Monday, March 24, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

DOGE: Musk to help Trump cut government red tape

US presidential election

Published 10 November 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Elon Musk brought one of his sons to the interview with Tucker Carlson.

Trump’s behavior during the summer assassination attempt was what finally convinced Elon Musk that the outspoken Republican was the right man to lead the US forward, according to the high-profile entrepreneur.

– America is the home of the free and the land of the brave, and that’s what we want in a president, and he is just that, Musk said.

During Tucker Carlson’s live broadcast on election night in Mar-a-Lago, several prominent Republicans were interviewed – not least tech mogul Elon Musk, who has been identified by many as one of the most important people behind the Trump campaign’s success.

In the interview, Carlson wonders how it is possible for Trump to win the election after his political opponents, and virtually all the establishment media, have attacked him almost daily for several years, portraying him as a rapist and a criminal while Kamala Harris’ campaign has spent almost three times as much money as the Republican campaign.

No, it’s remarkable, Musk replies.

– It might as well be an extension of the DNC. The DNC just sends them whatever the talking points are and they will just talk like NPCs all day long. So in practice it’s very stacked in Harris’ favor.

According to the contractor, one area that was heavily emphasized by the Republicans was the election work on the streets and especially in the swing states. He believes that this work has been neglected and that the Democrats have previously been the best at “knocking on doors” to encourage people to vote and tell them why they should vote for their particular candidate.

Big push for Amish voters

There are also many who really wanted to vote but could not get to the polls, Musk notes and that this has been something that he and the Republicans have invested heavily in several states ahead of this year’s election.

We paid particular attention to the Amish communities in Pennsylvania, he continues, noting that no candidate has ever managed to get large numbers of Amish people to vote in the same way.

Amish voters are also generally very unhappy with Joe Biden’s administration, and feel that they have been subjected to government overreach, for example, when several Amish farmers had their farms shut down for non-compliance with regulations.

– It really made them pretty upset and you just need to be able to channel the fact that they are upset and tell them that ‘there is one thing you can do about it and it’s called voting, and we are happy to transport you’.

– They get to ride in vans as long as they don’t drive them. So we just made sure that we bring them to the polls and that they voted the way they wanted to vote, he says, adding that nearly 100% of Amish voters support Trump.

“Playing to win”

On the day of Trump’s most high-profile assassination attempt, Elon Musk chose to publicly endorse the presidential candidate, and to throw himself wholeheartedly into the campaign.

– My philosophy is that if you play, you play to win. You don’t play by half measure, he says, explaining that he spent all his waking hours, 7 days a week, helping Trump win the election and getting undecided voters to vote for him.

– If people are not registered, they cannot vote. The initial focus was just to maximize registration and then once the registration deadline was over just to get the early votes.

Calls for Musk to be jailed

He further believes that his own platform, X, has played a crucial role in this year’s elections, calling it “the one place where you can find out the truth”. X’s influence and the dismantling of censorship has led prominent Democrats to call for Elon Musk’s imprisonment, and he notes that there has been widespread outrage within the US political establishment over the platform’s increased freedom of expression.

Other Democrats have called for Musk’s company to lose all government contracts, for his company to be nationalized, for him to be deported as an illegal immigrant or for him to be arrested for allegedly being “Putin’s best friend” while saying that he personally is not particularly worried about any of these things happening.

The last time Trump won the election, his opponents tried to have him impeached, charged and jailed almost immediately, but this time Musk personally believes the situation will be different.

I don’t think they’ll be quite as intense as last time, he says, explaining that it also matters how big the victory is.

Harris can’t have a conversation

Another partial explanation for Trump’s success, according to Musk, is that both the president and the vice president, J.D. Vance, have participated in many longer interviews with popular pod-casters outside the classic establishment media, thereby reaching a new audience of undecided voters to get to know them better.

– A reasonable minded smart person who is not hardcore one way or the other, they just listen to someone talk for a few hours and that’s how they decide whether they like you or not.

He also says that in his judgement, Harris is not capable of having longer discussions and that this was also the reason why she did not appear in any similar contexts, while Trump, on the other hand, can easily have an unscripted conversation for three hours, as was the case, for example, with the interview with the pod-caster Joe Rogan.

– I actually posted on X. Nothing would do more damage to Kamala’s campaign than to be on Joe Rogan, Musk continues.

 

“Strong and brave”

When asked why Musk chose to publicly support Donald Trump, he is silent for a while before answering that Trump’s reaction to the assassination attempt was crucial for him personally.

– I think he’s a very interesting and funny person. Very vilified by the media obviously and he has endured a lot. I went out and gave him my support immediately after he was shot. When you see somebody under fire and their reaction you know immediately if someone is brave or if they are a coward.

– To be hit by a bullet. The blood is coming down your face. There could be a second shooter. And yet he goes and fights. That’s true courage, you can’t fake it. America is the home of the free and the land of the brave, and that’s what we want in a president too. We want a strong brave person as president and he is that.

Media “mouthpiece of the Democrats”

Musk points out that the Harris campaign has not only spent much more money than Trump’s campaign, but that she has also had almost unanimous support from the vast majority of American news outlets, which, according to the entrepreneur, have practically repeated messages from the Democrats.

“Gigantic government bureaucracy”

Asked whether he will personally be involved in the Trump administration, Musk says he has been asked to help increase government efficiency in various areas something he sees as much needed.

– We have a gigantic government bureaucracy. We got over-regulation, we have agencies that have overlapping responsibilities. There are about 450 different government agencies. We’re just creating new agencies all the time, it gets to a point where basically everything is illegal, you just can’t get anything done.

In the past, Musk has used humorous memes to advocate for “DOGE” Department Of Government Efficiency something he emphasizes is sincere.

– These will be real costs for people. Hidden costs but very substantial. It’s very hard to build new housing if you are burdened by massive requirements that doesn’t make sense.

– We need to let the builders of America build, he concludes.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Trump avoids punishment in hush money case

US presidential election

Published 14 January 2025
– By Editorial Staff

President-elect Donald Trump has been convicted of accounting violations in the high-profile “hush money” case but still escapes punishment.

During a court hearing via video link in New York on January 10, 2025, the judge announced that Trump will receive an unconditional release, meaning he will avoid both a prison sentence and a fine.

The case involves payments to buy the silence of several people, including porn actress Stormy Daniels, ahead of the 2016 presidential election. Trump has consistently denied the allegations, describing the process as a politically motivated attempt to undermine his chances in the 2024 election.

It’s been a political witch hunt. It was done to damage my reputation so that I would lose the election, and, obviously, that didn’t work, Trump said during the hearing.

The unconditional release decision means that the conviction remains on Trump’s record, making him the first presidential candidate in US history with such a charge. However, Trump plans to appeal the conviction.

Keir Starmer accused of meddling in US elections

US presidential election

Published 14 January 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Keir Starmer and Joe Biden during a meeting last summer.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer faces allegations that the Labour Party influenced the 2024 US presidential election by sending volunteers to assist Kamala Harris’ campaign.

At the same time, criticism of the Prime Minister is growing at home, where he is accused of failing to act against Pakistani grooming gangs and a former Labour politician was arrested in a pedophile scandal days after he took an official stance on Starmer.

A political storm with international ramifications began in October 2024 when Donald Trump’s campaign accused UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and the Labour Party of trying to influence the US presidential election.

According to a complaint filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), the Labor Party sent volunteers to the United States to assist Kamala Harris’ campaign, which the Trump campaign described as “blatant foreign interference”.

– To protect our democracy from illegal foreign influence, it is imperative that the Federal Election Commission investigate this matter immediately, said Gary Lawkowski, campaign lawyer for Trump.

The complaint specifically pointed to a now-deleted LinkedIn post by Labor Party Chief Operating Officer Sofia Patel, in which she urged volunteers to travel to North Carolina and promised: “We will sort your housing”.

The Labor Party has not denied that volunteers traveled to the US but insists that no law was broken.

– The Labour party has volunteers, who have gone over pretty much every election, said Keir Starmer. They’re doing it in their spare time, they’re doing it as volunteers.

Criticism of Starmer’s domestic policy

Meanwhile, criticism of Starmer is growing at home. Violence against girls has reached record levels and the controversy surrounding grooming gangs continues to dominate the debate. During his time as head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), Starmer has been accused of failing to act forcefully against these groups, leading to widespread abuse scandals in towns such as Rotherham and Rochdale.

Last August, there was a knife attack in Southport in which three girls were killed. The incident has become a symbol of rising crime in the UK and led to riots in several cities. Four months later, in January this year, Elon Musk tweeted “Prison for Starmer ” in reference to the attack, further increasing pressure on the Prime Minister.

Starmer defender arrested in pedophile scandal

The crisis for the Labor Party deepened recently when former Labor MP Ivor Caplin was arrested after a sting operation carried out by citizen activists. Caplin is accused of trying to arrange a meeting with a 15-year-old boy.

Caplin, who had previously called Musk’s criticism of Starmer “unacceptable” and “unfounded”, was arrested just days after he publicly defended the prime minister. He has been released on bail pending the investigation.

How polls can be used to influence public opinion

US presidential election

Many pollsters predicted a very close presidential election in the United States - or even a clear victory for the Democrats. The question is whether the explanatory models for the major "miscalculations" hold up, or whether the institutes are really being used to influence opinion rather than to research it.

Published 19 November 2024
Opinion poll presented on American ABC just before the presidential election.

In the run-up to the US presidential election, both domestic voters and international audiences were told that the election would be an uncertain affair. It was claimed that Harris had “momentum” and a good chance of defeating Donald Trump – with several polls even showing her as the clear favorite to win by several percentage points.

As we know, that didn’t happen – at all. Trump won all seven battleground states and won 312 electoral votes – compared to a measly 226 for Harris. Despite losing big states like California, Trump also won the most popular votes in the US election. The result can probably be described without exaggeration as a landslide victory for Trump.

In the aftermath of the election, there have been many attempts to explain it away. Some claim that the pollsters and those behind the polls “underestimated” Trump’s voters. Others claim that they failed to “reach out” to Trump’s voter base, and that is why they were so wrong.

Some also argue, somewhat sweepingly, that the purpose of the polls was never to give an accurate picture of the situation or predict the outcome of the election, but only to show “patterns”, “attitudes” and “more or less qualified assessments” – and that therefore one should not react to the fact that in many cases they gave a seriously misleading picture of Harris’ and Trump’s real support among the American people.

People prefer a winner

Overall, there is much to suggest a very different and more sinister explanation for why the polls “happened” to be wrong about the outcome of the election. Rather, it may be that they have been systematically used as an active tool to influence elections.

Officially, of course, they say that they are only “investigating” what voters intend to vote for. In practice, there is evidence that these results have been both exaggerated and skewed in various ways in favor of the Democrats, making it appear that Kamala Harris was on her way to victory, when in fact she had almost no chance.

The reason would be very simple and logical – to try to shape public opinion to get the more politically insecure masses to go out and vote for Harris – and at the same time to make the more moderate Trump supporters feel resigned and stay home – because their candidate could not win this time either.

Psychologically, the strategy is not difficult to understand. A candidate who is portrayed as a winner or with a strong tailwind will attract more supporters than a candidate who is portrayed as a perceived loser. If voters perceive that their candidate has no real chance of defeating the opponent, many will abstain from voting – while many of those who are politically uncertain will tend to join the “winning team”.

Peer pressure is real

Despite the fact that there is often a lack of transparency in the activities and practices of pollsters and analysts, they enjoy an almost sacrosanct position in media coverage – or at least are widely interpreted as neutral, as actors without ulterior motives.

This view may be considered naive. These are not actors driven by a sense of justice, but by political ambitions and financial interests, and of course this does not only apply to the US presidential election. Opinion polls can strongly shape people’s views on many controversial issues – whether it’s NATO membership, migration policy, government support for the LGBT lobby, or whether Swedish arms should be sent to Ukraine and Israel.

The impact of peer pressure on human behavior is very real. Standing out and going against the grain is perceived by many as something unpleasant – with the risk of attracting social stigma in various ways. This is a basic psychology that politically conscious actors are of course aware of, and therefore inclined to use to their advantage. If a reluctant citizen who is leaning towards voting for the Sweden Democrats reads at the same time that 9 out of 10 Swedes would never consider voting for the party, the decision to actually do so becomes psychologically more difficult.

In the case of the US presidential election, there is much to suggest that support for Trump’s campaign – and perhaps above all dissatisfaction with the ruling Democrats for a variety of reasons – was so strong among broad segments of the population that it was simply not possible to manipulate public opinion to his detriment to the extent necessary to determine the outcome of the election.

Nor did it seem to matter that the entire left-liberal media establishment did everything it could, year after year, to paint Trump as a criminal, rapist, racist, fascist, extremist, or generally irrational lunatic. The explanation seems to be that a growing number of Trump supporters simply don’t care – largely because their trust in those pushing such messages has already been so badly eroded that the attempts to character assassinate Trump have not been effective enough.

So the subtle influence of the pollsters is by no means omnipotent, but for the discerning observer it is definitely a factor to consider in how opinion is actually shaped in practice.

 

TNT Editorial Team

FEMA supervisor ordered aid workers to skip Trump supporters’ homes after hurricane Milton

US presidential election

Published 18 November 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Public confidence in FEMA is at an all-time low after it was revealed that the agency failed to help Republican hurricane victims.

FEMA relief workers were told by their supervisor to avoid helping Donald Trump supporters after Hurricane Milton, which claimed around 30 lives.

The supervisor has now been fired for her actions, which her boss calls “reprehensible”.

According to a report by The Daily Wire, a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) official has instructed disaster relief workers to avoid homes with signs supporting Donald Trump while working in Florida after the hurricane.

Internal correspondence shows that Marn’i Washington, a FEMA supervisor, ordered his team to “avoid homes advertising Trump” as they surveyed the damage in Lake Placid, Florida, to determine which residents might qualify for federal aid.

Multiple federal employees confirmed to The Daily Wire that at least 20 homes with Trump signs or flags were skipped over between late October and early November because of this specific instruction.

Images from the system used by federal aid workers to track homes visited also showed notes such as: “Trump sign no entry per leadership” and “According to management, no stop at Trump flag”.

– I volunteered to help disaster victims, not discriminate against them. It felt wrong to discriminate against Trump supporters when they were most vulnerable, said one relief worker.

“Clear violation of FEMA’s core values”

FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell responded to the revelation by firing Washington, stating:

“More than 22,000 FEMA employees every day adhere to FEMA’s core values and are dedicated to helping people before, during and after disasters, often sacrificing time with their own families to help disaster survivors. Recently, a FEMA employee departed from these values to advise her survivor assistance team to not go to homes with yard signs supporting President-elect Trump”.
“This is a clear violation of FEMA’s core values & principles to help people regardless of their political affiliation”, she continued.

Damaging the agency’s credibility

The incident has prompted the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability to schedule a hearing to investigate the conduct. Committee Chairman James Comer has asked Criswell to testify before lawmakers on November 19. In addition, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has launched a statewide investigation into the incident.

The exposed scandal has led to massive outrage in the United States, with many questioning whether the agency can be considered a serious player at all – or whether it should be seen as a haven for hostile left-wing activists who let their political beliefs determine who gets help and who doesn’t.

Deanne Criswel, however, insists that the behavior is “reprehensible” and that, like Marn’i Washington, any other staff member who behaves in a similar way will be fired.

Share via

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.

Send this to a friend