Wednesday, March 26, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Former Prime Minister of Pakistan: “Defying the U.S. got me out of office”

Published 13 June 2023
– By Editorial Staff
Imran Khan's foreign policy was considered anti-American.

Former Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan claims that it was pressure from the US that brought him and his government down last year. The Americans are said to have preferred a change of regime in the country because Khan was considered too “Russia-friendly” and his foreign policy was not deemed to favor American interests.

In a candid interview with Newsweek, the former prime minister claims that his “defiance” of the Americans led to his political downfall last year. The US was reportedly very unhappy with the foreign policy Khan wanted to pursue and even more unhappy with his official visit to Russia.

Because of this, and following persuasion campaigns by his political opponents, the US, according to Khan, began to consider him an “enemy of the US” and eventually the opposition in the country, with US support, was able to maneuver him out.

Khan himself says he has written evidence that the Americans were involved in a conspiracy to remove him and replace him with a more US-friendly regime.

– For some reason, if you don’t agree with the US foreign policy, you turn anti-American

Khan, who himself advocates what he says is a foreign policy that does not support the interests of the US or other major powers, was removed from office just over a year ago following a vote of no confidence in the country’s parliament.

Imran Khan and former Secretary of State John Kerry in 2013. Photo: US State Department

Khan is also under house arrest and is accused of involvement in corruption, terrorism and murder, but says he is innocent and that his opponents made up the charges against him for purely political reasons to get him out of office.

I’m not really that worried about my own fate, because that’s secondary. The main thing is the future of Pakistan, which is what I’m worried about. Because I really fear now that this path which we are being taken on, there is nothing but darkness ahead. Because, apart from anything else, our whole democracy is being dismantled.

The US State Department said in a statement that it had nothing to do with the removal of Khan.

“These allegations are categorically false; you have heard me say this before. Pakistani politics are a matter for the Pakistani people to decide and for them to pursue within the auspices of their own constitution and laws”, it is claimed.

It is worth mentioning that as recently as November 2022, Khan was the target of an assassination attempt, shortly after his removal from office and while delivering a speech to his supporters urging them to march on the capital. Khan and nine others were injured when a seemingly lone gunman opened fire with automatic weapons, and a sympathizer of his Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party died in the attack.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Sources: Trump may fire national security advisor

Donald Trump's USA

Published yesterday 19:46
– By Editorial Staff
Waltz (center) with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.

The other powers that be in the White House are reportedly furious with Trump’s National Security Advisor Mike Waltz after he inadvertently added an outside journalist to an internal chat group where US war plans were discussed.

According to anonymous government sources, the gaffe is considered highly embarrassing and risks casting a pall of ridicule over the Trump administration and they are considering firing Waltz.

The Nordic Times recently reported that The Atlantic’s American-Jewish editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg was suddenly invited to the group and could read in real time the discussions of those in power about bombing the Houthi rebels in Syria.

Despite the sensitivity of the discussions, no one seemed to care about controlling who could see the plans, and it was Goldberg who eventually left the group of his own accord, drawing attention to the security flaws.

The revelation has enraged both the opposition and his own party colleagues, with many saying it is extremely frivolous and potentially very dangerous for conversations concerning the country’s interests and military resources to be conducted in such a casual and indiscriminate manner without any security considerations.

“Can’t have recklessness”

According to White House sources, the Trump administration considers the whole thing very embarrassing and Waltz, who invited the journalist to the group, is now reportedly hanging loose.

An anonymous administration official told Politico that the national security adviser’s future will be decided in a couple of days but that there are strong indications that he will be fired.

– It was reckless not to check who was on the thread. It was reckless to be having that conversation on Signal. You can’t have recklessness as the national security adviser.

Another person close to the White House is even more blunt, claiming that “everyone in the White House can agree on one thing: Mike Waltz is a fucking idiot“.

No political consequences for Trump

According to reports, at least two of Trump’s close aides have already called on the President to force Waltz to resign as soon as possible so that he alone can bear the blame for what happened before Congress, the voters and the American people.

– I don’t think there are any long term political consequences for Trump or the Administration, outside of this potentially costing Waltz his job, one of the sources clarified.

It is also worth noting that Speaker Mike Johnson and several other prominent Republicans have so far come to Waltz’s defense and publicly declared that he should absolutely not resign from his post.

US security breach – war plans shared with journalist

Donald Trump's USA

Published yesterday 16:56
– By Editorial Staff
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, National Security Advisor Mike Waltz, and Vice President JD Vance were three of the group's participants.

Jewish-American editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, Jeffrey Goldberg, thought someone was making fun of him when he was suddenly added to a secret chat group, along with what appeared to be the top US political leadership.

However, he soon realized that the chat group was real and he witnessed the powers-that-be discussing a secret military operation against the Houthi rebels in Yemen.

US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Vice President JD Vance reportedly discussed details of a sensitive bombing operation against Houthi targets in Yemen in an encrypted Signal chat – which inadvertently included Jeffrey Goldberg. The editor-in-chief revealed this himself in an article published Monday, while a Cabinet meeting was underway at the White House.

According to Goldberg, on March 11, he was added to a Signal group of 18 participants by a user who identified himself as national security adviser Mike Waltz. The group, titled “Houthi PC small group,” included profiles that appeared to belong to Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hetseth and CIA Director John Ratcliffe.

Initially, Goldberg was skeptical, thinking at first that he had been the victim of some kind of disinformation campaign.

– I had very strong doubts that this text group was real, because I could not believe that the national-security leadership of the United States would communicate on Signal about imminent war plans, he explains.

On March 14, participants began discussing the exact timing of the military operation.

“Hate bailing Europe out again”

I think we are making a mistake”, wrote a user named JD Vance, arguing that Europe benefits more from the attacks than the US.

3 percent of US trade runs through the suez. 40 percent of European trade does. There is a real risk that the public doesn’t understand this or why it’s necessary. The strongest reason to do this is, as POTUS said, to send a message”, he continued.

Vance added, however, that he was willing to agree to support the plans if the others were in favor of an attack but added that he is “not sure the president is aware how inconsistent this is with his message on Europe right now” and pointed to the risk of increased oil prices.

Security adviser Mike Waltz also declared that it will be the Europeans who will pay for the attacks, and Vance expressed that he “just hate bailing Europe out again”.

I fully share your loathing of European free-loading. It’s PATHETIC”, Hegseth replied.

White House confirms miss

On March 15 at 1:45 p.m. ET (according to Hegseth’s message in the chats), attacks also began against the Houthi rebels. Goldberg described checking social media at 1:55 p.m. and seeing reports of explosions in the Yemeni capital of Sanaa. The chat feed then featured congratulatory messages from Mike Waltz and others.

The existence of the secret chat group was real, Goldberg said, and he had apparently been invited by mistake, without any close scrutiny and without any of the top security officials seeming to realize he was even there. He also states that a large amount of highly sensitive information was disseminated in the group, but that he himself does not want to publish it further for US security reasons.

Shortly after the attacks, Goldberg left the chat and on the same day, Donald Trump declared on his Truth Social platform that he had “ordered the United States Military to launch decisive and powerful Military action against the Houthi terrorists in Yemen”.

The White House has confirmed that an outside user was accidentally added to the secret chat group but not why covert military operations and decisions were discussed in such an uncertain and casual manner.

According to the US National Security Council (NSC), the messages appear to be “authentic” but the chat group posed “no threats to our service members or our national security”.

“Stunning carelessness”

At a press conference, Trump dismissed knowledge of the incident – and instead pointed out that he did not like The Atlantic newspaper. His press secretary also emphasized that the president has full confidence in his security team.

Democratic Senator Jack Reed is not as impressed, calling it “one of the most egregious failures of operational security and common sense I have ever seen”  and calling for an immediate investigation.

– Military operations need to be handled with utmost discretion, using approved, secure lines of communication, because American lives are on the line. The carelessness shown by President Trump’s cabinet is stunning and dangerous, he continued in a statement.

Nebraska Republican Don Bacon is also highly critical, saying it is deeply problematic that the security team does not even appear to have used secure phones or been protected from outside interception.

Goldberg also stated that Waltz set up for some messages to be deleted after one and four weeks respectively a potential violation of law since federal rules require the archiving of official documents.

Others are more skeptical about the scandal, arguing that it is highly unlikely that a complete outsider and a journalist at that would be invited to a group like this by mistake. Instead, they speculate that the intention from the outset was for the information to get out though it is unclear why.

McDonald’s cheeseburgers used to recruit soldiers for Ukraine’s army

The war in Ukraine

Published 24 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Using fast food to attract young people to the army has provoked many.

A Ukrainian recruitment campaign on TikTok is enticing young men to sign military contracts with the promise of buying thousands of McDonald’s cheeseburgers.

The campaign has caused controversy and faced harsh criticism, while raising questions about the authorities’ recruitment practices during the ongoing war.

Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense has launched a recruitment video on TikTok, which appears to primarily target young men between the ages of 18 and 24. An age group that is currently excluded from the country’s mobilization.

The video emphasizes that those who sign a military contract will receive one million hryvnia (approximately €22,000) – a sum that, according to the video, is enough to buy 15,625 cheeseburgers at McDonald’s.

In the video, a man stands outside a McDonald’s restaurant and asks the question “How many cheeseburgers can be bought for 1,000,000 hryvnia?”, before presenting the figure of 15,625, based on a price of 64 hryvnia per cheeseburger.

The strategy of using McDonald’s fast food as an incentive has generated strong reactions from, among others, former Ukrainian diplomat Andrey Telizhenko.

He says the strategy shows desperation and a lack of respect for the citizens of Ukraine.

– Anyone who would fall for the promise of 15,625 cheeseburgers is not going to receive that money anyway, he says, pointing out that many soldiers do not survive long enough to use the money.

Creative desperation

The criticism is amplified by social media, where users express both surprise and anger. Many call the campaign bizarre and inappropriate, especially given the ongoing conflict with Russia.

Previous reports from the Associated Press and others in January 2025 show that the country is planning reforms to include younger age groups in recruitment, which the video in question appears to be part of.

The recruitment campaign also reflects a broader trend of Ukraine trying to reach younger generations through social media, but using cheeseburgers as bait during a war creates a contrast that many find offensive.

The debate highlights the problems Ukraine faces in balancing military needs with public trust. While some see the video as a creative way to reach young people, others see it as a sign of desperation in a time of crisis.

The Ukrainian Ministry of Defense has not yet commented publicly on the criticism.

NATO warns: “Climate crisis” threatens military pact’s capabilities

Published 24 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
NATO member states are urged to adapt their military forces to climate change as quickly as possible.

NATO is facing a serious threat, according to James Appathurai, the organization’s Assistant Secretary General for Innovation, Hybrid and Cyber Affairs.

This time, however, it is neither the Russians nor the Chinese who are said to be threatening the US-led military pact’s operations – but alleged climate change.

According to the Canadian NATO chief, the climate has changed dramatically in a short period of time and Europe’s military forces have not yet been able to adapt satisfactorily to these new conditions.

The NATO Climate Change and Security Impact Assessment report, for example, paints a picture of increased heavy rainfall, making it difficult for radar systems to function as intended.

Other problems identified include the negative impact of warmer air on aircraft performance and higher water temperatures making it more difficult to track enemy submarines. According to James Appathurai, it is therefore high time for NATO countries to focus on adapting their defense to climate change.

We need to look at the climate in terms of its impact on military effectiveness, he tells state broadcaster SVT.

“Sweden will be affected”

Since 2022, the US Army has been actively working on “climate adaptation”, which means, among other things, that all non-combat military vehicles will be electrified, and that solar and wind power will be used extensively to secure the energy supply.

Novel materials, new materials that we can generate for military equipment and uniforms. Better modelling using AI so we can see what temperature changes take place in the future, Appathurai explains, pointing out that lighter and more efficient aircraft engines are also being built to carry more cargo and consume less fuel.

James Appathurai and Major General Dimitrios Sigoulakis. Photo: NATO/ CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

 We are looking at all kinds of innovative technologies and better planning to be able to meet these challenges in the future and maintain our military effectiveness, he says, emphasizing that climate adaptation is being driven by purely military strategic reasons, rather than activist motives.

He further emphasizes that it is up to the individual member states to decide on climate adaptation, but that the leadership hopes to “forge consensus and give non-binding voluntary guidelines to member states”.

As I have outlined, Sweden will be affected by this, he states.

Share via

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.

Send this to a friend