Monday, March 24, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

Assessing the importance of India-Maldives ties amid growing strife

Published 25 January 2024
– By Sukanya Saha
PM Narendra Modi's serene Lakshadweep beach photo, an unexpected catalyst of diplomatic strains, shared on Twitter/X.

The Maldives finds itself amid a diplomatic storm, as its relationship with India has taken a hit due to a series of contentious events. The dispute began when Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi shared a seemingly harmless photograph of himself relaxing on a sunbed at a pristine beach in Lakshadweep.

This tropical archipelago, consisting of 36 atolls and coral reefs, is located in the Laccadive Sea, off the coast of Kerala. The images also captured the 73-year-old Modi snorkelling activities while sporting an orange life vest.

However, Modi’s relaxing pictures quickly stirred discontent among some in the Maldives, interpreted as an effort to divert tourists from the Indian Ocean archipelago, a region heavily dependent on tourism as a cornerstone of its economy.

Maldivian Deputy Minister of Youth Empowerment, Mariyam Shiuna, mocked Modi in a post, referring to him as a “clown”, a “terrorist” and “puppet of Israel” on microblogging site X, which has now been deleted.

Following this, several Indian celebrities, including actors and cricketers, began openly supporting initiatives aimed at showcasing local beaches and alternative tourist destinations. Moreover, one of the prominent travel websites in India temporarily halted flight reservations to the Maldives.

In response, Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s government called for the withdrawal of Indian military personnel, embarked on a significant overseas visit to China, and annulled a crucial water survey pact, intensifying tensions. However, beneath the surface of this brewing conflict lies a web of interconnected interests and dependencies that both nations share.

High Stakes in India-Maldives relations

At stake is a diplomatic and political relationship that has evolved over six decades. Since India established diplomatic ties with the Maldives in 1965, the two nations have developed deep connections across various sectors. Despite changes in government, India has worked tirelessly to build relationships with political, military, business, and civil society leaders. This meticulous effort has made India the preferred destination for Maldivians in areas such as education and healthcare.

Why does India need the Maldives?

The strategic location of the Maldives is a key factor. Situated barely 70 nautical miles from Minicoy and 300 nautical miles from India’s west coast, the Maldives holds significant importance in India’s maritime security calculus. India has invested heavily in training the Maldivian National Defence Force (MNDF), with nearly 70 per cent of their defence training conducted by India.

The looming Chinese presence in the region adds urgency to India’s need for the Maldives as an ally. As China has extended its influence over the last 15 years, India’s longstanding connections with the Maldives position it as a crucial ally in mitigating the growing impact of China’s presence. The establishment of a coastal radar system in the Maldives further underscores India’s commitment to monitoring activities in the Indian Ocean.

What compels the Maldives to rely on India?

India plays a pivotal role in meeting Maldives’ daily needs. From essential food supplies, medicines, and infrastructure materials to education, India’s contribution is integral to Maldives’ functioning. Indian universities and boarding schools have become the educational lifeline for Maldivian students, who seek quality education. Indian assistance during times of crisis, such as the 2004 tsunami and the 2014 drinking water crisis, has solidified the bond between the two nations.

Maldives’ economic dependence on India is evident, with India being its second-largest trade partner in 2022. The construction of the 300-bed Indira Gandhi Memorial Hospital in Malé and India’s role as a security provider during the 1988 coup attempt underscore the multifaceted nature of the relationship.

Muizzu’s move to revive China FTA raises concerns

In his current visit to China, Muizzu has suggested revitalising the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with Beijing. Muizzu’s push to revive the China Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is stirring apprehension as some experts fear it could heighten the risk of a debt crisis in the Maldives.

China currently holds 37 per cent of the total debt in the Maldives, and there are concerns that the FTA might exacerbate this, potentially leading the Maldives into a crisis similar to that of Sri Lanka, as reported by The Economic Times.

In its October report, the World Bank cautioned that deepening ties with China could pose challenges for Maldives, given its existing debt of $1.37 billion to Beijing. China holds the position of being the largest bilateral creditor for Maldives, surpassing both Saudi Arabia and India.

The path forward

It is crucial for both New Delhi and Male to recognise the depth of their interdependence and work towards de-escalating tensions. Diplomacy must prevail over knee-jerk reactions. While political rhetoric and public posturing may create temporary rifts, India’s historical role as a reliable partner in times of need and the Maldives’ strategic importance to India’s security interests highlight the mutual benefits of preserving a strong bilateral relationship. Therefore, both nations must engage in open and constructive dialogue to address concerns and find common ground.

Sukanya Saha is a contributing editor at The Nordic Times. Based in New Delhi, she is an accomplished journalist who has previously worked with several major Indian media outlets such as NDTV, India Today, IANS, and Jagran English. Currently, she is associated with Hindustan Times. In 2022, she topped the BRICS International Journalism Programme from India. Committed to understanding the complex dynamics that shape our world, Sukanya's passions range from world politics to science and space exploration.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

NATO warns: “Climate crisis” threatens military pact’s capabilities

Published today 14:06
– By Editorial Staff
NATO member states are urged to adapt their military forces to climate change as quickly as possible.

NATO is facing a serious threat, according to James Appathurai, the organization’s Assistant Secretary General for Innovation, Hybrid and Cyber Affairs.

This time, however, it is neither the Russians nor the Chinese who are said to be threatening the US-led military pact’s operations – but alleged climate change.

According to the Canadian NATO chief, the climate has changed dramatically in a short period of time and Europe’s military forces have not yet been able to adapt satisfactorily to these new conditions.

The NATO Climate Change and Security Impact Assessment report, for example, paints a picture of increased heavy rainfall, making it difficult for radar systems to function as intended.

Other problems identified include the negative impact of warmer air on aircraft performance and higher water temperatures making it more difficult to track enemy submarines. According to James Appathurai, it is therefore high time for NATO countries to focus on adapting their defense to climate change.

We need to look at the climate in terms of its impact on military effectiveness, he tells state broadcaster SVT.

“Sweden will be affected”

Since 2022, the US Army has been actively working on “climate adaptation”, which means, among other things, that all non-combat military vehicles will be electrified, and that solar and wind power will be used extensively to secure the energy supply.

Novel materials, new materials that we can generate for military equipment and uniforms. Better modelling using AI so we can see what temperature changes take place in the future, Appathurai explains, pointing out that lighter and more efficient aircraft engines are also being built to carry more cargo and consume less fuel.

James Appathurai and Major General Dimitrios Sigoulakis. Photo: NATO/ CC BY-NC-ND 2.0

 We are looking at all kinds of innovative technologies and better planning to be able to meet these challenges in the future and maintain our military effectiveness, he says, emphasizing that climate adaptation is being driven by purely military strategic reasons, rather than activist motives.

He further emphasizes that it is up to the individual member states to decide on climate adaptation, but that the leadership hopes to “forge consensus and give non-binding voluntary guidelines to member states”.

As I have outlined, Sweden will be affected by this, he states.

Biden and Harris lose security clearance

Donald Trump's USA

Published today 7:24
– By Editorial Staff
Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are two of the half-dozen former officials who will now lose access to classified information.

On Friday evening, President Donald Trump revoked the security clearances of Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton and a number of other former US political figures.

Trump justifies the move by saying that it is “no longer in the national interest” for the individuals in question to have access to classified information.

Former US President Donald Trump has revoked the security clearances of several former Democratic political opponents, including Kamala Harris and Hillary Clinton, as well as people linked to Joe Biden’s administration and family. This is according to a memorandum published on Friday, May 24.

The decision follows Trump’s statement in February that he would “immediately” withdraw Joe Biden’s access to classified information and stop the former president’s daily intelligence briefings. The document now formalizes the revocation of security clearances for Biden, as well as his family members and several former officials previously named by the White House in the context.

Among the more than dozen people affected by the action are former Secretary of State Antony Blinken, former National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan, Biden’s Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, and two former Republican members of Congress – Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger – who served on the House committee investigating Trump’s alleged involvement in the January 6, 2021 protests and occupation of the Capitol.

Denied “unescorted access” to Government Facilities

In the memorandum, Trump justifies the decision by stating that he has “determined that it is no longer in the national interest for the following individuals to access classified information”.

According to Trump, he has instructed heads of government agencies to take all necessary steps to “revoke any active security clearances held by the aforementioned individuals and to immediately rescind their access to classified information”.

This means that Biden, Harris, Clinton and others concerned will no longer be able to access classified government information – or access classified information from US intelligence agencies. They will also be prohibited from “unescorted access” to sensitive government facilities, according to the document.

Trump has previously pointed to Joe Biden’s long history of confusion – arguing that even when he was younger and healthier, the ex-president was not fit to be entrusted with sensitive information.

The incumbent’s opponents see the decision as a kind of revenge for the Biden administration revoking Trump’s security clearance after the events at the Capitol in January 2021.

Trump withdraws half a million residence permits

Donald Trump's USA

Published yesterday 11:34
– By Editorial Staff
A majority of those who lose their residence permits come from Haiti.

The US administration under Donald Trump has announced that around 530,000 citizens from Haiti, Nicaragua, Cuba and Venezuela will have their temporary residence permits in the United States revoked. According to the decision, affected individuals have 30 days to leave the country.

The decision, announced on Wednesday 24 April, applies to individuals previously granted temporary protection in the United States under the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program. This program has previously granted residency to nationals from countries deemed unsafe due to crises such as war, natural disasters or exceptional circumstances.

In its statement, the Trump administration justified the decision by saying that conditions in the countries concerned had improved enough for citizens to return and Homeland Security officials point out that TPS was meant to be a temporary solution – not a path to permanent residency.

For Nicaragua and Haiti, the changes will take effect from June 1, while for Venezuela and Cuba the decision will apply from July 1. Those who do not leave the country by the deadline risk deportation and face restrictions on future entry to the US.

Statistics from the US authorities show that around 300,000 Haitians, 140,000 Venezuelans, 60,000 Cubans and 30,000 Nicaraguans are affected.

In use since 1990

The TPS program, introduced in 1990, has previously been used to fly citizens from over a dozen countries, including El Salvador and Syria, into the US. During Trump’s previous term (2017-2021), there were several similar revocations of TPS status, decisions that his opponents tried unsuccessfully to appeal in court.

According to Homeland Security, individual waivers will be considered for people with pending applications for permanent residence or asylum.

The announcement has also led to loud protests from migrants and immigration activists who accuse the Trump administration of “racism” and of violating the rights of asylum seekers.

It can also be noted that a large majority of those who now lose their residence permits are Haitians – and that Trump as recently as last fall accused Haitians of killing and eating Americans’ dogs and cats.

Violent bullfighting banned in Mexico City

Published 21 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Animal rights activists see the change as a positive step in the right direction.

Bullfighting in Mexico City can continue – but without violence. A new law now bans the traditional practice of injuring or killing the bull, sparking protests from supporters.

Bullfighting has its roots in Iran, but is now mainly practiced in Spain, southern France and a number of Latin American countries such as Mexico and Colombia. It is a form of entertainment which, in short, involves a bullfighter, called a matador, fighting a bull. It is set up for the matador to win and the bull is injured and tired out to make this possible. Among other things, it is traditional to stick a lance in the bull’s neck. The show ends with the bull being killed on the spot with a sword. If the matador’s performance is good enough, an ear or tail can be taken home as a trophy.

Lawmakers in Mexico City have voted 61 to 1 in favor of a new law banning the violent aspect of bullfighting, AP News reports. Bulls can no longer be injured or killed during the shows, and sharp objects are banned. The bulls’ horns will also be protected, and the matador will only be allowed to use his red cape and cloak.

The bulls must not be injured or killed during the show. The horns of the bulls will be protected to avoid injury and all sharp objects are prohibited. The matador will only be allowed to wear his red cape and cowl.

The decision has been met with strong protests from supporters of bullfighting, who say the law threatens a cultural tradition. Several tried to break through a police barricade at the local congress after the vote, carrying signs saying “Being a fan of la fiesta brava (bullfighting) is not a crime, it’s a point of pride”.

Years of debate

The debate around bullfighting has been going on for years in Latin American countries, with animal rights activists arguing that it is animal cruelty, while others point to it as a tradition to be upheld. In 2022, a judge banned bullfighting in Mexico City and shut down one of the largest bullfighting rings in the world. However, the following year, Mexico’s Supreme Court overturned the decision, without any seemingly reasonable explanation, and reopened the bullfighting rings.

With the new law, advocates hope that animal protection will now have a stronger foothold – without banning the tradition itself.

It was either this or nothing, says Sofía Morín, an animal rights activist from the organization Culture Without Torture, Mexico Without Bullfighting, which is leading the initiative to change the law. We prefer this because, without a doubt, it’s a huge step in protecting animals.

Share via

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.

Send this to a friend