Friday, January 24, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Trudeau forced to resign after growing discontent

Published 7 January 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Trudeau announces that he is leaving his post.

Demands for the removal of Canada’s deeply unpopular prime minister grew during the fall and eventually the situation became untenable. Now Justin Trudeau has announced that he will resign as soon as his party (the Liberal Party of Canada) has appointed a new leader.

Already in early fall, the social democratic NDP chose to leave the coalition government after several conflicts. The left-liberal government then also lost its majority in parliament – which is why it has not been able to pass many of its policy proposals.

– Parliament has been paralyzed for months, after what has been the longest session of a minority parliament in Canadian history, Trudeau himself admits.

The Canadian Parliament was supposed to resume its work on January 27 but the recess is now extended to March 24 while a new leader is elected.

The opposition, led by the liberal-conservative Tory Party, has called several votes of no confidence in Trudeau during the fall and tried to bring about a new election. According to opinion polls, they are also the ones who would win big if there were an election today.

Martial law against citizens

Although the Prime Minister has survived the no-confidence votes, criticism from his own party colleagues has become increasingly harsh and many voices within his own party have called for his resignation.

If I’m having to fight internal battles, I cannot be the best option in that election, he said.

The reasons why many Canadians want Trudeau gone are many and vary depending on who you ask. Some are unhappy with the borderless mass immigration policy pursued by his government – while others point out that his government has contributed greatly to the economic crisis in which a large part of the population is now struggling to cope with everyday life.

During COVID-19, Trudeau also pursued an extremely harsh policy, including martial law and a state of emergency against his own people when they protested against the lockdown policy.

Trudeau was accused of pursuing an almost dictatorial policy and citizens who showed their displeasure were subjected to police violence, had their bank accounts frozen or were otherwise harassed.

Klaus Schwab’s disciple

Another reason why Trudeau is a very unpopular leader in many camps is his links to globalist networks and organizations not least Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum. Many have pointed out that Trudeau does not seem to serve the Canadian people first and foremost, but completely different interests, and seems to be Klaus Schwab’s follower, something the aging globalist himself has confirmed.

– I must say that when I mention our names like Mrs. Merkel and even Vladimir Putin, and so on. All of them have been Young Global Leaders at the World Economic Forum. But what we are very proud of right now is the young generation as Prime Minister, President of Argentina and so on, that we are penetrating the governments, he told us in 2017.

– Yesterday I was at a reception for Prime Minister and I should know that half of his cabinet or even more than half of his cabinet are from the World Economic Forum’s Young Global Leaders, he continued.

Left-liberal identity politics

Schwab has also proclaimed that humanity is facing “a fourth industrial revolution” that will “lead to a fusion of our physical, digital and biological identities“, and Trudeau in particular has been praised as an ultimate representative of this world order.

– I couldn’t imagine anybody (than Trudeau) who could represent more the world which will come out of this fourth industrial revolution, Schwab said back in 2016.

Perhaps more than any other Western leader, Trudeau has also profiled himself as a proponent of left-liberal identity politics with an explicit focus on LGBTQ issues, feminism and the fight against alleged racism and discrimination.

Critics have also pointed out that throughout his career, the prime minister has had a habit of behaving in an overly activist and theatrical manner for example, kneeling in public in support of the pro-violence Black Lives Matter movement a behavior that many consider unworthy of a national leader.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Musk in dispute with Wikipedia boss: Spreading propaganda

Published today 14:46
– By Editorial Staff
It is not the first time that Musk has harshly criticized Wikipedia.

A new conflict has flared up between Elon Musk and Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales.

The world’s richest man believes that the encyclopedia is not neutral at all but spreads political propaganda and is now calling on his followers to stop donating money to the project.

The row centers on a Wikipedia description of Musk’s high-profile gesture during Donald Trump’s inauguration ceremony on Monday.

On Musk’s Wikipedia page, the gesture is compared to a “Nazi salute”, which caused the tech mogul to react very strongly. He chose to post a screenshot of the text on his social media platform X, accusing Wikipedia of being “an extension of legacy media propaganda“.

Musk has also called on his followers to stop donating money to Wikipedia until “the balance is restored” and the encyclopedia becomes more neutral and objective.

Fighting back

Jimmy Wales responded by defending Wikipedia’s description, saying it was based on facts, not propaganda.

Is there anything you consider inaccurate in that description? It’s true you did the gesture (twice) and that people did compare it to a Nazi salute (many people) and it’s true that you denied it had any meaning”, Wales wrote.

The Wikipedia boss also hinted that Musk was in fact unhappy that Wikipedia is not for sale, referring to Musk’s previous offer to donate a billion dollars if the encyclopedia changed its name to “Dickipedia”.

Trump’s election promise broken – no peace in Ukraine yet

The war in Ukraine

Published today 10:43
– By Editorial Staff
If the war in Ukraine does not end quickly, it could go down in history as Trump's war, warns Steve Bannon.

One of Donald Trump’s recurring campaign promises was to bring an immediate end to the war in Ukraine promising to do so on his first day in office.

However, this promise has not been fulfilled and former Trump advisor Steve Bannon now warns that the Ukraine war risks becoming Trump’s “Vietnam”.

Trump’s message in the past has been that peace in Ukraine is “an easy thing to do”, that he promised to bring an end to the war “within 24 hours”.

– I will get it settled before I even become president, he has also proclaimed.

In recent weeks, however, the rhetoric has shifted, with the President no longer talking about the war ending anytime soon, but instead saying that “six months” is a more realistic timeframe but that it could also take longer or shorter than that.

Nixon as a cautionary example

At the same time, it is important for Trump’s own voter base that the war actually ends and that the multi-billion dollar US aid packages cease. If the conflict were to continue during Trump’s term, there is also an imminent risk that it will be seen as his war, critics say.

– If we aren’t careful, it will turn into Trump’s Vietnam. That’s what happened to Richard Nixon. He ended up owning the war, and it went down as his war, not Lyndon Johnson’s, said former Trump adviser Steve Bannon in an interview.

Nixon ran for office in 1968 on a promise to end the war, but once in office he instead escalated US involvement through widespread bombing and incursions into Cambodia and Laos before finally negotiating a withdrawal from Vietnam. The war became a defining and highly controversial issue of his presidency.

Following the ceasefire: Gazans search for the dead

The situation in Gaza

Published today 9:31
– By Editorial Staff
The Palestinian Civil Defense says it has already found hundreds of bodies.

Since the ceasefire took effect in Gaza, rescue workers and civilians have started to dig out bodies from the rubble of Israeli bombings.

In the first few days of the ceasefire, at least 200 dead have been found, and the Palestinian Civil Defense estimates that another 10,000 missing people are still buried under the rubble.

Rescuers and family members are working feverishly to find and identify the dead.

– In every street there are dead. In every neighborhood there are people under the buildings, said Abdullah Al-Majdalawi, a 24-year-old civil defense worker in Gaza City.

Civil Defense estimates that it will take at least 100 days to recover all the bodies, but the lack of bulldozers and other essential equipment could prolong the process further.

Many of the recovered bodies are in poor condition, making identification difficult, reports British state broadcaster BBC.

The UN has previously estimated that around 60% of all buildings in Gaza have been damaged or destroyed during the 15 months of fighting. The images now being broadcast around the world show widespread devastation, particularly in northern Gaza.

Palestinian civil defense under pressure

Mahmoud Basal, spokesperson for the Palestinian Civil Defense, says that 48% of civil defense personnel have either been killed, injured or detained during the conflict.

In addition, 85% of the agency’s vehicles and 17 out of 21 facilities are reported to have been damaged or destroyed, further hampering rescue efforts.

According to Palestinian health authorities, more than 47,000 people have been killed in Gaza during the conflict, most of them women and children. Another 111 000 have been injured. However, these figures have not been independently verified.

The ceasefire, which came into force on January 19, has given the more than two million inhabitants of Gaza a much-needed break from the fighting.

At the same time, humanitarian aid has been able to increase significantly, with over 630 trucks crossing the border on the first day – the largest delivery since the beginning of the war.

Although the ceasefire has brought a halt to the bombing, Gaza is facing a huge humanitarian crisis.

The UN World Food Program (WFP) reports that more than two million Gazans are now homeless, without income and completely dependent on food aid for their survival.

German Chancellor: “Freedom of expression does not apply to far-right extremists”

Totalitarianism

Published yesterday 7:36
– By Editorial Staff
Olaf Scholz with Klaus Schwab during this year's World Economic Forum conference in Davos.

The Social Democratic Chancellor Olaf Scholz now openly admits that only those who hold the “right” opinions are covered by European freedom of speech.

We have the freedom of speech in Europe and in Germany. Everyone can say what he wants, even if he is a billionaire. And what we do not accept is if this is supporting extreme-right positions, and I really want to emphasize that, Scholz said yesterday during the World Economic Forum summit in Davos.

The German leader’s comments came against the backdrop of Elon Musk causing a stir during Trump’s inauguration ceremony after making a gesture that many of his opponents chose to interpret as a “Nazi” or “fascist” salute.

The same Musk has previously criticized Scholz very harshly, calling the chancellor an “incompetent fool” who should resign. The multi-billionaire has also given his support to the German nationalist party AfD a party that many of Scholz’s allies want to ban completely.

Surprise and anger

Germany has long had some of the toughest opinion laws in Europe. Nationalist and anti-immigration speech is often punishable as is speech that can be interpreted as favorable to the historic National Socialist regime.

Yet Scholz’s statements that only certain political views are covered by freedom of expression have caused great surprise and anger. He is also accused of being a totalitarian leader who seems to have drawn inspiration from old communist regimes where freedom of expression did not exist.

Other critics point out that he has misunderstood both his mandate and the German constitution and that even “extreme right-wing views” are protected by the constitution as long as they do not violate criminal law.