Sunday, October 19, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Netherlands identifies Israel as threat actor in new security report

Published 28 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Archive photo: Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz and parts of the destruction in Gaza.
2 minute read

The Netherlands’ counter-terrorism authority has included Israel in its latest report as one of the state actors assessed to pose a threat to the country’s security. The country is thus placed alongside Iran, North Korea and Turkey, among others.

The Netherlands’ National Coordinator for Counterterrorism and Security (NCTV) published on July 17, 2025, its annual report “Assessment of threats from state actors 2025” (Beoordeling Dreigingen door Staatactoren 2025), where Israel is listed for the first time as a security-threatening actor.

Israel’s placement on the list is linked to assessments that the country uses informal methods to influence public opinion and political decision-making in the Netherlands, reports The Jerusalem Post, among others.

The report refers specifically to an incident in Amsterdam in November 2024, when Israeli supporters of the football team Maccabi Tel Aviv were attacked. After the incident, a report was distributed from the Israeli side containing details about the suspects, including their names.

However, the report was not distributed through official diplomatic channels but was sent directly to selected politicians and journalists in the Netherlands. The NCTV emphasizes that this may have contributed to individuals being subjected to threats, intimidation or, in the worst case, attacks.

The report part of a broader analysis

In addition to the Amsterdam incident, the report also points to Israel’s pressure on the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague, Netherlands. The NCTV’s assessment is that such methods can undermine the Netherlands’ sovereignty and create division in the political and media landscape.

Israel is thus mentioned on two separate occasions in the report, which underscores the growing attention surrounding the country’s active foreign policy and security-related influence within Europe.

In the report, Israel is classified alongside other countries such as North Korea, Iran, Russia and Turkey, all of which are assessed to use similar strategies to influence and destabilize foreign governments and societies.

However, Dutch authorities emphasize that the report is part of a broader analysis of international security threats and does not necessarily imply diplomatic action against Israel at present.

Israel’s growing influence causes concern

In addition to the report, there are analysts who believe that the ongoing Gaza war should also be seen as a cause of the deteriorating relationship between the two countries. The Netherlands is one of few Western countries that has advocated a more critical stance toward Israel’s actions.

The international community is monitoring developments, where some European countries have expressed concern about Israel’s growing influence in democratic processes on the continent. On the other hand, continued diplomatic channels and talks exist to reduce tensions.

The Netherlands’ latest threat report is a clear example of how European security authorities are broadening their assessments of potential threats – beyond the traditional picture – and ensuring that indirect and informal influence methods are also brought to attention.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

British field marshal: Ukraine cannot win against Russia

The war in Ukraine

Published today 10:51
– By Editorial Staff
Even with expanded Western support, Lord David Richards assesses that Ukraine cannot win the war.
3 minute read

One of Britain’s highest-ranking military officers assesses that Ukraine will never be able to defeat Russia on the battlefield and should instead negotiate for peace.

In an interview with The Independent’s podcast World of Trouble, Field Marshal Lord David Richards argues that Ukraine simply does not have the capacity to drive Russian forces from its territory and should instead seek a negotiated solution.

Richards, who was promoted to the country’s most prestigious five-star military rank earlier this year and led NATO forces during the troop surge in Afghanistan, is critical of how Ukraine’s allies have managed their support.

— What we have done in the case of Ukraine is encourage Ukraine to fight, but not given them the means to win, says the former Chief of the Defence Staff.

When Richards is asked to reflect on Ukraine’s chances of success against Russia, he is clear.

— My view is that they would not win.

When the interviewer asks whether Ukraine could win even with the right resources, the answer is brief.

— No.

Pressed further on whether the right resources could make a difference, he repeated his answer and added:

— No, they haven’t got the manpower.

Not an existential issue for the West

Richards, who is the only British officer to have commanded large American combat forces since 1945, believes the prospects for Ukraine are bleak.

— Unless we were to go in with them – which we won’t do because Ukraine is not an existential issue for us. It clearly is for the Russians, by the way.

— We’ve decided because it’s not an existential issue, we will not go to war. We are, you can argue – and I absolutely accept it – in some sort of hybrid war. But that’s not the same as a shooting war in which our soldiers are dying in large numbers, Richards continues.

He emphasizes that despite sympathy for the Ukrainians and their achievements, he still believes the war is not in the West’s vital national interests.

— My instinct is that the best Ukraine can do, and you already see President Zelensky, who’s an inspirational leader … the best they can do is a sort of a score draw.

Zelensky met Trump

The statement comes after Volodymyr Zelensky flew to Washington DC to meet Donald Trump and try to convince him to give Ukraine Tomahawk cruise missiles.

But Zelensky’s plans to pressure Trump appear to have been undermined by Vladimir Putin, who spoke with the American president hours before the White House meeting with the Ukrainian leader.

At a packed press conference, Trump appeared hesitant to give away American weapons, while maintaining a friendly tone with Zelensky. The American president emphasized his own country’s need to maintain stockpiles.

Zelensky said very little, except to politely suggest that Ukraine could offer its drone technology in an exchange deal. Trump seemed open to the idea.

After the summit, Zelensky said that Trump had not said no to the idea of Tomahawk missiles – but not yes either.

Iraq war built on lies

In the extensive interview about his military life, the field marshal revealed that although his career has been successful, there have been occasions when he came into conflict with the establishment and often disagreed with his military and political superiors.

As a major general and deputy chief of the army under General Sir Mike Jackson, he says it was obvious to him that British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s government was lying about its claims that Saddam Hussein was developing nuclear weapons in Iraq.

Tony Blair’s government lied about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction to legitimize the invasion. Photo: World Economic Forum/CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

Together with other senior officers, he questioned the legality of Britain’s decision to join American forces in the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Before the British joined the invasion, Blair presented an intelligence document to parliament claiming that the Iraqi dictator was developing nuclear weapons.

“This stinks”

The document, which has since been mocked as “the dodgy dossier” for its unfounded claims, caused dismay among senior officers who had access to the actual intelligence information.

— “I and others encouraged the chief of defence staff to query whether this was legal and what was the basis of this intelligence, says Lord Richards.

— I do remember one officer – who I won’t name but was on the intelligence side – saying, ‘Don’t worry. We’ll find something to put’. Yeah, ‘don’t worry. We’ll find something about that. We’ll justify what we were doing’, he recounts.

— I went back to say to Mike Jackson, ‘This stinks’.

Ambassador warns: US has underestimated China’s strength

The new multipolar world order

Published yesterday 15:24
– By Editorial Staff
Former U.S. Ambassador to China Nicholas Burns believes that one of China's greatest advantages is the Chinese Communist Party's ability to think strategically and long-term.
3 minute read

Nicholas Burns, who served as U.S. Ambassador to China for three years, argues that the Western world has systematically underestimated the Chinese superpower’s capabilities in technology, military, and infrastructure.

In a recent interview, the experienced diplomat highlights several areas where China is far ahead of the United States – and warns that American policymakers still fail to see the full gravity of the situation from the perspective of U.S. strategic interests.

Nicholas Burns, 68, concluded his tenure as U.S. Ambassador to China in January 2025 after three intense years in Beijing. With a long career in American diplomacy behind him – having served under six presidents and nine secretaries of state – he returned to Harvard University where he is a professor of diplomacy and international relations.

Now he speaks openly about his experiences and observations from his time in China. And the picture he paints is more alarming than many are willing to acknowledge.

Impressive infrastructure

We’ve underestimated Chinese power in the world, Burns states bluntly. As an example, he highlights China’s high-speed rail system:

Those trains are fabulous. We rode those trains. You know, you can go from Beijing to Shanghai in four and a half hours.

The distance is over a thousand kilometers, he points out, drawing a clear comparison with the American rail system Amtrak:

We have Amtrak’s just not like that.

But it is in scientific and technological capacity that Burns sees the greatest challenge.

That’s the coin of the realm in our decade, he says and continues:

In the next few decades. Which society will turn out more scientists and engineers?

Former US ambassador to China Nicholas Burns shakes hands with Xu Kunlin, governor of Jiangsu Province in China during a meeting in 2023. Photo: US Department of State

“Alarming” education statistics

The statistics he presents are striking. 34 percent of first-year students at Chinese universities study engineering or STEM fields (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics). In the United States, the corresponding figure is 5.6 percent.

And they’re a much bigger country, Burns adds.

He also points to a peculiar paradox in American society. At Harvard’s graduation ceremony, where he himself teaches, the pattern is clear:

At Harvard graduation, where I teach, when we ask our graduate students to stand up as a class, chemistry majors, biology majors, physics majors, largely Asian Americans, Some American citizens, excuse me, Asians, American citizens of Asian ethnicity or Chinese.

The same pattern is visible in business.

Last week, when President Trump gathered all the tech titans of the United States in the White House, tremendous number of those tech titans are Indian Americans and Chinese Americans, Burns says.

His conclusion is scathing:

We’re not competing when it really matters for the future. And that’s on technology.

Overlooked military strength

Burns also addresses the Chinese military, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), whose capabilities he believes the Western world underestimates.

Some people have said, well, it hasn’t fought since 1978. What is what it’s worth? I’ve seen the PLA, he says firmly.

I think we’ve underestimated their military strength, their technology strength.

Strategic long-term thinking

One of China’s greatest advantages, according to Burns, is the Chinese Communist Party’s ability to think strategically and long-term.

The Communist Party of China is strategic and they don’t have to worry about, you know, we want to worry about what the press says. I mean, that’s a good thing to have the press challenging the government. They have nobody opposing them. And so they can make big bets over 10, 20, 30 years.

As an example, he mentions China’s systematic Africa policy:

For 35 consecutive years, the Chinese foreign minister, whoever that person is, has made his first trip of the year in January to Africa to show the Africans you are our priority.

The contrast with the United States is striking.

I think President Trump never went to Africa in his first term. President Biden went once to Angola for two or three days in December, at the very end of his term, Burns says.

His conclusion is unequivocal:

They’re strategic, and we’re not competing on that level. So actually, I think the Chinese technology military economics are stronger than we think they are. And I think we’ve underestimated them, and we can’t do that any longer.

Bolton indicted – shared top secret information with family

Donald Trump's USA

Published 17 October 2025
– By Editorial Staff
John Bolton has consistently argued for an aggressive and hawkish American foreign policy.
3 minute read

Former US National Security Advisor John Bolton has been indicted for storing top secret documents in his home and sharing classified information with family members. Bolton’s hacked email account also gave unidentified hackers access to sensitive material.

The neoconservative figure John Bolton, who served as National Security Advisor during President Donald Trump’s first term and later became one of his sharpest critics, was indicted on Thursday for violations related to handling classified documents.

The indictment suggests that secret information was exposed when hackers – allegedly linked to the Iranian regime – broke into Bolton’s email account. A representative for Bolton informed the FBI in 2021 about the hack, according to prosecutors, but did not disclose that he had shared classified information via the account or that the hackers now had access to government secrets.

Bolton denied the charges in a defiant statement.

— Now, I have become the latest target in weaponizing the Justice Department to charge those he deems to be his enemies with charges that were declined before or distort the facts.

The indictment alleges that Bolton, between 2018 and August of this year, shared more than 1,000 pages of diary-like notes containing top secret information with two family members – identified as his wife and daughter. The material included information from meetings with US government officials, intelligence documents, and conversations with foreign leaders.

After sending one document, Bolton wrote to his relatives: “None of which we talk about!!!” In response, one of the relatives wrote: “Shhhhh”, prosecutors state.

— There is one tier of justice for all Americans. Anyone who abuses a position of power and jeopardizes our national security will be held accountable. No one is above the law, commented Attorney General Pam Bondi.

Neoconservative war hawk

Bolton’s attorney Abbe Lowell said that the underlying facts were investigated and resolved several years ago, and that the charges concern parts of Bolton’s personal diaries from his 45-year career in government.

He suggests that the case is linked to the Department of Justice’s failed attempt to block the publication of his 2020 book, “The Room Where It Happened”, which portrayed Trump as deeply ignorant about foreign policy.

— These charges are not just about his focus on me or my diaries, but his intensive effort to intimidate his opponents, to ensure that he alone determines what is said about his conduct, Bolton claimed.

Bolton has, throughout his long career in Republican foreign policy circles, become known as a neoconservative war hawk with hardline views on American military power.

He was, among other things, a strong advocate for the Iraq War and has consistently argued for an aggressive foreign policy toward Iran and North Korea. Trump once called him a “crazy” warmonger who would have led the country into “World War Six”.

When President Trump was asked about the indictment of his former National Security Advisor, he responded that he was not aware of it.

I didn’t know that. You’re telling me for the first time, but I think he’s, you know, a bad person. I think he’s a bad guy. Yeah, he’s a bad guy. Too bad. But that’s the way it goes, the president stated.

China drops visa requirements for Swedes

The new multipolar world order

Published 17 October 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Soon it will be easier for Swedes to visit the Great Wall of China and other Chinese travel destinations.
1 minute read

Swedish citizens will soon be able to travel to China without a visa. This was announced by Swedish Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergård (M) during a visit to Beijing.

Sweden has until now been one of few European countries lacking visa-free entry to China, despite most other nations on the continent having gained access to the new rules.

This is very welcome news, and businesses in particular have been requesting this for a long time. We don’t know the details regarding implementation or exact design, but I expect we will have this shortly. But as I understand it, it will cover Swedish citizens, Stenergård told publicly funded broadcaster SVT.

In July this year, China expanded its visa-free policy to cover a total of 74 countries, where citizens can visit the country for up to 30 days without a visa. Nearly all of Europe is included in the agreement, but Sweden and the United Kingdom have until now remained outside.

For Swedish travelers and businesses, the change represents a major relief, as visa applications were previously time-consuming and costly.

Swedish companies have unfortunately been affected by excessive red tape for a long time, not least at the EU level, she says.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.