Sunday, August 3, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Congressman: “Every Republican has a personal Israel lobbyist”

Published 15 June 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Ted Cruz is one of the most explicitly pro-Israel members of the Republican Party. But he is not alone.
3 minute read

Libertarian congressman Thomas Massie reveals in an interview with Tucker Carlson that every Republican in congress has a personal Israel lobbyist from AIPAC with whom they are in close contact and who tells them how to vote on various issues.

The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) is one of the most influential lobbying groups in the United States and the world, working to promote what it calls “pro-Israel policies” in the United States in various ways.

This often involves “buying” individual politicians at the federal or state level by simply donating very large sums of money to their election campaigns – in exchange for their pledge of loyalty to Israel and the Jewish diaspora in the United States.

Large sums are also spent on ad campaigns and other lobbying to smear and oppose politicians who are perceived in various ways as “enemies” of Israel – for example, for opposing Israel’s invasion of Gaza.

Thomas Massie, a Republican member of the House of Representatives, tells Tucker Carlson in an interview that AIPAC’s influence is greater than many could have imagined, and that all his party colleagues in congress have a personal Israel lobbyist with whom they are in very close contact, ask for advice, and who invites them on trips to Israel.

Fear of reprisals

Massie himself is deeply unpopular with the Israel lobby for questioning unlimited US military and economic support for Israel, and he says his party colleagues often complain that they are afraid to vote the way he does for fear of reprisals and problems.

– And I have Republicans who come to me and say, ‘That’s wrong, what a PAC is doing to you. Let me talk to my AIPAC person.’ By the way, everybody but me has an AIPAC person.

– It’s like your babysitter. Your AIPAC babysitter who is always talking to you for AIPAC. They’re probably a constituent in your district, but they are, you know, firmly embedded in AIPAC.

He goes on to say that he doesn’t know if Democratic members of congress also have a personal Israel lobbyist with whom they are in close contact, but notes that at least that is the case for Republicans.

– And when they come to D.C., you go have lunch with them. And they’ve got your cell number and you have conversations with them.

Thomas Massie has long been opposed by the Israel Lobby. Photo: Gage Skidmore/CC BY-SA 2.0

Nothing to gain by telling

When Tucker Carlson says it sounds “absolutely insane” and asks why the public doesn’t know about it, Massie explains that neither party benefits when the frequent contacts become public knowledge.

– It doesn’t benefit anybody. Why would they want to tell their constituents that they’ve basically got a buddy system with somebody who’s representing a foreign country? It doesn’t benefit the congressman for people to know that. So they’re not going to tell you that.

– They pay for trips for congressmen and their spouses to go to Israel. I’m not the only Republican who hasn’t taken the AIPAC trip to Israel, but I’m probably one of a dozen that hasn’t taken that trip and the other ones just haven’t got around to it.

Massie is one of the few Republicans who has long been at odds with AIPAC, and the lobbying group spent billions trying to smear him ahead of a Kentucky primary in early May, for example, effectively painting him as a supporter of the terror-listed Palestinian group Hamas. The witch hunt failed to produce the desired results, however, and the Libertarian managed to win with 76% of the vote.

Ahead of the November presidential election, the Israel lobby has announced plans to spend nearly $100 million to combat political candidates it perceives as harmful or hostile to Israel.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Jeans advertising campaign sparks outrage in woke circles

Cultural revolution in the West

Published today 14:03
– By Editorial Staff
American Eagle fights back and rises on the stock market after "racist" jeans advertisement featuring blonde, blue-eyed model Sydney Sweeney.
2 minute read

A jeans advertising campaign has drawn strong criticism for its wording in left-liberal circles in the US. Critics claim the campaign plays on “racist undertones”. The company behind it, American Eagle, is fighting back and the stock has risen this week.

Jeans company American Eagle released a new advertising campaign this week featuring actress Sydney Sweeney as the frontwoman.

The actress has also helped design a jeans model called the “Sydney Jean”, where part of the revenue from these jeans, according to the manufacturer, goes to the organization Crisis Text Line – a non-profit organization that offers free mental health support around the clock for issues related to domestic violence.

– Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color. My jeans are blue, Sweeney reportedly said in a now-removed commercial.

The campaign slogan reads: “Sydney Sweeney has great jeans”. Woke activists claim the wordplay has “racist undertones” because ‘jeans’ sounds like ‘genes’, which makes the message potentially interpreted as “Sydney Sweeney has great genes”.

American Eagle fights back

After several days of silence, American Eagle responded to the criticism via Instagram on Friday. In a statement, the company emphasized that the campaign was always about clothing:

“‘Sydney Sweeney has Great Jeans’ is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story. We’ll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way. Great jeans look good on everyone”.

Despite – or perhaps thanks to – the controversy, the campaign has been an economic success. American Eagle’s stock rose by over 10 percent immediately after the launch on July 23, representing a value increase of approximately 200 million dollars.

According to the company’s marketing director, Craig Brommers, the collaboration with Sweeney is the largest in the brand’s history.

Australia introduces 16-year age limit on YouTube

Published today 12:32
– By Editorial Staff
2 minute read

YouTube is now covered by Australia’s new law that prohibits children under 16 from creating social media accounts. The government justifies the decision by stating that the platform has contributed to harm among young users.

It was during 2024 that the Australian government proposed a law establishing a minimum age limit for social media. A large portion of young people in the country use social media, and the proposal was part of an ongoing parliamentary inquiry into its impact on society, which among other things points to the negative psychological effects of social media on teenagers. The bill was passed in November 2024.

The law essentially means that children under 16 will not be allowed access to social media, but will not apply to those who already have an account on any platform. This includes TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, Snapchat, X and also the forum Reddit. The intention was that YouTube, Messenger Kids, WhatsApp and Google Classroom would be exempted from the ban due to their health or educational purposes.

“Harmful”

Now the government has changed course and is also including YouTube in the ban, reports AP News. The decision is based on studies showing that the platform can be harmful to young people.

The evidence cannot be ignored that four out of 10 Australian kids report that their most recent harm was on YouTube, says Communications Minister Michelle Rowland.

According to reports, Google, which owns YouTube, has reacted with threats to sue the government. Children will, however, still be able to watch videos, but not have their own accounts.

First law of its kind

It will be the platforms’ responsibility to ensure that children do not register. In case of violations, companies can be fined up to 50 million Australian dollars, equivalent to approximately €28 million.

The law is the first of its kind globally, but France, Norway and the United Kingdom are also considering similar age limits. It takes effect in December 2025.

Trump: No trade deal if Canada recognizes Palestine

Donald Trump's USA

Published 31 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Is Donald Trump's loyalty to the state of Israel beginning to affect the US negotiations on the country's trade agreements with other nations? NOTE: The image is an archive photo.
2 minute read

US President Donald Trump threatens to halt a trade deal with Canada if the country recognizes Palestine. The statement comes after Canada’s Prime Minister confirmed plans for recognition at the UN General Assembly this coming September.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced on Wednesday that the country plans to recognize Palestine as an independent state when the UN General Assembly convenes in September.

Carney highlighted humanitarian arguments and argued that prospects for a two-state solution have disappeared, which other countries – including France and the United Kingdom – have also expressed during the summer.

However, the recognition is conditional and dependent on reforms within the Palestinian Authority as well as promised general elections in 2026 – elections in which Hamas would not be allowed to participate.

Donald Trump reacted immediately and wrote on his Truth Social platform that Canada’s intended recognition would have serious consequences for relations between the countries.

– That will make it very hard for us to make a trade deal with them, Trump declared shortly after Canada’s announcement.

Shaky relations between US and Canada

Trump has previously threatened to impose 35 percent tariffs on Canadian goods from August 1, something that has already caused concern in trade relations between the neighboring countries.

According to American sources, Trump’s move aims to increase pressure on Canada to refrain from recognizing Palestine. The goal is also to defend US trade policy and geopolitical interests at a time of increased tensions surrounding Israel and the war in Gaza.

Mark Carney, (LPC), Canada’s Prime Minister. Photo: World Economic Forum/CC BY-NC-SA 2.0

The trade relationship between the US and Canada is among the world’s largest and has historically been very close, but over the past year several major conflicts regarding tariffs, energy and climate regulations have strained cooperation.

Analysts believe that an American trade halt or high tariffs could have significant economic consequences for Canada’s export industry.

It remains unclear how far the Trump administration is prepared to go, or whether Canada will stick to its planned recognition ahead of the UN meeting in September.

The situation is expected to be closely watched by both other allied countries and international organizations in the coming weeks.

Democrats push Trump for full transparency on Epstein probe

The Epstein case

Published 31 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D) is now attempting to use the "rule of five" law to compel the US Department of Justice to release the Epstein investigation.
3 minute read

The Democrats want to force the US Department of Justice to release the entire Epstein investigation. Through a rarely used law, they hope to obtain the material that Donald Trump previously promised to publish – but which he is now accused of withholding.

During Trump’s election campaign, he was clear that he wanted to release the convicted sex offender’s “black book” with names of clients who, among other things, flew on the scandal-ridden “Lolita Express” to a private island in the Caribbean – where there is testimony regarding sex trafficking of young women and girls.

Furthermore, Trump also said he wanted to release classified documents regarding the Epstein investigation that have not been published to the public.

In May this year, in connection with an internal investigation, the US Department of Justice announced that they would not release the documents, citing that the material contains child pornography and other sensitive information.

The investigation also claims that no black book with customers was found or that Jeffrey Epstein blackmailed clients.

Accused of cover-up

According to reports from The Wall Street Journal, Trump’s name allegedly appears multiple times, and the Department of Justice is said to have informed Trump about this. Trump subsequently supported the decision not to release the investigation, which led to sharp criticism from certain voters and political commentators.

American political commentator Nick Fuentes has also accused the Trump administration of covering up the Epstein investigation. Following the criticism, Trump chose to release certain documents regarding the investigation, but a large portion of the material remains classified.

Broken his promise

Now the Democrats want to force the US Department of Justice to release the documents regarding the investigation, reports CBS News. They plan to do this by using a law called the “rule of five”.

The situation with the Epstein files is very simple – Donald Trump promised transparency and he has broken that promise, says minority leader Chuck Schumer at a press conference. As a candidate, Trump said on many occasions he would release the Epstein files if elected, and yet he has refused to do so.

In brief, the law makes it possible to force federal agencies to release documents if five members of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs request it. The law, which was enacted in 1928, is used very rarely and therefore it is difficult to predict whether it will hold up in court.

Chuck Schumer said the request covers “all documents, files, evidence or other materials in the possession of the Department of Justice or the FBI related to the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein” but also that “the private information of any victims is protected”.

Despite Trump’s previous promises and the Democrats’ intensified demands, it remains unclear whether the entire investigation will ever become fully public, or whether legal and confidentiality barriers will set limits on what the public gets to know.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.