In an interpellation debate, Elsa Widding asks whether Social Affairs Minister Jacob Forssmed (KD) will investigate the strong suspicions that the mRNA vaccine has a very harmful effect on the human genome and stop all use of the experimental vaccines until such an investigation is completed.
However, Forssmed is not interested in thoroughly investigating the harmful effects of the vaccine, claiming that the controls are already “rigorous and comprehensive”. Nor does he seem to want to take any personal responsibility for the consequences of mRNA technology.
Independent member of the Swedish Parliament Elsa Widding, addressed an interpellation to Minister of Social Affairs Jacob Forssmed in light of the experimental mRNA vaccine during the COVID crisis and the dangers and negative health effects suspected to be linked to the vaccine.
Widding refers to a wide range of experts and points out how there is a lot of evidence to suggest that mRNA vaccines can, among other things, be contaminated with bacterial DNA and thus carry a risk of very serious damage to human health.
– This is because synthetic foreign DNA is encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles, which can then integrate into human cells, leading to genomic instability, cancer, immune system disorders and adverse hereditary effects.
“Will the Minister take responsibility?”
She therefore asks Forssmed whether he will set up an independent investigation into the strong suspicions that the vaccine affects the human genome and whether he will stop all use of products based on mRNA technology until the above investigation is completed.
– If the Minister chooses not to stop the use of mRNA technology in Sweden, will the Minister take full responsibility for the consequences? she asks.
However, Forssmed does not seem to be prepared to take any personal responsibility at all – and he calls the process of checking the vaccine “rigorous and comprehensive“.
– I have good faith in the process related to the control and monitoring of medicines and vaccines, and I believe it is important that those who are deemed to be at risk of serious illness from COVID-19 can continue to receive the protection offered by the vaccine, he says.
“Dark shadow hangs over the authorities”
Widding soon becomes visibly frustrated in the debate that the Minister for Social Affairs does not seem to be interested in answering her questions at all and also seems to misunderstand what she is trying to get across.
– So the question is not whether the contaminating foreign DNA integrates into the DNA of human cells, but how often this happens and how serious the effects are.
– The genetic risks to humans and their offspring are unknown. That is why further scientific studies to determine these risks are urgently needed. Similarly, the government should investigate, for example, excess mortality, which remains very high in the Western world. If you look at the years 2020, 2021 and 2022, you can see that it was highest in 2021, when vaccination started, and still very high in 2022. Why is this not being investigated? Is there a link with the vaccines or not? she continues.
The independent MP argues that the monitoring of mRNA vaccines is not at all as “rigorous and comprehensive” as Forssmed claims – instead, many rules and best practices for clinical trials were violated during the COVID crisis.
– Someone – the manufacturer – has been sloppy in the manufacturing process of the modified mRNA vaccine, and the authorities have let them get away with it. I would therefore say that a very dark shadow hangs over the same authorities that the Minister is defending. Safe and effective vaccines cannot be produced as long as regulators do not act in the public interest.
Not preventing the spread of infection
Forssmed continues to avoid Widdings’ questions and instead declares that he is “confident that the vaccines used against COVID-19 are of good quality and that they are safe and effective against serious illness and death“.
– It is problematic that this type of non-scientific claims are spread, and it is of course not relevant to stop vaccinations with safe, effective and approved vaccines, the Minister continued.
Ms. Widdings’ irritation at the minister’s dodging of her questions is growing, and she also points out that the authorities may not have as much credibility on the vaccine issue as they would like to claim.
Translation: Head-in-the-sand behavior from Social Affairs Minister Forssmed.
– First, COVID-19 vaccines have never even been tested for their ability to block virus transmission and thus do not protect against the spread of infection. European regulators, as well as governments and state bodies, misled people to get them to accept these products. Hasn’t this affected the credibility of the authorities? Here I would like to remind the Council of State of the text of the Nuremberg Code, that is, the prohibition of subjecting people to experiments and of forcing, pressuring or persuading people to participate in medical experiments against their will.
– Second, the COVID-19 vaccines resulted in an unprecedented level of reported adverse events, including deaths. Moreover, analysis of public data shows that it was completely random which batch of vaccine a person received and thus also random which side effects the person suffered after the shot. Those who were unlucky enough to receive a shot from a really bad batch of modified mRNA vaccine had a 1 in 20 risk of becoming very seriously ill or dying. Others, who received their vaccine from the most favorable batch, had a minimal risk of illness or death.
– Third, analysis by several independent scientists now shows that Pfizer’s and Moderna’s products were contaminated with varying and uniquely high levels of residual DNA. It is this contamination that is at the heart of today’s debate…How can a vaccine be considered safe and effective when hardly anyone even knows what it contains?
“Affects the brain, heart and lungs”
Widding also highlights how the pressure for Swedes to take the experimental vaccines was enormous and how people were fooled into thinking they were preventing the spread of infection if they were vaccinated – even though this was not the case.
She highlights how modified mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 pose health risks that were not adequately studied before the vaccines were granted emergency approval and began to be injected into the world’s populations.
– The lipid nanoparticles do not stop at the injection site but reach the bloodstream and thus several organs. If cells in the blood vessels absorb these particles, they will cause vascular damage and blood clots, leading to an increased risk of stroke, heart attack and other acute vascular diseases. The Minister should know this if he has read the data from Pfizer. All these conditions are well documented in the medical literature and in national adverse event reporting systems. Full stop. Similarly, lipid nanoparticles can affect organs such as the brain, heart, lungs, kidneys, etc.
Vaccine manufacturers must be scrutinized
– While these risks apply to all mRNA vaccine technology, the potentially serious health risks due to the contamination with bacterial DNA we are talking about today also need to be addressed. The development of safe and effective vaccines depends on transparent and reliable oversight of vaccine manufacturers. Positive change starts with the recognition of errors, and this process must start immediately before more lives are lost in a careless and unnecessary way. A huge responsibility rests here on the shoulders of the Prime Minister, she concluded.
Despite repeated calls and direct questions, Forssmed continues to refuse to answer them, instead repeating mantras such as “we need to continue vaccinating” and that “it is important that people in risk groups receive vaccines“.
– It is important that we continue to stand up for science and the thousands of researchers who say that this is good and important and protects against severe disease and death, he says.
