Wednesday, June 11, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Simion seeks election annulment – alleges French and Moldovan interference

Published 21 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Simion states, among other things, that the electoral register contained 1.7 million fictitious names and that illegal voters were bussed in from Moldova.
3 minute read

Right-wing nationalist and EU-skeptic presidential candidate George Simion is demanding that Romania’s presidential election be declared invalid. He accuses France and Moldova of trying to influence the outcome of the election – claims that are also supported by Telegram founder Pavel Durov.

Simion, leader of the Alliance for the Unity of Romanians (AUR) party, claims that the election was compromised by “foreign interference” and says he has formally requested that Romania’s Supreme Court invalidate the results.

In a post on the X platform on Tuesday, Simion, who was leading in the polls ahead of the election, wrote that there is evidence of undue influence from “external state and non-state actors” – and specifically named two countries as responsible:

Neither France nor Moldavia , nor anyone else has the right to interfere in the elections of another state”.

To all Romanians: ask urgently the Constitutional Court to annul this farce. We will not give up and we will not betray! This is only the beginning of a great victory!” he continued.

Durov: “Ready to testify”

Simion also claims that the electoral register contained 1.7 million fictitious names and that the government had transported voters from neighboring Moldova. His party accuses Moldova’s pro-European government, the Party of Action and Solidarity (PAS), of urging the country’s million-strong diaspora in Romania to vote for his opponent Nicusor Dan.

Dan, mayor of Bucharest, won Sunday’s second round of voting with 54 percent of the vote. He is widely seen as pro-EU, pro-NATO, and pro-US. The election was held after the Constitutional Court invalidated the November results, in which the NATO-critical independent candidate Calin Georgescu won with 23 percent of the vote. The court cited “irregularities” and reports of Russian interference, which Moscow has denied.

It is noteworthy that Simion’s accusations have received unexpected support from Pavel Durov, founder of the messaging app Telegram. Durov has previously claimed that French intelligence services tried to pressure him to censor conservative Romanian channels ahead of the election.

I am ready to come and testify if it helps Romanian democracy”, he wrote in a post shared alongside Simion’s statement.

France denies election interference

France has denied Durov’s allegations and claims that they are disinformation and smear tactics.

The recent accusations against France are merely a diversionary maneuver from the real threats of interference targeting Romania. France calls on all Romanian political actors to exercise responsibility and defend democracy, the statement said.

Romanian authorities have in turn accused Russia of illegal election interference, but so far without publishing any concrete evidence to support this.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov dismissed the allegations and called the election “strange”. He claimed that the most popular candidate, Calin Georgescu, had been “forcibly removed”, and criticized what he described as the EU’s long history of interfering in other countries’ elections.

Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova went even further in her criticism, dismissing the Romanian election results as completely illegitimate.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Survey: Swedes are the world’s fifth most critical of Israel

The situation in Gaza

Published today 8:27
– By Editorial Staff
Trust in corruption accused Benjamin Netanyahu is also very low in most countries.
3 minute read

A survey by the American research institute Pew Research Center shows that the world has a predominantly negative attitude toward Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Swedes are among the most critical in the world – only four other countries have a more negative opinion. A full 75 percent of those surveyed in Sweden say they have a somewhat or very negative image of Israel.

The survey was conducted last spring, and in 20 of the 24 countries surveyed, at least half of adults have a negative attitude toward Israel. In countries such as Australia, Greece, Indonesia, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey, the proportion is particularly high, with around 75 percent or more expressing a negative attitude.

Support for Israel is lowest in Turkey, where 93 percent say they have a somewhat or very negative view of the country.

In India, opinions are more evenly divided, with 34 percent having a positive view and 29 percent a negative view. In African countries such as Kenya and Nigeria, the trend is different, with about half or more of those surveyed having a positive attitude toward Israel.

Illustration: Pew Research Center

Age and political affiliation influence

Compared to previous surveys, critical attitudes toward Israel have increased in several countries. In the US, the proportion of adults with a negative attitude has risen by 11 percentage points since March 2022. In the UK, the proportion has increased from 44 percent in 2013 to 61 percent this year.

The survey also shows clear differences based on age and political ideology. In high-income countries such as Australia, Canada, France, Poland, South Korea, and the US, younger people are more likely than older people to take a critical view of Israel, and in the US, the age difference is particularly clear.

Politically, people on the left are more likely to have a negative view than those on the right. In Australia, 90 percent of left-wingers have an unfavorable view, compared with 46 percent of right-wingers. In the US, the figures are 74 percent among liberals and 30 percent among conservatives.

Illustration: Pew Research Center

Low confidence in Netanyahu

Confidence in Benjamin Netanyahu is low in most countries surveyed. Except for Kenya and Nigeria, no more than one-third of adults in any country say they have confidence in his handling of international affairs.

In countries such as Australia, France, Germany, Greece, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Turkey, around 75 percent or more have little or no confidence in him. In several of these countries, a majority completely lack confidence in the corruption-accused prime minister.

Here too, there are differences linked to age and ideology. In Hungary, for example, people over the age of 50 are twice as likely to have confidence in Netanyahu as those between the ages of 18 and 34 (40 percent versus 20 percent).

Illustration: Pew Research Center

Ideologically speaking, right-wingers are more likely to support Netanyahu than left-wingers. In France, 25 percent of right-wingers trust him, compared to 12 percent in the center and 8 percent on the left.

Israelis are not particularly happy with developments either. In Israel, 58 percent of residents believe that their country is not very respected, or not respected at all, internationally, while 39 percent believe that it is.

These views are largely unchanged since last year, although the proportion saying that the country is not respected at all has increased from 15 to 24 percent.

Ukraine’s ex-prime minister: US has given the go-ahead to oust Zelensky

The war in Ukraine

Published yesterday 11:44
– By Editorial Staff
Ukraine's former prime minister believes that Zelensky will be "forced out" if he does not resign himself.
2 minute read

Former Ukrainian Prime Minister Mykola Azarov is convinced that President Volodymyr Zelensky will soon resign and leave the country, stating that the powers that be in Washington have already given the go-ahead to remove the Ukrainian leader.

In a post on the Telegram on June 9, Azarov wrote that the decision to remove Zelensky “has already been made in the United States” and that Washington has given the “go-ahead” for the process. He added that while Zelensky has some support in Europe, it is unlikely to affect the outcome and “hardly helps” him.

Azarov, who was prime minister under ousted President Viktor Yanukovych, argues that Zelensky will resign because his five-year term expired in May 2024. In such a scenario, according to Azarov, Speaker Ruslan Stefanchuk would step in as acting president and start shaping “a new political landscape” in Ukraine.

I don’t think Zelensky will remain in Ukraine after this”, Azarov said. “He will request protection, most likely from special forces, but they will not make such sacrifices for him. The options for his future may vary”, he added.

“The process of removing Zelensky has begun”

Already the week before his latest statement, Azarov made a similar prediction, claiming that the US has “written off” Zelensky and started a multi-step process to remove him. As an example, he cited the arrest of Leonid Mindich – described as a financial associate of both Zelensky and presidential chief of staff Andrei Yermak – which Azarov sees as a sign of an ongoing power shift.

He stressed that the arrest was not carried out by the Prosecutor General’s Office, but by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office – institutions he described as “created by the US, staffed by the US, and reporting only to the Americans“.

This is a serious signal that the process of removing Zelensky has begun”, Azarov wrote. He also hinted that if the president does not resign voluntarily, he will be “forced out“. Furthermore, he claimed that US auditors had recently arrived in Kiev to review how US tax money was spent – an initiative he attributed to instructions from the White House.

Potential obstacle to peace deal

Skeptics argue that Azarov’s statements should be seen in light of his political background, as a former prime minister under the ousted president Yanukovych, pointing out that the ex-prime minister has long been a vocal critic of Zelensky and has repeatedly called for his ouster.

Zelensky’s term of office formally expired on May 20, 2024, but presidential elections have not been held due to the state of emergency in Ukraine. Moscow therefore claims that Zelensky lacks legitimacy as the country’s leader.

Despite this, the Russian government has stated that it is open to negotiations with the current administration in Kiev. At the same time, it has warned that Zelensky’s status could be an obstacle to signing a binding peace agreement, as documents approved by a president with questionable legitimacy could be invalidated by a successor.

Nikolai Azarov (born December 17, 1947) was Prime Minister of Ukraine between 2010 and 2014, under President Viktor Yanukovych. He was previously Minister of Finance and one of the founders of the pro-Russian Party of Regions. Azarov resigned in January 2014 in the wake of the Western-backed Euromaidan protests and left the country shortly afterwards.

Since then, he has been living in exile in Russia and is wanted in Ukraine on suspicion of abuse of power. Since then, he has repeatedly criticized Zelensky and the current Ukrainian government.

Kennedy fires entire vaccine committee

Donald Trump's USA

Published yesterday 10:00
– By Editorial Staff
RFK with Donald Trump during a press conference last month.
2 minute read

US Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has dismissed all 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which advises the federal government on vaccine safety and efficacy.

The former members, all appointed by the Biden administration, will be replaced by new ones.

The ACIP consists of members with medical and public health backgrounds and is tasked with providing guidance to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) on how vaccines should be recommended and used among the civilian population.

Kennedy announced on June 9 that the purpose of the measure is to restore public confidence in vaccine science.

– Today we are prioritizing the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda, he said, adding:

– The public must know that unbiased science—evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest – guides the recommendations of our health agencies.

According to information from the former Department of Health and Human Services under the Trump administration, the Biden administration’s appointments meant that the new government would not have been able to appoint a majority of the committee until 2028. Of the 17 members, 13 would have taken office in 2024.

– A clean sweep is necessary to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science, he said, emphasizing that the new members “will prioritize public health and evidence-based medicine” and “no longer function as a rubber stamp for industry profit-taking agendas”.

Prominent vaccine critic

Kennedy has long been a vocal critic of what he describes as a corrupt alliance between the pharmaceutical industry and government agencies. He has promised to reform both the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, end mandatory vaccinations, and defend the individual’s right to informed medical decisions.

According to Kennedy, the public has been misled about the risks of vaccines, while pharmaceutical companies are protected from liability when harm occurs. He therefore demands full transparency in both trials and side effects, and wants to break what he sees as the industry’s deep control over research.

Although many see him as an important and powerful voice against the pharmaceutical industry, others are skeptical that his more far-reaching reforms will actually be implemented.

Violent riots in Los Angeles after deportation raids

Donald Trump's USA

Published 9 June 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The riots in Los Angeles are now in their third day.
4 minute read

Demonstrations against federal deportations of migrants in Los Angeles have escalated into widespread unrest over the past 24 hours.

President Donald Trump has ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to the city to assist police and protect federal buildings, a decision that has been sharply criticized by California Governor Gavin Newsom.

The protests in Los Angeles began last week after several federal raids against migrants without legal residence permits. The riots began on Saturday, when federal agents and demonstrators clashed in the suburb of Paramount.

On Sunday evening, the unrest culminated in violent riots, particularly in central Los Angeles, and according to police reports, protesters blocked Highway 101, set fire to cars and self-driving vehicles, and threw objects at the police.

The police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets, and stun grenades to disperse the demonstrators. At least 44 people have been arrested since the protests began. The number of arrests is likely to rise, given the situation.

The police have also declared several demonstrations illegal gatherings after the violence escalated.

National Guard on site – sharp criticism from state leadership

Early on Sunday, Donald Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles to support local police and protect federal buildings, including the Metropolitan Detention Center.

However, the decision was immediately met with criticism from California Governor Gavin Newsom, who called the move illegal and inflammatory, describing Trump’s actions as “the acts of a dictator, not a president”.

Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell also expressed concern about the developments and opened the door to reconsidering the police strategy: “Given the violence this evening, I believe we need to reevaluate”.

Trump has defended the decision to deploy the National Guard and called the protesters “violent, insurrectionist mobs”.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt emphasized that “these criminals will be arrested and swiftly brought to justice”.

At the same time, the US Department of Defense has raised the alert level at nearby military bases and warned of further action if the violence continues.

Raids on migrants behind the unrest

The unrest stems from a series of federal raids on undocumented migrants in the Los Angeles area, during which more than 100 people have been detained over the past week, including a prominent union leader.

The background is the Trump administration’s new, tougher line on immigration policy, with promises of record deportations and daily raids on suspected migrants.

Critics say the raids have also affected people legally residing in the country, and legal proceedings have now been initiated against several of the operations.

Chaotic scenes in the city center

Reports from Los Angeles paint a picture of a chaotic and tense atmosphere. Protesters, many carrying Mexican flags, have gathered outside federal buildings and chanted slogans in support of those facing deportation.

Several witnesses describe how self-driving cars and car tires were set on fire and how bottles and other objects were thrown at police and National Guard soldiers.

International media report scenes of total chaos and lawlessness in central Los Angeles, where police have responded with tear gas and rubber bullets to disperse the crowds.

Many residents are expressing shock and concern over the sudden escalation of violence, and both locals and protest organizers are now calling for restraint to avoid further clashes.

The situation in Los Angeles remains tense, and authorities fear further unrest in the coming days. The National Guard and police are now focusing on protecting federal buildings and maintaining order in the city center.

At the same time, the debate over Trump’s response and federal immigration policy continues at both the local and national levels.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.