Tuesday, August 5, 2025

Polaris of Enlightenment

Ireland holds referendum on “gender neutral” constitution

Cultural revolution in the West

Published 9 March 2024
– By Editorial Staff
Both proposals are wholeheartedly supported by Ireland's openly gay Deputy Prime Minister Leo Varadkar.
3 minute read

On International Women’s Day, March 8, Irish voters will go to the polls to decide on two important constitutional amendments. The changes relate to terms such as “family”, “woman” and “mother” and “the role of women and mothers in society”.

Irish voters will face two important choices tomorrow (Friday) as the country’s citizens vote on constitutional amendments on International Women’s Day. Two amendments are on the ballot.

Article 39 aims to accommodate different family structures by broadening the definition of “family” to include both marriage and “stable relationships”. Article 40 emphasizes the role of women/mothers in society. Comprehensive proposals that have sparked a heated debate about “inclusiveness” and its wider implications.

Voters will be asked if they want to delete Article 41(2), which reads: “The state recognizes that by her life within the home, woman gives to the state a support without which the common good cannot be achieved. The state shall, therefore, endeavor to ensure that mothers shall not be obliged by economic necessity to engage in labor to the neglect of their duties in the home”.

Polygamy could be legalized

Supporters argue that the amendment will include single-parent families and unmarried households, while opponents are concerned about the vagueness of the term “stable relationship” and its implications.

Irish junior minister (Irish: Aire Stáit) Neale Richmond warns of “serious consequences” and potential impact on Ireland’s immigration laws.

He believes that many people may use the term “durable relationships” to try to reunite with relatives under the guise of the arbitrary term. Despite this, he has announced his intention to vote in favour of the changes.

Polygamy has also entered the debate. Ireland could become the first EU country to recognize polygamy if the government wins popular support. This has added to the existing criticism of the proposals.

“Everyone should care”

In late January this year, the Irish Electoral Commission launched an “independent information campaign” ahead of the double vote, which, if passed, will remove the constitutional reference to women’s “duties in the home”.

Marie Baker, a Supreme Court judge and chairwoman of the Irish Electoral Commission, expressed hope Thursday that the public would study and debate the issues.

– The worst thing that could happen is that nobody cares about this. I would say everybody should care about what’s in the constitution. Everybody should care as to what it says. And everybody should care as to what they think about it, she said at a news conference.

“People with a cervix”

This is not the first time the Irish government has tried to remove the word “woman”.

Back in 2020, Ireland’s state-run Health Service Executive caused a stir by replacing “woman” with “persons with a cervix” in its cervical screening brochure.

Article 41(2) in its current form is in many ways relatively progressive, providing financial guarantees for mothers who may be forced by economic circumstances to work part-time outside the home.

The law was originally introduced with the aim of, among other things, changing the income tax law for women in the country. A law that had previously discriminated against mothers.

TNT is truly independent!

We don’t have a billionaire owner, and our unique reader-funded model keeps us free from political or corporate influence. This means we can fearlessly report the facts and shine a light on the misdeeds of those in power.

Consider a donation to keep our independent journalism running…

Jeans advertising campaign sparks outrage in woke circles

Cultural revolution in the West

Published 3 August 2025
– By Editorial Staff
American Eagle fights back and rises on the stock market after "racist" jeans advertisement featuring blonde, blue-eyed model Sydney Sweeney.
2 minute read

A jeans advertising campaign has drawn strong criticism for its wording in left-liberal circles in the US. Critics claim the campaign plays on “racist undertones”. The company behind it, American Eagle, is fighting back and the stock has risen this week.

Jeans company American Eagle released a new advertising campaign this week featuring actress Sydney Sweeney as the frontwoman.

The actress has also helped design a jeans model called the “Sydney Jean”, where part of the revenue from these jeans, according to the manufacturer, goes to the organization Crisis Text Line – a non-profit organization that offers free mental health support around the clock for issues related to domestic violence.

– Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair color, personality, and even eye color. My jeans are blue, Sweeney reportedly said in a now-removed commercial.

The campaign slogan reads: “Sydney Sweeney has great jeans”. Woke activists claim the wordplay has “racist undertones” because ‘jeans’ sounds like ‘genes’, which makes the message potentially interpreted as “Sydney Sweeney has great genes”.

American Eagle fights back

After several days of silence, American Eagle responded to the criticism via Instagram on Friday. In a statement, the company emphasized that the campaign was always about clothing:

“‘Sydney Sweeney has Great Jeans’ is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story. We’ll continue to celebrate how everyone wears their AE jeans with confidence, their way. Great jeans look good on everyone”.

Despite – or perhaps thanks to – the controversy, the campaign has been an economic success. American Eagle’s stock rose by over 10 percent immediately after the launch on July 23, representing a value increase of approximately 200 million dollars.

According to the company’s marketing director, Craig Brommers, the collaboration with Sweeney is the largest in the brand’s history.

Bizarre children’s series described as “digital drug”

Cultural revolution in the West

Published 10 May 2025
– By Editorial Staff
The characters of the children's series Cocomelon with its abnormal proportions.
3 minute read

The children’s series Cocomelon attracts young children around the world with its colorful animations and catchy songs. Despite its enormous popularity, criticism of the series is growing, with some warnings that its extreme editing could have a very negative effect on children’s brains.

More and more parents and experts are questioning the extremely fast pace of Cocomelon and whether the mass-produced style is really good for young minds, or whether it risks overstimulating children and making them restless.

One of the major objections to Cocomelon is its rapid editing technique, where camera angles change every two to three seconds. This is a hectic and exaggerated pace that is unfortunately all too common in modern children’s entertainment, but here it is taken to a new level.

According to a study by PubMed Central (PMC), the executive functions of 4-year-olds, such as self-control and working memory, are at risk of being severely impaired after being exposed to fast-paced clips for too long.

Many parents also report that their children become agitated after watching children’s series such as Cocomelon, and there is plenty of criticism on social media platforms such as X.

Mass-produced aesthetics

Other research also indicates that rapid camera and clip changes can negatively affect young children’s concentration. The fast pace is no accident either. Cocomelon is designed to capture children’s attention, but some argue that it now goes too far.

According to Findmykids.org, the constant impressions can trigger dopamine release, causing children to seek the same quick rewards even outside the screen – something that can make it harder for them to focus on calmer activities such as reading or playing.

In addition to the pace, the series’ aesthetics have also been criticized. Like most animated productions today, the characters have disproportionately large heads and overly cheerful expressions, which some find unpleasant.

For many parents and viewers, it feels like the series is made on an assembly line where quantity takes precedence over quality, resulting in an aesthetic that is more frightening than charming.

Opinions are divided

Unlike traditional cartoons such as Scooby-Doo, Cocomelon is animated in a way that prioritizes quantity over quality, which is evident in the disproportionate characters and the assembly line feel.

Opinions about Cocomelon are divided. Some experts, such as Rebecca Cowan at Walden University, argue that there is insufficient evidence to single out Cocomelon as the problem – instead, it is total screen time that may be harmful.

– Without empirical research on the show Cocomelon, there is no data to substantiate claims that this show is overstimulating due to the pace of the scenes, she says.

But others warn that the series’ pace and overstimulating elements can have a very negative impact on children’s development, especially in terms of concentration and calmness.

Cocomelon may seem like an easy solution for entertaining young children, but it is worth considering what the fast pace and mass-produced style do to young viewers.

Shakespeare museum “decolonizes” – allegedly promoting “white supremacy”

Cultural revolution in the West

Published 18 March 2025
– By Editorial Staff
William Shakespeare
2 minute read

In William Shakespeare’s birthplace of Stratford-upon-Avon, England, a much-criticized reassessment of the world-famous playwright’s cultural heritage is underway.

The Shakespeare Birthplace Trust has decided to “decolonize its substantial and extensive collection of Shakespeare-related material, among other things, on the grounds that this allegedly risks promoting “white supremacy”.

The Shakespeare Birthplace Trust in Stratford-upon-Avon has decided to “decolonize” its collections in a bid to create a more “inclusive museum experience”, according to The Telegraph.

It says the decision involves exploring the impact of empire and colonialism on the museum’s collections, and how Shakespeare’s works have contributed to these narratives.

The foundation believes that some items in the collections may contain “language or depictions that are racist, sexist, homophobic, or otherwise harmful”, reports The Standard.

The initiative is a result of a study conducted with Dr Helen Hopkins of the University of Birmingham in 2022. The study criticized the foundation’s attractions in Stratford for portraying Shakespeare as a “universal genius” – an idea that allegedly “benefits the ideology of white European supremacy”.

As part of the initiative, the Shakespeare Foundation plans to diversify its focus by celebrating global cultural contributions, such as Bengali poet Rabindranath Tagore and Bollywood dance inspired by “Romeo and Juliet”.

Dismantling history

However, critics say the decision is part of a broader trend to decolonize cultural institutions. Concerns are expressed that such a reappraisal of historical figures like William Shakespeare could lead to the dismantling of influential white figures in the West, rather than promoting a true understanding of the complex cultural heritage.

The Shakespeare Birthplace Trust stresses that the project should not be seen as a critique of Shakespeare’s work, but aims to reassess the historical context of the museum’s collections and artifacts.

However, “decolonizing” Shakespeare’s legacy risks not only losing the historical context of the world-famous poet’s work, according to analysts. It also risks distorting the cultural significance of one of the most influential writers of all time.

Apple phones suggest “racist” as an alternative to “Trump”

Cultural revolution in the West

Published 28 February 2025
– By Editorial Staff
An iPhone suggests “racist” when the word “Trump” is spoken. In the background, the Apple headquarters in California.
2 minute read

Apple’s voice-to-text system has caused a stir among iPhone users. When the word “racist” is dictated, “Trump” briefly appears before it is corrected something Apple now says it is looking into.

Tech and globalist giant Apple says it is working feverishly to fix the suspicious bug in its dictation feature. The bug, which first came to light on Tuesday, results in the iPhone temporarily displaying the word “Trump” when users utter “racist” via voice input, reports American CNN, among others.

Watch the video above to see how an iPhone behaves when the TNT journalist speaks the word “Trump”.

Several iPhone owners have reported and confirmed the strange event on social media. Videos demonstrating the bug have quickly spread, raising questions about the reliability of the technology and possible political implications.

Apple admits the bug

Apple has confirmed the problem in a statement, claiming that it is all due to an incorrect interpretation in the speech recognition model.

– We are aware of an issue with the speech recognition model that powers Dictation and we are rolling out a fix today, said a company spokesperson.

According to Apple, the bug is caused by the system incorrectly suggesting words with phonetic overlap. The company claims that the Dictation feature sometimes shows an incorrect word before quickly correcting it to the user’s intended word

Coincidentally, the bug came to light the day after Apple announced a massive $500 billion investment in US facilities and infrastructure. Donald Trump has stated that he sees the investment as a result of his tariff policy.

The company remains positive about “Woke”

Meanwhile, Apple shareholders voted down a proposal to end the company’s so-called DEI (“diversity, equity and inclusion”) initiative which is often linked to left-wing radicalism.

The incident marks another problem for Apple since the launch of their new AI system Apple Intelligence. The company was recently forced to disable a feature that summarized news headlines due to inaccuracies.

John Burkey, founder of AI startup Wonderrush.ai and former member of Apple’s Siri team, expresses skepticism about the company’s explanation.

– This feels like a significant prank. The pressing question is whether this was introduced into the data or embedded in the code.

Other experts question Apple’s explanation about phonetic similarity between words. Peter Bell, a professor of speech technology at the University of Edinburgh, says it’s more likely that the underlying software was modified by one or more Apple employees.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Our independent journalism needs your support!
Consider a donation.

You can donate any amount of your choosing, one-time payment or even monthly.
We appreciate all of your donations to keep us alive and running.

Dont miss another article!

Sign up for our newsletter today!

Take part of uncensored news – free from industry interests and political correctness from the Polaris of Enlightenment – every week.