered into a conference room – This comes down from the Director of The CIA. You can no longer say merry Christmas in any office space. You cannot have a manger scene on your desk or on your door or you will face administrative penalties, Shipp says when interviewed by conservative columnist Candace Owens.

Shipp’s immediate superiors and colleagues were reportedly so afraid of being fired or otherwise punished that they dared not speak out.

He goes on to say that the CIA clearly tried to work against Christian employees and used so-called diversity programs to oppress them. This is allegedly because Christians are the most difficult group in the US to manipulate, “will not answer to tyranny but only “listen to God“.

– This is why Christians are despised around the world, including by the previous administration… Going back to Obama, how they attacked Christians and eliminated the religious freedom post at the Department of State.

“Diversity” as a weapon

Earlier in August, Shipp recounted how, as early as 1994, Bill and Hillary Clinton began calling for “diversity efforts” in the intelligence community with a particular focus on transgender people.

People did nothing. Now, the perverted pushers of this are billionaires, CEOs, executives in government and education. DEI is their lethal weapon against America’s foundation”, he wrote at the time.

Kevin Shipp worked for the CIA for 17 years, but now spends his time educating the public and highlighting how the intelligence community focuses on manipulating and fighting its own people rather than protecting them from external threats.

He is the author of the book Twilight of the Shadow Government: How Transparency Will Kill the Deep State, which is about his experiences at the agency and how the CIA is said to control the US through unholy alliances with big business, the media and Wall Street.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Musk in dispute with Wikipedia boss: Spreading propaganda

Published today 14:46
– By Editorial Staff
It is not the first time that Musk has harshly criticized Wikipedia.

A new conflict has flared up between Elon Musk and Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales.

The world’s richest man believes that the encyclopedia is not neutral at all but spreads political propaganda and is now calling on his followers to stop donating money to the project.

The row centers on a Wikipedia description of Musk’s high-profile gesture during Donald Trump’s inauguration ceremony on Monday.

On Musk’s Wikipedia page, the gesture is compared to a “Nazi salute”, which caused the tech mogul to react very strongly. He chose to post a screenshot of the text on his social media platform X, accusing Wikipedia of being “an extension of legacy media propaganda“.

Musk has also called on his followers to stop donating money to Wikipedia until “the balance is restored” and the encyclopedia becomes more neutral and objective.

Fighting back

Jimmy Wales responded by defending Wikipedia’s description, saying it was based on facts, not propaganda.

Is there anything you consider inaccurate in that description? It’s true you did the gesture (twice) and that people did compare it to a Nazi salute (many people) and it’s true that you denied it had any meaning”, Wales wrote.

The Wikipedia boss also hinted that Musk was in fact unhappy that Wikipedia is not for sale, referring to Musk’s previous offer to donate a billion dollars if the encyclopedia changed its name to “Dickipedia”.

Trump’s election promise broken – no peace in Ukraine yet

The war in Ukraine

Published today 10:43
– By Editorial Staff
If the war in Ukraine does not end quickly, it could go down in history as Trump's war, warns Steve Bannon.

One of Donald Trump’s recurring campaign promises was to bring an immediate end to the war in Ukraine promising to do so on his first day in office.

However, this promise has not been fulfilled and former Trump advisor Steve Bannon now warns that the Ukraine war risks becoming Trump’s “Vietnam”.

Trump’s message in the past has been that peace in Ukraine is “an easy thing to do”, that he promised to bring an end to the war “within 24 hours”.

– I will get it settled before I even become president, he has also proclaimed.

In recent weeks, however, the rhetoric has shifted, with the President no longer talking about the war ending anytime soon, but instead saying that “six months” is a more realistic timeframe but that it could also take longer or shorter than that.

Nixon as a cautionary example

At the same time, it is important for Trump’s own voter base that the war actually ends and that the multi-billion dollar US aid packages cease. If the conflict were to continue during Trump’s term, there is also an imminent risk that it will be seen as his war, critics say.

– If we aren’t careful, it will turn into Trump’s Vietnam. That’s what happened to Richard Nixon. He ended up owning the war, and it went down as his war, not Lyndon Johnson’s, said former Trump adviser Steve Bannon in an interview.

Nixon ran for office in 1968 on a promise to end the war, but once in office he instead escalated US involvement through widespread bombing and incursions into Cambodia and Laos before finally negotiating a withdrawal from Vietnam. The war became a defining and highly controversial issue of his presidency.

Following the ceasefire: Gazans search for the dead

The situation in Gaza

Published today 9:31
– By Editorial Staff
The Palestinian Civil Defense says it has already found hundreds of bodies.

Since the ceasefire took effect in Gaza, rescue workers and civilians have started to dig out bodies from the rubble of Israeli bombings.

In the first few days of the ceasefire, at least 200 dead have been found, and the Palestinian Civil Defense estimates that another 10,000 missing people are still buried under the rubble.

Rescuers and family members are working feverishly to find and identify the dead.

– In every street there are dead. In every neighborhood there are people under the buildings, said Abdullah Al-Majdalawi, a 24-year-old civil defense worker in Gaza City.

Civil Defense estimates that it will take at least 100 days to recover all the bodies, but the lack of bulldozers and other essential equipment could prolong the process further.

Many of the recovered bodies are in poor condition, making identification difficult, reports British state broadcaster BBC.

The UN has previously estimated that around 60% of all buildings in Gaza have been damaged or destroyed during the 15 months of fighting. The images now being broadcast around the world show widespread devastation, particularly in northern Gaza.

Palestinian civil defense under pressure

Mahmoud Basal, spokesperson for the Palestinian Civil Defense, says that 48% of civil defense personnel have either been killed, injured or detained during the conflict.

In addition, 85% of the agency’s vehicles and 17 out of 21 facilities are reported to have been damaged or destroyed, further hampering rescue efforts.

According to Palestinian health authorities, more than 47,000 people have been killed in Gaza during the conflict, most of them women and children. Another 111 000 have been injured. However, these figures have not been independently verified.

The ceasefire, which came into force on January 19, has given the more than two million inhabitants of Gaza a much-needed break from the fighting.

At the same time, humanitarian aid has been able to increase significantly, with over 630 trucks crossing the border on the first day – the largest delivery since the beginning of the war.

Although the ceasefire has brought a halt to the bombing, Gaza is facing a huge humanitarian crisis.

The UN World Food Program (WFP) reports that more than two million Gazans are now homeless, without income and completely dependent on food aid for their survival.

German Chancellor: “Freedom of expression does not apply to far-right extremists”

Totalitarianism

Published yesterday 7:36
– By Editorial Staff
Olaf Scholz with Klaus Schwab during this year's World Economic Forum conference in Davos.

The Social Democratic Chancellor Olaf Scholz now openly admits that only those who hold the “right” opinions are covered by European freedom of speech.

We have the freedom of speech in Europe and in Germany. Everyone can say what he wants, even if he is a billionaire. And what we do not accept is if this is supporting extreme-right positions, and I really want to emphasize that, Scholz said yesterday during the World Economic Forum summit in Davos.

The German leader’s comments came against the backdrop of Elon Musk causing a stir during Trump’s inauguration ceremony after making a gesture that many of his opponents chose to interpret as a “Nazi” or “fascist” salute.

The same Musk has previously criticized Scholz very harshly, calling the chancellor an “incompetent fool” who should resign. The multi-billionaire has also given his support to the German nationalist party AfD a party that many of Scholz’s allies want to ban completely.

Surprise and anger

Germany has long had some of the toughest opinion laws in Europe. Nationalist and anti-immigration speech is often punishable as is speech that can be interpreted as favorable to the historic National Socialist regime.

Yet Scholz’s statements that only certain political views are covered by freedom of expression have caused great surprise and anger. He is also accused of being a totalitarian leader who seems to have drawn inspiration from old communist regimes where freedom of expression did not exist.

Other critics point out that he has misunderstood both his mandate and the German constitution and that even “extreme right-wing views” are protected by the constitution as long as they do not violate criminal law.