Sunday, July 27, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

British families pledge to donate money to descendants of slaves

Published 19 September 2023
– By Editorial Staff
Laura Trevelyan visits slave descendants in Grenada.
2 minute read

The former journalist at the British state channel BBC, Laura Trevelyan, has announced that she will donate £100,000 to descendants of slaves, given that her ancestors owned plantations in Grenada in the 1800s. Now over 100 prominent British families have joined the campaign by the new lobby group Heirs of Slavery.

According to The Telegraph, these families will “gather to determine how they can practically atone for the actions of their slave-owning ancestors”.

According to Trevelyan herself, this is just the beginning of a growing “movement” of white people who want to make amends to people of non-European descent for how they were treated by their ancestors long ago. She refers, among other things, to a “momentum” created by the Black Lives Matter movement.

There is all of this momentum towards repertory justice, whatever it means, in the wake of Black Lives Matter. It’s a question of how to channel all this moment and all this energy, she explains.

Heirs of Slavery aims to follow Caricom – a political and economic union with 15 member countries in the region, which has, among other things, demanded reparations and developed a 10-point plan for how Europe should apologize for slavery, donate money for development, and invest more resources in education about slavery.

A large proportion of the families now pledging compensation are descendants of people who owned slave plantations in Jamaica, Barbados, and Guyana. Several families have also previously formally apologized for their historical involvement in slavery. In November, a larger conference will be organized in London where it will be decided in more detail what the families will do financially.

A controversial idea

The idea that white people have an obligation to give money to descendants of slaves has become increasingly widespread in recent decades – especially among left-leaning groups in the USA.

Views on who should pay and how the compensation should be distributed vary. Some argue that all Black or non-European people have a right to financial compensation, while others say that only those who can prove they are actually descendants of slaves should receive this. The same variation exists concerning the bill, where some want descendants of documented slave owners to pay, while others believe that the state and taxpayers should finance it.

Criticism often leveled against the concept includes the basic premise of collective ethnic inheritance debt. Another criticism often raised is that slavery has historically been a global cultural phenomenon, which complicates the fair determination of which groups should be compensated and by whom.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Expert condemns Israeli air aid to Gaza: “A sham maneuver”

The genocide in Gaza

Published today 19:04
– By Editorial Staff
Johan von Schreeb, a Swedish professor of disaster medicine, believes that the Israeli proposal to allow aid deliveries by air is likely a strategy to ensure that less food gets through.
2 minute read

Israel’s aid shipments by air to Gaza are an ineffective sham maneuver that prevents real aid from reaching those in need. This is the view of Johan von Schreeb, professor of disaster medicine, after the Israeli military, IDF, initiated daily “humanitarian pauses” in the fighting.

The Israeli military has been conducting daily ceasefires since Sunday between 10 a.m. and 8 p.m. in densely populated parts of Gaza, including Al-Mawasi, Deir al-Balah and Gaza City. In connection with the pauses, the IDF has dropped aid supplies from the air, containing flour, sugar and canned goods.

But von Schreeb is critical of the method.

— We know that it is extremely ineffective, it is ten times more expensive than bringing in food by road. In this case, in Gaza where there is infrastructure even though much is destroyed, it is simply poor and likely a strategy to ensure that less food gets in, he says.

Risky distribution

The professor also warns that the airborne aid could end up in the wrong hands or cause additional dangers for the civilian population.

They could end up with those who have Kalashnikovs who can drive away the rest of the civilian population and instead sell the food, says von Schreeb.

According to the expert, the UN system has 6,000 trucks ready in Jordan and Egypt, but the borders to Gaza remain closed. Since the UN agency UNRWA was effectively banned from operating in Israel, the Israeli-American organization Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has taken over food distributions – with deadly consequences. Over 1,000 people are reported to have been killed or died during the organization’s distributions.

Israeli minister: “All of Gaza will be Jewish”

The genocide in Gaza

Published 25 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
"Thank God, we are erasing this evil. All of Gaza will be Jewish," said Jewish Power representative Amichai Eliyahu recently on an Israeli radio program regarding the starving population in Gaza and the ongoing genocide. Right: The starving children in Gaza where the situation is becoming increasingly desperate.
2 minute read

Israeli Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu has drawn strong criticism after statements about Israel not needing to worry about starvation in Gaza. The statement is one in a series from officials within Israel’s far-right government in line with the genocidal ambitions expressed already at the beginning of the Gaza war.

The far-right politician Amichai Eliyahu from the Jewish Power party (Otzma Yehudit) dismissed renewed UN warnings about artificial famine in the besieged enclave on Thursday. In an interview with Radio Kol Barama, he claimed that the Israeli government is “rushing to erase Gaza”.

Thank God, we are erasing this evil. All of Gaza will be Jewish, Eliyahu said according to Israeli news site Ynet.

— We shouldn’t be dealing with hunger in Gaza – let the world take care of them. No nation feeds its enemies. Have we completely lost our minds? Should we care about their evening meal?, he added.

Strong criticism from government leadership

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu quickly distanced himself from the statements and pointed out that Eliyahu is not a member of the security cabinet, which decides on warfare.

“This government’s policy is clear and unified. His statements do not represent it”, Netanyahu said.

Israel’s ambassador to the US, Yechiel Leiter, also condemned Eliyahu’s comments and called them “wrong, foolish and completely unrepresentative of Israel’s government and people”. In a post on X, he emphasized that Israel is committed to creating a mechanism to deliver humanitarian aid to civilians in Gaza “but not through Hamas”.

UN warns of mass starvation

According to local health authorities, more than 59,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since October 2023, including at least 113 who died of starvation. World Health Organization chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on Wednesday that Israel’s “blockade” has brought Gaza to the brink of “mass starvation”.

Philippe Lazzarini, head of the UN Palestinian refugee agency UNRWA, has urged Israel to allow access for the 6,000 aid transports currently stalled in Egypt and Jordan.

Israeli officials have in turn accused Hamas and other armed groups of hoarding supplies and attacking civilians at distribution sites.

WEF founder manipulated reports to protect political relationships

The globalist agenda

Published 25 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
"We must protect our relationships with India before Davos 2019", Schwab is alleged to have said, manipulating the organization's prestigious "Global Competitiveness Report" for political reasons.
3 minute read

Klaus Schwab allegedly altered countries’ rankings in important economic reports to avoid affecting relationships with India, and to prevent Brexit supporters from being able to use positive figures for the United Kingdom. Meanwhile, extensive expenses of 900,000 Swiss francs that his wife charged through WEF are being scrutinized.

World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab is accused of manipulating the organization’s prestigious “Global Competitiveness Report” for political reasons. According to an ongoing investigation, he changed countries’ rankings to protect diplomatic relationships and thereby prevent the results from being used politically, reports the Swiss newspaper Tages-Anzeiger.

Changed to protect India relations

The serious incident occurred in 2017-2018 when a methodology change caused India to fall over 20 places in the ranking while the United Kingdom climbed from seventh to fourth place. Schwab then intervened directly and emailed those responsible with the justification: “We must protect our relationships with India before Davos 2019”.

He did not want to risk Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi canceling his visit. At the same time, he wrote that the United Kingdom “must not see any improvement” because this would be “exploited by the Brexit camp”.

Despite Schwab saying he supported the new methodology, he concluded: “This year we simply cannot implement this”. Otherwise, the good relationships with India, which he had “invested so much in during the year”, would be destroyed.

The report was eventually published, but with altered figures: India ended up in 40th place and the United Kingdom in eighth place – both only one place worse than in 2016.

Shared secret reports with governments

Even more serious is that Schwab in 2022 allegedly shared a secret draft of the report with a government representative from an Arab country whose ranking had deteriorated significantly. After receiving “critical feedback”, Schwab recommended to management that the report not be published at all.

The 2021-2022 report was never published, and no new versions have appeared since then.

Wife’s expenses without official role

In parallel, Schwab’s wife Hilde is now being scrutinized, who without an official function at WEF has had her travels charged through the organization. Lawyers from the firm Homburger have discovered questionable expenses totaling 900,000 Swiss francs (€970,000) over the past ten years.

Hilde Schwab runs her own foundation for social entrepreneurship but has no formal role within WEF. Despite this, her travels, which cannot always be explained by her activities, have been paid for by WEF.

Denies the allegations

Schwab has tried to defend himself against the manipulation allegations:

To construct this as a manipulation is an insult to my academic standing, he has said.

He claims that he only forwarded corrections from governments to use updated data or correct errors in the analysis.

Investigation ongoing

The Nordic Times already reported in April that Klaus Schwab was forced to resign from WEF and that a comprehensive investigation is ongoing. The federal foundation authority is also reviewing the use of WEF’s funds.

An important board meeting has been postponed, but time is running out. By the end of August at the latest, invitations to WEF 2026 must be sent out.

Schwab’s spokesman, Jörg Denzler, refuses to comment on the investigation:

— The June agreement is of central significance for Mr. Schwab. In contrast to some other parties, Mr. Schwab fully complies with the terms and does not comment publicly when approached by the media.

Russia rules out talks between Putin and Zelensky without final agreement

The war in Ukraine

Published 25 July 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Moscow says no to a meeting between Putin and Zelenskyj before a finished agreement is on the table.
2 minute read

Russia currently rules out a meeting between President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, unless the parties first agree on the draft of a finished memorandum. This was stated by Vladimir Medinsky, the Kremlin’s lead negotiator in talks with Ukraine, in connection with the latest peace talks in Turkey.

Medinsky, one of the most prominent representatives of the Kremlin in the ongoing peace negotiations, emphasized that a personal meeting between the two leaders is only meaningful if they have already agreed on the terms of a peace agreement and are ready to sign it.

There’s no point in meeting only to begin negotiations from square one, he said, referring to previous summits that in practice prolonged the conflict rather than resolved it.

He also brought up historical cases where heads of state only met to sign already negotiated agreements, not to initiate new processes.

As an example, Medinsky mentioned the Chinese civil war in the 1940s:

Chiang Kai-shek constantly insisted on meeting in person to discuss everything. I believe they met five times, smiled, and posed for photographs, but it did not bring an end to the civil war. The core issues remained unresolved, and the war went on.

The Kremlin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, confirmed Medinsky’s line and stated that Russia considers such a meeting relevant only when a final agreement is in place.

The statements come at a time when the question of a meeting between Putin and Zelensky is once again being discussed internationally as a possible path to peace in Ukraine.

Parties far apart from each other

Many diplomats and international actors, not least in the West, have for a long time advocated direct talks between the two leaders to break the diplomatic deadlock in the conflict.

Volodymyr Zelenskyj has previously expressed a willingness to meet Putin to discuss peace, but has also set demands including the withdrawal of Russian forces and confirmation of Ukraine’s sovereignty as prerequisites.

Russia, for its part, has consistently demanded that the talks should be based on Russian security interests, including control over certain territories – something that the Ukrainian government rejects.

Medinsky’s and Peskov’s statements underscore that Russia does not see any immediate room for a summit as long as the fundamental prerequisites for peace are not already established, which makes the conditions for direct dialogue continue to be difficult.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.