Friday, January 24, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ad:

RFSL: “We are seeing increased resistance at all levels”

The LGBT lobby

Published 19 April 2024
– By Editorial Staff
RFSL during a so-called 'diversity parade'.

In the advocacy organization’s annual report, its president, Peter Sidlund Ponkala, writes that 2023 was a very dark year for the LGBTQ movement, claiming that the movement is now seeing “increased resistance at all levels”. This included increased challenges to “cultural expressions” such as storytelling drag queens and rainbow flags.

“2023 was the year when the questioning of LGBTI people’s right to be themselves, our cultural expressions, and our visibility began to be challenged on a broader front. In particular, the rights of trans people were questioned both nationally and internationally”, he says.

At the municipal level, Ponkala says, the movement’s “cultural expression” and “the right to be seen and to take up space” are increasingly being questioned – and this can be seen in the form of increased opposition to flying the rainbow flag or drag queens reading stories to young children.

Although the legislation for “changing” legal gender appears to be liberalized, the RFSL president argues that this is not enough. Instead, she argues that the law should be “entirely based on self-determination”.

“Therefore, we will have to continue this work to make it easier to change legal gender”, he promises, accusing opponents of more liberal legislation of “spreading rumors, half-truths and outright untruths”.

“Advancing our positions”

During the year, RFSL has also focused on lobbying for a ban on “attempts to convert LGBTQ people” and “highlighting the lack of legal security for LGBTI people seeking asylum”. It claims, among other things, that asylum applications from “vulnerable LGBTI people” are rejected in violation of Swedish and international law, and that “stereotypes and prejudices about LGBTI people” are used in the credibility and reliability assessments made by the Migration Board.

It is noteworthy that RFSL has also worked over the past year, according to its own statement, “to counteract an increasingly negative media image of transgender people and disinformation spread in both social media and the media” – something that has been done by contacting various authorities, healthcare providers and decision makers.

“Despite a bleak development, I would argue that 2023 was a year in which we advanced our positions”, he continues, saying that RFSL is constantly looking for new strategies to “strengthen RFSL for the future”.

“We will build partnerships with other stakeholders, with the business community, and find new collaborations. This is important work that we must continue to develop”.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

“Trans controversy” divides the atheist movement

The LGBT lobby

Published 10 January 2025
– By Editorial Staff
Richard Dawkins says the FFRF has given in to the “hysterical squeels” of identity politics activists

Well-known atheist and evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins has resigned from the board of the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) after the organization clearly endorsed the transgender movement and the idea that every human being can choose their own gender.

He is one of several high-profile figures who are tired of the atheist group’s activities being permeated by censorship and unscientific gender ideological activism.

Dawkins chose to leave the organization after the leadership censored an article by a scientist who pointed out that gender is not something you can choose, but something unchangeable and biological. “An act of unseemly panic“, according to him.

The FFRF itself claims the publication was a “mistake“, but Dawkins accuses the organization of succumbing to the “hysterical squeals” of activists who want to silence and deplatform dissent. Two other scientists – Jerry Coyne and Steven Pinker, have also left the atheist group, saying it is trying to impose a quasi-religious ideology full of “dogma, blasphemy, and heretics“.

The row over the transgender issue began in earnest when an article was published on the FFRF website, arguing that biology and innate gender are irrelevant in determining who is a woman and who is not, and that anyone who identifies as a woman is just that.

“An error of judgement”

This article was countered by Jerry Coyne who noted that the very definition of woman is strictly biological and based on the structure of the gametes. This led two of the group’s leaders to delete the article and apologize for the “distress” the views allegedly caused readers.

Despite our best efforts to champion reason and equality, mistakes can happen, and this incident is a reminder of the importance of constant reflection and growth”, wrote co-chairs Dan Barker and Annie Laurie Gaylor.

Publishing this post was an error of judgment, and we have decided to remove it as it does not reflect our values and principles. We regret any distress caused by this post and are committed to ensuring it doesn’t happen again“, they added.

Compared to religious fanatics

Non-gender atheists were quick to harshly criticize the FFRF for promoting a “quasi-religious ideology“, and Coyne himself quickly announced that he cannot remain in an organization that censors its members in this way.

I was simply promoting a biological rather than a psychological definition of sex, and I do not understand why you would consider that ‘distressing’“, he defended himself in an email.

The gender ideology which caused you to take down my article is itself quasi-religious. Having many aspects of religions and cults, including dogma, blasphemy, belief in what is palpably untrue, apostasy, and a tendency to ignore science when it contradicts a preferred ideology“, he continued.

The American-Canadian psychologist Steven Pinker, in turn, points out that the activist group can no longer be considered a defender of religious freedom but rather wants to “impose a new religion“.

As for Richard Dawkins, he has also previously criticized the spread of gender ideology and political activism in science. This has resulted, among other things, in the American Humanist Association (AHA) revoking a prize awarded to the evolutionary biologist 25 years earlier.

UK court to rule on legal definition of “woman”

The LGBT lobby

Published 29 November 2024
– By Editorial Staff
For Women Scotland believes that the definition of a woman should only be biological, not legal.

The UK Supreme Court is now considering whether trans women should be included in the definition of woman in the Equality Act. The outcome could change the way gender is legally defined in the country in the future.

Last year, Scotland’s Supreme Court ruled that transgender people who call themselves women should be covered by legislation aimed at improving gender balance on public boards. According to the Scottish Parliament, there should be a 50% representation of women, and the law will include those who are not biological women in that definition of woman.

The women’s organization For Women Scotland appealed the bill, arguing that the definition of a woman should only be biological, not legal. The organization points out that the legislation has far-reaching implications for women’s rights.

Legal or biological sex

Now the issue is being taken up in the UK Supreme Court, reports The Guardian. The hearings began on Tuesday and continued on Wednesday.

Since 2004, Scotland has applied the Gender Recognition Act (GRA), which allows transgender people to obtain legal recognition of their gender through a certificate. Two years ago, the Act was extended to allow transgender people to change their legal gender without the need for a medical diagnosis. The question now before the court is whether transgender people should be able to use this definition and identify as women under the UK Equality Act 2010.

“Biological denial”

On Tuesday, Aidan O’Neill, representing For Women Scotland, argued for what he called the “common sense” meaning of the words man and woman, telling the judges that gender is an “immutable biological state”, and that this interpretation is necessary to protect women’s rights. He also highlighted that women have historically been discriminated against through “biological determinism”, where biological differences have been used to limit women’s opportunities.

Now, O’Neill said, women instead face a new challenge in the form of “biological denial”, where biological sex is considered irrelevant

– That is to say that being a woman has nothing to do with biology and it is therefore not open to women to seek to deny men who identify as women and [have a GRC] access to women’s spaces.

“Transphobic”

The women’s organization has been accused of being “transphobic” and transgender people say it curtails their rights. Ruth Crawford, who represents the Scottish Parliament in the court, says the GRA should ensure that “a person who has become the sex of their acquired gender is entitled to the protections of that sex”, according to the BBC.

Harry Potter author JK Rowling has contributed financially to the women’s organization’s appeal and Maya Forstater, founder of the Sex Matters campaign, was also present in court.

The court is expected to give its ruling in a few weeks’ time.

Taiwanese public rejects gender self-identification

The LGBT lobby

Published 9 November 2024
– By Editorial Staff
View of the capital of Taiwan, Taipei.

An overwhelming majority of Taiwanese people are strongly skeptical of granting rights traditionally reserved for biological women to so-called trans women. This is according to a comprehensive study published in the Archives of Sexual Behavior.

The survey, conducted between April 16 and April 30, 2022, included participants from Taiwan and surrounding islands. The researchers collected a total of 10,158 valid responses addressing issues related to trans women’s rights and safety, the science journal PsyPost reports.

Respondents were asked to consider 14 statements such as “Trans women can be housed in female prisons”, with responses recorded on a binary scale where participants either agreed or disagreed with the statement.

The study was divided into three main categories: women’s safety, women’s rights and law and society issues.

The results show strong opposition to granting trans women, i.e. biological males who self-identify as women, rights and assets traditionally reserved for biological females.

A full 91.6% of respondents disagreed with all statements in the survey, indicating strong opposition to, for example, allowing trans women to use women’s public restrooms, which only 6.1% supported. Only 4.2% were in favor of allowing trans women to participate in female sporting events.

The survey points to deep skepticism about self-proclaimed gender identification among Taiwanese citizens, which could influence any legislative changes in this area.

Skepticism highest among women

Taiwan’s Gender Recognition Act, which requires sex reassignment surgery (SRS) for legal gender reassignment on identity documents, has long been controversial. The legal requirement faced further criticism after a high-profile court decision in 2021, in which a transgender person was allowed to change their legal gender without undergoing SRS, provided psychiatric evaluations were attached.

The study also revealed that opposition was stronger among women, parents and older individuals (over 36 years old). People with higher education showed no major differences in their responses compared to those without, and even supporters of same-sex marriage and gender identity education had generally low levels of support for gender identification.

Open feedback also showed a concern for women’s safety and rights, as well as a fear of gender identity issues considered to negatively affect children.

The researchers note some limitation in the sample, which consisted of a predominantly female participant base, which could potentially affect the results and its representativeness of the entire Taiwanese population.

At the same time, the study points to potentially significant public opposition to future legislative changes that would allow a more flexible approach to so-called gender identification.

Church of Sweden organizes international “trans conference”

The LGBT lobby

Published 10 October 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Oliver Jähnke is the project manager for "Transblessing".

On October 12-13, the Church of Sweden is organizing for the fourth year in a row the digital conference Transblessing, which prides itself on being “the world’s only digital, international conference for Christian transgender people under 35”.

The conference is planned and implemented by “young, Christian transgender people” and it is the Diocese of Västerås, the Church of Sweden, the SENSUS study organization, the Young Church of Sweden and the national association EKHO (Ecumenical groups for Christian LGBT people) that makes the event possible.

Project leader Oliver Jähnke, who was born a biological woman but now identifies as a man, said in a press release that expectations are high for this year’s conference.

“In the four conferences we have organized so far, we have seen how important and life-changing it is to meet young Christian transgender people from different countries. We are always in the minority, no matter what room we enter, so organizing and participating in Transblessing, where we are the norm, can have incredibly positive consequences in our lives”.

The conference is divided into four different ‘sessions’ over two days with different themes to be covered, namely: ‘Trans and the Bible’, ‘Interfaith’, ‘Spirituality’ and ‘Grief and Healing’.

Radical left-wing influence

The Church of Sweden has long been accused of being infiltrated by radical left-wing activists of various kinds who want the church to focus on issues other than theology and faith – such as LGBTQ, mass immigration or climate alarmism.

In the past, the event has also been criticized by parents who worry that the Church will uncritically encourage young people to undergo gender reassignment surgery through these events.

– The very name ‘Transblessing’ is remarkable. I don’t see how this fits in with the Church’s ideology. Everyone should be welcome in the church, but the church should not lead anyone down a path that is so dangerous, said one mother in an interview with the Christian magazine Världen Idag two years ago.

– These treatments are very harmful, especially for young people who haven’t really decided who they are. They are not mature. Gender dysphoria often passes at puberty and many regret it later. Is this really what the Church should be doing?