Saturday, November 1, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Swedish government makes U-turn: Children as young as six months can receive covid vaccine

The criticized covid vaccinations

Updated November 16, 2023, Published November 12, 2023 – By Editorial staff
Social affairs minister and Christian Democrat Jakob Forssmed describes it as "unsatisfactory" that children can no longer be vaccinated against covid in Sweden.

The Swedish government is now making it possible for parents to choose covid vaccination for their children, despite the public health agency still not recommending it. The decision comes after what is described as "a thorough review" of Sweden's laws and regulations.

Previously, the public health agency recommended children from 12 years of age to take the covid vaccine, a recommendation that was removed about a year ago. In connection with this, it also meant that parents who wanted to vaccinate their children against covid did not have the opportunity to do so, which led to some parents even going abroad to have their children vaccinated.

Last spring, the government announced that it intended to investigate whether it would be possible for private actors to administer the covid vaccine, provided that there was a national surplus of the vaccine. This would also mean the possibility for parents to have their children vaccinated against covid in Sweden.

The government has now decided that parents should be able to choose covid vaccination for their children in public administration, tax-funded SR reports. Social minister Jakob Forssmed of the Christian Democrats believes that it has been an "unsatisfactory situation" when parents sought vaccinations abroad and argues that it should not be legal to deny parents the right to vaccinate their children.

– We have conducted a thorough review of the laws and regulations surrounding vaccines for covid-19 and can conclude that there are no legal obstacles, says Forssmed.

The distribution of the vaccine will be handled by Sweden's regions, where the decision delegates the responsibility to each region to organize and carry out the vaccinations. This applies to children from the age of six months and upwards.

Earlier this week, the government also launched a new covid vaccination campaign where they want everyone who falls within the public health agency's recommendations to take new injections. Among others, all those who are 65 years or older, pregnant, as well as people from 18 years who are defined in some other risk group, and also those between 50 and 64 years who have not taken previous shots, are recommended. Children who, after individual medical assessment, are deemed to have a particularly high risk of serious illness from covid, and who have not previously received covid vaccine injections, are also recommended to get the shot.

Children who are not in a risk group are therefore still not recommended to take the vaccine, according to the public health agency.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Increased cancer risk linked to covid vaccines

The criticized covid vaccinations

Published today 11:38 am – By Editorial staff
The overall risk of cancer diagnosis increased by 27 percent compared to those who had not received the COVID-19 vaccine.

A comprehensive South Korean study shows a correlation between covid vaccines and increased cancer incidence, particularly prostate cancer and lung cancer.

However, the researchers are cautious in their conclusions and careful to point out that the statistical correlations do not constitute proof of any causal relationship.

In the study, which has been published in Biomarker Research, researchers examined data from 8,407,849 people between 2021 and 2023, drawn from the Korean National Health Insurance Database. The participants were divided into two groups depending on whether they had received covid vaccines or not. The aim was to examine both the actual occurrence (incidence) of cancer and subsequent cancer risks one year after vaccination.

The results show that there were indications of increased risks for various cancer types one year after receiving any form of covid vaccine, compared to those who had not received it. The overall risk of cancer diagnosis increased by 27 percent compared to those who had not received covid vaccines.

Regarding specific cancer forms, the most pronounced risk increases were seen for prostate cancer, which increased by 69 percent, followed by lung cancer which increased by 53 percent. Furthermore, the risk of thyroid cancer increased by 35 percent and stomach cancer by 34 percent. Colorectal cancer showed a risk increase of 28 percent, while breast cancer increased by 20 percent.

These risk increases applied to diagnoses made within one year after vaccination, regardless of whether mRNA or non-mRNA vaccines were used. However, it is unclear which covid vaccines were included in the study.

Statistical correlations

The researchers emphasize, however, that the study's results do not provide evidence that covid vaccines cause cancer, but rather that these are "statistical correlations".

One possible explanation could be, for example, that covid-vaccinated individuals have likely undergone more medical check-ups and screenings, which increases the chance of detecting cancer early compared to those who have not received covid vaccines. However, one cannot say with certainty what causes this, only that there is a difference depending on covid vaccination status.

Unjabbed: For singles who didn’t take the COVID vaccine

The criticized covid vaccinations

Published October 12, 2025 – By Editorial staff
"Don't give up. Anything worth achieving needs work", is the message from Unjabbed's founder Antonetta.

After conventional dating apps didn't meet her needs, Antonetta decided for various reasons to start a dating site for people who didn't take the COVID vaccine. On Unjabbed.net, people can meet others seeking love or friendship.

In 2023, Antonetta chose to use a popular dating app in an attempt to find love. Since she wanted to find like-minded people, she was also open about not having taken the COVID vaccine. This resulted in Antonetta's account being repeatedly deleted. She doesn't know why her account was removed, but she suspected it was related to her honesty about the COVID vaccine. Instead, she tried another app and chose not to explicitly state that she hadn't taken the COVID vaccine, but used various hints such as "believe in natural health", "avoid synthetic chemicals", and "seeking people who took the red pill". There she got a bunch of matches, but no one understood her hints and most of those she talked to had taken the COVID vaccine.

In the wake of this, Unjabbed.net was born, a dating and friendship site for those who didn't take the COVID vaccine. Since 2023, it has attracted thousands of members from several countries, but users are primarily from the United States, United Kingdom, and Canada. In Sweden, there are a few hundred members at the time of writing. Worth noting is that the site only exists as a website, not an app. The app that exists with the same name is from a different creator, according to Antonetta.

Several dating sites also participated in marketing COVID vaccine campaigns during 2021, according to Antonetta. For example, Tinder created labels where people could fill in whether they had taken the COVID vaccine or not. After the site launched, she received responses from members that they had also had bad experiences on conventional dating sites.

"After starting unjabbed.net, several members told me they couldn't find anyone on conventional dating apps and as soon as they said they were unvaccinated they were either insulted or had their accounts deleted or felt their accounts were being hidden in search results or restricted in some way", Antonetta tells The Nordic Times.

Financially challenging

Starting a new dating site is not always an easy path. To be visible, you need marketing and advertising - something that costs a lot of money. The site was free until last year when they chose to introduce a membership fee to afford reaching out to other singles who didn't take the COVID vaccine. However, Antonetta wanted the amount to be affordable compared to many other dating sites and apps, which can cost up to 60 dollars for three months, and also charge for sending messages.

"Our website just charges $16 USD for a whole year and we don't charge for individual messages".

The advantage of charging is also that many people think twice before creating an account, and it also prevents spam, says Antonetta. However, it's possible to create a free account as well, but you don't have all the features on the site.

Several have found love

Despite unjabbed.net being relatively newly started, Antonetta says she has received messages from people who found each other on her site.

"One couple donated 50 dollars to us and told us they had met on our website and are now married. A woman contacted us and said she's getting married to the man she met on our website. So it works!"

Tips for finding the right match

If you're planning to create an account, Antonetta recommends both writing something about yourself and having photos. If you want to be more anonymous, you can, for example, upload a picture in sunglasses or similar. She also suggests writing something that can create a conversation.

"People can write anything. What are their thoughts on the future of the world? What line of work are they in? What are their hobbies? Favorite places in the world to visit? Funny stories", she suggests.

She also advises that it's more advantageous to write to people in your own country than outside the border. It partly signals that you've given up hope in your country, but it's also very difficult to make long-distance relationships work. Furthermore, she also suggests spreading information about the site in your own city; there may be singles who didn't take the COVID vaccine but missed that there's a dating site for this purpose.

There is hope

Finding like-minded people can be difficult, and even though more and more people show understanding for those who chose not to take the COVID vaccine, there are still many who believe it was wrong not to take it. At the same time, Antonetta encourages unvaccinated singles to dare to go out and talk to people they meet in stores, in town, or on the bus. You never know who you might meet there. Finally, she also wants to say that you shouldn't give up hope on love.

"Don't give up. Anything worth achieving needs work".

Number of members at the time of writing on Unjabbed.net by country

  • USA: 1349
  • United Kingdom: 872
  • Canada: 984
  • Australia: 249
  • New Zealand: 68
  • France: 501
  • Germany: 705
  • Italy: 234
  • Belgium: 142
  • Switzerland: 70
  • Spain: 76
  • Portugal: 42
  • Denmark: 129
  • Norway: 204
  • Sweden: 479
  • Netherlands: 1019
  • Japan: 25
  • Ireland: 63

British cardiologist links royal family cancer cases to covid vaccine

The criticized covid vaccinations

Published September 8, 2025 – By Editorial staff
According to Aseem Malhotra, it is "highly likely that the COVID vaccines have been a significant factor in the cancer cases among members of the royal family".

The vaccine-skeptical cardiologist Aseem Malhotra caused major controversy when he assessed during Reform UK's conference that experimental covid vaccines were "highly likely" to have been a significant factor behind cancer diagnoses among members of the British royal family.

During his speech at the party conference in Birmingham on Saturday, Dr. Aseem Malhotra delivered extensive criticism of mRNA vaccines. The British cardiologist, who is a close friend and advisor to the US vaccine-skeptical health secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., spoke to delegates on the conference's final day.

Malhotra argued that hundreds of studies have shown harm from mRNA vaccines and that these affect people's genes in a damaging way.

— It may be a risk factor for cancer. Many other doctors feel the same way, he said from the stage at the conference venue, linking the same vaccines to illness cases within the royal family.

— It's highly likely that the Covid vaccines have been a factor, a significant factor, in the cancer of members of the royal family, he continued.

"No one should have been injected"

During the 15-minute speech, the doctor also argued that the covid vaccine was significantly more likely to cause serious harm than the virus itself.

— What does that mean? It is highly likely that not a single person should have been injected with this.

Malhotra also directed criticism at the World Health Organization WHO, which he claimed had been "captured" by Microsoft founder and vaccine lobbyist Bill Gates. He called for the organization to be replaced by a better and more functional system.

— Nobody is immune to medical misinformation, he proclaimed during the speech.

"Dangerous extremism"

Several British cancer organizations have distanced themselves from Malhotra's comments, including Cancer Research UK and Blood Cancer UK, which state that there are no controlled studies showing increased cancer risk after covid-19 vaccination.

Britain's health secretary Wes Streeting has also reacted very strongly to the statements and demands that Reform's party leader Nigel Farage distance himself from the speaker.

— When we are seeing falling numbers of parents getting their children vaccinated, and a resurgence of disease we had previously eradicated, it is shockingly irresponsible for Nigel Farage to give a platform to these poisonous lies, Streeting thundered.

The minister urges Farage to apologize and "sever all ties with this dangerous extremism".

A spokesperson for Reform UK notes, however, that Malhotra was invited as a guest speaker and has the right to his own opinions – even if the party does not share them.

— Dr Aseem Malhotra is a guest speaker with his own opinions who has an advisory role in the US government. Reform UK does not endorse what he said but does believe in free speech, the spokesperson explains.

US halts mRNA investment: “More risks than benefits”

The criticized covid vaccinations

Published August 7, 2025 – By Editorial staff
RFK points out that mRNA vaccines may be counterproductive - and prolong virus outbreaks instead of stopping them.

The US Department of Health and Human Services is halting the development of experimental mRNA vaccines. 22 contracts worth nearly $500 million are being terminated, citing that the technology poses significantly greater risks than benefits.

Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. states that the decision was made following scientific reviews and consultations with experts at research institutions including the NIH and the FDA.

— One mutation, and the vaccine becomes ineffective. This dynamic drives a phenomenon called antigenic shift, meaning that the vaccine paradoxically encourages new mutations and can actually prolong pandemics as the virus constantly mutates to escape the protective effects of the vaccine Kennedy explains.

He particularly highlights the Omicron variant as an example of how mRNA vaccines failed to halt transmission despite widespread vaccination.

— A single mutation can make mRNA vaccines ineffective, the health secretary states, noting that "the same risk applies to flu".

Wants to see "broader" strategy

According to Kennedy, the department's conclusion is clear: the risks of mRNA technology outweigh the benefits when it comes to respiratory viruses.

— After reviewing the science, and consulting top experts at NIH and FDA, HHS has determined that mRNA technology poses more risks than benefits for these respiratory viruses.

Instead, the department will prioritize what Kennedy calls "safer, broader vaccine strategies", such as traditional whole-virus vaccines and new platforms "that don’t collapse when viruses mutate".

HHS clarifies that certain contracts already in final stages will be allowed to run their course, but no new mRNA projects will be initiated. BARDA (Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority), the federal agency responsible for advanced biomedical development, is now tasked with focusing on techniques "with stronger safety records and transparent clinical and manufacturing data practices".

Critics were labeled conspiracy theorists

Many analysts warned early on that mRNA vaccines posed serious health risks, but were routinely dismissed as conspiracy theorists by both politicians and mainstream media.

Over time, however, a large number of serious vaccine injuries and deaths have been reported, particularly in connection with the extensive COVID-19 vaccination campaigns.

The criticism has not only concerned safety itself, but also the lack of long-term studies and authorities' inadequate handling of adverse event reports. Against this backdrop, Kennedy's announcement is seen by many as a long-awaited course correction.

Changed policy for children and pregnant women

The decision to halt mRNA contracts is not the only change. In recent weeks, Kennedy has also taken initiatives to remove the mercury compound thimerosal from influenza vaccines, in accordance with recommendations from the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

He also welcomed the decision to no longer recommend COVID-19 vaccines for healthy children and pregnant women.

— There was a lack of any clinical data to support the repeat booster strategy in children, he stated.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.