Monday, April 21, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Ukrainian child soldiers praised by German state media

Published today 15:31
– By Editorial Staff
DW's portrayal of the training camp for child soldiers as something positive and natural has caused great anger on social media.

In a high-profile report by the German state broadcaster Deutsche Welle, viewers see how Ukrainian children as young as 10 are being made “combat-ready” and taught how to handle different types of weapons in what are described as “secret military camps across the country” specifically targeted at minors.

However, many have reacted very strongly to the positive tone of the report, pointing out that it appears that the German media is actively trying to portray the child soldier camps as something positive and necessary.

Child soldiers are perhaps most commonly associated with bloody civil wars in the jungles of Africa and Asia – and something that is systematically rejected in the West as barbaric and completely unacceptable – with the argument that adults have a responsibility to do what they can to keep children out of wars and conflicts.

DW’s report, however, does not follow that template at all, instead telling viewers that the military training camps for children are a deliberate and long-term strategy on the part of Ukraine and something of a necessary evil.

– In Ukraine, kids as young as 10 are getting combat ready. As fighting with Russia drags on, secret military camps across the country are teaching kids the art of war, including how to shoot pistols, rifles, and even machine guns. Ukrainians realize the war may continue for many years, and they want to be prepared, says the reporter, and continues:

– Today’s children may just be tomorrow’s soldiers.

“Will die for my country”

The German journalist claims that the children will not be sent to the front until they reach the age of majority – but it is not clear whether this is just something he has been told by camp officials, or whether he has actually looked into it.

– They think I’m their little girl, I can be a fighter, I can be a soldier, and I’m just saying I will get killed for my country, I will get injured for my country. And it’s the choices I’ve made. They just don’t understand it, says a 14-year-old girl.

Although the child soldier camp is mainly portrayed as a positive thing, one of the people in charge admits that not all Ukrainians support the activity and that many parents do not want to send their children there – because they are afraid that the children will be sent to the army.

We learn to protect them. We learn to help them to survive in the war, he assures.

“The degeneration of liberal democracy knows no bounds”

The report has sparked widespread anger and frustration on social media – with many pointing out that it seems the German media company is trying to normalize the use of child soldiers in war.

The Ukrainians are training child soldiers. And German state media is celebrating it. Ukraine-mania brings out the darkest demons of the human soul”, writes one user.

Training children for the meat grinder? The degeneracy of liberal democracy knows no bounds. If they were Africans in Congo and not Europeans in Ukraine, DW would be screaming bloody murder over the use of child soldiers”, argues another.

Others draw parallels with the final stages of the Second World War and how Germany used child soldiers to prolong the war – even though there was no longer any chance of victory.

Some have also noted that at least one of the instructors appears to be wearing a variant of the national coat of arms of National Socialist Germany on his makeshift uniform – something that is not mentioned in DW’s report, despite the fact that this type of symbol is banned in Germany.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Pope Francis has passed away

Published today 11:52
– By Editorial Staff
Francis became Archbishop of Buenos Aires in 1998 and was elected Pope in 2013.

Pope Francis has died at the age of 88, the Vatican confirmed on Monday morning.

Francis, born Jorge Mario Bergoglio in Buenos Aires in 1936, became the first pope from Latin America in 2013. He led the Catholic Church for more than a decade and was seen by many followers as a pope who emphasized social justice, simplicity and care for the world’s most vulnerable.

– At 7:35 this morning, the Bishop of Rome, Francis, returned to the home of the Father. His entire life was dedicated to the service of the Lord and of his Church, said Cardinal Kevin Farrell, the Vatican’s chamberlain, in an official statement.

– Pope Francis taught us to live the values of the Gospel with faithfulness, courage, and universal love, especially for the poorest and most marginalized, Farrell continued, adding:

– With immense gratitude for his example as a true disciple of the Lord Jesus, we commend the soul of Pope Francis to the infinite, merciful love of God, One and Tribune.

Double-sided pneumonia

Pope Francis was last seen in public on Easter Sunday, when he attended the traditional Easter Mass in St. Peter’s Square at the Vatican. Due to his health, his Easter greeting was delivered by another priest, but afterwards the Pope rose from his wheelchair and waved to the assembled crowd from the balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica.

Dear brothers and sisters, happy Easter, he said. Earlier that day, he met with US Vice President J.D. Vance in a private meeting.

The Pope had been released from hospital in March after five weeks of treatment for an infection that led to double-sided pneumonia.

Francis was ordained a priest in the late 1960s and became Archbishop of Buenos Aires in 1998. He was appointed Cardinal by John Paul II and elected Pope on March 13, 2013.

World Bank softens climate rhetoric to keep US backing

Donald Trump's USA

Published today 11:08
– By Editorial Staff
World Bank President Ajay Banga was appointed by Joe Biden and has been a vocal advocate of the 'green transition' in the past.

The World Bank has clearly toned down its previously very explicit climate profile as the Donald Trump administration evaluates its support to international organizations and aims to reduce funding for various climate programs around the world.

However, according to sources within the department, this is a purely strategic adjustment to ensure continued US support, while the actual climate policy remains largely unchanged.

The Nordic Times reported that NATO is dropping its politically correct language and has removed or revised formulations relating to gender and climate in an attempt to appease the conservative Trump administration.

And they are not alone in trying to adapt to reality and the new US administration the World Bank and its top officials have also clearly changed their rhetoric since Trump became president.

World Bank President Ajay Banga has focused in recent months on labor issues and Republican-friendly energy sources such as nuclear power and natural gas, although he still believes that climate investment does not conflict with the Bank’s core mission of fighting poverty.

Remember, we have a board which has representatives of all our shareholders and all these words and thinking go through their system, Banga said during a press conference ahead of the bank’s spring meetings in Washington.

“Do you want to scream this all loudly?”

He confirmed that 45% of the bank’s loans in 2025 will go to climate-related projects, but also emphasized a broader energy strategy than before.

– There is no reason why a country in Africa should not care about affordable, accessible electricity – and it includes gas, geothermal, hydroelectric, solar, wind and nuclear where it makes sense.

According to former employees and current sources within the World Bank, the rhetoric is a trade-off to avoid conflict with the US, whose support is crucial. The Biden administration pledged $4 billion to the bank’s poverty-fighting work, but the sum must first be approved by a Republican-controlled Congress.

– Now, do you want to scream this all loudly? Probably not in this environment, said Samir Suleymanov, former head of the World Bank’s strategic initiatives.

A spokesperson for the bank, however, argued that the agenda has been consistent:

– For two years, we’ve been working to make the Bank faster, more efficient, and focused on creating jobs.

“Sort of a relief”

Trump allies have called on the US to leave the World Bank, arguing that it favors China and diverges from US interests. An investigation into US participation in international organizations is expected in August. However, a full withdrawal is considered unlikely, as it would open the door to China buying up US shares.

Karen Mathiasen, a former US representative at the Bank, notes a sharper tone compared to Trump’s first term:

– Now everything feels very hostile and adversarial.

But others welcome the rhetorical shift. Suleymanov argues that in the past, the focus on clean energy limited other emission-reducing projects.

– It may sound funny, but there is sort of a relief that this kind of pretend thing is over. The ideological underpinning took so much space. Everybody had the feeling they were caught in the game, like this is something that they have to do, but not necessarily with a clear practical outcome in mind.

It is worth noting that the World Bank’s sister organization, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), has also recently toned down its climate rhetoric choosing instead to focus more on “trade growth and global challenges”. Here, too, it is said to be trying to maintain a good relationship with Trump and his inner circle.

NATO drops politically correct language

Published today 7:03
– By Editorial Staff
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte and French Admiral Pierre Vandier.

NATO will be much less politically correct than before – at least in terms of language

Wording on climate, gender and diversity has been changed or removed from the US-led military pact’s rules of engagement – reportedly to appease the Trump administration.

At home in the United States, President Donald Trump and his inner circle have vowed to fight what they have described as far-left infiltration of US government agencies through various Diversity, Equality and Inclusion (DEI) programs.

For example, Trump’s Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, has declared that any focus on “diversity” is destructive and harmful, and vowed to eliminate the Department of Defense’s diversity initiatives.

The US president has also expressed criticism of how NATO operates today – and the fact that the military pact is now revising its language, making it far less politically correct, is seen by observers as a desperate attempt to make Trump and his staff more sympathetic to the organization’s activities.

According to one official Politico spoke to, the phrase “green technology” has been replaced by “innovative technology” and “climate” by “operational environment“, among others.

“More people pricking up their ears”

In addition, gender-related phrases are avoided – as are terms such as “woman”, “peace” or “security”. At least if you want the proposals to be approved with the support of the Americans.

– Everyone sees on the news where the Trump admin stands; you don’t want to do anything that shoots yourself in the foot, the NATO official said.

– Everyone knows that the worst thing you can do is present it as a diversity issue … Now more people are pricking up their ears to make sure it is spoken about in military terms

NATO also has several “climate advisers” attached to the organization, tasked with advising the military leadership on how the environment and climate change could affect the military alliance’s combat capabilities. However, it appears that these will remain in place for the time being.

On several occasions, Trump has stated that he is considering leaving NATO – mainly pointing to the fact that the US bears too much of the military alliance’s costs. He wants Sweden and other countries to increase their defense budgets to 5% of GDP a doubling compared to today.

US shuts down Biden’s censorship agency

Donald Trump's USA

Published 18 April 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Members of the Trump administration have long expressed concerns about how freedom of expression is being restricted and curtailed in various ways.

The United States has now officially shut down an agency that, according to Secretary of State Marco Rubio, was used by the Biden administration to systematically censor US citizens with uncomfortable views.

The Global Engagement Center (GEC) was established in 2016 within the US Department of State, with a mission to “recognize, understand, expose, and counter foreign state and non-state propaganda and disinformation”.

In December, the center was renamed Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (R/FIMI), but on Wednesday, Marco Rubio announced that it had been permanently shut down.

– Under the previous administration, this office, which cost taxpayers more than $50 million per year, spent millions of dollars to actively silence and censor the voices of Americans they were supposed to be serving, Rubio said.

– This is antithetical to the very principles we should be upholding and inconceivable it was taking place in America.

In an interview published Wednesday with conservative activist Mike Benz, Rubio explained that the GEC was initially intended as a tool to combat extremist propaganda from groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS, but that the operation later began “going after individual American voices”.

– We ended government-sponsored censorship in the United States through the State Department, he declared.

“Worst offender in US government censorship”

Rubio added that the Biden administration had supported groups that “literally tagging and labeling voices in American politics – Ben Shapiro, The Federalist, others – tagging them as foreign agents”.

The GEC had an annual budget of $61 million and employed about 120 people. In December, Republican members of Congress refused to provide continued funding for the unit.

President Donald Trump and his supporters have long accused Democrats of using government institutions to silence conservative views online. In 2023, tech billionaire Elon Musk also criticized the GEC, calling it “worst offender in US government censorship & media manipulation” and “a threat to our democracy”.

Journalist Matt Taibbi also accused the center of trying to suppress discussions on COVID-19 under the pretext of fighting “Russian personas and proxies”.

Already last year, a group of Republican members of Congress harshly criticized the GEC in a letter to then Secretary of State Antony Blinken. The letter accused the Center of bias in favor of “American progressives” and of trying to silence opinions that were “deemed politically inconvenient or disagreeable”.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.