Monday, June 23, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Sources: Turkey prepares to invade Syria

The escalation in the Middle East

Published 18 December 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Turkey is accused of wanting to become the “ruler” of the region.
2 minute read

Turkey and its allied militias are reported to be building up their forces near the Syrian border and are expected to launch a major invasion against Kurdish-controlled areas of the country soon.

The Wall Street Journal is the source of the information, citing senior US officials. According to the newspaper’s sources, the forces include militia fighters as well as Turkish commandos and a large number of artillery pieces.

Preparations are taking place near Kobani on Syria’s northern border with Turkey – a town that today has a Kurdish majority, and according to the sources, Washington is currently focusing on trying to persuade the Turkish leadership to hold off on the military operation.

Ilham Ahmed, who works for the Civil Administration of the Syrian Kurds, has also sent a letter to US President-elect Donald Trump, appealing to him to prevent a Turkish attack.

From across the border, we can already see Turkish forces amassing, and our civilians live under the constant fear of imminent death and destruction“, Mr. Ahmed writes in the letter obtained by the WSJ.

US threatens sanctions

According to the Kurds, Erdoğan’s goal is to “establish de facto control” over the Kurdish territories before Trump takes office in January – and the aim is reportedly to force the US to cooperate with Ankara as the “ruler” of the region.

Already last week, US-backed Kurds in the country said they had been subjected to Turkish artillery and drone attacks, prompting Republican Senator Lindsey Graham to warn the Ankara leadership that the NATO member could face sanctions if it did not cease hostilities.

Since overthrowing the government of Bashar al-Assad, jihadist militants and their allies have also taken control of almost all of western Syria – and are supported in various ways by Turkey itself.

Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS)
Abu Mohammad al-Julani is now Syria’s de facto head of state – but different actors are fighting for control of Syrian territory. Photo: facsimile X/@PamirNews/CNN

Fight for influence and new territory

In the east and north-east, however, Syria is still controlled by the Kurdish Syrian Democratic Forces – funded in part by the United States. Turkey’s position is that the armed Kurdish groups are considered terrorists.

There are estimated to be between 1.6 and 2.5 million Kurds living in Syria – mainly in autonomous regions in the north of the country. The Kurdistan region, which includes parts of Iraq, Iraq, Syria, Armenia and Turkey, is home to around 35 million Kurds, and Kurdish nationalist groups are striving to establish an independent nation state in the region.

As previously reported by The Nordic Times, the fall of Assad seems to have led to various actors quickly trying to seize territory and strengthen their influence in the region. One clear example is Israel, which recently captured new land beyond the Golan Heights area that it has illegally occupied since 1967 – on the grounds that it wants to prevent potential hostilities and terrorist threats against the Jewish state.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Trump’s ambition to end forever wars appears at a standstill

The escalation in the Middle East

The US "anti-war" president, recently recommended for the Nobel Peace Prize, can forget that thought after last night's war of aggression.

Published yesterday 22:18
– By Jenny Piper
Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu have long been close - a friendship that looks to have cost him the "America First" election promise.
3 minute read

It is ironic that yesterday the Pakistani government formally recommended US President Donald Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing his mediation efforts to end the latest military conflict between Islamabad and New Delhi. Considering that Trump ordered attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan just a few hours later, he can definitely forget about receiving that award. That said, Obama did receive the Peace Prize despite the increase in US military interventions around the world during his time in the White House, so anything is possible.

Trump thus did the dirty work for Israel, which started the problem, and the US will take the blame for the consequences. Smart.

After the attacks, Trump warned Iran that if they do not make peace, more and harsher attacks will follow. Iran, for its part, has already announced that it will not bow down.

Trump has been criticized for his decision to actively enter the war by other US congressmen, some of whom say that the attacks on Iran are grounds for impeaching Trump.

Iran has accused the US of violating international law and the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) with its nighttime attacks on important nuclear facilities, while assuring the public that no radioactive contamination has been detected at the sites attacked.

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi has condemned the US air strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities as a serious violation of international law and writes on X that Tehran reserves all options to respond in accordance with its right to self-defense.

“The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences. Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behavior. The United States, a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, has committed a grave violation of the UN Charter, international law and the NPT by attacking Iran’s peaceful nuclear installations. In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defense, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interest, and people”.

Iran is now demanding that the UN Security Council hold an emergency meeting, but everyone already knows that this is just a show, as both the US and Israel have carte blanche in this toothless organization.

At the same time, other forces may wake up when third parties allied with Iran want to get involved. Although major powers such as Russia, North Korea, and China, together with neighboring countries in the Middle East, have so far taken a wait-and-see position because Iran has not wanted support, a spokesman for Yemen’s Houthis has already warned that if the US gets involved, the group will attack their warships in the Red Sea.

Another unpleasant thought is the many dormant “cells” around the world that may now be activated, with consequences for ordinary people as well. So all those who are now praising Trump’s “bravery” may find themselves eating their words if they start thinking more long term.

Glenn Diesen, professor at the University of Southeast Norway, sums it up well in a post on X, where he stated that US President Donald Trump has once again dragged the country into a conflict in the Middle East.

“Bush ran on a peace platform against nation-building, Obama promised ‘change’, Biden would ‘bring the adults back’, and Trump would get the US out of the forever wars in the Middle East. They all started wars… It does not matter who you vote for, when they do not work for you”.

But there is at least one winner here: the arms industry, whose shares will once again rise when the stock market opens.

 

Jenny Piper

All Jenny Piper's articles can be found on her blog.

Trump breaks promise – launches overnight attack on Iran

The escalation in the Middle East

Published yesterday 10:21
– By Editorial Staff
Trump announced the US decision to attack Iran during a press briefing at the White House overnight. On the right, a large B2 bomber used in the strike.
2 minute read

Overnight Sunday, the US carried out airstrikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities – Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan – in a dramatic escalation of the conflict between Israel and Iran. “America first” President Donald Trump, who has now officially dragged the country into a new war of aggression at Israel’s request, described the attack as “very successful” and claimed that Iran’s nuclear capability was “totally destroyed”.

The decision followed weeks of tension in which Israel, since 13 June, has attacked Iranian targets to stop what it claimed, without evidence and contrary to intelligence reports, was an imminent nuclear weapons program.

Trump gave Iran a two-week deadline for diplomatic negotiations but acted after only two days, according to sources, due to pressure from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has been described as desperate to draw the US into the war of aggression against Iran.

Immediate repercussions

Iran condemned the attacks as “outrageous” and warned of “serious and lasting consequences”. In response, Iran fired ballistic missiles at Israel, injuring at least 23 people in cities such as Tel Aviv and Haifa. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar claimed that Iran’s nuclear program had been “set back two to three years” despite 30 years of never being able to demonstrate that it was close to producing any nuclear weapons.

International reactions

The attack has provoked strong reactions globally. Netanyahu called Trump’s decision “historically courageous”, while UN Secretary-General António Guterres described it as “a dangerous escalation”. Cuba and Venezuela condemned the attacks, and Russian President Vladimir Putin earlier expressed concern that we are “sliding toward World War III”. In the US, congressmen such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Thomas Massie criticized the decision as “unconstitutional” because it lacked congressional approval.

Economic and regional impact

Financial markets are expected to react negatively due to increased uncertainty and rising oil prices. Airlines are avoiding Middle East airspace, and the Houthi movement in Yemen announced that a response to US attacks is “inevitable”. Trump warned Iran of “force far greater” if it does not seek peace, increasing the risk of a wider conflict.

While Trump touts the attack as a military success, analysts fear it could trigger a wave of retaliation, threatening US bases and destabilizing the region. Iran’s Atomic Energy Authority insists that its nuclear program will continue despite the damage.

Trump voters oppose US involvement in Israel’s war

Donald Trump's USA

Published 19 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Many Trump voters were attracted by his promises to avoid expensive and unnecessary wars.
3 minute read

A majority of Donald Trump’s supporters oppose US military intervention in Israel’s war against Iran. This is according to a new opinion poll published on Wednesday.

According to the comprehensive survey by The Economist/YouGov, conducted over the weekend, 53 percent of voters who supported Trump in the 2024 presidential election want the US to stay out of Israel’s attacks.

Only 19 percent of Trump’s supporters advocate US military intervention, while 63 percent prefer the administration to try to negotiate with Iran over its nuclear program.

Among all voters in the survey, 60 percent believed that the US should refrain from using military force in the conflict.

The results reflect long-standing public support for peaceful solutions to the Iran issue. An April poll by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs-Ipsos showed that eight in ten Americans preferred diplomacy or tougher economic sanctions to military action to stop Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

And even if diplomacy or sanctions were to fail, many Americans prefer other methods. The same Ipsos poll showed that 60 percent could envisage US cyberattacks against Iranian systems, but only 48 percent of Americans supported air strikes against nuclear facilities.

“A terrible mistake”

Opposition to military escalation is also evident among several Republican politicians.

This is not our war. But if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution“, Thomas Massie, a Republican congressman from Kentucky, wrote on X earlier this week. He expressed his support for an attempt to gather support in the House of Representatives for a bipartisan resolution to limit the president’s war powers.

Libertarian Senator Rand Paul is also a very vocal opponent of dragging the US into yet another unnecessary war.

– I will not vote to send american kids to Iran. I think its a terrible mistake, every way is not our war. Our country is bankrupting itself over our own obligations to our own people. We should not ever send one soldier to Iran and I hope I am pretty clear on that, he recently declared in an interview.

Tim Burchett, Republican congressman from Tennessee, told CNN on Wednesday that he wanted to see “very little” US involvement in the escalating conflict.

– We don’t need another endless war in the Middle East. Old men make decisions and young men die, and that’s the history of war, he said.

– We need to take a deep breath and slow down this thing and let the Israelis do their thing. We do not need a three-front war in our lifetime.

At the same time, powerful neoconservative actors and the Israel lobby are waging an intense campaign to get the Trump administration to drag the US into the war – despite popular opposition and the president’s earlier promises to be a “peacemaker” and end all wars.

Republican Senator: The Bible commands us to support Israel

The escalation in the Middle East

Published 19 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Ted Cruz believes that Christians have a biblical duty to support Israel—otherwise, they risk incurring God's wrath.
3 minute read

Influential Republican Senator Ted Cruz justifies his support for Israel’s war against Iran by referring to the Bible and what he learned in Sunday school as a child.

During a heated conversation with former Fox News personality Tucker Carlson, Cruz revealed that his stance on the conflict is based more on religious dogma than on political analysis and judgment.

– Growing up in Sunday school I was taught from the Bible, those who bless Israel will be blessed, and those who curse Israel will be cursed, and from my perspective, I want to be on the blessing side of things, Cruz explained.

The senator emphasized that his support for Israel is rooted in the belief that the US is commanded by God to stand behind the country.

– Where does my support for Israel come from? Number one, because biblically we are commanded to support IsraelIt doesn’t say the government of Israel, it says the nation of Israel. So that’s in the Bible. As a Christian, I believe that, he emphasized.

But Carlson questioned Cruz’s knowledge of the Bible and asked him to specify where in the Bible the verse can be found.

– I don’t have the scripture off the tip of mypull out your phone, Cruz replied, to which Carlson quickly pointed out:

– It’s in Genesis. You’re quoting a Bible phrase you don’t have context for, you don’t know where in the Bible it is… that’s your theology?’

Must Christians support Netanyahu?

The conversation quickly became more heated when Carlson continued to demand an answer as to why Christians must support Israel:

– We’re commanded as Christians to support the government of Israel? Define Israel. This is important. Are you kidding? This is a majority Christian country.

Cruz responded irritably:

– Define Israel? Do you not know what Israel is? That would be the country you’ve asked like 49 questions about.

Carlson pressed on:

– So that’s what Genesis—that’s what God is talking about? Is that the current borders, the current leadership, he’s talking about the political entity of Israel? Is the nation God is referring to in Genesis the same country Benjamin Netanyahu is running now?

Is the US at war or not?

Carlson, who had previously criticized Trump for abandoning his “America First” policy in connection with the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, then put Cruz under further pressure. The senator had previously made a surprising statement about the US’s role in the conflict.

– I’ve said we. Israel is leading them, but we’re supporting them, Cruz said when Carlson pointed out that he had previously said that the US was carrying out attacks against Iran.

Carlson reacted strongly to the fact that the US position in the conflict seems to vary depending on which politician you ask:

– You’re breaking news here. The US government last night denied… on behalf of Trump, that we’re acting on Israel’s behalf in any offensive capacity.

Cruz tried to backtrack:

– No, we’re not bombing them. Israel is bombing them.

You just said we were. This is high stakes. You’re a senator. If you’re saying the United States is at war with Iran right now, people are listening, Carlson pointed out.

No deeper knowledge of Iran

The host also took the opportunity to reveal Cruz’s ignorance about Iran when he asked the Republican politician how many people live in Iran.

– I don’t know the population, Cruz admitted, prompting Carlson to exclaim:

– Not at all? You don’t know the population of the people you’re trying to topple?

Cruz tried to turn the question back on Carlson, who quickly replied, “92 million”.

– How could you not know that? It’s kind of relevant because you’re calling for the overthrow of the government.

Cruz also admitted that he had no deeper knowledge of Iran’s ethnic composition and conceded that he was no expert on the country whose government he wants to overthrow. He also argued that this type of detailed knowledge was irrelevant in this context.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.