Sunday, May 11, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Professor of climatology: “95% of forest fires are caused by humans”

The exaggerated climate crisis

Published 14 January 2025
– By Editorial Staff

The fires in California, especially in and around Los Angeles, are not caused by climate change but by human activity. That’s according to a recent study that reviewed decades of fire incidents. Whether through carelessness, accidents or intentional acts, humans are behind the overwhelming majority of fires.

John Abatzoglou, a professor of climatology at the University of California, Merced, has analyzed three decades of fire data from Los Angeles County. His research shows that most fires in the area are caused by human activity, NBC News reports.

– More than 95% of these are human-ignited fires. Arson is among the causes, but most human-caused fires are not intentional, Abatzoglou explains.

According to his analysis, vehicles and other equipment are the most common causes of fires in the area between 1992 and 2020. Sparks from faulty machinery or heat from engines can quickly ignite dry vegetation, especially during the hot and dry months of summer.

However, Mr. Abatzoglou stresses that changes in the weather, such as strong winds, can contribute to exacerbating the conditions that make fires more difficult to control, but they are not the primary cause of fires.

Poor maintenance of power lines and infrastructure problems are other examples of factors contributing to the current and perhaps most devastating fires in California’s history.

The statistics seemingly support a growing criticism of simplistic explanations that refer only to climate change.

Nonchalant political governance

California’s authorities have long been questioned for what many believe is their inability to address the problems and work preventively. As recently as 2020, the state experienced one of its worst fire seasons ever, with millions of acres burning and thousands of people forced to leave their homes.

The state’s criticized governor, Gavin Newsom (D), has previously highlighted climate change as a key factor behind the growing problems with fires in the state. At the same time, there are growing calls for more pragmatic solutions that address the human factors behind the fires.

Critics of the theory that climate change is the main cause of the fires say the focus should shift to human behavior. The dryness and heat that make areas particularly vulnerable to fires are exacerbated by poor infrastructure maintenance, carelessness and illegal actions.

The impact of eucalyptus trees

Eucalyptus trees, common in many parts of the world and especially in California, have been shown to have a significant impact on forest fires. The trees contain large amounts of oils that are extremely flammable making them particularly risky in hot and dry conditions.

Research has shown that eucalyptus oils, released at high temperatures, can create a kind of ‘fire torch’ that makes the fire spread faster. In some cases, it has also been shown that these trees can help make forest fires more intense, acting as a form of “fire torch” rather than a barrier.

Eucalyptus trees arrived in California in the 19th century, mainly via migrants from Australia. The trees were initially introduced as a solution to provide fast-growing trees for paper production and fuel.

By the early 1900s, thousands of acres of eucalyptus trees were planted with the encouragement of the state government. In modern-day California, and particularly in Los Angeles, eucalyptus is a common feature of the landscape, with large stands in both urban and more remote areas.

Arson is part of the problem

Arson is another part of the problem. Authorities in California report that individuals sometimes intentionally set fires on land for a variety of reasons, including insurance fraud, revenge or pure vandalism.

At the same time, experts point out that many fires are accidental and could be prevented with better training and safety practices. According to Mr. Abatzoglou, much of the responsibility lies with individuals and businesses to take precautions.

According to statistics from California, the number of fires linked to human activity has remained stably high for several decades. This includes everything from cigarette butts discarded in the wild to accidents on construction sites.

Despite this, some argue that climate change has a contributing role by creating longer periods of extreme heat and drought. But, as Abatzoglou points out, in the vast majority of cases the direct causes are human.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Swedish Green Party: Fuel prices to rise sharply if we win 2026 election

The exaggerated climate crisis

Published today 12:39
– By Editorial Staff
Amanda Lind, Green Party, promises higher fuel prices in case of an election win next year.

The Swedish Green Party wants to see higher prices for petrol and diesel if it wins next year’s election and is counting on support from other red-green parties. The party is proposing a significantly higher reduction target and a new emissions trading system.

According to spokesperson Amanda Lind, Sweden risks missing several climate targets with its current policy and believes that a faster transition requires fossil fuels to become more expensive.

Amanda Lind emphasized in the tax-funded SVT program “30 minuter” that the party wants to raise the reduction obligation so that the price of gasoline and diesel initially rises by two to three kronor per liter, and then gradually more until 2030.

It will be more expensive for us to manage the climate transition, Lind said.

Broad consensus

The Green Party wants to phase out the reduction obligation in the long term and instead introduce a national emissions trading system, where companies must purchase emission allowances from the state. Until this system is in place, the party wants the reduction obligation to be increased, which will directly affect the price at the pump.

Amanda Lind believes that the entire opposition supports this approach and that there is broad agreement that traditional fuels must cost more.

The Kristersson government has previously lowered the reduction obligation and thus fuel prices, which the Green Party believes has slowed down electrification and climate work. To mitigate the impact on households with long distances to travel, the party wants to introduce targeted support and at the same time invest in public transport and electric cars.

Overall, the Green Party’s proposal means that fuel prices will increase gradually over the coming years if the red-green coalition wins the 2026 election.

Sweden Democrats leader dismisses climate alarmism: “No reason to panic”

The exaggerated climate crisis

Published 7 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Jimmie Åkesson wants the focus to be on long-term and sustainable initiatives - not quick panic solutions.

Unlike most other Swedish establishment politicians, Sweden Democrats leader Jimmie Åkesson is highly skeptical of the climate alarmist rhetoric that dominates and wants the EU to slow down its climate initiatives.

Åkesson does not believe that the “climate threat” is in reality as serious as it is often portrayed by politicians and the media, nor does he buy the argument that we must hurry up and do everything we can before it is too late.

– I don’t share the view that there is such a hurry, he tells the tabloid Aftonbladet. Instead, he wants to put more resources into military rearmament.

– I am absolutely no expert, but everyone I talk to who has really familiarized themselves with what the IPCC’s various reports and scenarios say, there is no reason whatsoever to panic or climate anxiety, or anything like that at all.

Instead of quick and ill-considered measures that can have very negative consequences for society at large, the leader of the Sweden Democrats argues that we should invest in a long-term transition and electrification.

As expected, Åkesson’s departure from the established narrative on the climate issue has not gone down well with everyone.

Climate professor: “Very urgent”

Markku Rummukainen is a professor of climatology at Lund University and until 2023 represented Sweden on the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) a body tasked with compiling and presenting research on alleged climate change, global warming and its consequences.

The climate professor raged against Åkesson’s move, firmly stating that his views contradict the IPCC reports and unlike the SD leader, Rummukainen emphasized that it is “very urgent” to stop climate change.

– Yes, it is. There are, of course, different options for the way forward depending on what we do. There are opportunities to limit climate change between 1.5 and 2 degrees. If we don’t take the climate issue seriously, we will end up with higher numbers.

– According to the IPCC, all emissions matter. We are already seeing, and being affected by, the impacts of climate change. These include rising temperatures, rising sea levels and more extreme events such as more intense heatwaves and heavier rainfall. The effects are increasing rapidly with emissions, he continues.

“Following Putin’s lead”

Green Party spokesperson Daniel Helldén is also outraged by Jimmie Åkesson’s comments and says he has “got the whole climate issue backwards“.

Helldén also makes repeated attempts to link the SD leader with Russia and Vladimir Putin because Russian gas and oil exports are said to benefit if the EU does not invest heavily in “green” energy.

– It would strengthen the states that we are now trying to arm ourselves against. The policy he is pursuing is really following Putin’s lead. He must be cheering what he is saying.

– Russia’s huge exports of gas and oil are higher than the aid Europe gives to Ukraine. If the EU were to put the brakes on climate action, Russia could continue exporting. It will be Putin who wins from it, he repeats.

Swedish researchers to breed cows that burp less

The exaggerated climate crisis

Published 29 April 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The aim is to reduce methane emissions from cows by 25% in as many years.

In a new project, researchers want to find a way to breed cows that emit less methane gas. The ultimate goal is to reduce total emissions by 25% in 25 years.

In the ongoing project, carried out by geneticists and researchers at Växa Sverige with support from SLU, the plan is to measure emissions from 100,000 cows and sheep in Sweden. The project, called the Global Metagenetics Initiative, is led internationally by Wageningen University.

It will also involve DNA testing of different cows to find out which type of cow burps the least.

This knowledge will allow us to carry out a so-called genomic breeding evaluation. This means that we select and breed the cows that have many predispositions for low methane gas emissions, says Tomas Klingström at SLU, to the tax-funded SVT.

According to researchers, there can be a big difference in belching between different ruminants, with some cows emitting 30 percent less methane gas than others.

– The goal is to reduce methane emissions from cows by 25% in 25 years.

British scientists start outdoor geoengineering experiments

The exaggerated climate crisis

Published 27 April 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The UK government supports research and experiments on blocking the sun.

According to reports, British researchers are planning small-scale outdoor experiments with the controversial technology of geoengineering as part of a new government research program worth over £50 million. Critics warn of the risks and want to see a temporary halt to the plans.

The program, led by the Advanced Research and Invention Agency (Aria), aims to investigate techniques for blocking sunlight and thus slowing down alleged climate change, according to reports in The Guardian, among others.

The technology, which involves spraying reflective particles into the atmosphere or enhancing cloud formation with seawater spray, is intended, according to its proponents, to temporarily lower the Earth’s surface temperatures.

Professor Mark Symes, program manager at Aria, says there is considerable interest in cooling the Earth.

– The uncomfortable truth is that our current warming trajectory makes a number of such tipping points distinctly possible over the next century. This has driven increased interest in approaches that might actively cool the world in a short timeframe in order to avoid those tipping points, says Mark Symes.

Proponents of geoengineering argue that the technology could act as an emergency brake if climate change threatens to reach what are considered irreversible levels.

Aria emphasizes that the experiments will be carefully controlled and designed to provide the necessary data on the possibilities and risks.

Critics, however, warn that the initiative, which is supported by Bill Gates, among others, could divert attention from the alleged need to reduce carbon dioxide emissions.

Dangerous distraction

Senior scientists have called the project a dangerous distraction, comparing the technology to treating cancer with aspirin.

However, Aria insists that the trials do not release any toxic substances and promises to consult with the local community and carry out environmental impact assessments before each test.

In parallel with Aria’s program, the UK’s National Environment Research Council (NERC) has launched a £10 million project to analyze the effects of geoengineering, but without conducting new field experiments.

Dr. Sebastian Eastham at Imperial College London, one of the researchers involved in the NERC project, emphasizes the importance of international cooperation.

We know that SRM, or even the prospect of SRM, would affect international relations – this is a serious research question.

Geoengineering remains a controversial field of research. There is currently no global agreement on regulation, and critical experts are calling for a moratorium on large-scale interventions in the Earth’s atmosphere.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.